Ir al contenido

Documat


How are feelings of difficulty and familiarity linked to learning behaviors and gains in a complex science learning task?

  • Yingbin Zhang [3] ; Luc Paquette [3] ; Ryan S. Baker [1] ; Nigel Bosch [3] ; Jaclyn Ocumpaugh [1] ; Gautam Biswas [2] Árbol académico
    1. [1] University of Pennsylvania

      University of Pennsylvania

      City of Philadelphia, Estados Unidos

    2. [2] Vanderbilt University

      Vanderbilt University

      Estados Unidos

    3. [3] University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Localización: European journal of psychology of education, ISSN-e 1878-5174, ISSN 0256-2928, Vol. 38, Nº 2, 2023, págs. 777-800
  • Idioma: inglés
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10212-022-00616-x
  • Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
  • Resumen
    • The feelings of difficulty and familiarity (FOD and FOF) are two types of metacognitive experiences. Both may influence student engagement and the application of metacognitive strategies, but these relationships are not well understood, in part because many studies have relied on self-report measures of behaviors that may not accurately reflect students’ actual behaviors. In this study, FOD and FOF were related to objective measures of off-task behaviors and metacognitive strategies. These measures were extracted from 88 sixth graders’ action logs within a computer-based learning environment known as Betty’s Brain. Pre- and post-tests were administered to assess learning. Results reveal that high-FOD students showed more off-task behaviors and fewer strategic behaviors than low-FOD students, particularly when this difference was measured in terms of the frequency (as opposed to proportion) of strategic behaviors. FOF was not associated with off-task behaviors and metacognitive strategies but emerged as a moderator in the relationship between FOD and learning gains. Low-FOD students learned more than high-FOD students in the low-FOF group, but such a difference was not found in the high-FOF group.

