An alternative analysis of variance

• Autores: Nicholas T. Longford
• Localización: Sort: Statistics and Operations Research Transactions, ISSN 1696-2281, Vol. 32, Nº. 1, 2008, págs. 77-91
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • The one-way analysis of variance is a staple of elementary statistics courses. The hypothesis test of homogeneity of the means encourages the use of the selected-model based estimators which are usually assessed without any regard for the uncertainty about the outcome of the test. We expose the weaknesses of such estimators when the uncertainty is taken into account, as it should be, and propose synthetic estimators as an alternative.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Efron, B., and Morris, C. N. (1972). Limiting the risk of Bayes and empirical Bayes estimators – Part II: The empirical Bayes case. Journal...
  • Hjort, N. L., and Claeskens, G. (2003). Frequentist model average estimators, Journal of the American Statistical Association. 98, 879-899.
  • Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., and Volinsky C. T. (1999). Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Statistical Science, 14, 382-401.
  • Kass, R. E., and Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773-795.
  • Longford, N. T. (2003). An alternative to model selection in ordinary regression. Computing and Statistics, 13, 67-80.
  • Longford, N. T. (2005). Missing Data and Small-Area Estimation. Modern Analytical Equipment for the Survey Statistician. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Longford, N. T. (2007). On standard errors of model-based small-area estimators. Survey Methodology, 33, 69-79.