Ir al contenido

Documat


La transferencia de aprendizaje algorítmico y el origen de los errores en la sustración

  • Autores: Ana Belén Sánchez García Árbol académico, Ricardo López Fernández Árbol académico
  • Localización: Revista de educación, ISSN 0034-8082, Nº 354, 2011 (Ejemplar dedicado a: La formación práctica de estudiantes universitarios: repensando el Practicum), págs. 429-445
  • Idioma: español
  • DOI: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-354-006
  • Títulos paralelos:
    • The transfer of algorithmic learning and the origin of errors in subtraction
  • Enlaces
  • Resumen
    • español

      Los resultados de la investigación que presentamos demuestran que la influencia del conocimiento formal, intuitivo y procedimental en el proceso de aprendizaje algorítmico; el contexto pedagógico del aula y el proceso de transferencia del conocimiento matemático son decisivos en la generación del error que se nutre de mecanismos de transferencia analógica. Específicamente, hemos estudiado este hecho en el algoritmo de la sustracción. En este artículo analizamos las respuestas emitidas por nueve niños/as de edades comprendidas entre siete y diez años, en una prueba compuesta por 20 sustracciones. En total, fueron grabados los procesos ejecutados por los nueve niños/as en 180 restas. Los datos obtenidos a través de protocolos en voz alta, fueron analizados con ayuda del programa estadístico Nud*ist 4.0. El estudio que presentamos, se inscribe en una investigación en la que hemos analizado una base de datos de 7.140 restas realizadas por 357 niños/as de edades comprendidas entre siete y trece años, al objeto de determinar si producían errores sistemáticos y conocer su tipología. En este artículo, evidenciamos como los errores, se focalizan en torno a determinados factores de la tarea relacionados con la comprensión de conceptos esenciales para el aprendizaje significativo de la habilidad. Lo último, opinamos es esencial para ayudar a los profesores en la programación didáctica de la enseñanza del algoritmo de la sustracción y en la práctica metodológica específica a aplicar en el aula; pues contribuyen a clarificar la naturaleza de los procesos algorítmicos y la generación del error en la sustracción. Finalmente, demostramos la importancia de los factores contextuales, como el lenguaje utilizado en el proceso de enseñanza. Lo anterior, es debido a que los niños/as al iniciar el aprendizaje construyen algunas interpretaciones sobre el procedimiento, en base a una serie de conceptos o vocabulario específico organizado dentro del campo conceptual de la sustracción.

    • English

      The results of the study presented in this paper demonstrate that the influence of formal, intuitive and procedural knowledge in the process of algorithmic learning, the pedagogical context of the classroom and the process of transferring mathematical knowledge are decisive in error generation through mechanisms of analogical transfer. The paper reports this fact in the subtraction algorithm. The answers given by nine children of ages between seven and ten years in a test made up of 20 subtraction problems were analysed. Altogether, the processes executed by the nine children were recorded in 180 subtraction operations. The volume of data obtained via talk-aloud protocols was analysed with the help of the Nud*ist 4.0 statistical program. The study falls within the context of a larger study where the authors analysed a database of 7,140 subtraction operations performed by 357 children between the ages of seven and thirteen years, with the aim of determining whether systematic errors occurred and typing any systematic errors found. The article shows how the errors most commonly found cluster around certain factors of the task. These factors are related to the understanding of essential concepts for the meaningful learning of the ability. In the authors' opinion, it is essential to help teachers plan how to teach the subtraction algorithm and provide teachers with a specific methodological practice to apply in the classroom; these things would help make the nature of algorithmic processes clearer and reduce error generation in subtraction. Lastly, the paper demonstrates the importance of contextual factors, such as the language used in the teaching process. When children begin learning, they build interpretations of the procedure, based on a series of concepts or specific vocabulary organised within the conceptual field of subtraction.

  • Referencias bibliográficas
    • Baroody, A., Herbet, P. G. & Barbara W. (1983). Children's use of Mathematical Structures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,...
    • Brown, J. S., Burton, R. B. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 2, 155-192.
    • Brown, D. & Clement, J. (1989). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction....
    • Brown, J. S. & Vanlehn, K. (1982).Towards a generative theory of «bugs». In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser & T. A. Romberg (Comps.),...
    • Carpenter, T. P. & Moser, J. M. (1982). The development of addition and subtraction problem-solving skills. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M....
    • Carpenter, T. P. & Moser, J. M.(1983). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Comps.), Acquisition...
    • Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students ́ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research...
    • Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75, 649-672.
    • Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics: An Educational Approach. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
    • Fischbein, E. (1994). The interaction between the formal and the algorithmic and the intuitive components in a mathematical activity. In R....
    • Fischbein, E. (1999). Intuitions and schemata in mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 11-50.
    • Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S. & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication...
    • Fuson, K. (1986). Role of representation and verbalization in the teaching of multi-digit additions and subtractions. European Journal of...
    • Fuson, K. (1992a). Research on learning and teaching addition and subtraction of whole numbers. In G. Leinhardt, R. Putnam & R. A. Hattrup...
    • Fuson, K. (1992b). Research on Whole Number Addition and Subtraction. Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: a project...
    • Fuson, K. & Briars, D. J. (1990). Using base-ten blocks learning/teaching approach for first and second grace place value and multidigit...
    • Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R., Markman, A., Levidow, B., Wolff, P. & Forbus, K. (1997). Analogical Reasoning and Conceptual Change:...
    • Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J. & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and Transfer: A General Role for Analogical Encoding. Journal of Educational...
    • Hiebert, J. & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Comp.),...
    • Hiebert, J. & Wearne, D. (1996). Instruction, understanding, and skill in multidigit addition and subtraction. Cognition and Instruction,...
    • López, R. y Sánchez, A. B. (2006). Adquisición del error en la sustracción en Educación Primaria. Proceedings of Internacional Symposium on...
    • López, R. (2007). Los componentes generadores de errores algorítmicos. Caso particular de la sustracción. Revista de Educación, 344, 377-402.
    • Mayer, R. E. (1992). Teaching for transfer of problem-solving skills to computer programming. In E. De Corte, M. C. Linn & L. Verschaffel...
    • Nesher, P. (1976). The three determinants of difficulty in verbal arithmetic problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7, 369-388.
    • Nesher, P. & Katriel, T. (1977). A semantic analysis of addition and subtraction word problems in arithmetic. Educational Studies in Mathematics...
    • Nesher, P., Greeno, J. G. & Riley, M. S. (1982). The development o semantic categories for addition and subtraction. Educational Studies...
    • Nesher, P. y Hershkovitz, S. (1994). The role of schemes in two-step problem: Analysis and Research findings. Educational Studies in mathematics,...
    • Ohlsson, S. & Langley, P. (1988). Psychological evaluation of path hypotheses in cognitive diagnosis. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Comps.),...
    • Olhlson, S. & Rees, E. (1991). The function of conceptual understanding in the learning of arithmetic procedure. Cognition and Instruction,...
    • Orgill, M. & Bodner, G. (2003).What research tells us about using analogies to teach chemistry. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice,...
    • Orrantia, J. (2003). El rol del conocimiento conceptual en la resolución de problemas aritméticos con estructura aditiva. Infancia y Aprendizaje,...
    • Resnick, L. (1982). Syntax and semantics in learning to subtract. In T. Carpenter, J. Moser & T. Romberg (Comps.), Addition and subtraction:...
    • Resnick, L. (1983). A developmental theory of number understanding. In H. P. Ginsburg (Comp.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp....
    • Resnick, L. & Omanson, S. F. (1987). Learning to understand arithmetic. In R. Glaser (Comp.), Advances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale,...
    • Sander, E. (2001). Solving arithmetic operations: a semantic approach. In proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science...
    • Thagard, P. (1992). Analogy, explanation, and education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 537-544.
    • Thorton, S. (1998). La resolución infantil de problemas. Madrid: Morata.
    • Van De Walle, J. (1990). Concepts of Number. In J. N. Payne (Comp.), Mathematics for the young child (pp. 63-89). National Council of Teachers...
    • VanLehn, K. (1982). Bugs are not enough: Empirical studies of bugs, impasses and repairs in procedural skills. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour,...
    • VanLehn, K. (1986). Arithmetic procedures are induced from examples. In J. Hiebert (Comp.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case...
    • VanLehn, K. (1990). Mind bugs: origins of procedural misconceptions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    • VanLehn, K. (1983). On the Representation of Procedures in Repair Theory. In H. Ginsburg (Ed.), The Development of Mathematical Thinking....
    • VanLehn, K. (1987). Learning one subprocedure per lesson. Artificial Intelligence, 31, 1-40.
    • VanLehn, K. & Brown, J. S. (1980). Planning nets: A representation for formalizing analogies and semantic models of procedural skills....
    • Young, R. M. & O'Shea, T. (1981). Errors in children's subtraction. Cognitive Science, 5, 153-177.
    • Zook, K. B. (1991). Effects of analogical processes on learning and misrepresentation. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 41-72.
    • Zook, K. B. & DiVesta, F. J. (1991). Instructional analogies and conceptual misrepresentations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83,...

Fundación Dialnet

Mi Documat

Opciones de artículo

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno