Ir al contenido

Documat

Evaluación sostenible de experiencias de aprendizaje basado en proyectos

  • TRAVERSO RIBÓN, Ignacio [2] ; BANDERAS ALBERICO, Antonio [1] ; DODERO, Juan Manuel [1] Árbol académico ; RUIZ RUBE, Iván [1] Árbol académico ; PALOMO, Manuel [1] Árbol académico
    1. [1] Universidad de Cádiz

      Universidad de Cádiz

      Cádiz, España

    2. [2] Research Center for Information Technology

      Research Center for Information Technology

      Stadtkreis Karlsruhe, Alemania

  • Localización: Education in the knowledge society (EKS), ISSN 1138-9737, ISSN-e 2444-8729, Vol. 17, Nº. 1, 2016, págs. 19-44
  • Idioma: español
  • DOI: 10.14201/eks2016171943
  • Títulos paralelos:
    • Sustainable assessment of learning experiences based on projects
  • Enlaces
  • Resumen
    • español

      En las experiencias de aprendizaje basadas en proyectos, la monitorización detallada de las actividades de los miembros de cada equipo puede resultar de utilidad para la evaluación de su trabajo. Mediante procedimientos de evaluación, los supervisores pueden evaluar las capacidades de trabajo en equipo con una finalidad formativa. Suelen aplicarse estrategias como la auto-evaluación, la evaluación entre iguales y la co-evaluación para hacer que la evaluación formativa sea sostenible. Seguir una estrategia de evaluación no es siempre sencillo para los miembros de los equipos, pues necesitan un conocimiento razonable del proceso y los criterios de evaluación. Este artículo describe una metodología de evaluación orientada al aprendizaje y un framework software de datos abiertos aplicable a la evaluación de proyectos de desarrollo colaborativo. Se han elaborado una rúbrica y una serie de indicadores que proporcionan evidencias sobre las habilidades y, posteriormente, se han aplicado a un curso basado en proyectos de pequeña escala. Los proyectos se gestionaron y ejecutaron con la ayuda de una forja de software libre que incluye una herramienta de gestión de tareas para la planificación y el seguimiento, un repositorio de control de versiones para almacenar el software entregable y una wiki para almacenar los entregables textuales. La experiencia ha proporcionado evidencias a favor del método de evaluación y el framework de datos abiertos para hacer la evaluación del trabajo en equipo más sostenible.

    • English

      In a project-based learning experience, the detailed monitoring of the activities in which team members participate can be useful to evaluate their work. Using learning-oriented assessment procedures, supervisors can assess the teamwork abilities with a formative purpose. Evaluation strategies such as self-assessment, peer assessment and co-assessment are often used to make evaluation formative and sustainable. Conducting an assessment strategy is not easy for team members, since they need before to have a reasonable understanding of the evaluation process and criteria. This paper describes a learning-oriented evaluation methodology and an open data framework that can be applied to collaborative project settings. An evaluation rubric and a series of indicators that provide evidences about the developed skills have been elaborated and applied in a small-scale project-based course. Projects were managed and developed with the help of an open source software forge that contains a ticketing tool for planning and tracking of tasks, a version control repository to save the software outcomes, and using a wiki to host text deliverables. The experience provides evidences in favor of using the assessment method and open data framework to make teamwork evaluation more sustainable.

