Skip to main content
Log in

Obnoxious facility location in multiple dimensional space

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The obnoxious facility location problem in three dimensions is optimally solved by an exact method based on Apollonius spheres, and in three or more dimensions by a modification of the Big-Cube-Small-Cube (BCSC, Schobel and Scholz in Comput Oper Res 37:115–122, 2010) global optimization method to within a pre-specified accuracy. In our implementation, no specifically designed bounds are required. The general purpose bounds proposed in this paper do not employ derivatives of the functions. Such an approach can be used, for example, for locating multiple obnoxious facilities in two dimensional space, locating obnoxious facilities on the plane with demand points in three-dimensional space, or applying different distance norms. We concentrated mainly on three-dimensional problems which have the most practical applications. A four dimensional practical application is presented. We solved problems in a cube, part of a cube, a non-convex building, and locating a facility on the plane when demand points are in a three-dimensional space. We also solved problems in 4–6 dimensions to illustrate the effectiveness of the BCSC method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Church RL, Drezner Z (2022) Review of obnoxious facilities location problems. Comput Oper Res 138:105468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church RL, Garfinkel RS (1978) Locating an obnoxious facility on a network. Transp Sci 12:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z, Wesolowsky GO (1983) Minimax and maximin facility location problems on a sphere. Naval Res Logist Q 30:305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z, Kalczynski P, Salhi S (2019) The multiple obnoxious facilities location problem on the plane: a Voronoi based heuristic. OMEGA: Int J Manag Sci 87:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T, Drezner Z, Kalczynski P (2020) Multiple obnoxious facilities location: a cooperative model. IISE Trans 52:1403–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durier R, Michelot C (1985) Geometrical properties of the Fermat-weber problem. Eur J Oper Res 20:332–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkut E, Neuman S (1989) Analytical models for locating undesirable facilities. Eur J Oper Res 40:275–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, McGinnis LF Jr, White JA (1992) Facility layout and location: an analytical approach, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman AJ, Dearing PM (1975) Concepts of optimal location for partially noxious facilities. Bull Oper Res Soc Am 23:B85

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamacher HW, Nickel S (1998) Classification of location models. Locat Sci 6:229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen P, Peeters D, Thisse J-F (1981) On the location of an obnoxious facility. Sistemi Urbani 3:299–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen P, Jaumard B, Krau S (1995) An algorithm for Weber’s problem on the sphere. Locat Sci 3:217–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert D, Cohn-Vossen S (1932) Anschauliche geometrie. Springer, Berlin. English translation published by Chelsea Publishing Company, New York (1956): Geometry and the imagination

  • Johnson RA (2013) Advanced Euclidean geometry. Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalczynski P, Drezner Z (2021) Extremely non-convex optimization problems: the case of the multiple obnoxious facilities location. Optim Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-021-01731-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalczynski P, Suzuki A, Drezner Z (2020) Obnoxious facility location: the case of weighted demand points. In review, ArXiv: arXiv:2008.04386 [math.OC]

  • Love RF, Morris JG, Wesolowsky GO (1988) Facilities location: models & methods. North Holland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahieu E (2015) Trilateration and the intersection of three spheres. http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/TrilaterationAndTheIntersectionOfThreeSpheres/Wolfram Demonstrations Project

  • Oguejiofor O, Aniedu A, Ejiofor H, Okolibe A (2013) Trilateration based localization algorithm for wireless sensor network. Int J Sci Modern Eng (IJISME) 1:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Partensky MB (2008) The circle of Apollonius and its applications in introductory physics. Phys Teach 46:104–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöbel A, Scholz D (2010) The big cube small cube solution method for multidimensional facility location problems. Comput Oper Res 37:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamos M, Hoey D (1975) Closest-point problems. In: Proceedings 16th Annual Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, Berkeley, CA, pp 151–162

  • Suzuki A (2019) Big triangle small triangle method for the Weber problem on the sphere. In: Eiselt HA, Marianov V (eds) Contributions to Location Analysis—In Honor of Zvi Drezner’s 75th Birthday. Springer, pp 109–123

  • Thisse J-F, Ward JE, Wendell RE (1984) Some properties of location problems with block and round norms. Oper Res 32(6):1309–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas F, Ros L (2005) Revisiting trilateration for robot localization. IEEE Trans Rob 21:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch SB, Salhi S, Drezner Z (2006) The multifacility maximin planar location problem with facility interaction. IMA J Manag Math 17:397–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zmazek B, Žerovnik J (2004) The obnoxious center problem on weighted cactus graphs. Discret Appl Math 136:377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zvi Drezner.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: Intersection points of 3 spheres

For notation purposes all upper case variables are vectors of 3 components: a vector \(X=(x_1,x_2,x_3)\). Greek letters or lower case letters are single numbers. The scalar product \(\cdot \) is: \(A\cdot B=a_1b_1+a_2b_2+a_3b_3\). The cross operator \(\times \) of two vectors A and B is: \(A\times B=(a_2b_3-a_3b_2,-a_1b_3+a_3b_1,a_1b_2-a_2b_1)\). The norm of a vector is \(||X||=\sqrt{x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2}\).

The centers of the three spheres are \(X_1, X_2, X_3\) with radii \(r_1,r_2,r_3\). The intersection points are calculated by the following sequence:

  1. 1.

    \(U=\frac{X_2-X_1}{||X_2-X_1||}\);  \(\alpha =U\cdot (X_3-X_1)\)

  2. 2.

    \(V=\frac{X_3-X_1-\alpha U}{||X_3-X_1-\alpha U||}\);  \(\beta =V\cdot (X_3-X_1)\)

  3. 3.

    \(\gamma =\frac{r_1^2-r_2^2+||X_2-X_1||^2}{2||X_2-X_1||}\);  \(\delta =\frac{r_1^2-r_3^2-2\alpha \gamma +\alpha ^2+\beta ^2}{2\beta }\)

  4. 4.

    \(\Delta =r_1^2-\gamma ^2-\delta ^2\)

  5. 5.

    If \(\Delta <0\) there are no intersection points.

  6. 6.

    Otherwise, the two intersection points are: \(X=X_1+\gamma U+\delta V\pm \sqrt{\Delta }(U\times V)\).

Appendix B: The Fortran program

Fig. 5
figure 5

A FORTRAN code that finds all the intersection points of 3 spheres

The part of the FORTRAN program that finds all feasible intersections of 3 spheres is depicted in Fig. 5. An additional part of the program (not shown) evaluates intersections between spheres and the boundary of the cube. The three centers are \(x_i, y_i, z_i\) for \(i=1,2,3\). The demand points are in the vectors \(x(\cdot ), y(\cdot ), z(\cdot )\) with weights \(w(\cdot )\) and weight squared in \(w2(\cdot )\). The function “fall” calculates the squared value of the objective function and stops the evaluation if the value drops below the best known solution:

figure a

Appendix C: Finding the \(3^{\delta} -2^{\delta} \) sequences

See Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
figure 6

A FORTRAN code to find the \(3^{\delta} -2^{\delta} \) sequences of length \(\delta \), and the \(\delta =3\) sequences

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalczynski, P., Suzuki, A. & Drezner, Z. Obnoxious facility location in multiple dimensional space. TOP 31, 331–354 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-022-00640-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-022-00640-6

Keywords

Navigation