Ir al contenido

Documat

Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura

    1. [1] Universidad de Salamanca

      Universidad de Salamanca

      Salamanca, España

  • Localización: Education in the knowledge society (EKS), ISSN 1138-9737, ISSN-e 2444-8729, Nº. 23, 2022
  • Idioma: español
  • DOI: 10.14201/eks.28600
  • Títulos paralelos:
    • Developing robust state-of-the-art reports: Systematic Literature Reviews
  • Enlaces
  • Resumen
    • español

      La revisión sistemática de literatura es un método sistemático para identificar, evaluar e interpretar el trabajo de académicos y profesionales en un campo elegido. Su propósito es identificar lagunas en el conocimiento y necesidades de investigación en un campo concreto. Las revisiones sistemáticas conforman una familia amplia de métodos y aproximaciones y resultan totalmente necesarias por el volumen tan enorme de producción científica en formato digital al que se tiene potencialmente acceso. Sin embargo, no es suficiente con adjetivar una revisión como sistemática. El objetivo de este artículo es presentar las diferentes fases que se deben llevar a cabo cuando se realiza una revisión sistemática. Se comienza con la introducción de los marcos metodológicos de referencia para la realización de revisiones sistemáticas, para, a continuación, profundizar en las fases de planificación, realización e informe de la revisión sistemática. De modo que todo artículo que lleve este marbete (revisión sistemática de literatura) además de cumplir unos principios metodológicos y de transparencia, permita que cualquier investigador pueda no solo confiar en las conclusiones derivadas del trabajo, sino evolucionar la revisión sistemática realizada para atacar el problema derivado de la obsolescencia y el continuo avance del conocimiento científico, en consonancia con el modelo de datos FAIR, es decir, que se cumplen con los principios de encontrabilidad, accesibilidad, interoperabilidad y reutilización. Este artículo se ha escrito en español y en inglés.

    • English

      A systematic literature review is a systematic method for identifying, evaluating, and interpreting the work of scholars and practitioners in a chosen field. Its purpose is to identify gaps in knowledge and research needs in a particular field. Systematic reviews form a broad family of methods and approaches and are made absolutely necessary by the enormous volume of scientific output in digital format that is potentially accessible. However, it is not enough to label a review as systematic. This article aims to present the different phases to be carried out when conducting a systematic review. It begins with introducing the methodological frameworks for conducting systematic reviews and then goes into the phases of planning, conducting, and reporting the systematic review. So that any article bearing this label (systematic literature review), in addition to complying with methodological and transparency principles, allows any researcher not only to trust the conclusions derived from the work but also to evolve the systematic review carried out to tackle the problem derived from the obsolescence and continuous advance of scientific knowledge, in line with the FAIR data model, i.e., it meets the principles of findability, accessibility, interoperability and reuse. This article has been written in English and Spanish.

