Resumen de Contribución del pensamiento computacional con 'scratch' al proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje de las matemáticas

Álvaro Molina Ayuso

• 1. Introducción o motivación de la tesis:

  El desarrollo de habilidades de Pensamiento Computacional ha cobrado mucho interés en la última década en el ámbito educativo, quedando recogida su importancia desde Educación Infantil hasta Secundaria en la ley educativa española publicada en 2022. Por ello se precisan de procesos de investigación empírica que ayuden a facilitar el desarrollo de estas habilidades para todo el alumnado y de manera transversal e integrada en el desarrollo de las diferentes áreas de conocimiento. De manera particular, esta tesis se centra en analizar como el desarrollo del Pensamiento Computacional a través de prácticas educativas desarrolladas con el software de programación visual por bloques Scratch puede favorecer al proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje de las Matemáticas en distintos niveles educativos: en Educación Primaria, Secundaria y en la formación inicial del profesorado de Educación Primaria.

  2.Contenido de la investigación:

  El contenido de la investigación es una serie de experiencias empíricas para valorar el efecto que puede tener el desarrollo de habilidades de Pensamiento Computacional a través de prácticas computacionales con el software educativo Scratch sobre el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje de las Matemáticas. Para ello se han analizado diferentes aspectos que intervienen en este proceso. Por un lado, en los procesos de resolución de problemas empleando el método de Polya; por otro lado, y de manera más específica, centrándonos en cómo trabajar contenidos y saberes básicos asociados al área de la Geometría; por último, para ver el efecto que tiene en un elemento clave para implantar un recurso educativo de manera adecuada y efectiva, en la formación inicial del profesorado en Educación Primaria. Con estos estudios se ha podido ver el efecto que tiene el desarrollo de estas habilidades de manera completa e integrada en todo el proceso de aprendizaje de las Matemáticas que puede vivir el alumnado a lo largo de su etapa educativa, al mismo tiempo que se aborda la importancia de las habilidades que necesita un docente para que esto sea efectivo 3.Conclusión:

  Los estudios llevados a cabo e el desarrollo de esta Tesis Doctoral han ayudado a comprobar el efecto positivo que puede tener la inclusión de prácticas computacionales con Scratch y el desarrollo de habilidades de Pensamiento Computacional en el proceso de aprendizaje de las Matemáticas en diferentes contextos. El ver que puede favorecer el desarrollo de habilidades asociadas a la resolución de problemas hace que sea un recurso que `se puede integrar perfectamente en el aprendizaje de esta disciplina ya que la resolución de situaciones problemáticas es uno de los ejes principales que permite a nuestro alumnado tener una adecuada alfabetización matemática. Por otro lado, y de manera más específica para su inclusión curricular, los efectos positivos que puede tener para trabajar contenidos y saberes propios de las Matemáticas facilitan la inclusión de este tipo de recursos en el proceso de enseñanza en un contexto formal y adecuado para distintos niveles educativos. Pero para poder llevar esto al aula de manera efectiva es necesario que el profesorado tenga un nivel mínimo de habilidades y destrezas computacionales. Para que esto sea así,en la correspondiente investigación de esta Tesis Doctoral se muestra el efecto positivo que tiene la inclusión de prácticas computacionales en la formación inicial de futuros y futuras docentes a la vez que motiva su interés por este tema y hace que se conciba como un elemento importante para la educación que requiere cualquier estudiante del Siglo XXI 4. Bibliografía:

  Abelson, H., & Sussman, G. J. (1996). Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. The MIT Press. https://library.oapen.org/viewer/web/viewer.html?file=/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/26092/sicp.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Abiteboul, S., Archambaul, J., Balagué, C., Baron, G., Berry, G., Doweket, G., de la Higuera, C., Nivat, N., Tort, F., & Viéville, T. (2013). Rapport de l’académiedes sciences. L’enseignement de l’informatique en France. Il est urgent de ne plus attendre. https://www.academie-sciences.fr/pdf/rapport/rads_0513.pdf Acuña-Medina, N., León–Arias, M., López–Palomino, L., Villar–Navarro, C., & Mulford-León, R. (2018). Aprendizajes de las Matemáticas Mediados Por Juegos Interactivos En Scratch En La IEDGVCS. Cultura Educación y Sociedad, 9(2), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.17981/cultedusoc.9.2.2018.03 Adell Segura, J., Llopis Nebot, M. Á., Esteve Mon, F., & Valdeolivas Novella, M. G. (2019). El debate sobre el pensamiento computacional en educación. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.22303 Adina Nistor, Agueda Gras-Velazquez, Noelle Billon, G. M. (2018). Education Practices in Europe. Scientix Obsaervatory report. http://www.scientix.eu/documents/10137/782005/STEM-Edu-Practices_DEF_WEB.pdf/b4847c2d-2fa8-438c-b080-3793fe26d0c8 Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185 Ateşkan, A., & Hart, D. O. (2021). Demystifying computational thinking for teacher candidates: A case study on Turkish secondary school pre-service teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6383–6399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10626-9 Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. N. (2017). A didactical model for educational robotics activities: a study on improving skills through strong or minimal guidance. In A. Dimitris Alimisis, Michele Moro & E. Menegatti (Eds.), Educational robotics in the makers era (Vol. 560, pp. 58–72). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55553-9 Balanskat, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2015). Computing our future. In Computer programing and coding. Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. European Schoolnet.

  Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top.

