Compromiso con OER en las universidades

• Autores: Rosana Montes Soldado , Francisco Miguel Gea Megías , Claudio Dondi
• Localización: EDMETIC, ISSN-e 2254-0059, Vol. 3, Nº. 2, 2014 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Tendencias y retos de la investigación en Tecnología Educativa), págs. 7-28
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.21071/edmetic.v3i2.2887
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Engaging with OER at universities
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • At present, there is great interest over the concept of Open Educational Resources (OER) in all of its forms: OpenCourseware repositories OCW, spare open resources, or even more recently as Massive Online Open Courses (also called MOOC). This panorama has generated considerable debate about their effectiveness in terms of learning, sustainability and especially the role that higher education institutions play in this context. We understand that students are involved on formal and informal learning activities, and require universities should have new model to recognize their skills and abilities on these scenarios.

    One case study is the MOOC learning framework, where universities are interested but there are nowadays some doubts and fears about the official recognition as a usual learning activity. In this article we analyse some data from the activity in an Open Course developed in the University of Granada and the implications regarding learning skills and recognition. Finally, we link this approach with the studies given in the Open Learning Framework developed within the European project OERtest, in which five higher education institutions have conducted a pilot on this issue. We can offer some conclusions regarding the feasibility of certifying and award credits to a student.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • AbiertaUGR (2013). http://abierta.ugr.es
  • COURSERA (2011). http://www.coursera.org/
  • EACEA (2007). The Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. Lifelong Learning Programmed 2007-2013. Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/llp/
  • EDX (2012). http://www.edx.org/
  • GEA, M (2011). Collective Intelligence and Online Learning Communities. International Conference on Information Society (i-Society 2011) Technical...
  • GEA, M. (2013). Formación abierta sobre modelos de enseñanza masivos: nuevas tendencias hacia el aprendizaje social. IV Congreso Internacional...
  • MILLER, G.E. (2011). ICDE’s Role in Ensuring Quality in International InterInstitutional Collaborations. Retrieved from http://www.icde.org/?module=Files;action=File.getFile;ID=1775
  • MiriadaX (2013). http://www.miriadax.net/
  • MITx (2011). Webpage: http://www.mitx.org [Accessed September 7th, 2012].
  • OCWC (2001). OpenCourseWare Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.ocwconsortium.org/en/courses/catalog
  • OERTEST (2010). Testing the Feasibility of OER-Course Certification. Webpage: http://oer-europe.net
  • OERTEST CONSORTIUM (2012). Open Learning Recognition: Taking Open Educational Resources a Step Further. Retrieved from http://oereurope.net/open_learning_recognition
  • OERu (2011). OER University project. Retrieved from http://wikieducator.org/OER_university
  • TANNHAUSER, A.C. (2012). OERtest Policy Recommendations. Retrieved from http://oer-europe.net/policy_recommendations
  • UDACITY (2012). http://www.udacity.com/
  • UnedCOMA (2013). http://www.unedcoma.es
  • WALSH, K. (2012) Exploring the Khan Academy’s use of Learning Data and Learning Analytics. Emerging EdTech22, april 2012. Retrieved from http://go.nmc.org/rttpc