  • Referencias bibliográficas
    • Archer, N., Fevrier-Thomas, U., Lokker, C., McKibbon, K. A., & Straus, S. E. (2011). Personal health records: a scoping review. Journal...
    • Balijepally, V., Mangalaraj, G., & Iyengar, K. (2011). Are we wielding this hammer correctly? A reflective review of the application of...
    • Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology,...
    • Blackman, K. C., Zoellner, J., Berrey, L. M., Alexander, R., Fanning, J., Hill, J. L., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2013). Assessing the internal...
    • Boers, M. (2018). Graphics and statistics for cardiology: Designing effective tables for presentation and publication. Heart, 104(3), 192–200....
    • Bolinger, M. T., Josefy, M. A., Stevenson, R., & Hitt, M. A. (2021). Experiments in Strategy Research: A Critical Review and Future Research...
    • Boote, D., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation....
    • Booth, A. (2006). Clear and present questions: formulating questions for evidence based practice. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 355-368. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830610692127
    • Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (2nd ed.). Sage.
    • Boulos, M. N. K., Hetherington, L., & Wheeler, S. (2007). Second Life: an overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and...
    • Bryant, S. L., & Gray, A. (2006). Demonstrating the positive impact of information support on patient care in primary care: a rapid literature...
    • Buck, H. G., Harkness, K., Wion, R., Carroll, S. L., Cosman, T., Kaasalainen, S., Kryworuchko, J., McGillion, M., O’Keefe-McCarthy, S., Sherifali,...
    • Butler, G., Deaton, S., Hodgkinson, J., Holmes, E., & Marshall, S. (2005). Quick but Not Dirty: Rapid Evidence Assessments as a Decision...
    • Candy, B., King, M., Jones, L., & Oliver, S. (2011). Using qualitative synthesis to explore heterogeneity of complex interventions. BMC...
    • Cardwell, K., O’Neill, S. M., Tyner, B., Broderick, N., O’Brien, K., Smith, S. M., Harrington, P., Ryan, M., & O’Neill, M. (2022). A rapid...
    • Codina, L. (2017). Revisiones bibliográficas y cómo llevarlas a cabo con garantías: systematic reviews y SALSA Framework. Retrieved April...
    • Conde, M. Á., Rodríguez-Sedano, F. J., Fernández-Llamas, C., Gonçalves, J., Lima, J., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Fostering STEAM...
    • Cooke, A., D., S., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10),...
    • Cruz-Benito, J., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Therón, R. (2019). Analyzing the software architectures supporting HCI/HMI processes through...
    • Daigneault, P. M., Jacob, S., & Ouimet, M. (2014). Using systematic review methods within a Ph.D. dissertation in political science: challenges...
    • Daudt, H. M. L., van Mossel, C., & Scott, S. J. (2013). Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience...
    • del Amo, I. F., Erkoyuncu, J. A., Roy, R., Palmarini, R., & Onoufriou, D. (2018). A systematic review of Augmented Reality contentrelated...
    • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research,...
    • Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational...
    • Dias, L. P. S., Barbosa, J. L. V., & Vianna, H. D. (2018). Gamification and serious games in depression care: A systematic mapping study....
    • Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., Shaw, R. L., Smith, J. A., & Young, B. (2006). How can...
    • Ferreras-Fernández, T., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Merlo-Vega, J. A. (2015). Open access repositories as channel of publication scientific...
    • Fink, A. (1998). Conducting literature research reviews: from paper to the Internet. Sage.
    • Fornons, V., & Palau, R. (2021). Flipped Classroom in the Teaching of Mathematics: A Systematic Review. Education in the Knowledge Society,...
    • García-Holgado, A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018). Mapping the systematic literature studies about software ecosystems. In F. J. García-Peñalvo...
    • García-Holgado, A., Marcos-Pablos, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2020). Guidelines for performing Systematic Research Projects Reviews....
    • García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). Mitos y realidades del acceso abierto. Education in the Knowledge Society, 18(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2017181720
    • García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Seoane-Pardo, A. M. (2015). An updated review of the concept of eLearning. Tenth anniversary. Education in the...
    • Gastel, B., & Day, R. (2016). How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (8th ed.). Greenwood.
    • Genero, M., Cruz-Lemus, J. A., & Piattini, M. (2014). Métodos de Investigación en Ingeniería del Software. RA-MA.
    • Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM...
    • Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1, Article...
    • Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information...
    • Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade....
    • Greenhalgh, T. (2019). How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-based Medicine and Healthcare (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    • Greenhalgh, T., Wong, G., Westhorp, G., & Pawson, R. (2011). Protocol-realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards...
    • Guirao-Goris, J. A., Olmedo Salas, A., & Ferrer Ferrandis, E. (2008). El artículo de revisión. Revista Iberoamericana de Enfermería Comunitaria,...
    • Gyongyosi, L., & Imre, S. (2019). A Survey on quantum computing technology. Computer Science Review, 31, 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2018.11.002
