Ir al contenido

Documat

Realidad Aumentada Adaptativa

  • Tenemaza Vera, Regina Maritzol [2] ; Ramírez, J. [1] ; De Antonio, Angélica [1]
    1. [1] Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

      Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

      Madrid, España

    2. [2] Departamento de Informática y Ciencias de la Computación(DICC) Facultad de Ingeniería de Sistemas Escuela Politécnica Nacional Quito- Ecuador
  • Localización: Revista Politécnica, ISSN-e 2477-8990, Vol. 34, Nº. 2, 2014 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista Politécnica), págs. 44-44
  • Idioma: español
  • Enlaces
  • Resumen
    • español

      Resumen: Hoy Google ofrece su producto Google Glass, hace uso de Realidad Aumentada Adaptativa (A2R), lo quemuestra su importancia como tecnología emergente. Por otro lado, la existencia de teléfonos inteligentes que permitenaplicaciones ubicuas y móviles, y la gran cantidad de sensores disponibles en ellos que dotan al software de capacidadespara percibir el entorno del usuario, su localización y sus actividades, crean la necesidad de que ahora el software tengaque adaptarse al usuario de la aplicación en tiempo real. Como precursores de la Realidad Aumentada Adaptativa sepresta una especial atención a la hipermedia adaptativa y a la adaptabilidadweb. Debido al grado de desarrollo alcanzadopor este tipo de sistemas, cabe esperar que sirvan de fuente de inspiración a la hora de determinar las característicasdel usuario relevantes para la adaptación y los modelos que requiere la adaptabilidad en sistemas de Realidad AumentadaAdaptativa. Asimismo, este trabajo presenta algunos proyectos de A2R destacando sus carencias, sobre todo, en loque se refiere a su adaptabilidad al usuario. Por último, se mencionan algunas posibles futuras líneas de investigaciónen el campo de la A2R derivadas de las debilidades identificadas en los sistemas actuales de A2R.

    • English

      Abstract: Today Google announces its Google Glass product, implementing Adaptive Augmented Reality (A2R). Thisshows the importance of A2R as an emerging technology. On the other hand, the existence of smart phones that allowubiquitous and mobile applications, and the large number of available sensors in them that provide software with thecapability to perceive the user’s environment, their location and their activities, create the need for the software to adaptto the user of the application in real time. As precursors of Adaptive Augmented Reality special attention is paid here toadaptive hypermedia and web adaptability. Because of the degree of development reached by such technologies, theycan be expected to serve as a source of inspiration in determining the user characteristics that are relevant to adaptation,and the models required for adaptability in Adaptive Augmented Reality. Also, this paper presents some A2R projects,highlighting its shortcomings, especially in terms of its adaptability to the user. Finally, some possible future researchlines in the field of A2R are derived from the identified weaknesses in current A2R systems

  • Referencias bibliográficas
    • Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality.Presence, 6(4), 355-385.
    • Benyon, D. (1993). Adaptive systems: a solutionto usability problems.
    • User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 3(1), 65-87.
    • Boyle, C., and Encarnacion, A. O. (1994). MetaDoc:An adaptive
    • hypertext reading system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.
    • Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. Usermodeling and useradapted interaction, 11(1-2), 87-110.
    • Brusilovsky, P., and Millán, E. (2007, January). Usermodels for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educationalsystems. In The adaptive web (pp....
    • Choi, S. Y., and Kang, J. M. (2012). An Adaptive SystemSupporting
    • Collaborative Learning Based on Location-Based Social Network and
    • Semantic UserModeling. International Journal of Distributed
    • Chung, W., and Paynter, J. (2002, January). Privacyissues on the Internet. In System Sciences, 2002.HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual...
    • Damala, A., Stojanovic, N., Schuchert, T., Moragues,J., Cabrera, A., and Gilleade, K. (2012). Adaptiveaugmented reality for cultural heritage:
    • ARtSENSEproject. In Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation(pp. 746-
    • Heufemann, P. L., Villegas, J. G., and Ko, I. Y. (2013).Web Usage Based Adaptive Systems. In AdvancedTechniques in Web Intelligence-2 (pp....
    • Hervás, R., Bravo, J., and Fontecha, J. (2014). Anassistive navigation
    • system based on augmentedreality and context awareness for people with mildcognitive impairments.
    • Hervás, R., Bravo, J., Fontecha, J., and Villarreal,V. (2013). Achieving Adaptive Augmented Realitythrough Ontological Context-Awareness applied...
    • Kobsa, A. (2001). Generic user modeling systems.User modeling and user-adapted interaction, 11(1-2), 49-63.
    • Langlotz, T., Nguyen, T., Schmalstieg, D., and Grasset,R. (2014). NextGeneration Augmented RealityBrowsers: Rich, Seamless, and Adaptive.Proceedingsof...
    • Martins, A. C., Faria, L., De Carvalho, C. V., and Carrapatoso,E.
    • (2008). User Modeling in Adaptive HypermediaEducational Systems (pp.
    • -207). Journalof Educational Technology & Society, 11(1).
    • Neuhöfer, J. A., Govaers, F., Mokni, H. E., and Alexander,T. (2012).
    • Adaptive information design foroutdoor augmented reality. Work: A Journal of Prevention,Assessment and Rehabilitation, 41, 2187-2194.
    • Oh, S., and Byun, Y. C. (2012). A user-adaptive augmentedreality
    • system in mobile computing environment.In Software and network
    • engineering (pp. 41-53). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    • Pascoe, J. (1998, October). Adding generic contextualcapabilities to
    • wearable computers. InWearableComputers, 1998. Digest of Papers. Second InternationalSymposium on (pp. 92-99). IEEE.
    • Ozcan, R., Orhan, F., Demirci, M. F., and Abul,O. (2012). An Adaptive Smoothing Method forSensor Noise in Augmented Reality Applicationson...
    • Popescu, E., Badica, C., and Trigano, P. (2007, September).Rules for Learner Modeling and AdaptationProvisioning in an Educational
    • HypermediaSystem. In synasc (pp. 492-499).
    • Roggen, D., Tröster, G., Lukowicz, P., Ferscha, L., delR Millan, J., and Chavarriaga, R. (2013). Opportunistichuman activity and context
    • recognition. Computer,46(2), 36-45.
    • Sugiyama, K., Hatano, K., and Yoshikawa, M. (2004,May). Adaptive
    • web search based on user profileconstructed without any effort from users. In Proceedingsof the 13th international conference on WorldWide...
    • , Tiroshi, A., Kuflik, T., Kay, J., and Kummerfeld, B.(2012).
    • Recommender systems and the social web.In Advances in User Modeling
    • (pp. 60-70). SpringerBerlin Heidelberg.
    • Wang, H., Bao, X., Choudhury, R. R., and Nelakuditi,S. (2013,
    • February). InSight: recognizing humanswithout face recognition. In
    • Proceedings of the 14thWorkshop on Mobile Computing Systems and
    • Xu, Y., Stojanovic, N., Stojanovic, L., Cabrera, A., and Schuchert, T.
    • (2012, July). An approach for using complex event processing for adaptive augmented reality in cultural heritage domain: experience report.In...
    • Zimmermann, A., Specht, M., and Lorenz, A. (2005).Personalization
    • and context management. User Modelingand User-Adapted Interaction,
Fundación Dialnet

Mi Documat

Opciones de artículo

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno