Why there is no scientific method: and why it is not a problem

• Autores: Jean Bricmont
• Localización: Mètode Science Studies Journal: Annual Review, ISSN 2174-3487, ISSN-e 2174-9221, Nº. 5, 2015 (Ejemplar dedicado a: The light of Science. Science, literature and society), págs. 182-187
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto Completo Ejemplar
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Einstein, A., 1936. «Physics and Reality». In Einstein, A., 1954. Ideas and Opinions of Albert Einstein. Crown publishers. New York.
  • Feyerabend, P., 1975. Against Method. New Left Books. London.
  • Grunbaum, A., 1984. The Foundations of Psychoanalysis; A Philosophical Critique. University of California Press. Berkeley.
  • Haack, S., 1993. Evidence and Inquiry. Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology. Blackwell. Oxford.
  • Hume, D., 2014 [1748]. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Barnes & Noble. New York.
  • Kuhn, T., 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolution, 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
  • Popper, K. R., 2002 [1935]. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge. New York.
  • Quine, W. V. O., 1980 [1953]. «Two Dogmas of Empiricism». In Quine, W. V. O. From a Logical Point of View. 2nd ed., revised. Harvard University...
  • Roseveare, N. T., 1982. Mercury’s Perihelion from Le Verrier to Einstein. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
  • Sokal, A. and J. Bricmont, 1999. Fashionable Nonsense. Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. St Martin’s Press. New York.
  • Stove, D. C., 1982. Popper and After: Four Modern Irrationalists. Pergamon Press. Oxford.