  Barr, B. V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing Computational Thinking to K-12: What is Involved and What is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905 Basu, S., Biswas, G., Sengupta, P., Dickes, A., Kinnebrew, J. S., & Clark, D. (2016). Identifying middle school students’ challenges in computational thinking-based science learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0036-2 Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary. Journal of STEM Education, 12(5), 23–38. file:///Users/ruthsc/Downloads/out (1).pdf Bender, W., Urrea, C., & Zapata-Ros, M. (2015). Presentación del número especial sobre Pensamiento Computacional. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 46(46), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/46/1 Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 58(3), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006 Benton, L., Hoyles, C., Kalas, I., & Noss, R. (2017). Bridging Primary Programming and Mathematics: Some Findings of Design Research in England. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-017-0028-x Berry, M. (2013). Computing in the national curriculum A guide for primary teachers. http://www.computingatschool.org.uk/data/uploads/CASPrimaryComputing.pdf Bers, M. U. (2018). Coding, Playgrounds and Literacy in Early Childhood Education: the Development of KIBO Robotics and ScratchJr. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2100–2108.

  Bers, M. U. (2019). Coding as another language: a pedagogical approach for teaching computer science in early childhood. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(4), 499–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00147-3 Bers, M. U., & Sullivan, A. (2019). Computer science education in early childhood: The case of scratchjr. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 18, 113–138. https://doi.org/10.28945/443710.28945/4437 Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Kampylis, P., Wastiau, P., Engelhardt, K., Earp, J., Horvath, M., Malagoli, C., Cachia, R., Giannoutsou, N., & Punie, Y. (2022). Reviewing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education. State of play and practices from computing education. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2760/126955 Boletín Oficial de Castilla y León. (2016). ORDEN EDU/589/2016, de 22 de junio, por la que se regula la oferta de materias del bloque de asignaturas de libre configuración autonómica en tercer y cuarto curso de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Boletín Oficial de Castilla y León, 122, 29175–29343. http://bocyl.jcyl.es/boletines/2010/06/23/pdf/BOCYL-D-23062010-1.pdf Boletín Oficial de la Comunidad de Madrid. (2014). DECRETO 89/2014, de 24 de julio, del Consejo de Gobierno, por el que se establecepara la Comunidad de Madrid el Currículo de la Educación Primaria. Boletín Oficial de La Comunidad de Madrid, 175, 10–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv153k4jj.4 Boletín Oficial de la Comunidad de Madrid. (2015). DECRETO 48/2015, de 14 de mayo, del Consejo de Gobierno, por el que se establece para la Comunidad de Madrid el currículo de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Boletín Oficial de La Comunidad de Madrid, 118, 10–319.

  Boletín oficial de la Junta de Andalucía. (2016). Orden de 14 de julio de 2016, por la que se desarrolla el currículo correspondiente a la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria en la Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía. Boletín Oficial de La Junta de Andalucía (B.O.J.A.), 108–396. http://juntadeandalucia.es/eboja/2016/144/BOJA16-144-00289-13500-01_00095875.pdf Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía. (2021). Orden de 15 de enero de 2021, por la que se desarrolla el currículo correspondiente a la etapa de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria en la Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía. Boletín Oficial de La Junta de Andalucia, 7, 656–793.

  Boletín Oficial de la Región de Murcia. (2015). Decreto 220/2015, de 2 de septiembre de 2015, por el que se establece el currículo de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria en la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia. Boletín Oficial de La Región de Murcia, 203.

  Boletín oficial de La Rioja. (2015). Decreto 19/2015, de 12 de junio, por el que se establece el currículo de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria y se regulan determinados aspectos sobre su organización así como la evaluación, promoción y titulación del alumnado de la Comunidad Autónoma de L. Boletín Oficial de La Rioja, 79, 12368–12730. http://ias1.larioja.org/boletin/Bor_Boletin_visor_Servlet?referencia=2386883-1-PDF-493946 Boletín Oficial de las Illes Balears. (2015). Decreto 35/2015, de 15 de mayo, por el que se establece el currículo del Bachillerato en las Islas Baleares. Boletín Oficial Las Illes Balears, 2005, 25225–25264.

  Boletín Oficial de Navarra. (2014). Decreto Foral 60/2014, de 16 de julio, por el que se establece el currículo de las enseñanzas de Educación primaria en la Comu- nidad Foral de Navarra. Boletín Oficial de Navarra, 174.

  Boletín Oficial las Illes Balears. (2016). Decreto 29/2016 de 20 de mayo, por el que se modifica el Decreto 34/2015, de 15 de mayo, por el que se establece el currículo de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria en las Illes Balears. Boletín Oficial Las Illes Balears, 64, 15365–15394.

  Brennan, K. (2012). Best of both worlds: issues of structure and agency in computational creation, in and out of school. Tesis Doctoral. MIT Media Lab.

  Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Annual American Educational Research Association Meeting, Vancouver, Canada, 1–25.

  Bull, G. (2005). Children , Computers , and Powerful Ideas. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5, 349–352.

  Bull, G., Garofalo, J., & Hguyen, N. R. (2020). Thinking about computational thinking: Origins of computational thinking in educational computing. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1694381 Bundy, A. (2007). Computational Thinking is Pervasive. Journal of Scientific and Practical Computing, 1(2), 67–69.

  Calao, L. A., Moreno-León, J., Correa, H., & Robles, G. (2015). Developing mathematical thinking with Scratch. An experiment with 6th grade students. Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3 2 Calder, N. (2010). Using Scratch: An integrated problem-solving approach to mathematical thinking. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(4), 9–14. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ906680%5Cnhttp://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ906680 Campbell, D., & Fiske, D. (1959). Psycholo gical Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.

  Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research (R. McNally (ed.)).

  Castañeda, M., Cabrera, A., Navarro, Y., & Vries, W. (2010). Pocesamiento de datos y análisis estadísticos utilizando SPSS. Edipucrs. http://www.pucrs.br/edipucrs/spss.pdf Castells, M. (1998). La era de la información: Economía, sociedad y cultura. Vol. III. Fin del milenio. Siglo XXI.

  Castro, W., & Godino, J. (2011). Métodos mixtos de investigación en las contribuciones a los simposios de la SEIEM (1997-2010). In M.Marín et al (Ed.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XV (pp. 99–116). http://funes.uniandes.edu.co/1803/ Chan, S. W., Looi, C. K., & Sumintono, B. (2020). Assessing computational thinking abilities among Singapore secondary students: a Rasch model measurement analysis. Journal of Computers in Education, 8, 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00177-2 Chiang, F. kuang, & Qin, L. (2018). A Pilot study to assess the impacts of game-based construction learning, using scratch, on students’ multi-step equation-solving performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(6), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1412990 Clark-wilson, A., Noss, R., Hoyles, C., Saunders, P., & Benton, L. (2016). Key Factors for Successfully Embedding a Programming Approach to the Primary Maths Curriculum at Scale.

  Clements, D. H. (1986). Effects of Logo and CAI Environments on Cognition and Creativity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.309 Cobo, J. C. (2008). El concepto de tecnologías de la información. Benchmarking sobre las definiciones de las TIC en la sociedad del conocimiento Informazio-teknoligien. Zer, 14(27), 295–318. http://www.ejournal.unam.mx/iibiblio/vol16-32/IBI03203.pdf Colás, P., & Buendía, L. (1992). Investigación Educativa. Alfar.

  Consejería de Educación y Deporte. (2019). Instrucción 12/2019, de 27 de junio, por la que se establecen aspectos de organización y funcionamiento para los centros que imparten Educación Primaria para el curso 2019/2020. Consejería de Educación y Deporte, 16. https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/educacion/portals/delegate/content/626f75be-5453-423f-8163-ce41c6152979/Instrucción 12 de 27-06-2019 Educación Primaria Consejo de la Unión Europea. (2018). Recomendación del Consejo, de 22 de mayo de 2018, relativa a las competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente. Diario Oficial de La Unión Europea, C189/1(2), 1–13.

  Cooper, S., Dann, W., & Pausch, R. (2003). Using animated 3d graphics to prepare novices for cs1. Computer Sciencie Education, 13(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1076/csed.13.1.3.13540 CSTA. (2016). Csta K–12 Computer Science Standards. CSTA. https://www.csteachers.org/page/standards Culbertson, J. A. (1986). Whither computer literacy? In Culbertson and L. L. Cunningham (Ed.), Microcomputers and Education (Vol. 1, pp. 109–131). The University of ChicagoPress.

  Curran, J. (2017). A guide to programming languages for coding in class. https://medium.com/groklearning/a-guide-to-programming-languages-for-coding-in-class-4e6de6c01343 Curzon, P., Peckman, J., Settle, A., & Robert, E. (2009). Computational Thinking (CT): On Weaving It In. SIGCSE Bull, 41, 201–202.

  Cutumisu, M., Adams, C., & Lu, C. (2019). A Scoping Review of Empirical Research on Recent Computational Thinking Assessments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(6), 651–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09799-3 Dagiene, V., & Futschek, G. (2008). Bebras international contest on informatics and computer literacy: Criteria for good tasks (Mittermeir R.T. & M. M. Syslo (eds.); Vol. 5090). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69924-8_2 Deci, E. E. (1992). The Relation of Interest to the Motivation of Behavior: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The Role of interest in Learning and Development (pp. 43–70). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315807430-12 Del Álamo Venegas, J. J., Alonso Díaz, L., Yuste Tosina, R., & López Ramos, V. (2021). La Dimensión Educativa De La Robótica: Del Desarrollo Del Pensamiento Al Pensamiento Computacional En El Aula. Campo Abierto, 40(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.17398/0213-9529.40.2.221 Demartini, C. G., Benussi, L., Gatteschi, V., & Renga, F. (2020). Education and digital transformation: The “riconnessioni” project. IEEE Access, 8, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3018189 Dhariwal, S. (2018). Scratch memories: A visualization tool for children to celebrate and reflect on their creative trajectories. IDC 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202770 Diari Oficial de la Generalitat Valenciana. (2015). DECRETO 87/2015, de 5 de junio, del Consell, por el que establece el currículo y desarrolla la ordenación general de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria y del Bachillerato. Diari Oficial de La Generalitat Valenciana, 7544. https://dogv.gva.es/portal/ficha_disposicion_pc.jsp?sig=005254/2015&L=1 Diario Oficial de Castilla-La Mancha. (2009). Decreto 40/2015, de 15/06/2015, por el que se establece el currículo de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria y Bachillerato. Diario Oficial de Castilla-La Mancha, 18872–20324.

  Diario Oficial de Galicia. (2015). ORDEN de 15 de julio de 2015 por la que se establece la relación de materias de libre configuración autonómica. Diario Oficial de Galicia, 136, 30316–30431.

  DiSessa, A. (2000). Changing minds: computers, learning, and literacy. MIT Press.

  Du, J., & Wimmer, H. (2019). Information Systems Education Journal. Information Systems Education Journal (ISEDJ), 17(4), 91–100.

  Duo-terron, P. (2022). STEAM in Primary Education . Impact on Linguistic and Mathematical Competences in a Disadvantaged Context. 7(June), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.792656 Ershov, A. P. (1981). Programming, the second literacy. Microprocessing and Microprogramming, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-6074(81)90002-8 Esteve-Mon, F., Llopis, M. Á., & Adell Segura, J. (2020). Digital competence and computational thinking of student teachers. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(2), 29–41. doi:10.3991/ijet.v15i02.11588 European Commission. (2016). Communication on new skills agenda, human capital, employability and competitiveness 2016. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52016DC0381 Evangelopoulou, O., & Xinogalos, S. (2018). MYTH TROUBLES: An Open-Source Educational Game in Scratch for Greek Mythology. Simulation and Gaming, 49(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878117748175 Falloon, G. (2016). An analysis of young students’ thinking when completing basic coding tasks using Scratch Jnr. On the iPad. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12155 Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5-6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers and Education, 63, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016 Furber, S. (2012). Shut down or restart? The way forward on computing in UK schools. In British Journal of Educational Technology (Issue January, pp. 789–801). The Royal Society. https://royalsociety.org/-/media/education/computing-in-schools/2012-01-12-summary.pdf%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.elib10.ub.unimaas.nl/10.1111/bjet.12453.

  Gabriele, L., Bertacchini, F., Tavernise, A., Vaca-Cárdenas, L., Pantano, P., & Bilotta, E. (2019). Lesson planning by computational thinking skills in Italian pre-service teachers. Informatics in Education, 18(1), 69–104. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.04 Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J. M., Minniti, L., & White, B. J. G. (2016). Computational Thinking, Grade 1 Students and the Binomial Theorem. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-016-0019-3 Gander, W., Petit, A., Berry, G., Demo, B., Vahrenhold, J., McGettrick, A., Boyle, R., Drechsler, M., Mendelson, A., Stephenson, C., Ghezzi, C., & Meyer, B. (2013). Informatics Education: Europe Cannot Afford to Miss the Boat. In Joint Informatics Europe & ACM Europe working group on informatics Education. https://www.informatics-europe.org/images/documents/informatics-education-acm-ie.pdf García, Y., Reyes, D., & Burgos, F. (2017). Diálogos Educativos. Diálogos Educativos, 18, 37–48.

  Gaulin, D. C. (2001). Tendencias actuales en la resolución de problemas. Sigma, 19, 51–63.

  Generalitat de Catalunya. (2015a). Decreto 119/2015, de 23 de junio, de ordenación de las enseñanzas de la Educación Primaria. Diari Oficial de La Generalitat de Catalunya, 120, 18872–20324. https://portaldogc.gencat.cat/utilsEADOP/PDF/6900/1431927.pdf Generalitat de Catalunya. (2015b). DECRETO 187/2015, de 25 de agosto, de ordenación de las enseñanzas de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Diari Oficial de La Generalitat de Catalunya, 6945, 1–314.

  Gretter, S., & Yadav, A. (2016). Computational Thinking and Media & Information Literacy: An Integrated Approach to Teaching Twenty-First Century Skills. TechTrends, 60(5), 510–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0098-4 Grover, S. (2015). “Systems of Assessments” for Deeper Learning of Computational Thinking in K-12. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp 15-20) (pp. 15–20).

  Grover, S., Cooper, S., & Pea, R. (2014). Assessing computational learning in K-12. ITICSE 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2591713 Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051 Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2018). Computational thinking: A competency whose time has come. In S. Sentence, E. Barendsen, & C. Schulte (Eds.), Computer science education: Perspectives on teaching and learning in school (pp. 20–35).

  Guamán Gómez, V. J., Daquilema Cuásquer, B. A., & Espinoza Guamán, E. E. (2021). El pensamiento computacional en el ámbito educativo. Sociedad & Tecnología, 2(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v2i1.69 Gurstein, M. (2011). Open Data: Empowering the empowered of effective data use for everyone. First Monday, 16(2), 2–7. http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3316/2764 Gutierrez-Esteban, P., & Beccerra, M. T. (2014). Los entornos personales de aprendizaje (PLE). Una experiencia de aprendizaje informal en la formación innicial del profesorado. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 13(2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695 Halverson, E., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The Maker Movement in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g681403820 Haseski, H. I., Ilic, U., & Tugtekin, U. (2018). Defining a New 21st Century Skill-Computational Thinking: Concepts and Trends. International Education Studies, 11(4), 29. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n4p29 Hassan, H., Adnan, A., Poh, L. G., & Hashim, M. S. M. (2018). Using Scratch Programming To Engage Primary School Penggunaan Scratch Programming Untuk Meningkatkan Penglibatan Murid Sekolah Rendah. Jurnal Penyelidikan Tempawan, XXXV, 49–57.

  Hassenfeld, Z. R., & Bers, M. U. (2020). Debugging the Writing Process: Lessons From a Comparison of Students’ Coding and Writing Practices. Reading Teacher, 73(6), 735–746. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1885 Hemmendinger, D. (2010). A plea for modesty. ACM Inroads, 1(2), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/1805724.1805725 Hickmott, D., Prieto-Rodriguez, E., & Holmes, K. (2017). A Scoping Review of Studies on Computational Thinking in K–12 Mathematics Classrooms. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-017-0038-8 Holmes, K., Prieto-Rodriguez, E., Berger, &, Holmes, K., Prieto-Rodriguez, E., Hickmott, D., & Berger, N. (2018). Using coding to teach mathematics: results of a pilot project. In Integrated Education for the Real World: 5th International STEM in Education Conference: Post-conference Proceedings. November, 152–158.

  Hoyles, R., & Noss, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: learning cultures and computers. In Choice Reviews Online (Board, Vol. 17). Klwer. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-0959 Hubwieser, P., & Mühling, A. (2014). Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education. 128–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2670757.2670759 Iskrenovic-Momcilovic, O. (2020). Improving Geometry Teaching with Scratch. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/7807 ISTE. (2011). Operational Definition of Computational Thinking.

  Ivanova, A. A., Srikant, S., Sueoka, Y., Kean, H. H., Dhamala, R., O’Reilly, U. M., Bers, M. U., & Fedorenko, E. (2020). Comprehension of computer code relies primarily on domain-general executive resources. BioRxiv, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.16.045732 Jacob, S. R., & Warschauer, M. (2018). Computational Thinking and Literacy. Journal of Computer Science Integration, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.26716/jcsi.2018.01.1.1 Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Shah, P., & Jonides, J. (2014). The role of individual differences in cognitive training and transfer. Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0364-z Johnson, B., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Turner, L. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224 Johnson, L., Adams, B., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 Edition. In Horizon Report. http://www.nmc.org/publications/2014-horizon-report-k12 Juškevičiene, A., & Dagiene, V. (2018). Computational thinking relationship with digital competence. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2018.14 Kafai, Y., & Burke, Q. (2014). Connected code: why children need to learn programming. MIT Press.

  Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, andLearning in a Digital World (I. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (ed.)).

  Ke, F. (2014). An implementation of design-based learning through creating educational computer games: A case study on mathematics learning during design and computing. Computers and Education, 73, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.010 Kesan, C., & Caliscan, S. (2013). The Effect Of Learning Geometry Topics Of 7 Th Grade In Primary Education With Dynamic Geometer`s Sketchpad Geometry. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 131–139.

  Keshavarz, H. (2020). Web self-efficacy: A psychological prerequisite for web literacy. Webology, 17(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.14704/WEB/V17I1/A209 Kiliç-Çakmak, E. (2010). Learning strategies and motivational factors predicting information literacy self-efficacy of e-learners. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1090 Klieme, E. (2004). Assessment of Cross-Curricular problem-solving competencies, Comparing Learning Outcomes. In M. S. J. H. Moskowitz (Ed.), Comparing Learning Outcomes: International Assesment and Educational Policy (pp. 81–107).

  Knuth, D. E. (1974). Computer Science and its Relation to Mathematics. The American Mathematical Monthly, 81(4), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1974.11993556 Kong, S. (2019). Computational Thinking Education. In Computational Thinking Education. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6528-7 Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Nelson, V., & Makosz, S. (2019). Mathematical or Computational Thinking? An Early Years Perspective. Mathematical Learning and Cognition in Early Childhood, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12895-1_6 Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1 Krauss, J., & Protsman, K. (2017). Computational Thinking and Coding for Every Student. The Teacher’s Getting-Started Guide. Crowin Press Inc. https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=V3RlDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Krauss,+J.,+Prottsman,+K.+(2017).+Computational+Thinking+and+Coding+for+Every+Student.+The+Teacher’s+Get-+ting-Started+Guide.+Corwin+Press+Inc.&ots=BsBk3aYseX&sig=2XSjfONNVeug15H0J1e Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., Malyn-Smith, J., & Werner, L. (2011). Computational thinking for youth in practice. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929902 Lerís, M. D., & Sein-Echaluce, M. L. (2011). La personalización del aprendizaje: un objetivo del paradigma educativo centrado en el aprendizaje. Arbor: Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, 187(3), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2011.Extra-3n3135 Lesh, R., & Zawojeuski, J. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–804).

  Leung, H. Y.-H. (2021). Integrating computational thinking into mathematics education. In et al. M. Chang (Ed.), Doctoral student forum proceedings of the 25th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education (GCCCE 2021) (pp. 7–12).

  Lewis, C. M. (2010). How programming environment shapes perception, learning and goals: Logo vs. Scratch. SIGCSE’10 - Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 346–350. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734383 Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020). On Computational Thinking and STEM Education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00044-w Lie, J., Hauge, I., & Meaney, T. (2017). Computer Programming in the Lower Secondary Classroom: Mathematics Learning. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/911 Lindh, J., & Holgersson, T. (2007). Does lego training stimulate pupils’ ability to solve logical problems? Computers and Education, 49(4), 1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.008 López Rupérez, F. (2022). El enfoque del currículo por competencias. Un análisis de la LOMLOE. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 80(281), 55–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22550/REP80-1-2022-05 Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., & Eastmond, E. (2010). The Scratch programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 10(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868358.1868363 Mannila, L., Dagiene, V., Demo, B., Grgurina, N., Mirolo, C., Rolandsson, L., & Settle, A. (2014). Computational thinking in K-9 education. ITiCSE-WGR 2014 - Working Group Reports of the 2014 Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference, January 2016, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2713609.2713610 Mantilla, R., & Negre, F. (2021). Pensamiento computacional, una estrategia educativa en épocas de pandemia. 7(1), 89–106.

  Martínez, M., Castellanos López, M. Á., & Chacón López, J. C. (2014). Métodos de investigación en psicología. Madrid: EOS Universitaria.

  Martínez, R. (2007). La investigación en la práctica educativa: Guía metodológica de investigación para el diagnóstico y evaluación en los centros docentes. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.

  Mayer, R., & Wittrock, M. (2006). Problem solving, Handbook Of Educational Psychology (P. A. & P. H. W. Alexander (ed.); pp. 287–303). Routledge.

  Mayoral, S., Roca Tena, M., TimonedaGallart, C., & Serra Sala, M. (2015). Enhancing cognitive planning in first-year secondary education students. Aula Abierta, 43(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aula.2014.10.001 McComas, W. F. (2013). The Language of Science Education: an Expanded Glossary of Key Terms and Con- cepts in Science Teaching and Learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

  MECD. (2018). Programación, robótica y pensamiento computacional en España. https://code.intef.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Pensamiento-Computacional-Fase-1-Informe-sobre-la-situación-en-España.pdf Meseguer, P., Moreno, J., Moreno, J. J., Olcoz, K., Pimentel, E., Toro, M., Velázquez, Á., & Vendrell, E. (2015). Enseñanza de la informática en primaria, secundaria y bachillerato: estado español. https://docplayer.es/12338899-Ensenanza-de-la-informatica-en-primaria-secundaria-y-bachillerato-estado-espanol-2015.html Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. (2019). Escuela de Pensamiento Computacional. https://intef.es/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Impacto_EscueladePensamientoComputacional_Curso2018-2019.pdf Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. (2022a). Real Decreto 157 / 2022 , de 1 de marzo , por el que se establecen la ordenación y las enseñanzas mínimas de la Educación Primaria . (pp. 1–109).

  Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. (2022b). Real Decreto 217/2022, de 29 de marzo, por el que se establece la ordenación y las enseñanzas mínimas de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria (pp. 41571–41789).

  Mitchell, M. (1992). Situational Interest: Its Multifaceted Structure in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436.

  Mladenović, M., Krpan, D., & Mladenovi, S. (2017). Learning programming from scratch. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2017(November Special Issue INTE), 419–427.

  Molina, A., Adamuz, N., & Bracho, R. (2020). La resolución de problemas basada en el método de Polya usando el pensamiento computacional y Scratch con estudiantes de Educación Secundaria. Aula Abierta, 5(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.49.1.2020.83-90 Montgomery, D. C. (1991). Design and Analysis of Experiments (I. John Wiley & Sons (ed.)). https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1854431 Moreno-Leon, J., & Robles, G. (2016). Code to learn with Scratch? A systematic literature review. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 10–13, 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474546 Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2015). The Europe Code Week ( CodeEU ) initiative. 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), March, 554–559.

  Moreno-León, J., Robles, G., & Román-González, M. (2016). Code to Learn: Where Does It Belong in the K-12 Curriculum? Jite.Org, 15, 283–303. http://jite.org/documents/Vol15/JITEv15ResearchP283-303Moreno2233.pdf Moreno-León, J., Robles, G., & Román-González, M. (2017). Towards Data-Driven Learning Paths to Develop Computational Thinking with Scratch. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 8(1), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2017.2734818 Moreno-León, J., Robles, G., Román, M., & Rodríguez, J. D. (2019). Not the same: a text network analysis on computational thinking definitions to study its relationship with computer programming. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación En Tecnología Educativa, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.397151 Moreno-Morilla, C., Guzmán-Simón, F., & García-Jiménez, E. (2021). Digital and information literacy inside and outside Spanish primary education schools. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, 100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100455 Morse, J. M., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed Method Design: Principles and Procedures. Left Coast Press, Inc.

  National Research Council. (2002). Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology (National academy press (ed.)). National Academy of Engineering, Committee on Technological Literacy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/10250 National Research Council. (2004). Computer Science: reflecions on fields, reflections on the field (Committee on the Fundamentals of Computer Science:Challenges and Opportunities (ed.)). The National Academy Press.

  National Research Council. (2010). Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/12840 Nelson, J. (2009). Celebrating Scratch in Libraries. Creation software helps young people develop 21st-century literacy skills. School Library Journal, 20–21.

  Niss, M. (2002). Mathematical Competencies and the Learning of Mathematics : the Danish Kom Project. In Proceedings of the 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education.

  Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., & Adamchuk, V. (2009). The use of digital manipulatives in K-12: Robotics, GPS/GIS and programming. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350828 Obaya, A. (2003). El construccionismo y sus repercusiones en el aprendizaje asistido por computadora. ContactoS, 48, 61–64.

  Olabe, J. C., Olabe, M. A., Basogain, X., Maiz, I., & Castaño, C. (2011). Programming and Robotics with Scratch in Primary Education. Education in a Technological World: Communicating Current and Emerging Research and Technological Efforts, July 2016, 356–363.

  Onrubia, J. (2016). Aprender y enseñar en entornos virtuales: actividad conjunta, ayuda pedagógica y construcción del conocimiento. RED: Revista de Educación a Distancia, 50(3), 1–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red/50/3 Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. . (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 474–498.

  Ortega-Ruipérez, B., & Asensio, M. (2021). Evaluar el Pensamiento Computacional mediante Resolución de Problemas: Validación de un Instrumento de Evaluación. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 14(1), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2021.14.1.009 Ortega, B. (2017). PENSAMIENTO COMPUTACIONAL Y RESOLUCIÓN DE PROBLEMAS. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

  Orton, K., Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Jona, K., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Bringing computational thinking into high school mathematics and science classrooms. Transforming Learning, Empowering Learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), 705–712. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051 Ouahbi, I., Kaddari, F., Darhmaoui, H., Elachqar, A., & Lahmine, S. (2015). Learning Basic Programming Concepts by Creating Games with Scratch Programming Environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1479–1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.224 Palts, T., & Pedaste, M. (2020). A model for developing computational thinking skills. Informatics in Education, 19(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.15388/INFEDU.2020.06 Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., Orfanakis, V., & Zaranis, N. (2014). Novice programming environments. Scratch & app inventor: A first comparison. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 09-June-20, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/2643604.2643613 Papert, S. (1972). Teaching Children Thinking. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 9(5), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800720090503 Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas (Second Edi). Basic Books.

  Papert, S. (1996). An exploration in the Space of Mathematics Education. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 95–123.

  Papert, S. (1999). What is Logo and who needs it? In Logo philosophy and implementation. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0114-8 Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991a). Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 36, 1–14. http://namodemello.com.br/pdf/tendencias/situatingconstrutivism.pdf Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991b). Situating Constructionism. Constructionism, 1–12.

  Parsons, D., & Haden, P. (2007). Programming osmosis: Knowledge transfer from imperative to visual programming environments. Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications, May, 209–215. http://www.citrenz.ac.nz/conferences/2007/209.pdf Pérez-Escoda, A., García-Ruiz, R., & Aguaded, I. (2019). Dimensions of digital literacy based on five models of development. Cultura y Educación, 31(2), 232–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1603274 Phillips, R. S., & Brooks, B. P. (2014). The Hour of Code: Impact on Attitudes Towards and Self-Efficacy with Computer Science. Code, 66(4), 0–6. https://code.org/files/HourOfCodeImpactStudy_Jan2017.pdf Podestá, P. (2011). Geometría (1a Edición). Ministerio de Educación de la Nación. http://bibliotecadigital.educ.ar/uploads/contents/M-Geometria0.pdf Polly, D. (2015). Elementary Education Pre-service Teachers’ Development of Mathematics Technology Integration Skills in a Technology Integration Course. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 34(4), 431–453. http://www.learntechlib.org/p/149774/ Polya, G. (1945). How To Solve It (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press, Doubleday Anchor Books.

  Pomper, M. A. (1990). LOGO in Practice. Journal of Visual Literacy, 10(2), 84–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.1990.11674456 Pozo, J. (2000). Aprendices y maestros (A. Editorial (ed.); Primera ed). Alianza Editorial.

  Prat, C. S., Madhyastha, T. M., Mottarella, M. J., & Kuo, C. H. (2020). Relating Natural Language Aptitude to Individual Differences in Learning Programming Languages. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60661-8 Prendes Espinosa, M. P., & Cerdán Cartagena, F. (2020). Tecnologías avanzadas para afrontar el reto de la innovación educativa. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.28415 Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. From On the Horizon. MCB University Press, 9(5), 1–6.

  Prensky, M. (2008). Programming Is the New Literacy. https://www.edutopia.org/literacy-computer-programming Recio, T. (2002). Situación de la Enseñanza de las Matemáticas en la Educación Secundaria Española.

  Redecker, C. (2017). Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu) (P. Yves (ed.)). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC107466 Reig, D., & Vílchez, L. (2015). Los jóvenes en la era de la hiperconectividad: tendencias, claves y miradas. Revista Fuentes, 17, 145–147. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2015.i17.08 Resnick, M. (2007). Sowing the Seeds for a more Creative Society. Learning & Leading with Technology, 35(4), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.2167142 Resnick, M. (2013). Learn to code, code to learn. EdSurge, Mayo. http://web.media.mit.edu/~mres/papers/L2CC2L-handout.pdf Resnick, M., Kafai, Y., & Maeda, J. (2003). A Networked, Media-Rich Programming Environment to Enhance Technological Fluency at After-School Centers in Economically-Disadvantaged Communities. Proposal to the National Science Foundation, 1–14. http://web.media.mit.edu/~mres/papers/scratch-proposal.pdf Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programing for all. Comunication of the ACM, 52(11), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779 Riina, V., Yves, P., Gómez, S. C., & Brade, G. Van den. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: the Conceptual Reference Model. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/digcomp-20-digital-competence-framework-citizens-update-phase-1-conceptual-reference-model Rodríguez-Martínez, J. A., González-Calero, J. A., & Sáez-López, J. M. (2020). Computational thinking and mathematics using Scratch: an experiment with sixth-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448 Román-González, M. (2015). Computational Thinking Test: Design Guidelines and Content Validation. Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN 2015), January, 2436–2444. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4203.4329 Román-González, M. (2016). Codigoalfabetización y pensamiento computacional en educación primaria y secundaria: validación de un instrumento y evaluación de programas [UNED]. http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/view/tesisuned:Educacion-Mroman Román-González, M., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2017). Complementary Tools for Computational Thinking Assessment. Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education (CTE 2017), 154–159. http://www.eduhk.hk/cte2017/doc/CTE2017 Proceedings.pdf Romero-Frías, E., y Magro, C. (2016). La emancipación intelectual en la sociedad digital: El maestro ignorante de Rancière en nuestros días. Revista Letral, 16, 89–105. https://goo.gl/K7wkTg Ross, E. W., & Gautreaux, M. (2018). Pensando de Manera Crítica sobre el Pensamiento Crítico. Aula Abierta, 47(4), 383. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.47.4.2018.383-386 Roy, S., & Roth, D. (2015). Solving general arithmetic word problems. Conference Proceedings - EMNLP 2015: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1743–1752. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d15-1202 Rushkoff, D. (2012). Code Literacy: A 21st-Century Requirement. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/code-literacy-21st-century-requirement-douglas-rushkoff Sáez-López, J. M., Román-González, M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using “scratch” in five schools. Computers and Education, 97, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003 Santos-Trigo, M. (2014). Problem solving in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 496–501). NY: Springer.

  Savolainen, R. (2002). Network competence and information seeking on the Internet: From definitions towards a social cognitive model. Journal of Documentation, 58(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410210425467 Saygin, C., Yuen, T. T., Yuen, T., Shipley, H., Wan, H., & Akopian, D. (2012). Design , Development , and Implementation of Educational Robotics Activities for K - 12 Students. Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. http://engineering.utsa.

  Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. Orlando Academic Press.

  Schoenfeld, A. H. (2012). How we think: A theory of human decision making, with a focus on teaching. In C. S. (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 229–243). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_16 Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Business. https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=ST_FDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Schwab,+K.+(2017).+The+fourth+industrial+revolution.+Crown+Business.&ots=DUgDbNwDXQ&sig=8vcO-y1XDJekCcbhdrkhVmR6r6E#v=onepage&q&f=false Selby, C. (2013). Computational Thinking : The Developing Definition. ITiCSE Conference 2013, 5–8.

  Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native: myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 6(4), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910973776 Selwyn, N. (2013). Educational in a digital world. Global Perspectives on Technology and Education. Routledge. https://content.taylorfrancis.com/books/download?dac=C2011-0-08345-5&isbn=9781136264788&format=googlePreviewPdf Sheil, B. A. (1980). Teaching procedural literacy. Proceedings of the ACM 1980 Annual Conference, ACM 1980, 125–126. https://doi.org/10.1145/800176.809944 Sinclair, N., & Bruce, C. D. (2015). New opportunities in geometry education at the primary school. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0693-4 Sneider, C., Stephenson, C., Schafer, B., & Flick, L. (2014). Teacher’s Toolkit: Exploring the Science Framework and NGSS: Computational Thinking in the Science Classroom. Science Scope, 038(03), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/ss14_038_03_10 Song, J. (2017). Effects of Learning through Scratch-Based Game Programming on Students’ Interest in and Perceived Value of Mathematics Curriculum. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.2.199 Stoitsov, G., & Stoitsova, G. (2019). Increasing the Motivation of Primary School Pupils Through the Use of Ict in the Educational Process. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 7(2), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i2.2019.1025 Suárez Zapata, A., García Costa, D., Martínez Delgado, P. A., & Martos Torres, J. (2018). Contribución de la robótica educativa en la adquisición de conocimientos de matemáticas en la Educación Primaria. Magister, 30(1), 43–54. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/6722243.pdf Sung, W., Ahn, J., & Black, J. B. (2017). Introducing Computational Thinking to Young Learners: Practicing Computational Perspectives Through Embodiment in Mathematics Education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9328-x Sysło, M. M., & Kwiatkowska, A. B. (2014). Learning Mathematics Supported By Computational Thinking. In Constructionism and Creativity (pp. 258–268). G. Futschek, G., Kynigos, C.

  Tang, X., Yin, Y., Lin, Q., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers and Education, 148(April), 103798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103798 Taylor, M., Harlow, A., & Forret, M. (2010). Using a Computer Programming Environment and an Interactive Whiteboard to Investigate Some Mathematical Thinking. 8, 561–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.078 Tedre, M., & Denning, P. J. (2016). The long quest for computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (pp. 120–129). Koli Calling ’16, New York. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2999541.2999542 Téliz, F. (2015). Uso didáctico de las TIC en las buenas prácticas de enseñanza de las matemáticas. Estudio de las opiniones y concepciones de docentes de Educación Secundaria en el departamento de Artigas. Cuadernos de Investigación Educativa, 6(2). http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?pid=S1688-93042015000200002&script=sci_arttext#Pozo_t Tsur, M. (2017). Scratch Microworlds : introducing novices to scratch using an interest-based, open-ended, scaffolded experience [Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/112561 Utreras, E., & Pontelli, E. (2020). Accessibility of block-based introductory programming languages and a tangible programming tool prototype. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 12376 LNCS. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58796-3_4 Vaca Cárdenas, L. A., Tavernise, A., Bertacchini, F., Gabriele, L., Valenti, A., Pantano, P., & Bilotta, E. (2016). An Educational Coding Laboratory for Elementary Pre-service Teachers: A Qualitative Approach. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 6(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v6i1.5364 Vaikutytė-Paškauskė, Justina Vaičiukynaitė, J., & Donatas, P. (2018). Research for CULT Committee - Digital Skills in the 21st century. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/e tudes/STUD/2018/617486/IPOL_STU(2018)617486_EN.pdf Valles, M. (2002). Entrevistas cualitativas. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

  Van Djick, J. (2016). La cultura de la conectividad. Siglo XXI. http://catedradatos.com.ar/media/La-cultura-de-la-conectividad_-Jose-Van-Dijck.pdf Verd Pericás, J., & Lozares Colina, C. (2016). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Síntesis.

  Vidal-Silva, C., Jiménez, C., Yupanqui, M. T., Sepúlveda, S., & Madariaga, E. (2020). Development of algorithmic and mathematical-logic competences of children in Chile with scratch. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 381–385.

  Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5 Wilson, C. (2015). Hour of code - A record year for computer science. ACM Inroads, 6(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723168 Wing, J. (2006). Computational Thinking. Comunication of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.

  Wing, J. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118 Wing, J. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking - What and why? The Link Magazine, Spring(6), 20–23.

  Wing, J. (2014). Computational Thinking Benefits Society. 40th Anniversary Blog of Social Issues in Computing, 2014. http://socialissues.cs.toronto.edu/index.html%3Fp=279.html Wolfram, S. (2016). How to Teach Computational Thinking. Stephen Wolfran Writings Blog. https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2016/09/how-to-teach-computational-thinking/ Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014a). Computational Thinking in Elementary and Secondary Teacher Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872 Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014b). Computational Thinking in Elementary and Secondary Teacher Education. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., 14(1).

  Yadav, A., Stephenson, C., & Hong, H. (2017). Computational thinking for teacher education. Communications of the ACM, 60(4), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994591 Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2011). Introducing computational thinking in education courses. SIGCSE’11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953297 Yelland, N. (1995). Mindstorms or a storm in a teacup? A review of research with Logo. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 26(6), 853–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739950260607