The present thesis incorporates the CAD model into an adjoint-based optimization loop and uses it for the shape optimization of a 2D transonic turbine blade mid-section (profile). This is demonstrated by performing a single and multipoint optimization of the LS89 turbine, originally designed at the VKI. Substantial aerodynamic improvements are reported for both design point and off-design conditions.The case is deeply analysed from the flow analysis point of view. The present thesis is a step forward in three main aspects. First, the way the CAD model (for turbomachinery applications) is used within the shape optimization loop.To include the CAD model into the optimization loop, the CAD kernel and the grid generator (multiblock structured) are differentiated using the Algorithmic Differentiation (AD) tool ADOL-C. The advantage of including the CAD model in the design system is that assembly or manufacturing constraints can be imposed on the shape, allowing the optimized model or component to be manufactured. Second, a new definition of the parametric effectiveness indicator is proposed, based on the ability of a set of CAD-based design variables to produce a shape change using the adjoint sensitivities. An interesting thing is that parametric effectiveness considers the design variables can be non-orthogonal to each other and it can be applied to any type of constrained or unconstrained problems. If, in the beginning of the optimization, the parametric effectiveness is high, it is expected to reach a final solution with increased performance. Third, a new adaptive shape parameterization strategy is adopted, which is assisted by the above parametric effectiveness indicator in order to explore the design space more efficiently. The parametric effectiveness, which rates the quality of a CAD based parameterization for optimization, is used in a novel multilevel shape refinement procedure to: (1) introduce the minimum amount of design variables required to modify the shape in the direction the adjoint sensitivities dictate; (2) to create the best parameterization to be used during the optimization. By using the proposed methods and tools, not only the optimal geometry is defined by the CAD, which is the industry adopted standard for the design of components, but also, the designer avoids the use of either too few (slow improvements from cycle to cycle) or too many (increase the computational burden) design variables. The proposed methodology results to be an effective strategy to explore rich design spaces, to improve convergence rate, robustness and final solution of the adjoint-based optimization.
© 2008-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados