Ir al contenido

Documat

Validez y fiabilidad del inventario polidiagnóstico para trastornos psicóticos OPCRIT 4.0 adaptado al español

  • Rafael Martínez-Leal [1] ; Maria Soriano [3] ; Luis Salvador-Carulla [2] ; Annabel Folch-Mas [4]
    1. [1] Universitat Rovira i Virgili

      Universitat Rovira i Virgili

      Tarragona, España

    2. [2] Australian National University

      Australian National University

      Australia

    3. [3] Unidad de Salud Mental, Hospital Universitario San Agustín. Linares, España
    4. [4] Intellectual Disability and Developmental Disorders Research Unit (UNIVIDD), Fundació Villablanca, Institut d´Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili (IISPV), Departament de Psicologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili. Reus, España/Centre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, ANU College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University. Canberra, Australia
    Mostrar afiliaciones +
  • Localización: Salud pública de México, ISSN-e 1606-7916, ISSN 0036-3634, Vol. 64, Nº. 4, 2022, págs. 406-414
  • Idioma: español
  • DOI: 10.21149/13470
  • Títulos paralelos:
    • Validity and reliability of the polydiagnostic inventoryfor psychotic disorders OPCRIT 4.0 adapted to Spanish
  • Enlaces
  • Resumen
    • español

      Objetivo. Adaptar y validar al español el Inventario de Criterios Operativos Diagnósticos (OPCRIT 4.0) para tras-tornos psicóticos. Se trata de una herramienta que permite diagnosticar a un paciente mediante las principales clasifica-ciones diagnósticas. Material y métodos. Se realizó la traducción y retrotraducción del inventario original en inglés al español y se comprobó la validez de criterio, la validez concurrente y la fiabilidad interevaluador del mismo, a partir de una muestra de 106 historias clínicas de usuarios adultos de un centro de salud mental comunitario. Resultados.Los datos obtenidos demostraron la validez y fiabilidad de la adaptación del OPCRIT 4.0 en la evaluación de la muestra de historias clínicas. Conclusiones. La adaptación y validación al español del instrumento OPCRIT 4.0 permite disponer de un sistema rápido, fiable y útil para obtener el diagnóstico del trastorno psicótico en un paciente a través de diferentes sistemas de clasificación.

    • English

      Objective. This study proposes the Spanish adaptation and validation of the operational criteria OPCRIT checklist for psychotic disorders 4.0. This instrument provides a diagno-sis based on several diagnostic systems. Materials and methods. The original inventory was translated into Span-ish and then back-translated into the original English language. We tested the criterion-validity, the concurrent validity and the inter-rater reliability from a sample of 106 clinical records of adult patients from a local community mental health center. Results. The data obtained demonstrated the validity and reliability of the OPCRIT 4.0 adaptation in the evaluation of the sample of medical records. Conclusions. The OPCRIT 4.0 Spanish adaptation and validation provides a fast, reliable, and useful system allows the diagnosis of psychotic disorders through different classification systems.

  • Referencias bibliográficas
    • Dennison CA, Legge SE, Pardiñas AF, Walters JTR. Genome-wide association studies in schizophrenia: Recent advances, challenges and future...
    • Forsyth JK, Asarnow RF. Genetics of Childhood-onset Schizophrenia 2019 Update. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2020;29:157-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2019.08.007
    • Seidman LJ, Mirsky AF. Evolving notions of schizophrenia as a developmental neurocognitive disorder. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017;23:881-92....
    • Al-Diwani AAJ, Pollak TA, Irani SR, Lennox BR. Psychosis: an autoimmune disease? Immunology. 2017;152:388-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12795
    • Kroken RA, Sommer IE, Steen VM, Dieset I, Johnsen E. Constructing the immune signature of schizophrenia for clinical use and research; an...
    • Van Kesteren CFMG, Gremmels H, De Witte LD, Hol EM, Van Gool AR, Falkai PG, et al. Immune involvement in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia:...
    • Radua J, Ramella-Cravaro V, Ioannidis JPA, Reichenberg A, Phiphopthatsanee N, Amir T, et al. What causes psychosis? An umbrella review of...
    • Dean B, Copolov D, Scarr E. Understanding the pathophysiology of schizophrenia: Contributions from the Melbourne Psychiatric Brain Bank. Schizophrenia...
    • Foley C, Corvin A, Nakagome S. Genetics of Schizophrenia: Ready to Translate? Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19:61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0807-5
    • Misiak B, Stramecki F, Gawęda Ł, Prochwicz K, Sąsiadek MM, Moustafa AA, Frydecka D. Interactions between variation in candidate genes and...
    • Zwicker A, Denovan-Wright EM, Uher R. Gene-environment interplay in the etiology of psychosis. Psychological Medicine. 2018;48:1925-36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329171700383X
    • Migdalska-Richards A, Mill J. Epigenetic studies of schizophrenia: current status and future directions. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2019;25:102-10....
    • Jablensky A. The diagnostic concept of schizophrenia: its history, evolution, and future prospects. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12:271-87.
    • Möller H. Is schizophrenia still one entity with similar symptomatic patterns, neurobiological characteristics, and treatment perspectives?...
    • Merritt J, Tanguturi Y, Fuchs C, Cundiff A. W. medical etiologies of secondary psychosis in children and adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr...
    • Kircher T, Wöhr M, Nenadic I, Schwarting R, Schratt G, Alferink J, et al. Neurobiology of the major psychoses: a translational perspective...
    • Tandon R, Gaebel W, Barch DM, Bustillo J, Gur RE, Heckers S, et al. Definition and description of schizophrenia in the DSM-5. Schizophrenia...
    • Maj M. Critique of the DSM-IV operational diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;172:458-60. https://doi.org/10.1192/BJP.172.6.458
    • Peralta V, Cuesta MJ. Clinical models of schizophrenia: a critical approach to competing conceptions. Psychopathology. 2000;33:252-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000029154
    • Kendler KS. Phenomenology of schizophrenia and the representativeness of modern diagnostic criteria. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:1082-92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1976
    • Peralta V, Goldberg X, Ribeiro M, Sanchez-Torres AM, Fañanás L, Cuesta MJ. Familiality of psychotic disorders: A polynosologic study in multiplex...
    • McGuffin P, Farmer A, Harvey I. A polydiagnostic application of operational criteria in studies of psychotic illness. Development and reliability...
    • Cardno AG, Jones LA, Murphy KC, Asherson P, Scott LC, Williams J, et al. Factor analysis of schizophrenic symptoms using the OPCRIT checklist....
    • Brittain PJ, Stahl D, Rucker J, Kawadler J, Schumann G. A review of the reliability and validity of OPCRIT in relation to its use for the...
    • Farmer AE, Jones I, Williams J, McGuffin P. Defining schizophrenia: Operational criteria. J Ment Health. 1993;2:209-22. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638239309003767
    • Oliveira L, Pereira A, Nogueira V, Soares MJ, Valente J, Dourado A, et al. Symptom dimensions of psychosis–opcrit factorial analysis of a...
    • Quattrone D, Di Forti M, Gayer-Anderson C, Ferraro L, Jongsma HE, Tripoli G, et al. Transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology at first...
    • Craddock M, Asherson P, Owen MJ, Williams J, McGuffin P, Farmer AE. Concurrent validity of the OPCRIT diagnostic system. Comparison of OPCRIT...
    • Wiesinger GF, Nuhr M, Quittan M, Ebenbichler G, Wölfl G, Fialka- Moser V. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire for...
    • Hutchinson A, Bentzen N, König-Zahn C. Cross-cultural health outcome assessment: a user’s guide. Groningen: ERGHO, 1997.
    • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
    • Azevedo MH, Soares MJ, Coelho I, Dourado A, Valente J, Macedo A, et al. Using consensus OPCRIT diagnoses. An efficient procedure for best-estimate...
    • Martínez-Leal R, Soriano-Peña MF, Moreno-Küstner B. Falta de insight en la esquizofrenia. Cuadernos de Psiquiatría Comunitaria. 2004;4:146-58.
    • Wing JK, Babor T, Brugha T, Burke J, Cooper JE, Giel R, et al. Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry....
    • Leckman JF, Sholomskas D, Thompson WD, Belanger A, Weissman MM. Best estimate of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis: a methodological study. Arch...
    • Serretti A, Lattuada E, Cusin C, Smeraldi E. Factor analysis of delusional disorder symptomatology. Compr Psychiatry. 1999;40:143-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-440X(99)90118-9
    • Muñoz-Negro JE, Ibáñez-Casas I, de Portugal E, Lozano-Gutiérrez V, Martínez-Leal R, Cervilla JA. A Psychopathological Comparison between Delusional...
    • McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22:276-82.
    • Bujang MA, Baharum N. Guidelines of the minimum sample size requirements for Cohen’s Kappa. Epidemiol Biostat Public Health. 2017;14:1-10....
Fundación Dialnet

Mi Documat

Opciones de artículo

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno