El Aborto inducido y sus determinantes sociodemográficos. Un estudio en 27 países europeos

• Llorente-Marrón, Mar ^[1] ; Díaz-Fernández, Montserrat ^[1] ; Dema Moreno, Sandra ^[1] ; Méndez-Rodríguez, Paz ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Oviedo

     Universidad de Oviedo

     Oviedo, España

     
• Localización: Anales de ASEPUMA, ISSN-e 2171-892X, Nº. 24, 2016
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen
  • español

    La interrupción voluntaria del embarazo es un fenómeno global que responde a patrones sociodemográficos y en el que las características particulares de cada país juegan un papel fundamental. El conocimiento de los determinantes individuales y características socioeconómicas que justifican la decisión de interrumpir voluntariamente un embarazo no deseado constituye un aspecto fundamental para diseñar políticas públicas que garanticen de forma efectiva los derechos sexuales y reproductivos de las mujeres El objetivo del trabajo consiste en analizar los determinantes socioeconómicos del aborto en Europa desde una perspectiva temporal y territorial. Mediante un modelo de datos panel se analizan los determinantes y características socioeconómicas de cada unidad transversal en relación a dicha práctica. La estimación del modelo destaca la influencia sobre el mismo de factores relacionados con el acceso al empleo, educación, edad al nacimiento del primer hijo, condiciones económicas, etc. además de los rasgos propios no observados que influyen en el comportamiento de la variable a explicar.

  • English

    Induced abortion is a global phenomenon that varies according to socio-demographic patterns and in which the particular characteristics of each country play a key role. The knowledge of the individual determinants and socioeconomic characteristics that justify the decision to voluntarily terminate an unwanted pregnancy is a fundamental aspect in order to design public policies that effectively guarantee women's sexual and reproductive rights.

    The aim of the paper is to analyze the socioeconomic determinants of abortion in Europa from a temporal and spatial perspective. By means of panel data model determinants and socioeconomic characteristics of each cross piece in relation to this practice are analyzed. The estimated model captures the unobservable heterogeneity among regions highlighting the influence on it of factors related to access to employment, education, age at first birth, economic conditions, etc. in addition to the traits unobserved influencing the behavior of the dependent variable

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Ancel, P., N. Lelong, Papiernik, E., Saurel Cubizolles, M. y Kaminski, M. (2004). “History of induced abortion as a risk factor for preterm...
  • Asal, V., Brown, M.; Figueroa, R.G. (2008). “Structure, Empowerment and the Liberalization of Cross-National Abortion Rights.” Politics and...
  • Baizán, P. (2005). “The impact of labour market status on second and higher-order births. Acomparative study of Denmark, Italy, Spain and...
  • Begall, K.; Mills, M.C. (2013). “The Influence of Educational Field, Occupation and OccupationalSex Segregation on Fertility in the Netherlands,”...
  • Bloom, D., Canning, D., Fink G.; Finlay, J. E. (2009). “Fertility, female labor forcé participation, and the demographic dividend.” Journal...
  • Galobarders, B., Shaw, M., Lawlor, D. A.; SMITH, G. D. (2006). “Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1).” Journal of Epidemiology and...
  • Gil Lacruz, A. I., Gil Lacruz, M. Brenal Cuenca, E. (2012). “Socio-economic determinants of the abortion rates”. Sexuality Research and Social...
  • Hansen, M.L.H., Molgaard Nielsen, D., Knudsen, L. B.; Keiding, N. (2009). “Rates of induced abortion in Denmark according to age, previous...
  • Lesthaeghe, R.; Willems, P. (1999). “Is Low Fertility a Temporary Phenomenon in the European Union?” Population and Development Review, 25(2),...
  • Llorente Marrón, M., Díaz Fernández, M.; Méndez, P. (2016). “Contextual Determinants of Induced Abortion, pp. A Panel Analysis.” Revista de...
  • Luci, A. y THÉVENON, O. (2013). “The impact of family policy packages on fertility trends in developed countries.” European Journal of population,...
  • McDonald, P. (2006a). “Low fertility and the state; the efficacy of policy.” Population and Development Review, 32(3), pp. 401-510
  • McDonald, P. (2006b). “An Assessment of Policies that Support Having Children from the Perspectives of Equity, Efficiency and Efficacy.” Yearbook...
  • McDonald, P. (2013). “Societal foundations for explaining low fertility, pp. Gender equity.” Demographic Research, 28(34), pp. 981-994
  • Rowe, H., Kirkman, M., Hardiman, A., Mallett, S. Rosenthal, D. (2009). “Considering Abortion, pp. a 12-Month Audit of Records of Women Contacting...
  • Santelli, J., Lindberg, L., Orr, M., Finer, L.; Speizer, I. (2009). “Toward a Multidimensional Measure of Pregnancy Intentions, pp. Evidence...
  • Troitskaia, I., Avdeev, A., Badurashvili, I., Kapanadze, E.; Tretjakova, V. (2009). “A comparative analysis of birth-control practices in...
  • Walzer, S. (1994). “The role of gender in determining abortion attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly, 75(3), pp. 687-693.
  • Wang, G.Z.; Buffalo, M.D. (2004). “Social and Cultural Determinants of Attitudes toward Abortion, pp. A Test of Reiss’ Hypotheses.” The Social...
  • Wang, G.Z. (2014). “The Impact of Social and Economic Indicators on Maternal and Child Health.” Social Indicators Research, 116(3), pp. 935-957.
  • Zurriaga O, M. A. (2009).”Recourse to induced abortion in Spain, pp. profiling of users and theinfluence of migrant populations.” Gaceta Sanitaria...