Inducing Supervision Practices among peers in a Community of Practice

• Gonçalves, Daniela ^[1] ; Nogueira, Isabel Cláudia ^[1] ; da Silva, Maria Cristina Vieira ^[1]
  1. [1] Higher School of Education of Paula Frassinetti
• Localización: JETT, ISSN-e 1989-9572, Vol. 7, Nº. 2 (Virtual Communities of and for Learning), 2016, págs. 108-119
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo  1    2  
• Resumen

  • The Bologna process and the creation of the European Higher Education Area have been proving to be a challenge. As teachers trainers in a Higher Education institution, the teacher training models deserve, to us, particular reflection, namely the teaching processes adopted by Higher Education teachers. We believe that teacher training is an important period in the individuals socialization, in which the inherent criticality of the professional knowledge construction process (in the sense of Shulman (1986) – including content, pedagogical and curricular knowledge) should be a central tenet in the construction of teachers professionnality. Presenting itself as an organization capable of conceiving, designing, acting and thinking, we claim for supervision pratices that help school to discuss and plan for the future, truly ambitious, that questions the less well achieved moments to understand their causes, being able to draw new action lines.Thus, having the establishment of a Community of Practice as a starting point, it is our goal with this text to present some of the support tools that are being tested in pedagogical supervision among peers with some preliminary results. We believe these results point towards what it is essential to develop and present the induction of a new pedagogical supervision for Higher Education. By identifying facilitators/constraining mechanisms on the implementation of regulatory processes of educational activity among peers, we aim not only improving the quality of the practices on Higher Education contexts, but also benefiting, from our point of view, the learning process of students in general.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Alarcão, I. (org.). (2001). Escola reflexiva e nova racionalidade. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
  • Amado, J. (2013). (coord). Manual de Investigação Qualitativa em Educação. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade.
  • Aragão, A.M. (2014). Constituição da reflexividade docente. Indícios de desenvolvimento profissional coletivo. In I. Sá-Chaves (Coord.) Educar,...
  • Barnett, R. (2000). University Knowledge in age of supercomplexity. Higher Education, vol. N.40, nº4, pp. 409-422.
  • Bogdan, R. e Biklen, S. (1994). Investigação qualitativa em educação. Uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Porto: Porto Editora.
  • Day, C. & Sachs, J. (2004). Professionalism, performativity and empowerment: discourses in the politics and purposes of continuing professional...
  • Dias de Carvalho, A. (2011). “Problematização e dilematização enquanto referenciais metodológicos da formação de educadores”. Saber &...
  • Esteve, J. M. (2004). terceira revolu o educacional a educa o na sociedade do conhecimento. ão Paulo: oderna.
  • Fabre, M. (2011). O que é problematizar? Géneses de um paradigma. Saber & Educar, 16. Retrieved from http://repositorio.esepf.pt/handle/10000/510.
  • Gil, A. C. (1999). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. São Paulo: Atlas
  • Günther, H. (2006). Pesquisa Qualitativa Versus Pesquisa Quantitativa: Esta É a Questão? Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 22(2), pp. 201-210.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Libâneo, J. (2002). “Ainda as perguntas: o que pedagogia, quem o pedagogo, o que deve ser o curso de Pedagogia”. In Pimenta, . G. (Org.) Pedagogia...
  • Ministry of Education (1986). Education Act. Retrieved from http://www.dges.mctes.pt/NR/rdonlyres/2A5E978A-0D63-4D4E-981246C28BA831BB/1126/L4686.pdf
  • Neves, J. L. (1996). Pesquisa qualitativa – Características, usos e possibilidades. Caderno de Pesquisas em Administração, 1(3), pp. 1-5.
  • Pacheco, J. A. (2005). studos curriculares ara a compreens o cr tica da educa o Porto: Porto Editora.
  • Perrenoud, P. (2002). r tica reflexiva no of cio de professor profissionaliza o e raz o pedag gica. Porto Alegre: Editora Artemed.
  • Ponte, . P. (1 8). Da formação ao desenvolvimento profissional. In Actas do ProfMat 98 Lisboa: APM, pp. 27-44.
  • Raupp, F. M.; Beuren, I. M. (2003). Metodologia da pesquisa aplicável às ciências sociais. São Paulo: Atlas.
  • Roldão, . do C. (200 ). ormação de professores baseada na investigação e pr tica reflexiva. In resid ncia ortuguesa do onselho da ni o uropeia...
  • Sá-Chaves, I. (2007). A interligação dos conceitos de Didáctica, Avaliação e Supervisão na acção pedagógica. Uma perspectiva de (re)configuração...
  • Sá-Chaves, I. (2014). Novos saberes básicos de todos os cidadãos no século XXI, novos desafios à formação de professores. Renovar os saberes,...
  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, pp. 4-14.
  • Shulman, L. (2000). “Teacher development: oles of domain expertise and pedagogical knowledge.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology...
  • Vieira, F. (Org.) (2009). Transformar a Pedagogia Universitária. Santo Tirso: De Facto Editores.
  • Vitón, M. J. & Gonçalves, Daniela (2015). Práctica docente en la enseñanza universitaria, reflexión de saberes y aprendizaje transformativo....
  • Yin, R. (2001). Estudo de CasoPlanejamento e Métodos. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.