Integration of good practices of active methodologies with the reuse of student-generated content

• Rosa Arruabarrena ^[1] ; Ana Sánchez ; José M. Blanco ; José A. Vadillo ; Imanol Usandizaga
  1. [1] Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

     Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

     Leioa, España

     
• Localización: International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, ISSN 2365-9440, Nº. 16, 2019
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0140-7
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 6 Citas
• Resumen

  • In this article, we present an integrated instructive methodological approach. We begin with a set of proposals for educational innovation oriented towards active learning that have been tested separately and implemented for various subjects in courses of different levels. The approach integrates the following elements: (1) the dynamic generation of digital content by students and their integration into shared knowledge bases of the subjects involved; (2) the systematic use of quality content, mainly in video format, distributed through online platforms as support for flipped classrooms; (3) peer evaluation to support the development of reflective and self- critical capacities; and (4) systematic collaboration with students and professors from other universities to develop the enumerated activities. The methodology has been tested in a variety of subjects, thanks to its flexibility. In all experienced cases, it has been shown that it is feasible for students to generate enough valuable and reusable content. In addition, students have expressed high levels of satisfaction with the implementation of the proposal.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Aflalo, E. (2018). Students generating questions as a way of learning. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10. 1177/1469787418769120.
  • Agrawal, A., & Rajapakse, D. C. (2018). Perceptions and practice of peer assessments: An empirical investigation. International Journal...
  • Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126,...
  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational...
  • Barak, M., & Asakle, S. (2018). AugmentedWorld: Facilitating the creation of location-based questions. Computers & Education, 121,...
  • Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE national conference proceedings, Atlanta,...
  • Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning...
  • Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., & Lou, S. J. (2012). A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacherassessment, student...
  • Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., Wua, K. T., & Uden, L. (2009). Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners’ reflection...
  • Chewar, C., & Matthews, S. J. (2016). Lights, camera, action!: Video deliverables for programming projects. Journal of Computing Sciences...
  • Churches, A. (2008). Bloom’s taxonomy blooms digitally. Tech & Learning, 1, 1–6. de Almeida-Soares, D. (2008). Understanding class blogs...
  • Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis, (p. 88). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology ISBN 978-0911379013.
  • Domínguez, C., Jaime, A., Sánchez, A., Blanco, J. M., & Heras, J. (2016). A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among...
  • Droumeva, M., & Murphy, D. (2016). A sound pedagogy: Active learning through media production. In EDULEARN16 proceedings, (pp. 3974–3982).
  • Falchikov, N. (2004). Involving students in assessment. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 3(2), 102–108.
  • Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks....
  • Genereux, W. E. (2014). Student-made video projects in a computer technology course. In 2014 ASEE annual conference & exposition, Indianapolis,...
  • Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Onghena, P. (2011). An inventory of peer assessment diversity. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,...
  • Greene, H. (2014). Learning through student created, content videos. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 7(2), 469–478.
  • Ion, G., Barrera-Corominas, A., & Tomàs-Folch, M. (2016). Written peer-feedback to enhance students’ current and future learning. International...
  • Jaime, A., Blanco, J. M., Domínguez, C., Sánchez, A., Heras, J., & Usandizaga, I. (2016). Spiral and project-based learning with peer...
  • Kalayci, S., & Humiston, K. R. (2015). Students’ attitudes towards collaborative tools in a virtual learning environment. Educational...
  • Kay, A. E., Hardy, J., & Galloway, R. K. (2018). Learning from peer feedback on student-generated multiple choice questions: Views of...
  • Kerimkulova, S., Belova, X., Kozhabayeva, K., Syzdykbayeva, R., Myrzabayeva, A., & Ospanova, S. (2016). Creative use of technology for...
  • Khalid, A. (2014). Use of student generated videos to enhance teaching quality in aerospace engineering classes. In ASEE southeast section...
  • Khan Academy Free Online Courses, Lessons & Practice. (2019). https://www.khanacademy.org. Accessed 19 Febr 2019.
  • Le Roux, I., & Nagel, L. (2018). Seeking the best blend for deep learning in a flipped classroom-viewing student perceptions through...
  • Li, H., Xiong, Y., Zang, X., Kornhaber, M. L., Lyu, Y., Chung, K. S., & Suen, H. K. (2016). Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis...
  • Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback....
  • Lundin, M., Rensfeldt, A. B., Hillman, T., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Peterson, L. (2018). Higher education dominance and siloed knowledge:...
  • Matthew, K. I., Felvegi, E., & Callaway, R. A. (2009). Wiki as a collaborative learning tool in a language arts methods class. Journal...
  • McGarr, O., & Clifford, A. M. (2013). Just enough to make you take it seriously’: Exploring students’ attitudes towards peer assessment....
  • Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2008). The essential elements of team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008(116),...
  • Ng, E. M. (2018). Integrating self-regulation principles with flipped classroom pedagogy for first year university students. Computers &...
  • Niño, M., Blanco, J. M., Jaime, A., & Usandizaga, I. (2015). Collaborative learning, lessons learned sharing and knowledge management...
  • Nouri, J. (2016). The flipped classroom: For active, effective and increased learning–especially for low achievers. International Journal...
  • O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education,...
  • Orús, C., Barlés, M. J., Belanche, D., Casaló, L., Fraj, E., & Gurrea, R. (2016). The effects of learner-generated videos for YouTube...
  • Panadero, E. (2016). Is it safe? social, interpersonal, and human effects of peer assessment. Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment,...
  • Panadero, E., & Brown, G. T. (2017). Teachers’ reasons for using peer assessment: Positive experience predicts use. European Journal of...
  • Project Knowledge 14. (2014). http://projectknowledge14.blogspot.com/search/label/EN. Accessed 21 Feb 2019.
  • Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018). Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: Its effects on peer feedback...
  • Schwarzenberg, P., Navon, J., Nussbaum, M., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Caballero, D. (2018). Learning experience assessment of flipped courses....
  • Seale, J. (2009). Doing student voice work in higher education: An exploration of the value of participatory methods. British Educational...
  • Smith, D. K. (2014). iTube, YouTube, WeTube: Social media videos in chemistry education and outreach. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(10),...
  • Søndergaard, H., & Mulder, R. A. (2012). Collaborative learning through formative peer review: Pedagogy, programs and potential. Computer...
  • Strijbos, J. W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning...
  • Topping, K. J. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. Optimizing new modes of assessment....
  • Trentin, G. (2009). Using a wiki to evaluate individual contribution to a collaborative learning project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,...
  • Van Noy, M., James, H., & Bedley, C. (2016). Reconceptualizing learning: A review of the literature on informal learning. Piscataway:...
  • Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions....
  • Verleger, M. A., Rodgers, K. J., & Diefes-Dux, H. A. (2016). Selecting effective examples to train students for peer review of open-ended...
  • Wang, S., & Camilla, V. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us? Calico Journal, 29(3), 412.
  • Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: The crucial factors of design, teacher...
  • Wheeler, S. (2010). Open content, open learning 2.0: Using wikis and blogs in higher education. In Changing cultures in higher education,...
  • Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative...
  • Willmot, P., Pond, K., Loddington, S. P., & Palermo, O. A. (2008). Perceptions of peer assessment in university teamwork. In International...
  • Yang, X., Guo, X., & Yu, S. (2016). Student-generated content in college teaching: Content quality, behavioural pattern and learning...
  • Yu, F. Y., & Wu, C. P. (2016). The effects of an online student-constructed test strategy on knowledge construction. Computers &...
  • Zheng, B., Niiya, M., & Warschauer, M. (2015). Wikis and collaborative learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education,...