Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal age replacement policy for discrete time parallel systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the case of discrete age replacement policy, a system whose lifetime is measured by the number cycles is replaced preventively after a specific number of cycles or correctively at failure, whichever occurs first. Under the discrete setup, the policy has been mostly considered for single unit systems. In this paper, a discrete time age replacement policy is studied for a parallel system that consists of components having discretely distributed lifetimes. In particular, the necessary conditions for the unique and finite replacement cycle that minimize the expected cost rate are obtained. The theoretical results are illustrated with numerical examples to observe the effect of the cost values and the mean lifetime of the components on the optimal replacement cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

n :

the number of components in the system

\(X_{i}\) :

the lifetime of the ith component, \(i=1,\ldots ,n\)

T :

the lifetime of the parallel system

\(F(\cdot )\) :

the cumulative distribution function of \(X_{i}\), \(i=1,\ldots ,n\)

\(p(\cdot )\) :

the probability mass function of \(X_{i}\), \(i=1,\ldots ,n\)

\(r(\cdot )\) :

the hazard rate of the parallel system

\(c_{CM}\) :

the cost of corrective maintenance

\(c_{PM}\) :

the cost of preventive maintenance

\(c_{a}\) :

the acquisition cost of a component

\(c_{r}\) :

the rejuvenation cost of a component

References

  • Alkaff A (2021) Discrete time dynamic reliability modeling for systems with multistate components. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 209:107462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold BC, Balakrishnan N, Nagaraja HN (2008) A first course in order statistics. Classics in applied mathematics. In: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

  • Barde S, Ko YM, Shin H (2020) Fitting discrete phase-type distribution from censored and truncated observations with pre-specified hazard sequence. Oper Res Lett 48:233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien Y-H (2012) The effects of renewing free-replacement warranty on the discrete age replacement policy. IEEE Trans Reliab 61:389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies K, Dembińska A (2019) On the number of failed components in a \(k\)-out-of-\(n\) system upon system failure when the lifetimes are discretely distributed. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 188:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembińska A (2018) On reliability analysis of \(k\)-out-of-\(n\) systems consisting of heterogeneous components with discrete lifetimes. IEEE Trans Reliab 67:1071–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembińska A, Eryilmaz S (2021) Discrete time series-parallel system and its optimal configuration. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 215:107832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembińska A, Nikolov NI, Stoimenova E (2021) Reliability properties of \(k\)-out-of-\(n\) systems with one cold standby unit. J Comput Appl Math 388:113289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisele KT (2008) Recursions for multivariate compound phase variables. Insur Math Econ 42: 657–672

  • Eryilmaz S (2021) Revisiting discrete time age replacement policy for phase-type lifetime distributions. Eur J Oper Res 295:699–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz S (2022) Discrete stochastic models and applications for reliability engineering and statistical quality control. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L, Peng R (2019) Reliability modeling for a discrete time multi-state system with random and dependent transition probabilities. Proce Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab 5:747–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski K (2021) The number of failed components in a coherent working system when the lifetimes are discretely distributed. Metrika 84:1081–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan C, Eryilmaz S (2021) Reliability assessment of a discrete time cold standby repairable system. TOP 29:613–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolin BH, Winokur HS (1967) Exact moments of the order statistics of the geometric distribution and their relation to inverse sampling and reliability of redundant systems. J Am Stat Assoc 62:915–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair NU, Sankaran PG, Balakrishnan N (2018) Reliability Modelling and Analysis in Discrete Time, Academic Press

  • Nakagawa T (1984) A summary of discrete replacement policies. Eur J Oper Res 17:382–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa T, Osaki S (1977) Discrete time age replacement policies. Oper Res Quart 28:881–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poursaeed MH (2021) Reliability analysis of an extended shock model. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab 235:845–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoh H, Hirakoshi H, Nakagawa T (1998) A new modified discrete preventive maintenance policy and its application to hard disk management. J Qual Maint Eng 4:284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudheesh KK, Asha G, Jagathnath Krishna KM (2021) On the mean time to failure of an age-replacement model in discrete time. Commun Stat Theory Methods 50:2569–2585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis HL, Scott WG (2000) Distributed power generation. Planning and Evaluation. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group

  • Zhao X, Mizutani S, Nakagawa T (2015) Which is better for replacement policies with continuous or discrete scheduled times? Eur J Opera Res 242:477–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Al-Khalifa KN, Hamouda AM, Nakagawa T (2017) Age replacement models: a summary with new perspectives and methods. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 161:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions, which were very useful in improving this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serkan Eryilmaz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A. Appendix

A. Appendix

Proof of Proposition 1

Define \(v(N)=1-(1-p)^{N}.\) Then, the function defined by (4) can be rewritten as

$$\begin{aligned} r(N)=1-\frac{\left( 1-\left[ v(N)\right] ^{n}\right) }{\left( 1-\left[ 1- \frac{1-v(N)}{1-p}\right] ^{n}\right) }. \end{aligned}$$

Because p is known and satisfies \(0<p<1\), the proof follows by applying the L’hospital rule and noting that \(v(N)\longrightarrow 1\) as \(N\longrightarrow \infty .\)

Proof of Proposition 2

Manifestly,

$$\begin{aligned} P\left\{ S(T)=n,T\le N\right\} +P\left\{ S(T)\ne n,T\le N\right\} =P\left\{ T\le N\right\} . \end{aligned}$$

Because \(P\left\{ S(T)\ne n,T\le N\right\} =0\),

$$\begin{aligned} P\left\{ S(T)=n,T\le N\right\} =P\left\{ T\le N\right\} . \end{aligned}$$

Thus, we have

$$\begin{aligned} P\left\{ S(T)=n\mid T\le N\right\} =\frac{P\left\{ T\le N\right\} }{ P\left\{ T\le N\right\} }=1 \end{aligned}$$

which implies (5). On the other hand, from Corollary 1 of Jasinski (2021), we have

$$\begin{aligned} P\left\{ S(N)=i\mid T>N\right\} =\frac{\left( {\begin{array}{c}n\\ i\end{array}}\right) F^{i}(N)(1-F(N))^{n-i}}{ 1-F^{n}(N)}, \end{aligned}$$

for \(i=0,1,...,n-1\). Thus

$$\begin{aligned} E(S(N) \mid T>N)= & {} \frac{1}{1-F^{n}(N)}\sum \limits _{i=0}^{n-1}i\left( {\begin{array}{c}n\\ i\end{array}}\right) F^{i}(N)(1-F(N))^{n-i} \\= & {} \frac{nF(N)(1-F^{n-1}(N))}{1-F^{n}(N)}, \end{aligned}$$

where the last equation follows from

$$\begin{aligned} \sum \limits _{i=0}^{n-1}\left( {\begin{array}{c}n\\ i\end{array}}\right) ia^{i}(1-a)^{n-i}=na(1-a^{n-1}). \end{aligned}$$

Proof of Theorem 1

A necessary condition for the existence of finite and unique \(N^{*}\) minimizing C(N) is that an \(N^{*}\) satisfies

$$\begin{aligned} C(N+1)\ge C(N), \end{aligned}$$
(A.1)

and

$$\begin{aligned} C(N)<C(N-1), \end{aligned}$$
(A.2)

for \(N=1,2,...\). From (8) and (A.1), we have that

$$\begin{aligned} a\sum \nolimits _{t=0}^{N-1}\left[ 1-F^{n}(t)\right] +b(1-F^{n}(N+1))\sum \nolimits _{t=0}^{N-1}\left[ 1-F^{n}(t)\right] \\ +nc_{a}F(N+1)(1-F^{n-1}(N+1))\sum \nolimits _{t=0}^{N-1}\left[ 1-F^{n}(t) \right] -a\sum \nolimits _{t=0}^{N}\left[ 1-F^{n}(t)\right] \\ -b(1-F^{n}(N))\sum \nolimits _{t=0}^{N}\left[ 1-F^{n}(t)\right] -nc_{a}F(N)(1-F^{n-1}(N))\sum \nolimits _{t=0}^{N}\left[ 1-F^{n}(t)\right] \ge 0 \end{aligned}$$

After some simple manipulations, we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \left[ nc_{a}\frac{F(N+1)(1-F^{n-1}(N+1))-F(N)(1-F^{n-1}(N))}{1-F^{n}(N)}-b \frac{F^{n}(N+1)-F^{n}(N)}{1-F^{n}(N)}\right] \\ \times \sum \nolimits _{t=0}^{N-1}\left[ 1-F^{n}(t)\right] -b\left[ 1-F^{n}(N) \right] -nc_{a}F(N)(1-F^{n-1}(N))\ge a \end{aligned}$$

which yields

$$\begin{aligned}&\left[ nc_{a}\frac{H(N+1)-H(N)}{1-F^{n}(N)}-b\cdot r(N+1)\right] \sum \nolimits _{t=0}^{N-1}\left[ 1-F^{n}(t)\right] \nonumber \\&-b\left[ 1-F^{n}(N)\right] -nc_{a}H(N)\ge a, \end{aligned}$$
(A.3)

where \(H(N)=F(N)(1-F^{n-1}(N)).\) Similarly, from (A.2)

$$\begin{aligned}&\left[ nc_{a}\frac{H(N)-H(N-1)}{1-F^{n}(N-1)}-b\cdot r(N)\right] \sum \nolimits _{t=0}^{N-2}\left[ 1-F^{n}(t)\right] \nonumber \\&-b\left[ 1-F^{n}(N-1)\right] -nc_{a}H(N-1)<a. \end{aligned}$$
(A.4)

Thus, if

$$\begin{aligned}&\lim _{N\longrightarrow \infty }\left[ nc_{a}\frac{H(N+1)-H(N)}{1-F^{n}(N)} -b\cdot r(N+1)\right] \sum \nolimits _{t=0}^{N-1}\left[ 1-F^{n}(t)\right] \nonumber \\&-b\left[ 1-F^{n}(N)\right] -nc_{a}H(N)\ge a, \end{aligned}$$
(A.5)

then there exists a finite and unique \(N^{*}\) satisfying (A.3) and (A.4). Manifestly,

$$\begin{aligned} \lim _{N\longrightarrow \infty }\frac{H(N+1)-H(N)}{1-F^{n}(N)} =\lim _{N\longrightarrow \infty }\frac{F(N+1)-F(N)}{1-F^{n}(N)}-\frac{ F^{n}(N+1)-F^{n}(N)}{1-F^{n}(N)}. \end{aligned}$$

Using the L’hospital rule for the first fraction and Proposition 1 for the second fraction, we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \lim _{N\longrightarrow \infty }\frac{H(N+1)-H(N)}{1-F^{n}(N)}=\left( \frac{1 }{n}-1\right) p. \end{aligned}$$

Thus the condition (A.5) becomes

$$\begin{aligned} \left[ nc_{a}\left( \frac{1-n}{n}\right) p-bp\right] E(T)>a \end{aligned}$$

which is equivalent to (9).

Proof of Proposition 3

Clearly,

$$\begin{aligned} P\left\{ S(N)=0\mid T>N\right\} =\frac{P\left\{ X_{1}>N,X_{2}>N\right\} }{ P\left\{ T>N\right\} }. \end{aligned}$$

Thus, we have

$$\begin{aligned} P\left\{ S(N)=1\mid T>N\right\}= & {} 1-\frac{P\left\{ X_{1}>N,X_{2}>N\right\} }{P\left\{ T>N\right\} } \\= & {} 1-\frac{P\left\{ X_{1}>N,X_{2}>N\right\} }{1-P\left\{ X_{1}\le N,X_{2}\le N\right\} } \end{aligned}$$

which gives the result.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eryilmaz, S., Tank, F. Optimal age replacement policy for discrete time parallel systems. TOP 31, 475–490 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-022-00648-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-022-00648-y

Keywords

Mathematic Subject Classification

Navigation