    • Hart, C. (2002). Doing a Literature Search: A Comprehensive Guide for the Social Sciences. Sage.
    • Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., J., C., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M., & Wech, V. (2021). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of...
    • Hutton, B., Catalá-López, F., & Moher, D. (2016). The PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis:...
    • Ibrahim, R. (2008). Setting up a research question for determining the research methodology. ALAM CIPTA International Journal on Sustainable...
    • Keshav, S. (2007). How to read a paper. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 37(3), 83-84. https://doi.org/10.1145/1273445.1273458
    • King, A. J., Bol, N., Cummins, R. G., & John, K. K. (2019). Improving visual behavior research in communication science: An overview,...
    • King, W. R., & He, J. (2005). Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Communications of the Association for...
    • Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Version 2.3 [Technical...
    • Letelier, L. M., Manríquez, J. J., & Rada, G. (2005). Revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: ¿son la mejor evidencia? Revista Médica...
    • Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., &...
    • Marcos-Pablos, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2020). Information retrieval methodology for aiding scientific database search. Soft Computing,...
    • Mayo-Wilson, E., Li, T., Fusco, N., Dickersin, K., & MUDS investigators. (2018). Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in...
    • McGhee, G., Marland, G. R., & Atkinson, J. (2007). Grounded theory research: literature reviewing and reflexivity. Journal of Advanced...
    • Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental...
    • Miedema, F. (2022). Open Science: the Very Idea. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2115-6
    • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The...
    • Oxman, A. D., Cook, D. J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1994). Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based...
    • Oxman, A. D., & Guyatt, G. H. (1988). Guidelines for reading literature reviews. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 138(8), 697-703.
    • Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan,...
    • Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S....
    • Palvia, P., Leary, D., Mao, E., Midha, V., Pinjani, P., & Salam, A. F. (2004). Research methodologies in MIS: An update. The Communications...
    • Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews....
    • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2005). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.
    • Phelps, S. F., & Campbell, N. (2012). Systematic Reviews in Theory and Practice for Library and Information Studies. Library and Information...
    • Pluye, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., & Johnson-Lafleur, J. (2009). A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly...
    • Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews....
    • Randolph, J. J. (2009). A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review. Practical Assessment. Research & Evaluation, 14(13), 1-13....
    • Ren, P., Xiao, Y., Chang, X., Huang, P.-Y., Li, Z., Gupta, B. B., Chen, X., & Wang, X. (2021). A Survey of Deep Active Learning. ACM Computing...
    • Richardson, W. S., Wilson, M. C., Nishikawa, J., & Hayward, R. S. (1995). The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions....
    • Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting...
    • Shea, B., Moher, D., Graham, I., Pham, B., & Tugwell, P. (2002). A comparison of the quality of Cochrane Reviews and systematic reviews...
    • Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Welch, V., Kristjansson, E., & Henry,...
    • Smith, V., Devane, D., Begley, C. M., & Clarke, M. (2011). Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare...
    • Soto, M., & Rada, G. (2003). Formulación de preguntas en medicina basada en la evidencia. Revista Médica de Chile, 131(10), 1202-1207....
    • Stamp, K. D., Machado, M. A., & Allen, N. A. (2014). Transitional care programs improve outcomes for heart failure patients: an integrative...
    • Stovold, E., Beecher, D., Foxlee, R., & Noel-Storr, A. (2014). Study flow diagrams in Cochrane systematic review updates: an adapted PRISMA...
    • Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning...
    • Torres-Torres, Y.-D., Román-González, M., & Pérez-González, J.-C. (2021). Specific Didactic Strategies Used for the Development of Computational...
    • Vázquez-Ingelmo, A., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Therón, R. (2019). Information Dashboards and Tailoring Capabilities - A Systematic Literature...
    • Veteska, J., Kursch, M., Svobodova, Z., Tureckiova, M., & Paulovcakova, L. (2022). Longitudinal Co-teaching Projects: Scoping Review....
    • Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2),...
    • Whittemore, R., Chao, A., Jang, M., Minges, K. E., & Park, C. (2014). Methods for knowledge synthesis: An overview. Heart & Lung,...
    • Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
    • Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., & Pawson, R. (2010). Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what...
    • Yu, D. S. F., Lee, D. T. F., Kwong, A. N. T., Thompson, D. R., & Woo, J. (2008). Living with chronic heart failure: a review of qualitative...
Fundación Dialnet

Mi Documat

Opciones de artículo

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno