Reglas leximin para problemas de bancarrota con incertidumbre*

• Sánchez Sánchez, Francisca J. ^[1] ; Hinojosa Ramos, Miguel A. ^[1] ; Mármol Conde, Amparo M. ^[2]
  1. [1] Universidad Pablo de Olavide

     Universidad Pablo de Olavide

     Sevilla, España

     
  2. [2] Universidad de Sevilla

     Universidad de Sevilla

     Sevilla, España

     
• Localización: Anales de ASEPUMA, ISSN-e 2171-892X, Nº. 20, 2012
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
  • Texto completo
• Resumen
  • español

    En este trabajo modelizamos los problemas de bancarrota en condiciones de in-certidumbre, bajo el supuesto de que hay varios posibles estados de la naturaleza, identificándose cada uno de ellos con un problema de bancarrota diferente. Para esta extensión multidimensional de los problemas clásicos de bancarrota, consideramos situaciones en las que los agentes presentan preferencias de tipo aditivo y leximin sobre los posibles resultados. Proponemos reglas de reparto en las que se combinan diferentes principios de racionalidad y se garantiza la eficiencia con respecto a las preferencias de tipo leximin.

  • English

    We model bankruptcy problems under uncertainty under the assumption that there are several possible states of nature, each of which is identified with a di®er-ent bankruptcy problem. For this multi-dimensional extension of classic bankruptcy problems, we consider situations in which agents exhibit at the same time additive preferences and leximin preferences on their possible results. We propose division rules which combine di®erent rationality principles and guarantee eÿciency with respect to leximin preferences.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Aumann, R. J., Maschler, M. (1985).“ Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud.” Journal of Economic Theory, 36, pp....
  • Bergantinos, G., Lorenzo, L., Lorenzo Freire, S. (2010).“ A characterizations of the proportional rule in multi-issue allocation situations.”...
  • Bergantinos, G., Lorenzo Freire, S. (2011). “New caracterizations of the constrained equal awards rule in multi-issue allocation situations.”...
  • Bossert, W.(1993). “An alternative solution to bargaining problems with claims.” Mathematical Social Sciences, 25, pp. 205–220.
  • Bossert, W., Nosal, E., Sadanand, V. (1996).“ Bargaining under uncertainty and the monotone path solutions.” Games and Economic Behavior,...
  • Bossert, W., Peters, H. (2001).“ Minimax regret and efficient bargaining under uncertainty.” Games and Economic Behavior, 34, pp. 1–10.
  • Calleja, P., Borm, P., Hendrickx, R. (2005). “ Multi-issue allocation situations.” European Journal of Operational Research, 164, pp. 730–747.
  • Chun, Y., Thomson, W. (1992).“ Bargaining problems with claims.” Mathematical Social Sciences, 24, pp. 19–33.
  • González Arcón, C., Borm, P., Hendrickx, R. (2007).“ A composite run-to-the-bank rule for multi-issue allocation situations.” Methods of Operations...
  • Herrero, C. (1998).“Bargaining with claims in economic environments.” Revista Espa˜nola de Econom´ıa, 15, 1, pp. 3–13.
  • Ju, B-G., Miyagawa, E., Sakai, T. (2007).“ Non-manipulable división rules in claim problems and generalizations.” Journal of Economic Theory,...
  • Lorenzo Freire, S., Hendrickx, R., Casas Mendez, B.(2009). ´ “The two-stage constrained equal awards and losses for multi-issue allocation...
  • Marmol, A. M., Ponsati, C. (2008).“ Bargaining over multiple issues with maxmin and leximin preferences.” Social Choice and Welfare, 30(4),...
  • Moreno Ternero, J.D. (2009).“ The proportional rule for multi-issue bankruptcy problems.” Economics Bulletin, 29, pp. 483–490.
  • Pulido, M., Sanchez Soriano, J., Llorca, N.l(2002).“ Game theory techniques for University management: and extended bankruptcy model.” Annals...
  • Pulido, M., Borm, P., Hendrickx, R., Llorca, N., Sanchez Soriano, J., (2008).“ Compromise solutions for bankruptcy situations with references.”...
  • Thomson, W. (2003). “ Axiomatice and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: A survey”. Mathematical Social Sciences,...