Resumen de Hypoellipticity and loss of derivatives

David S. Tartakoff, J. J. Kohn, Makhlouf Derridj

• Let {X1, . . . , Xp} be complex-valued vector fields in Rn and assume that they satisfy the bracket condition (i.e. that their Lie algebra spans all vector fields). Our object is to study the operator E =
  X.i Xi, where X.i is the L2 adjoint of Xi. A result of H¡§ormander is that when the Xi are real then E is hypoelliptic and furthemore it is subelliptic (the restriction of a destribution u to an open set U is ¡°smoother¡± then the restriction of Eu to U). When the Xi are complex-valued if the bracket condition of order one is satisfied (i.e. if the {Xi, [Xi,Xj ]} span), then we prove that the operator E is still subelliptic. This is no longer true if brackets of higher order are needed to span. For each k ¡Ã 1 we give an example of two complex-valued vector fields, X1 and X2, such that the bracket condition of order k+1 is satisfied and we prove that the operator E = X.1X1 + X.2X2 is hypoelliptic but that it is not subelliptic. In fact it ¡°loses¡± k derivatives in the sense that, for each m, there exists a distribution u whose restriction to an open set U has the property that the D¥áEu are bounded on U whenever |¥á| ¡Â m and for some ¥â, with |¥â| = m . k + 1, the restriction of D¥âu to U is not locally bounded.