  • Referencias bibliográficas
    • Achcaoucaou, F., Guitart-Tarrés, L., Miravitlles-Matamoros, P., Núñez-Carballosa, A., Bernardo, M. & Bikfalvi, A. (2014). Competence assessment...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20394
    • Amelung, M., Krieger, K. & Rosner, D. (2011). E-Assessment as a Service. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 4(2), 162-174.
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2010.24
    • Barootchi, N. & Keshavarz, M. H. (2002). Assessment of achievement through portfolios and eachermade
    • tests. Educational Research, 44(3), 279-288.
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131880210135313
    • Bizer, C. H. & Berners-Lee, T. (2009). Linked data-the story so far. Semantic Services, Interoperability and Web Applications: Emerging...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jswis.2009081901
    • Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in continuing education, 22(2), 151-167.
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713695728
    • Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term,...
    • Bouman, R. & Van Dongen, J. (2009). Pentaho Solutions: Business Intelligence and Data Warehousing with Pentaho and MySQL. Wiley.
    • Colombo, A., Damiani, E., Frati, F., Oltolina, S., Reed, K. & Ruffatti, G. (2008). The use of a meta-model to support multi-project process...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2008.55
    • Csapó, B., Ainley, J., Bennett, R. E., Latour, T. & Law, N. (2012). Technological issues for computerbased assessment. Assessment and...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_4
    • D’Aquin, M. (2012). Putting linked data to use in a large higher-education organisation. Proceedings of the Interacting with Linked Data (ILD)...
    • Davies, S. (2010). Effective Assessment in a Digital Age.
    • Dodero, J. M., Ruiz-Rube, I., Palomo-Duarte, M. & Cabot, J. (2012). Model-driven learning design. Journal of Research and Practice in...
    • Falchikov, N. (2013). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education....
    • Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5-6),...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816
    • Gala-Pérez, S. J. (2013). Intensive metrics for the study of the evolution of open source projects. Master’s thesis, Universidad Rey Juan...
    • Gil, C., Montoya, M. G., Herrada, R. I., Banos, R., Montoya, F. G. & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2011). Cooperative learning and electronic...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2011.040149
    • Hea, Y., Huib, S. C. & Quanc, T. (2009). Automatic summary assessment for intelligent tutoring systems. Computers & Education, 53(3),...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.008
    • Hernández-Leo, D., Moreno, V., Dodero, J., Pardo, A., Romero-Ternero, M., Dimitriadis, Y. & Asensio-Pérez, J. I. (2012). Aplicación de...
    • Johnson, D. H. (2013). Teaching a “MOOC”: Experiences from the front line. Digital Signal Processing and Signal Processing Education Meeting...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DSP-SPE.2013.6642602
    • Karger, D. (2013). Standards opportunities around data-bearing Web pages. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371(1987), 20120381.
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0381
    • Klenowski, V., Askew, S. & Carnell, E. (2006). Portfolios for learning, assessment and professional development in higher education. Assessment...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930500352816
    • Liber, O. & Johnson, M. (2008). Personal learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 1-2.
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820701772645
    • Lim, C. P., Lai, Y. C. & Ng, E. M. (2011). Using wikis to develop student teachers' learning, teaching, and assessment capabilities....
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.06.001
    • Litherland, K., Carmichael, P. & Martínez-García, A. (2013). Ontology-based e-Assessment for Accounting Education. Accounting Education,...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2013.824198
    • Lugton, M. (2012). What is a MOOC? What are the different types of MOOC? xMOOCs and cMOOCs. Reflections.
    • Markham, T. & Larmer, J. (2003). Project Based Learning Handbook: A Guide to Standards-Focused Project Based Learning for Middle and High...
    • Martín-Cuadrado, A. M., López-González, M. A. & García-Arce, A. (2013). Innovation Network: Videoconferencing as a Resource in Teaching...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2013.2273111
    • Masip-Álvarez, A., Hervada-Sala, C., Pàmies-Gómez, T., Arias-Pujol, A., Jaen-Fernandez, C., Rodriguez-Sorigue, C., . . . Montferrer-Linan,...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530142
    • Mor, Y. & Koshinen, T. (2013). MOOC y más allá. eLearning Papers, 33, 1-7. Munkhchimeg, B. & Baigaltugs, S. (2013). Control possibility...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IFOST.2013.6616920
    • Palomares, A. (2011). The educational model at university and the use of new methodologies for teaching, learning and assessment. Revista...
    • Palomo-Duarte, M., Dodero, J. M., Medina-Bulo, I., Rodríguez-Posada, E. J. & Ruiz-Rube, I. (2014). Assessment of collaborative learning...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.680969
    • Piedra, N., Chicaiza, J., López, J., Romero, A. & Tovar, E. (2010). Measuring collaboration and creativity skills through rubrics: Experience...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492349
    • Redecker, C. & Johannessen, Ø. (2013). Changing assessment—Towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT. European Journal of Education,...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12018
    • Redecker, C., Punie, Y. & Ferrari, A. (2012). eAssessment for 21st century learning and skills. En 21st Century Learning for 21st Century...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33263-0_23
    • Robles, G., Koch, S. & González-Barahona, J. M. (2004). Remote analysis and measurement of libre software systems by means of the CVSAnalY...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20040351
    • Sadler, D. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Educatio, 35(5),...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015
    • Shih, R. C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing?Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.934
    • Vassiliadis, P. (2009). A survey of extract-transform-load technology. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining, 5(3), 1-27.
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jdwm.2009070101
    • Walvoord, B. E. & Anderson, V. J. (2009). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment in college. San Francisco: John Wiley...
    • Wood, E. J. (2008). The E-assessment handbook by Geoffrey Crisp. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(1), 91-92.
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmb.131
    • Zafra, A., Gibaja, E., Luque, M. & Ventura, S. (2011). An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of e-learning system as Support for Traditional...
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/nwesp.2011.6088218
    • Zhao, L. & Elbaum, S. (2003). Quality assurance under the open source development model. Journal of Systems and Software, 66(1), 65-75.
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(02)00064-X
Fundación Dialnet

Mi Documat

Opciones de artículo

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno