Feedback may be more effective if students engage with its content. Almost no studies have examined the potential of online elaborated feedback to enhance students’ mathematical argumentation. We designed a set of tasks requiring argumentation that must be supported by constructing examples in an interactive diagram using automatic verbal characteristics suggested by the technological environment. We explored whether and how a 7th-grade student's engagement with the mediation tools supports her mathematical argumentation of claims on the topic of comparing fractions. Our data were derived from a task-based interview and automatic analyses that the technological environment provides. The results show that there was an improvement in the student's argumentation in response to the feedback process.
© 2008-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados