Desarrollo del pensamiento computacional en cinemática del sólido rígido

• Beatriz Sánchez Tabuenca ^[1] ; Sergio Serrano Pastor ^[1] ; Jorge A. Jover Galtier ^[1] ; María Benita Murillo Esteban ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Zaragoza

     Universidad de Zaragoza

     Zaragoza, España

     
• Localización: Educación y conocimiento como ejes del pensamiento crítico: Experiencias innovadoras y significativas / coord. por Mariana González Boluda, Yanira Mesalina Ramírez Cruz, Carolina Lorenzo Álvarez, 2024, ISBN 978-84-1079-028-5, págs. 393-404
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto Completo Libro (pdf)
• Resumen

  • The updating of teaching with computational tools is crucial to meet the growing digital demand of the industry. In the subject of Mechanics within the Industrial Technology Engineering degree, students learn to develop mathematical models of the kinematics of mechanical systems. However, understanding the fundamental concepts and visualising motion from the obtained equations is not intuitive. To overcome this limitation and bridge theory with practical engineering applications, an active and collaborative experience is implemented. This experience involves simulating the motionof a windshield wiper from two perspectives: specific computer-aided design software and a computer algebra system to solve the posed mathematical model, applying knowledge from previous numerical methods courses. The goal is for students to acquire a systematic simulation approach involving conceptualization, decomposition, problem-solving, and interpretation, which can be adapted to other cases. Evaluation through individual surveys indicates that this work promotes cooperation and motivation byconnecting theory with practice, as well as enhancing motion visualisation. The rubric used to assess the students’ projects identified opportunities for improvement, particularly in using mathematical prior knowledge to solve the kinematic equations and in the interpretation of results

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Angelique, H., Kyle, K., y Taylor, E. (2002). Mentors and muses: New strategies for academic success. Journal of College Student Retention:...
  • Babbie, E. (2016). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40
  • Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., y Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Wiley.
  • EDUCAUSE. (2023). 2023 higher education trend watch. Recuperado de https://www.educause.edu/
  • Fukuzawa, S., Boyd, C., y Cahn, J. (2017). Student motivation in response to problem-based learning. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching,...
  • Hanover Research. (2023). 2023 trends in higher education. Recuperado de https://www.hanoverresearch.com/
  • InsideTrack. (2023). Reimagining higher education: 2023 trends and innovations. Recuperado de https://www.insidetrack.org/
  • Jonsson, A., y Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review,...
  • Kioupi, V., y Voulvoulis, N. (2019). Education for sustainable development: A systemic framework for connecting the SDGs to educational outcomes....
  • OECD. (2009). Assessment and innovation in education. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 24. https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019
  • Terrion, J. L., y Leonard, D. (2007). A taxonomy of the characteristics of student peer mentors in higher education: Findings from a literature...
  • Topping, K. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
  • United Nations. (2023). The sustainable development goals report 2023. Recuperado de https://unstats.un.org/
  • Wiley. (2023). Higher ed’s next chapter, 2023-2024: Four trends shaping the learning landsca- pe. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/y73p6