El método TOPSIS relativo vs. absoluto

• Autores: Blanca Alejandra Ceballos Martín, María Teresa Lamata Jiménez , David Alejandro Pelta Mochcovsky , Juan Miguel Sánchez Lozano
• Localización: Rect@: Revista Electrónica de Comunicaciones y Trabajos de ASEPUMA, ISSN-e 1575-605X, Vol. 14, Nº. 2, 2013, págs. 181-192
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen
  • español

    Los métodos de decisión multicriterio constituyen una herramienta básica para la toma de decisiones en el mundo empresarial. En este trabajo nos vamos a centrar en la aplicación del método TOPSIS analizando el impacto que tiene en los resultados, la utilización de diferentes formas de la matriz de decisión. En primer lugar se utiliza el modo tradicional o relativo y, en segundo lugar, el modo absoluto que tiene en cuenta el rango del correspondiente criterio. Concretamente se pretende realizar un estudio de la repercusión que tiene en el resultado final la elección de un modo u otro realizando las pruebas pertinentes sobre un problema de localización asociado a las energías renovables.

  • English

    Multicriteria decision making methods are essential tools to make decisions in the corporate world. We focus here in the TOPSIS method to analyze the impact that, the way the decision matrix is constructed affects the final results. Two different ways are analized: firstly, the original matrix is considered, and secondly, a variant including two novel alternatives is used. These alternatives are constructed taking into account the range of the corresponding criteria. We made comparisons using a location problem derived from the renewable energy field.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Hwang, C. and Yoon, K. Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and Applications, (Springer Verlag, New York, 1981).
  • Raiffa, H. and Keeney, R. Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs, (Wiley, New York, 1976).
  • Luce, R. and Raiffa, H. Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey, (Wiley, New York, 1957).
  • Zeleny, M. Multiple criteria decision making, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982).
  • Barzilai, J. and Golany, B. AHP rank reversal, normalization and aggregation rules. INFOR. 32(2) (1994) 57-64.
  • Dyer, J. Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science. 36(3) (1990) 249-258.
  • Milani, A. S. Shanian, A. Madoliat, R. and Nemes, J. A. The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a...
  • Saaty, T. and Vargas, L. G. The legitimacy of rank reversal. OMEGA 12(5) (1984) 513–516.
  • Saaty, T. Rank generation, preservation, and reversal in the analytic hierarchy decision process. Decision Science. 18(2) (1987) 157-177.
  • Saaty, T. and Vargas, L. Experiments on rank preservation and reversal in relative measurement. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 17(4-5)...
  • Saaty, T. L. and Sagir, M. An essay on rank preservation and reversal. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 49(5–6) (2009) 1230–1243.
  • Schenkerman, S. Avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision-support models. European Journal of Operational Research. 74(3) (1994) 407–419.
  • Wang, Y.M. and Luo, Y. On rank reversal in decision analysis. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 49(5-6) (2009) 1221–1229.
  • García-Cascales, M. S. and Lamata, M. T. On rank reversal and TOPSIS method. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 56(5-6) (2012) 123–132.
  • Saaty, T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).
  • Saaty, T. L. An Exposition of the AHP in Reply to the Paper ‘Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process’. Management Science. 36 (1990) 259-268.
  • Alonso, J. and Lamata, M. Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. International Journal of Uncertainty. 14(4) (2006)...
  • García-Cascales, M. S. Lamata, M. T. and Sánchez-Lozano, J. M. Evaluation of photovoltaic cells in a multi-criteria decision making process,...
  • Arán-Carrión, J., Espín-Estrella, A., Aznar-Dols, F., Zamorano-Toro, M., Rodríguez, M., y RamosRidao, Environmental decision-support systems...
  • Cavallaro, F. Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for assessing thermal-energy storage in concentrated solar power (CSP) systems. Applied Energy. 87(2)...
  • Chen, S. Hwang, C. Beckmann, M. and Krelle, W. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, (Springer Verlag, New York,...
  • Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K. Multiple Attribute Decision Methods and Applications, (Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, 1981).
  • Jo, J. H. and Otanicar, T. P. A hierarchical methodology for the mesoscale assessment of building integrated roof solar energy systems. Renewable...