Human lumbar spine biomechanics: study of pathologies and design of new surgical procedures

Andrea Calvo

Ayuda

Human lumbar spine biomechanics: study of pathologies and design of new surgical procedures

Autores: Andrea Calvo
Directores de la Tesis: Amaya Pérez del Palomar Aldea (dir. tes.)
Lectura: En la Universidad de Zaragoza ( España ) en 2018
Idioma: español
Tribunal Calificador de la Tesis: Salvador Ivorra Chorro (presid.) , José Cegoñino Banzo (secret.) , Vincenzo Moramarco (voc.)
Enlaces
- Tesis en acceso abierto en: Zaguán
Resumen
- This thesis aims to shed light on the process that undergoes the lumbar spine as a result of intervertebral disc degeneration and different lumbar surgeries, paying special attention on the main risk factors and how to overcome them.
  
  Low back pain is the leading musculoskeletal disorder in all developed countries generating high medical related costs. Intervertebral disc degeneration is one of the most common causes of low back pain. When conservative treatments fail to relieve this pain, lumbar surgery is needed and, in this regard, lumbar fusion is the \textquotedblleft gold standard\textquotedblright technique to provide stability and neural decompression.
  
  Degenerative disc disease has been studied through two different approaches. An in-vivo animal model was reproduced and followed-up with MRI and mechanical testing to see how the water content decreased while the stiffness of the tissue increased. Then, degeneration was induced in a single disc of the human lumbar spine and the effects on the adjacent disc were investigated by the use of the finite element models.
  
  Further on, different procedures for segmental fusion were computationally simulated. A comparison among different intersomatic cage designs, supplemented with posterior screw fixation or placed in a stand-alone fashion, showed how the supplementary fixation drastically decreased the motion in the affected segment increasing the risk of adjacent segment disease more than a single placed cage. However, one of the main concerns regarding the use of cages without additional fixation is the subsidence of the device into the vertebral bone. A parametric study of the cage features and placement pointed to the width, curvature, and position as the most influential parameters for stability and subsidence.
  
  Finally, two different algorithms for tissue healing were implemented and applied for the first time to predict lumbar fusion in 3D models. The self-repairing ability of the bone was tested after simple nucleotomy and after instrumentation with internal fixation, anterior plate or stand-alone intersomatic cage predicting, in agreement with previous animal and clinical studies, that instrumentation may be not necessary to promote segmental fusion. In particular, the intervertebral disc height was seen to play an important role in the bone bridge or osteophyte formation.
  
  To summarize, this thesis has focused in the main controversial issues of intervertebral disc degeneration and lumbar fusion, such as degenerative process, adjacent segment disease, segment stability, cage subsidence or bone bridging. All the models described in this thesis could serve as a powerful tool for the pre-clinical evaluation of patient-specific surgical outcomes supporting clinician decisions.
  
  REFERENCIAS M A Adams, D S McNally, and P Dolan. ’Stress’ distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. The Journal of bone and joint surgery., 78(6):965–972, 1996.
  
  Mauro Alini, Stephen M. Eisenstein, Keita Ito, Christopher Little, A. Annette Kettler, Koichi Masuda, James Melrose, Jim Ralphs, Ian Stokes, and Hans Joachim Wilke. Are animal models useful for studying human disc disorders/degeneration? European Spine Journal, 17(1):2–19, 2008.
  
  Jérôme Allain, Joël Delecrin, Jacques Beaurain, Alexandre Poignard, Thierry Vila, and Charles Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette. Stand-alone ALIF with integrated intracorporeal anchoring plates in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disc disease: a prospective study on 65 cases. European Spine Journal, 23(10):2136–2143, 2014.
  
  A. Andreykiv, F. Van Keulen, and P. J. Prendergast. Simulation of fracture healing incorporating mechanoregulation of tissue differentiation and dispersal/proliferation of cells. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 7(6):443–461, 2008.
  
  M. Argoubi and A. Shirazi-Adl. Poroelastic creep response analysis of a lumbar motion segment in compression. Journal of Biomechanics, 29(10):1331–1339,1996.
  
  Luciano Bances. Interbody cage without instrumentation for the treatment of lumbar disc hernia. PhD thesis, University of Zaragoza, 2016.
  
  Maxim Bashkuev, Sara Checa, Sergio Postigo, Georg Duda, and Hendrik Schmidt. Computational analyses of different intervertebral cages for lumbar spinal fusion. Journal of Biomechanics, 48(12):3274–3282, 2015.
  
  Gene Cheh, Keith H. Bridwell, Lawrence G. Lenke, Jacob Buchowski,Michael D. Daubs, Yongjung Kim, and Christy Baldus. Adjacent segment disease followinglumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: A minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 32(20):2253–2257, 2007.
  
  L. E. Claes and C. A. Heigele. Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. Journal of Biomechanics, 32(3):255–266, 1999.
  
  Alfonso Fantigrossi, Fabio Galbusera, Manuela Teresa Raimondi, Marco Sassi, and Maurizio Fornari. Biomechanical analysis of cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Medical engineering & physics, 29(1):101–9, 2007.
  
  Fabio Galbusera, Hendrik Schmidt, and Hans-Joachim Joachim Wilke. Lumbar interbody fusion: A parametric investigation of a novel cage design with and without posterior instrumentation. European Spine Journal, 21(3):455–462, 2012.
  
  G. A. Holzapfel, C. A J Schulze-Bauer, G. Feigl, and P. Regitnig. Single lamellar mechanics of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 3(3):125–140, 2005.
  
  R Huiskes, H. Weinans, H.J. Grootenboer, M. Dalstra, B. Fudala, and T.J. Slooff. Adaptative bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 20(11):1130–1150, 1987.
  
  Kei Miyamoto, Koichi Masuda, Jesse G. Kim, Nozomu Inoue, Koji Akeda, G. B J Andersson, and Howard S. An. Intradiscal injections of osteogenic protein-1 restore the viscoelastic properties of degenerated intervertebral discs. Spine Journal, 6(6):692–703, 2006.
  
  MM Panjabi. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. Journal of Spinal Disorders, 5(4):390–397, 1992.
  
  Hendrik Schmidt, Maxim Bashkuev, Fabio Galbusera, Hans-Joachim Wilke, and Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl. Finite element study of human lumbar disc nucleus replacements. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering, 17(16):1762–76, 2014.
  
  Shirazi-Adl, A.M. A., Ahmed, and S.C. Shrivastava. Mechanical response of a lumbar motion segment in axial torque alone and combined with compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 11(9):914–927, 1986.
  
  Nam Vo, Laura J. Niedernhofer, Luigi Aurelio Nasto, Lloydine Jacobs, Paul D. Robbins, James Kang, and Christopher H. Evans. An overview of underlying causes and animal models for the study of age-related degenerative disorders of the spine and synovial joints. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 31(6):831–837, 2013.