  • Referencias bibliográficas
    • Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear...
    • Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning....
    • Ayres, P. (2006). Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems. Learning and Instruction, 16(5),...
    • Azevedo, R. (2015). Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues....
    • Azevedo R., Aleven V. (2013) Metacognition and learning technologies: An overview of current interdisciplinary research. In Azevedo R. &...
    • Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal...
    • Azevedo, R., Harley, J., Trevors, G., Duffy, M., Feyzi-Behnagh, R., Bouchet, F., & Landis, R. (2013). Using trace data to examine the...
    • Beckmann, J. F., & Goode, N. (2014). The benefit of being naïve and knowing it: The unfavourable impact of perceived context familiarity...
    • Biswas, G., Segedy, J. R., & Bunchongchit, K. (2016). From design to implementation to practice a learning by teaching system: Betty’s...
    • Borgers, N., Sikkel, D., & Hox, J. (2004). Response effects in surveys on children and adolescents: The effect of number of response options,...
    • Brunner, E., & Puri, M. L. (2001). Non-parametric methods in factorial designs. Statistical Papers, 42(1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003620000039
    • Ching-En, C. (2018). Metacognitive experience modeling using eye-tracking. In Penstein Rosé C. et al. (Eds), Artificial Intelligence in Education....
    • Craig, K., Hale, D., Grainger, C., & Stewart, M. E. (2020). Evaluating metacognitive self-reports: Systematic reviews of the value of...
    • D'Angelo, C., Rutstein, D., Harris, C., Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., ... Haertel, G. (2014). Simulations for STEM learning: Systematic...
    • Dent, A. L., & Koenka, A. C. (2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence:...
    • Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th...
    • Dindar, M., Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2020). Interplay of metacognitive experiences and performance in collaborative problem solving....
    • Efklides, A. (2002). Feelings and judgments as subjective evaluations of cognitive processing: How reliable are they? Psychology: The Journal...
    • Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research...
    • Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European...
    • Efklides, A. (2009). The role of metacognitive experiences in the learning process. Psicothema, 21(1), 76–82.
    • Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist,...
    • Efklides, A. (2016). Metamemory and affect. In J. Dunlosky & S. U. K. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory. (pp. 245–267)....
    • Efklides, A., Kourkoulou, A., Mitsiou, F., & Ziliaskopoulou, D. (2006). Metacognitive knowledge of effort, personality factors, and mood...
    • Efklides, A., Papadaki, M., Papantoniou, G., & Kiosseoglou, G. (1998). Individual differences in feelings of difficulty: The case of school...
    • Efklides, A., Samara, A., & Petropoulou, M. (1999). Feeling of difficulty: An aspect of monitoring that influences control. European Journal...
    • Efklides, A., & Tsiora, A. (2002). Metacognitive experiences, self-concept, and self-regulation. Psychologia, 45(4), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2002.222
    • Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3),...
    • Feldon, D. F., Callan, G., Juth, S., & Jeong, S. (2019). Cognitive load as motivational cost. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 319–337....
    • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE.
    • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10),...
    • Fulmer, S. M., & Tulis, M. (2013). Changes in interest and affect during a difficult reading task: Relationships with perceived difficulty...
    • Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Maitner, A. T., & Claypool, H. M. (2016). Moderation of the familiarity-stereotyping effect: The role...
    • Garcia-Marques, T., & Mackie, D. M. (2001). The feeling of familiarity as a regulator of persuasive processing. Social Cognition, 19(1),...
    • KE Godwin H Seltman M Almeda M Davis Skerbetz S Kai RS Baker AV Fisher 2021 The elusive relationship between time on-task and learning: Not...
    • Gunthert, K. C., & Wenze, S. J. (2012). Daily diary methods. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for...
    • Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L., & Ho, A. N. (2013). Modeling the relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement...
    • Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2009). Liking what’s familiar: The importance of unconscious familiarity in the mere-exposure effect. Social...
    • Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers...
    • Kinoshita, S. (1997). Masked target priming effects on feeling-of-knowing and feeling-of-familiarity judgments. Acta Psychologica, 97(2),...
    • Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers...
    • Liu, C., Liu, J., Cole, M., Belkin, N. J., & Zhang, X. (2012). Task difficulty and domain knowledge effects on information search behaviors....
    • Lupo, S. M., Strong, J. Z., & Conradi Smith, K. (2019). Struggle is not a bad word: Misconceptions and recommendations about readers struggling...
    • Mair, P., & Wilcox, R. (2020). Robust statistical methods in R using the WRS2 package. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 464–488. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01246-w
    • Malmberg, L., Lim, W. H., Tolvanen, A., & Nurmi, J. (2016). Within-students variability in learning experiences, and teachers’ perceptions...
    • Malmberg, L., Walls, T. A., Martin, A. J., Little, T. D., & Lim, W. H. (2013). Primary school students’ learning experiences of, and self-beliefs...
    • Meany Daboul, M. G., Roscoe, E. M., Bourret, J. C., & Ahearn, W. H. (2007). A comparison of momentary time sampling and partial-interval...
    • Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
    • Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x
    • Molenaar, I. (2014). Advances in temporal analysis in learning and instruction. Frontline Learning Research, 2(4), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i4.118
    • Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125–173....
    • Noguchi, K., Gel, Y. R., Brunner, E., & Konietschke, F. (2012). nparLD: An R software package for the non-parametric analysis of longitudinal...
    • Ohtani, K., & Hisasaka, T. (2018). Beyond intelligence: A meta-analytic review of the relationship among metacognition, intelligence,...
    • Patall, E. A., Hooper, S., Vasquez, A. C., Pituch, K. A., & Steingut, R. R. (2018). Science class is too hard: Perceived difficulty, disengagement,...
    • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies...
    • Qiu, X., & Lo, Y. Y. (2016). Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use. Language...
    • Reder, L. M., Paynter, C., Diana, R. A., Ngiam, J., & Dickison, D. (2007). Experience is a double-edged sword: A computational model of...
    • Reder, L. M., & Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer....
    • Rellinger, E., Borkowski, J. G., Turner, L. A., & Hale, C. A. (1995). Perceived task difficulty and intelligence: Determinants of strategy...
    • Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students’ prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding...
    • Rovers, S. F. E., Clarebout, G., Savelberg, H. H. C. M., de Bruin, A. B. H., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2019). Granularity matters:...
    • Schmeck, A., Opfermann, M., van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Leutner, D. (2015). Measuring cognitive load with subjective rating scales during...
    • Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (1992). Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments. Journal of...
    • Segedy, J. R. (2014). Adaptive Scaffolds in Open-Ended Computer-Based Learning Environments (Order No. 3674132). [Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt...
    • Segedy, J. R., Kinnebrew, J. S., & Biswas, G. (2015). Using coherence analysis to characterize self-regulated learning behaviours in open-ended...
    • Sockalingam, N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2013). Does the extent of problem familiarity influence students’ learning in problem-based learning?...
    • Soemer, A., Idsardi, H. M., Minnaert, A., & Schiefele, U. (2019). Mind wandering and reading comprehension in secondary school children....
    • Soppe, M., Schmidt, H. G., & Bruysten, R. J. M. P. (2005). Influence of problem familiarity on learning in a problem-based course. Instructional...
    • Tansey, E. A., & Johnson, C. D. (2015). Recent advances in thermoregulation. Advances in Physiology Education, 39(3), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00126.2014
    • Tornare, E., Czajkowski, N. O., & Pons, F. (2015). Children’s emotions in math problem solving situations: Contributions of self-concept,...
    • Touroutoglou, A., & Efklides, A. (2010). Cognitive interruption as an object of metacognitive monitoring: Feeling of difficulty and surprise....
    • Tulis, M., & Fulmer, S. M. (2013). Students’ motivational and emotional experiences and their relationship to persistence during academic...
    • van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2008). Instructional efficiency: Revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educational Psychologist,...
    • Veenman, M. V. J., Elshout, J. J., & Meijer, J. (1997). The generality vs domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning...
    • Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(6), 1235–1253....
    • Whittlesea, B. W., & Williams, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don’t? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings...
    • Wilcox, R. R. (2011). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing (3rd ed). San Diego, CA: Academic press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804733-0.00014-7
    • Winn, W., Stahr, F., Sarason, C., Fruland, R., & Oppenheimer, P.,... Lee, Y. L. (2006). Learning oceanography from a computer simulation...
    • Yang, Z., Barnard-Brak, L., & Lan, W. Y. (2019). Examining the association of over-claiming with mathematics achievement. Learning and...
    • Zhang, N., Biswas, G., & Hutchins, N. (2021). Measuring and analyzing students’ strategic learning behaviors in open-ended learning environments....
    • Zhang, Y., Paquette, L., Baker, R. S., Ocumpaugh, J., Bosch, N., Munshi, A., & Biswas, G. (2020). The relationship between confusion and...

Fundación Dialnet

Mi Documat

Opciones de artículo

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno