Designing the Didactic Strategy Modeling Language (DSML) From PoN: An Activity Oriented EML Proposal

• A. Ruiz ^[1] ; J. I. Panach ^[2] ; O. Pastor ^[3] ; F. D. Giraldo ^[1] ; J. L. Arciniegas ^[4] ; W. J. Giraldo ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad del Quindío

     Universidad del Quindío

     Colombia

     
  2. [2] Universitat de València

     Universitat de València

     Valencia, España

     
  3. [3] Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

     Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

     Valencia, España

     
  4. [4] Universidad del Cauca

     Universidad del Cauca

     Colombia

     

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje: IEEE-RITA, ISSN 1932-8540, Vol. 13, Nº. 4, 2018, págs. 136-143
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1109/rita.2018.2879262
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • This paper presents the design of the didactic strategy modeling language (DSML) according to the principles of Physics of Notations (PoN). The DSML is a visual and activity-oriented language for learning design characterized by the representation of different activities according to the nature of the task. Once the language is designed, a blind interpretation study is conducted to validate the semantic transparency of the learning activity iconography. The results of the paper allow to refine the icons. In addition to this, an authoring tool for DSML, which is integrated to an LMS, is presented. As a result, a model driven course was designed as a DSML pre-validation.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • P. Marqués. (2011). La Enseñanza Buenas Prácticas. La Motivación. [Online]. Available: http://peremarques.net/
  • I. Martinez-Ortiz, P. Moreno-Ger, J. L. Sierra, and B. Fernandez-Manjon, “Educational modeling languages,” in Computers and Education: E-learning,...
  • R. Koper, B. Olivier, and T. Anderson, IMS Learning Design Information Model. Lake Mary, FL, USA: IMS Global Learning Consortium, 2003.
  • L. Botturi, “E2ML: A visual language for the design of instruction,” Educ. Technol. Res. Develop., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 265–293, 2006.
  • M. Derntl and R. Motschnig-Pitrik, “CoUML: A visual language for modeling cooperative environments,” in Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional...
  • L. Botturi, “E2ML: A visual language for the design of instruction,” Educ. Technol. Res. Develop., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 265–293, 2006.
  • J. Bundsgaard, “Introducing the collaborative learning modeling language (ColeML),” in Proc. 13th Conf. E-Learn. (ECEL), 2014, pp. 81–88.
  • D. Celik and G. D. Magoulas, “A review, timeline, and categorization of learning design tools,” in Proc. 15th Int. Conf. Adv. Web-Based Learn....
  • G. Conole, “Describing learning activities: Tools and resources to guide practice,” in Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing and...
  • D. Moody, “The ‘physics’ of notations: Toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering,” IEEE Trans. Softw....
  • A. Ruíz, W. J. Giraldo, and J. Arciniegas, “Method for the integration of the didactic strategy model in virtual learning platforms in the...
  • K. Figl, M. Derntl, M. C. Rodriguez, and L. Botturi, “Cognitive effectiveness of visual instructional design languages,” J. Vis. Lang. Comput.,...
  • L. Botturi, M. Derntl, E. Boot, and K. Figl, “A classification framework for educational modeling languages in instructional design,” presented...
  • IMS Global. (2003). IMS Learning Design Specification. [Online]. Available: http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/
  • M. Caeiro, M. Llamas, and L. Anido, “PoEML: Modeling learning units through perspectives,” Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 36, pp. 380–396,...
  • S. Neumann et al., “Report of the results of an IMS learning design expert workshop,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 58–72,...
  • A. Berggren et al., “Practical and pedagogical issues for teacher adoption of IMS learning design standards in moodle LMS,” J. Interact. Media...
  • G. B. Meneses, “NTIC, interacción y aprendizaje en la universidad,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. de Pedagogia, Univ. Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona,...
  • C. Marcelo et al., Las Actividades de Aprendizaje en la Enseñanza Universitaria: ¿hacia un aprendizaje autónomo de los Alumnos? Madrid, Spain:...
  • W. J. Giraldo, “Marco de Desarrollo de Sistemas Groupware Interactivos Basado en la Integración de Procesos y Notaciones—CIAF,” Ph.D. dissertation,...
  • M. das Graças da Teixeira, G. K. Quirino, F. Gailly, R. de Almeida Falbo, G. Guizzardi, and M. P. Barcellos, “PoN-S: A systematic approach...
  • K. Figl, J. Mendling, and M. Strembeck, “Towards a usability assessment of process modeling languages,” in Proc. 8th GI-Workshop Geschäftsprozessmanagement...
  • A. Aguña, “Patrones en aprendizaje: Concepto, aplicación y diseño de un patrón,” in RED: Revista de Educación a Distancia, vol. 31, pp. 1–19,...
  • W. C. Howell and A. H. Fuchs, “Population stereotypy in code design,” Organizational Behav. Hum. Perform., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 310–339, 1968.
  • P. Caire, N. Genon, P. Heymans, and D. L. Moody, “Visual notation design 2.0: Towards user comprehensible requirements engineering notations,”...
  • B. Shneiderman, Software psychology: Human Factors in Computer and Information Systems. Boston, MA, USA: Little, Brown and Company, 1980.
  • L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl, and B. S. Bloom, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational...
  • J. Brooke, “SUS: A retrospective,” J. Usability Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 29–40, 2013.
  • LAMSFoundation. (2017). Learning Activity Management System. [Online]. Available: https://www.lamsfoundation.org/community_home. htm
  • M. Saeed, F. Saleh, S. Al-Insaif, and M. El-Attar, “Empirical validating the cognitive effectiveness of a new feature diagrams visual syntax,”...