Ir al contenido

Documat

La interrelación de la creatividad, fluidez, pensamiento lateral y tecnología a la hora de diseñar Juegos Educativos Serios en un aula de ciencias naturales

  • Richard Lamb [1] ; Leonard Annetta [2] ; David Vallett [3]
    1. [1] Washington State University

      Washington State University

      Estados Unidos

    2. [2] George Mason University

      George Mason University

      Estados Unidos

    3. [3] University of Nevada, Las Vegas

      University of Nevada, Las Vegas

      Estados Unidos

    Mostrar afiliaciones +
  • Localización: Electronic journal of research in educational psychology, ISSN-e 1696-2095, Vol. 13, Nº. 36, 2015 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Los videojuegos: nuevos instrumentos para la educación y el desarrollo de habilidades), págs. 219-242
  • Idioma: español
  • DOI: 10.14204/ejrep.36.14110
  • Títulos paralelos:
    • The interface of creativity, fluency, lateral thinking, and technology while designing Serious Educational Games in a science classroom
  • Enlaces
  • Resumen

    • Introducción.

      La creatividad es la producción de los nuevos, originales, únicos, y divergentes productos e ideas mediadas a través del pensamiento lateral. La evidencia sugiere que los altos niveles de creatividad y la fluidez son importantes en el desarrollo continuo de interés de los estudiantes, la eficacia y en última instancia, el impacto de carrera en las ciencias.

      Método.

      En este estudio, 559 estudiantes seleccionados al azar asistieron a un taller largo de ocho meses, para el diseño de videojuegos basados en la ciencia como herramienta de aprendizaje en el aula. Posteriormente, los estudiantes diseñan videojuegos basados en la ciencia que ejemplifican aprendidas, conceptos clave de la ciencia. Al finalizar el taller, todos los estudiantes se les dió la prueba de Pensamiento Creativo de Torrance para ayudar en el desarrollo de la comprensión de la relación entre la creatividad y las construcciones relacionadas.

      Resultados.

      Los autores también explorar las implicaciones de la función del pensamiento lateral como un sistema cognitiva media en el aprendizaje de las ciencias. Los resultados sugieren que existe una diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre el pre-test y post- test y los resultados que los datos confirman el modelo sugerido por el papel de la creatividad, la fluidez y el pensamiento lateral en relación con el procesamiento de la ciencia.

      Discusión y conclusión.

      Tratando de promover el interés en las herramientas de apoyo creativas tales como los que se utilizan durante el diseño de SEGs puede proporcionar convergencia disciplinaria a través del pensamiento lateral. Más específicamente estos resultados están de acuerdo con los resultados encontrados en otros estudios como Yamamoto y Nakakoji (2005), Chen et al (2007) y Spencer, Lucas & Claxton (2012), que sugieren que hay manifestaciones conductuales subyacentes de la creatividad y la fluidez que afecta el proceso de la ciencia y el diseño a través de pensamiento lateral

  • Referencias bibliográficas
    • Achieve, Inc. (2013). The Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org
    • Adams, R. S., Turns, J., & Atman, C. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies,...
    • Almeida, L., Prieto, L., Ferrando, M., Oliveria, E., & Ferrandiz, C. (2008). Torrance test of creative thinking: the question of its construct...
    • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology,...
    • Andreasen, N. & Ramchandran, K. (2012). Creativity in art and science: are there two cultures? Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(1),...
    • Anwar, M., Rasool, S., & Haq, R. (2012). A comparison of creative thinking abilities of high and low achievers secondary school students,...
    • Arciniegas, D. B., Anderson, C. A., & Filley, C. M. (Eds.). (2013). Behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry. New York, NY: Cambridge...
    • Atkinson, A. P., & Adolphs, R. (2011). The neuropsychology of face perception: beyond simple dissociations and functional selectivity....
    • Baillargeon, R., Li, J., Gertner, Y., & Wu, D. (2011). How do infants reason about physical events? The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood...
    • Barrès, V., Simons III, A., & Arbib, M. (2013). Synthetic event-related potentials: a computational bridge between neurolinguistic models...
    • Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms...
    • Bond, C. E., Philo, C., & Shipton, Z. K. (2011). When There isn't a Right Answer: Interpretation and reasoning, key skills for twenty-first...
    • Boysen, S. T., & Capaldi, E. J. (Eds.). (2014). The development of numerical competence: Animal and human models. London, England: Psychology...
    • Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes...
    • Camazine, S. (Ed.). (2003). Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    • Cattell, R. B. (1956). Validation and intensification of the sixteen personality factor questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 112,...
    • Chen, M., Liou, Y., Wang, C., Fan, Y., & Chi, Y. (2007). TeamSpirit: Design, implementation and evaluation of a web-based group decision...
    • Chow, C. (2012). Learning from our global competitors: A comparative analysis of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education...
    • Christoff, K., Gordon, A., Smith, R., & Vancouver, B. C. (2011). The role of spontaneous thought in human cognition. Neuroscience of Decision...
    • Common Core Standards Initiative (2014). Common Core Standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/
    • Crowder, J. A., Carbone, J. N., & Friess, S. A. (2014). Cognitive Intelligence and the Brain: Synthesizing Human Brain Functions. In Artificial...
    • Crutchfield, R. (1962). Conformity and creative thinking. Contemporary approaches to creative thinking, New York New York: Atherton Press.
    • Deininger, G., Loudon, G., & Norman, S. (2012). Modal preferences in creative problem solving, Cognitive processing, 13(1), 147-150. doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0479-3
    • Dietrich, A. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of altered states of consciousness: the transient hypofrontality hypothesis. Consciousness and...
    • Dimitrov, D. (2012). Statistical methods for validation of assessment scale data in counseling and related fields, Alexandria, VA: American...
    • Drachen, A., & Canossa, A. (2011). Evaluating motion: Spatial user behaviour in virtual environments. International Journal of Arts and...
    • Duncan, J. (2013). The Structure of Cognition: Attentional Episodes in Mind and Brain. Neuron, 80(1), 35-50. doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.015
    • Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. Neuroimage,...
    • Goodchild, M. F., & Janelle, D. G. (2010). Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal, 75(1),...
    • Gotz, I. (1981). On defining creativity, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 39(3), 297-301. doi.org/10.2307/430164
    • Gramann, K., Gwin, J. T., Ferris, D. P., Oie, K., Jung, T. P., Lin, C. T., & Makeig, S. (2011). Cognition in action: imaging brain/body...
    • Haigh, M. (2013). Fostering Creativity Through Science Education. Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship,...
    • Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive...
    • Holliday, G. M., & Lederman, N. G. (2013). Informal Science Educators' Views about Nature of Scientific Knowledge. International Journal...
    • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives....
    • Kaufman, J., Plucker, J. & Russell, C. (2012). Identifying and assessing creativity as a component of giftedness, Journal of Psychoedcuational...
    • Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013). Cost-benefit models as the next, best option for understanding subjective...
    • Lamb, R. L. (2013). The application of cognitive diagnostic approaches via neural network of analysis of serious educational games. Doctoral...
    • Lamb, R. (2014). Examination of allostasis and online laboratory simulations in a middle school science classroom. Computers in Human Behavior,...
    • Lamb, R., & Annetta, L. (2009). A pilot study of online simulations and problem based learning in a chemistry classroom. Journal of Virginia...
    • Lamb, R., & Annetta, L. (2012a). Influences of gender on computer simulation outcomes. Meridian, 13(1). doi: 10.1007/s10956-012-9417-5
    • Lamb R., and Annetta L. (2012b). The use of online modules and the effect on student outcomes in a high school chemistry class, Journal of...
    • Lamb, R., Annetta, L. Meldrum, J., & Vallett, D. (2011). Measuring science interest: Rasch validation of the science interest survey....
    • Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Vallett, D. B., & Sadler, T. D. (2014). Cognitive Diagnostic Like Approaches Using Neural Network Analysis of...
    • Lamb, R. L., Vallett, D., & Annetta, L. (2014). Development of a Short-Form Measure of Science and Technology Self-efficacy Using Rasch...
    • Lamb, R. L., Vallett, D. B., Akmal, T., Baldwin, K. (2014). A computational modeling of student cognitive processes in science education....
    • Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features...
    • McComas, W. F. (2012). Darwin's error: using the story of pangenesis to illustrate aspects of nature of science in the classroom. The...
    • Morcom, A. M., Bullmore, E. T., Huppert, F. A., Lennox, B., Praseedom, A., Linnington, H., & Fletcher, P. C. (2010). Memory encoding and...
    • Meyer, A. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2013). Inventing creativity: An exploration of the pedagogy of ingenuity in science classrooms. School...
    • Myers, B. A., Hudson, S. E., & Pausch, R. (2000). Past, present and future of user interface software tools. ACM Transactions on Computer...
    • Myers, D. G. (1995). Psychology (4th Edition).New York: Worth Publishers Inc.
    • Onarheim, B., & Friis-Olivarius, M. (2013). Applying the neuroscience of creativity to creativity training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,...
    • Raykov, T. (2004). Estimation of maximal reliability: A note on a covariance structure modeling approach. British Journal of Mathematical...
    • Ray, K., & Smith, M. (2010). The kindergarten child: What teachers and administrators need to know to promote academic success in all...
    • Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Eisenberg, M. (2000). Beyond black boxes: Bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation....
    • Roy, M., Shohamy, D., & Wager, T. D. (2012). Ventromedial prefrontal-subcortical systems and the generation of affective meaning. Trends...
    • Ruo, B. Baker, D. Thompson, J. Murray, P., Huber, G. & Sudano, J. (2008). Patients with worse mental health report more physical limitations...
    • Shneiderman,B., et.al. (2008). Creativity support tools: Repost from a U.S. National Science Foundation, International Journal of Human-Computer...
    • Simmons, B. (2010). Clinical reasoning: concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1151-1158. doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05262.x
    • Sawyer, R. K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    • Spencer, E. Lucas, B. & Claxton, G. (2012). Progression in creativity-developing new forms of assessment: A literature review, Creativity,...
    • Steiger, J. (1990). Some additional thoughts on components, factors and factor indeterminacy, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 41-45....
    • Surkova, I. (2012). Towards a creativity framework, Society and Economy, 34(1), 115-138. doi.org/10.1556/SocEc.2011.0013
    • Thorstuon, L. (1952). Creative talent. Applications of Psychology, New York, NY: Harper & Row.
    • Torrance, E. (1970). Achieving socialization with sacrificing creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 4, 183-189. doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1970.tb00858.x
    • Tseng, S. W. W., & Lin, C. H. (2012). A Study on the Application of Design Thinking Strategy to Form Generation System. Advanced Materials...
    • Urhahne, D., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2011). Conceptions of the nature of science-are they general or context specific? International...
    • Vartanian, O., Bristol, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2013). Neuroscience of Creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262019583.001.0001
    • Wilson, K., Vyakarnam,S., Volkmann, C., Mariotti, S. & Rabuzzi, D. (2009). Educating the next wave of entrepreneurs unlocking entrepreneurial...
    • Yamamoto, Y., &Nakakoji, K. (2005). Interaction design of tools for fostering creativity in the early stages of information design. International...
    • Zangeneh, M., Omid, M., & Akram, A. (2012). A comparative study between parametric and artificial neural networks approaches for economical...
Fundación Dialnet

Mi Documat

Opciones de artículo

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno