Ir al contenido

Documat


Analyzing intervention strategies employed in response to automated academic-risk identification: a systematic review

  • Augusto Schmidt [1] ; Cristian Cechinel [4] ; Emanuel Marques Queiroga [5] ; Tiago Primo [1] ; Vinicius Ramos [4] ; Andréa Sabedra Bordin [4] ; Rafael Ferreira Mello [2] ; Roberto Muñoz [3]
    1. [1] Universidade Federal de Pelotas

      Universidade Federal de Pelotas

      Brasil

    2. [2] Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco

      Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco

      Brasil

    3. [3] Universidad de Valparaíso

      Universidad de Valparaíso

      Valparaíso, Chile

    4. [4] PPGTIC, UFSC, Araranguá, Brazil
    5. [5] Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-rio-grandense (IFSul), Pelotas, Brazil
  • Localización: Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje: IEEE-RITA, ISSN 1932-8540, Vol. 20, 2025, págs. 77-85
  • Idioma: inglés
  • DOI: 10.1109/RITA.2025.3540161
  • Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
  • Resumen
    • Predicting in advance the likelihood of students failing a course or withdrawing from a degree program has emerged as one of the widely embraced applications of Learning Analytics. While the literature extensively addresses the identification of at-risk students, it often doesn’t evolve into actual interventions, focusing more on reporting experimental outcomes than on translating them into real-world impact. The goal of early identification is straightforward, empowering educators to intervene before actual failure or dropout, but not enough attention is paid to what happens after the students are flagged as at risk. Interventions like personalized feedback, automated alerts, and targeted support can be game-changers, reducing failure and dropout rates. However, as this paper shows, few studies actually dig into the effectiveness of these strategies or measure their impact on student outcomes. Even more striking is the lack of research targeting stakeholders beyond students, like educators, administrators, and curriculum designers, who play a key role in driving meaningful interventions. The paper explores recent literature on automated academic risk prediction, focusing on interventions in selected papers. Our findings highlight that only about 14% of studies propose actionable interventions, and even fewer implement them. Despite these challenges, we can see that a global momentum is building around Learning Analytics, and institutions are starting to tap into the potential of these tools. However, academic databases, loaded with valuable insights, remain massively underused. To move the field forward, we propose actionable strategies, like developing intervention frameworks that engage multiple stakeholders, creating standardized metrics for measuring success and expanding data sources to include both traditional academic systems and alternative datasets. By tackling these issues, this paper doesn’t just highlight what is missing; it offers a roadmap for researchers and practitioners alike, aiming to close the gap between prediction and action. It’s time to go beyond identifying risks and start making a real difference where it matters most.

  • Referencias bibliográficas
    • D. Baneres, M. E. Rodríguez-Gonzalez, and M. Serra, “An early feedback prediction system for learners at-risk within a first-year higher education...
    • D. Gasevic, Y.-S. Tsai, S. Dawson, and A. Pardo, “How do we start? An approach to learning analytics adoption in higher education,” Int....
    • A. Ortigosa, R. M. Carro, J. Bravo-Agapito, D. Lizcano, J. J. Alcolea, and Ó. Blanco, “From lab to production: Lessons learnt and real-life...
    • H. Waheed, S.-U. Hassan, N. R. Aljohani, J. Hardman, S. Alelyani, and R. Nawaz, “Predicting academic performance of students from VLE big...
    • X. Du, J. Yang, B. E. Shelton, J.-L. Hung, and M. Zhang, “A systematic meta-review and analysis of learning analytics research,” Behav. Inf....
    • C. Herodotou, B. Rienties, A. Boroowa, Z. Zdrahal, M. Hlosta, and G. Naydenova, “Implementing predictive learning analytics on a large scale:...
    • T. Han, A. Takkaç-Tulgar, and N. Aybirdi, “Factors causing demotivation in EFL learning process and the strategies used by Turkish EFL learners...
    • H. Tohidi and M. M. Jabbari, “The effects of motivation in education,” Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 31, pp. 820–824, Jan. 2012.
    • A. Qvortrup and E. Lykkegaard, “Study environment factors associated with retention in higher education,” Higher Educ. Pedagogies, vol. 7,...
    • F. Acevedo, “Concepts and measurement of dropout in higher education: A critical perspective from Latin America,” Issues Educ. Res., vol....
    • A. S. Wells and R. L. Crain, “Perpetuation theory and the longterm effects of school desegregation,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 64, no. 4, pp....
    • K. Zeichner, “Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education,”...
    • R. Torraco, “Economic inequality, educational inequity, and reduced career opportunity: A self-perpetuating cycle?” New Horizons Adult Educ....
    • R. B. S. Filho and R. M. de Lima Araújo, “Evasão e abandono escolar na educação básica no Brasil: Fatores, causas e possíveis consequências,”...
    • D. Clow, “The learning analytics cycle: Closing the loop effectively,” in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Learn. Anal. Knowl., Apr. 2012, pp. 134–138....
    • B. Kitchenham, “Procedures for performing systematic reviews,” Keele Univ., Keele, U.K., Joint Tech. Tech. Rep. TR/SE-0401 and NICTA 0400011T.1,...
    • B. T.-M. Wong and K. C. Li, “A review of learning analytics intervention in higher education (2011–2018),” J. Comput. Educ., vol. 7, no....
    • S. Heikkinen, M. Saqr, J. Malmberg, and M. Tedre, “Supporting selfregulated learning with learning analytics interventions—A systematic literature...
    • C. Cechinel, X. Ochoa, H. L. D. Santos, J. B. C. Nunes, V. Rodés, and E. M. Queiroga, “Mapping learning analytics initiatives in Latin America,”...
    • M. A. Chatti, A. L. Dyckhoff, U. Schroeder, and H. Thüs, “A reference model for learning analytics,” Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn., vol....
    • A. Al-Azawei and M. A. A. Al-Masoudy, “Predicting learners’ performance in virtual learning environment (VLE) based on demographic, behavioral...
    • N. R. Aljohani, A. Fayoumi, and S.-U. Hassan, “Predicting at-risk students using clickstream data in the virtual learning environment,” Sustainability,...
    • F. G. Karaoglan Yilmaz, “Utilizing learning analytics to support students’ academic self-efficacy and problem-solving skills,” Asia–Pacific...
    • U. B. Qushem, A. Christopoulos, and M.-J. Laakso, “Learning management system analytics on arithmetic fluency performance: A skill development...
    • G. Kostopoulos, S. Karlos, and S. Kotsiantis, “Multiview learning for early prognosis of academic performance: A case study,” IEEE Trans....
    • M. L. Bernacki, M. M. Chavez, and P. M. Uesbeck, “Predicting achievement and providing support before STEM majors begin to fail,” Comput....
    • E. Wakelam, A. Jefferies, N. Davey, and Y. Sun, “The potential for student performance prediction in small cohorts with minimal available...
    • E. Pogorskiy and J. F. Beckmann, “Learners’ web navigation behaviour beyond learning management systems: A way into addressing procrastination...
    • M. Adnan, A. A. S. Alarood, M. I. Uddin, and I. U. Rehman, “Utilizing grid search cross-validation with adaptive boosting for augmenting...
    • M. C. Sáiz-Manzanares, R. Marticorena-Sánchez, and J. Ochoa-Orihuel, “Using advanced learning technologies with university students: An analysis...
    • M. Williams, L. J. Lluka, and P. Chunduri, “A learning analyticsinformed activity to improve student performance in a first year physiology...
    • S. Shabbir, M. A. Ayub, F. A. Khan, and J. Davis, “Short-term and longterm learners’ motivation modeling in web-based educational systems,”...
    • M. M. D. Oliveira, R. Barwaldt, M. R. Pias, and D. B. Espíndola, “Understanding the student dropout in distance learning,” in Proc. IEEE...
    • M. C. Sáiz-Manzanares, R. Marticorena-Sánchez, J. F. Díez-Pastor, and C. I. García-Osorio, “Does the use of learning management systems with...
    • A. Larrabee Sønderlund, E. Hughes, and J. Smith, “The efficacy of learning analytics interventions in higher education: A systematic review,”...
    • B. Rienties, S. Cross, and Z. Zdrahal, “Implementing a learning analytics intervention and evaluation framework: What works?” in Big Data...
    • D. Gaševic, S. Dawson, and A. Pardo, ´ How Do We Start? State and Directions of Learning Analytics Adoption. Oslo, Norway: International...
    • R. Prado, Retention in Higher Education: Theoretical and Practical Contributions, vol. 28. Brasília, Brazil: Linhas Críticas, 2022.
    • Z. Pan et al., “A systematic review of learning analytics: Incorporated instructional interventions on learning management systems,” J. Learn....
    • K. Alalawi, R. Athauda, and R. Chiong, “An extended learning analytics framework integrating machine learning and pedagogical approaches...
    • M. Tepgec and D. Ifenthaler, “From data to outcomes: Experimental learning analytics insights,” in Smart Learning Environments in the Post...
    • R. Kaliisa, K. Misiejuk, S. López-Pernas, M. Khalil, and M. Saqr, “Have learning analytics dashboards lived up to the hype? A systematic...

Fundación Dialnet

Mi Documat

Opciones de artículo

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno