Abstract
Let G be a semiabelian variety and \(C\) a curve in G that is not contained in a proper algebraic subgroup of G. In this situation, conjectures of Pink and Zilber imply that there are at most finitely many points contained in the so-called unlikely intersections of \(C\) with subgroups of codimension at least 2. In this note, we establish this assertion for general semiabelian varieties over \(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}\). This extends results of Maurin and Bombieri, Habegger, Masser, and Zannier in the toric case as well as Habegger and Pila in the abelian case.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Let G be a semiabelian variety defined over \(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}\) and \(X \subseteq G\) an algebraic subvariety. In this article, we study the intersections of X with algebraic subgroups \(H \subseteq G\) having codimension at least \(\dim (X)+1\). For reasons of dimension, one does not expect that such a subgroup H intersects X at all. However, such “unlikely intersections” can appear and interesting phenomena arise when intersecting \(X \subseteq G\) with the countable union \(G^{[\dim (X)+1]}\) of all algebraic subgroups having codimension \(\ge \dim (X)+1\). For example, it is not clear a priori whether the intersection \(X \cap G^{[\dim (X)+1]}\) is Zariski-dense in X or not. However, conjectures of Pink [43] and Zilber [63] imply the following.
Conjecture
(Unlikely Intersection Conjecture, (UIC)). If X is not contained in a proper algebraic subgroup of G, then \(X \cap G^{[\dim (X)+1]}\) is not Zariski-dense in X.
One immediately realizes that, in the case X is a hypersurface, this statement is exactly the Manin–Mumford conjecture which was proved by Laurent [33], Raynaud [46] and Hindry [26] in the multiplicative, abelian and general semiabelian case respectively.
Some special cases of the above conjecture have been already mentioned in a pioneering work of Bombieri et al. [10], in which they proved that a curve \(C\) in \(G=\mathbb {G}_{m}^t\) has finite intersection with \(G^{[2]}\) under the stronger assumption that \(C\) is not contained in any translate of a proper algebraic subgroup of G. Maurin [35] gave a general proof with the weaker necessary assumption that \(C\) is not contained in a proper algebraic subgroup, using the generalized Vojta inequality of Rémond [48]. An alternative proof has been given by Bombieri et al. [9], relying on Habegger’s proof of the Bounded Height Conjecture for algebraic tori [25].
After several partial results [14, 20, 45, 47, 56] in this direction, Habegger and Pila [27] eventually proved (UIC) for curves in abelian varieties, using o-minimal counting techniques.
The main purpose of this note is to establish the following generalization of the results in [27, 35], which amounts to the full (UIC) in case X is an algebraic curve.
Theorem 1.1
Let G be a semiabelian variety and \(C\subseteq G\) an irreducible curve not contained in a proper algebraic subgroup of G. Suppose \(C\) and G are defined over a number field \(\mathbb {K}\). Then \(C\cap G^{[2]}\) is finite.
If C is contained in a proper algebraic subgroup H of G, the intersection of C with \(G^{[2]}\) can be infinite. This is easy to see in the toric case \(G = \mathbb {G}_{m}^t\). Passing to the component of H containing C, which can be assumed to be \( \approx \mathbb {G}_{m}^{t^\prime }\) possibly after raising C to an appropriate power, this reduces to the well-known fact that the intersection of a curve \(C^\prime \subseteq \mathbb {G}_{m}^{t^\prime }\) with \((\mathbb {G}_{m}^{t^\prime })^{[1]}\) is infinite. Indeed, any non-constant rational function f on \(C^\prime \) attains infinitely many roots of unity as values, the preimages of which are elements of \(C^\prime \cap (\mathbb {G}_{m}^{t^\prime })^{[1]}\) if f is the restriction of a standard coordinate function on \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^{t^\prime }\). In conclusion, our result is essentially optimal.
We also note that the above theorem implies the Mordell–Lang conjecture for curves in semiabelian varieties [42, Theorem 5.3], yielding hence a special case of a well-known result of McQuillan [37]. However, we make use of the Mordell–Lang conjecture—in the proof of Lemma 3.1—for the intersection of curves in abelian varieties with their Mordell–Weil group. This is also a source of non-effectivity in our main result.
Our main Theorem and most of the above-mentioned results concern semiabelian varieties defined over the algebraic numbers due to the arithmetical methods employed in the proofs. Of course, one might look at curves and semiabelian varieties defined over larger fields. In [13], the authors show that Maurin’s Theorem holds for complex curves, while the first author, in collaboration with Dill, extended the work of Habegger and Pila to curves and abelian varieties over the complex numbers in [5]. Finally, in [4], they extended our Theorem 1.1 to complex curves lying in semiabelian varieties over \(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}\).
Our proof of Theorem 1.1 follows the strategy employed by Bombieri et al. in [9], relying on the Bounded Height Conjecture proved for semiabelian varieties by the second author [30]. However, new difficulties arise in its implementation for semiabelian varieties instead of algebraic tori.
First, semiabelian varieties lack Poincaré reducibility, which is true for tori as well as for abelian varieties. This makes it often necessary to avoid its usage by other tools, mostly through auxiliary quotient constructions.
Second, we have to prove that the points in \(C \cap G^{[2]}\) satisfy a Northcott property (i.e., there are only finitely many such points of height \(\le B\) for any constant B); see Proposition 4.1. In the toric case \(G = \mathbb {G}_{m}^t\), this was proven in [11, Lemma 1], but as this approach does not seem to generalize to semiabelian varieties, we adapt instead a counting argument from the proof of (UIC) for curves in abelian varieties given by Habegger and Pila [27]. The proof of this counting argument involves linear forms in logarithms on semiabelian varieties [21, 60] as well as Pila and Wilkie’s o-minimal counting Theorem [44] and its refinement [27] and Ax’s Theorem [1].
Third, technical difficulties related to semiabelian varieties appear throughout the argument. A rather unexpected complication comes from the mixed structure of semiabelian varieties. In order to establish a close relation between the algebraic degree of a subgroup \(H \subseteq G\) and the covolume of the associated period lattice \(\Omega _H\) in its \({\mathbb {R}}\)-linear span \(V_H\) (Lemma 2.2), it is necessary to choose a specific metric on the Lie algebra of \(G({\mathbb {C}})\).
Our result has applications in the context of Pell equations over polynomial rings. In fact, Masser and Zannier [39] had the astonishing insight that there is a connection between (UIC) and the (local) solvability of families of such Pell equations over a base curve. As an example, let us consider the two equations
and
where we consider T as the coordinate on the base curve \({{\mathbb {A}}}_{{\mathbb {C}}}^1{\setminus } \{1\}\) and seek solutions \((A,B) \in \mathbb {C}[X]^2\) after the specialization \(T = t\), \(t \in \mathbb {C}{\setminus } \{1\}\). Consider the family of curves
over \(U= {\mathbb {A}}_{\mathbb {C}}^1{\setminus } \{(-1)^{1/3},1\}\) and, for each \(t \in U({\mathbb {C}})\), the points
of \({\mathcal {C}}_t\). Denote by \(\infty ^\pm _t\) the two points at infinity of a projective non-singular model \(\overline{{\mathcal {C}}}_t\) of \({\mathcal {C}}_t\). Following the argument in [2, Section 9], it can be seen that we have a solution \((A,B) \in \mathbb {C}[X]^2\) of (1, \(T = t\)) if and only if \(P_t= [P^+_t-\infty ^-_t] \) is a multiple of \(Q_t = [\infty ^+_t-\infty ^-_t]\) on the Jacobian \(\textrm{Jac}(\overline{{\mathcal {C}}}_t)\). Looking at the degree of T in (1), it is clear that the equation is not identically solvable and thus \(P_t\) is not a multiple of \(Q_t\) identically. On the other hand, one can show using Siegel’s Theorem for integral points on curves over function fields (see the end of Section 10 of [2] or p. 68 of [61]) that there are infinitely many \(t \in \mathbb {C}\) for which \(P_t\) is a multiple of \(Q_t\). Thus the equation (1, \(T = t\)) is solvable for infinitely many \(t \in \mathbb {C}\).
In contrast to this, our Theorem 1.1 implies that there are at most finitely many \(t \in {\mathbb {C}}\) such that the other equation (2, \(T=t\)) admits a solution \((A,B) \in \mathbb {C}[X]^2\). However note that the polynomial in front of \(B^2\) in (2) is not square-free. This forces one to consider not just abelian varieties but also linear extensions of those. See [7] or [49] for a short description and some examples involving multiplicative as well as additive extensions. The generic fiber of the family \({\mathcal {C}}\) is birationally equivalent to the elliptic curve
inducing an isomorphism between the Jacobians of their projective non-singular models.
We write \(\varphi _T: {\mathcal {C}}\dashrightarrow E\) for the birational map over \({\overline{\mathbb {Q}}}(T)\). It is explicitly given by sending (X, Y) to \((1/X + T, Y/X^2)\) and we first compute that
Note that
Write \(\textrm{Jac}_{\mathfrak {m}}(E)\) for the generalized Jacobian of E with respect to the modulus
From Lutz–Nagell for number fields [52, VIII, Exercise 8.11], it follows that \((1, \pm \sqrt{2})\) is not torsion on E. Consulting the references cited above, we conclude that \(\textrm{Jac}_{\mathfrak {m}}(E)\) is isomorphic to a fixed non-split extension G of E by \({\mathbb {G}}_m\). We write
Now suppose we have a solution of (2, \(T = t\)). Then we get a rational function f on E whose divisor is a linear combination of the divisors \([\varphi _t(P_t^+) -\varphi _t(\infty _t^-)]\) and \([\varphi _t(\infty ^+_t)-\varphi _t(\infty ^-_t)]\). Moreover \(f(1, \sqrt{2}) = f(1,-\sqrt{2}) \ne 0\). This implies that \({\overline{P}}_t, {\overline{Q}}_t\) satisfy a linear relation over \({\mathbb {Z}}\). As t varies over the points of the base curve U, the point \(({\overline{P}}_t, {\overline{Q}}_t)\) defines an irreducible curve C in \(G^2\) and each linear relation defines a subgroup of \(G^2\) of codimension 2. Clearly, both G and C are defined over the algebraic numbers. In addition, we can check that the point \(\varphi _{-2}(P^{\pm }_{-2}) = (-1,0)\) is torsion on E while, again using Lutz–Nagell, one can check that \(\varphi _{-2}(\infty _{-2}^{\pm })\) is not torsion. Thus \(\overline{P_t}, {\overline{Q}}_t \in \textrm{Jac}_{{\mathfrak {m}}}(E)\) satisfy no constant linear relation and C is not contained in a subgroup of \(G^2\) of positive codimension. This reduces the finiteness assertion to our Theorem 1.1.
Another application of this kind of results has recently appeared in [3] and concerns multiplicative dependence of values of rational functions and linear dependence of points of elliptic curves after reduction modulo primes. There are three main results in [3] respectively for \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^t\), \(E^g\) and \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^t\times E^g\), where E is an elliptic curve over \(\mathbb {Q}\), and they use the appropriate special case of the statement of Theorem 1.1. While for the first two cases, the desired results were already in the literature [20, 35, 56], for the third the authors prove a weaker case of Theorem 1.1 where the projections of the curve on the multiplicative and the elliptic factors cannot both be contained in proper coset. In this way, the bounded height results contained in [10, 55] are sufficient and the use of the strategy of [9] can be avoided. With the result of this article we can remove that superfluous hypothesis in Theorem 2.8 of [3] and in its corollaries.
2 Preliminaries
Throughout this section, G is a semiabelian variety defined over a field k. Recall that this means that G is a connected smooth algebraic k-group that is the extension
of an abelian variety A of dimension g by an algebraic torus T. We always assume that \(T=\mathbb {G}_{m}^t\); such an identification can always be made if \(k={\mathbb {C}}\) or after base change to a finite extension of k.
In this section we collect and prove several basic results that we are going to need later.
2.1 The open anomalous locus
A coset in G is the translate \(H + p\) of a connected algebraic subgroup H by a closed point p of G. We usually write cosets of G in the form \(p+H\). Let V be an irreducible subvariety of G. A positive-dimensional irreducible subvariety \(W\subseteq V\) is called G-anomalous (or simply anomalous) in V if it is contained in a coset \(p+H\) with
We let \(V^{\textrm{oa},G}\) (or simply \(V^{\textrm{oa}}\)) to be the complement in V of the union of all anomalous subvarieties of V.
The following theorem is a generalization of Theorem 1.4 of [12].
Theorem 2.1
(Structure Theorem). Let \(V\subseteq G\) be an irreducible subvariety of positive dimension.
-
(a)
For any proper semiabelian subvariety H of G, the union \({\mathscr {Z}}_H\) of all subvarieties W of V contained in any coset of H with
$$\begin{aligned} \dim W > \max \{0, \dim V +\dim H - \dim G \} \end{aligned}$$(3)is a closed subset of V, and the set \(H + {\mathscr {Z}}_H\) is not dense in G.
-
(b)
There is a finite collection \(\varPhi _V\) of such proper semiabelian subvarieties H such that every maximal anomalous subvariety W of V is a component of \(V \cap (p+H)\) for some H in \(\varPhi _V\) satisfying (3) and some p in \({\mathscr {Z}}_H\); and \(V^{oa}\) is obtained from V by removing the \({\mathscr {Z}}_H\) for all H in \(\varPhi _V\). In particular \(V^{oa}\) is open in V.
Proof
This is essentially contained in the proof of [15, Corollary 2.4] and follows from work of Kirby [29] and the Fiber Dimension Theorem (see, e.g., [12, p. 8]).
Let us first prove part (a). Consider the projection \(\psi :G\rightarrow G/H\) and its restriction \(\psi _V:V\rightarrow \psi (V)\) to V. Then, \(V \cap (p+H)= \psi _V^{-1}(\psi _V(p))\) for all \(p \in V\). Now, the set \({\mathscr {Z}}_H\) consists of the fibers of \(\psi _V\) of dimension
and is therefore closed in V by the Fiber Dimension Theorem. The set \(H + {\mathscr {Z}}_H\) is nothing but the union of all cosets of H that give rise to an anomalous component in V. We have \(\psi (H + {\mathscr {Z}}_H)= \psi ({\mathscr {Z}}_H)\subseteq \psi (V)\). If \(H + {\mathscr {Z}}_H\) were dense in G, then \(\psi ( {\mathscr {Z}}_H)\) would be dense in G/H. This is only possible if \(\psi (V)\) is dense in G/H. This implies that
But now the Fiber Dimension Theorem gives an open dense \(U \subseteq \psi (V)\) whose points q satisfy
The set U must then be disjoint from \(\psi ({\mathscr {Z}}_H)\) and therefore the latter cannot be dense in G/H.
We now turn to part (b). We recall [15, Theorem 2.3], which is a corollary of the theorem on [29, p. 449]. If V is an irreducible subvariety of G then there exists a finite family \(\varPhi _V\) of proper semiabelian subvarieties such that for all cosets \(p+K\) of a semiabelian subvariety K and all anomalous components W of \(V\cap (p+K)\) there exists an \(H\in \varPhi _V\) and \(q\in G\) so that \(W\subseteq q+H\) and
where \(W'\) is the irreducible component of \(V\cap (q+H)\) containing W. Now, let W be a maximal anomalous component arising from an intersection \(V\cap (p+K)\). We can suppose that K is the smallest semiabelian subvariety so that \(W\subseteq p+K\). We will show that \(K \in \varPhi _V\), where \(\varPhi _V\) is as in the above statement. The statement actually gives an \(H\in \varPhi _V\) with (4). We show that \(K=H\). By assumption we have \(K\subseteq H\). Let \(W'\) be the irreducible component of \(V\cap (q+H)\) containing W and suppose \(H\ne K\) so \(W\subsetneq W'\). By the maximality of W, \(W'\) cannot be anomalous and we have
So, by (4), we have
which contradicts the fact that W was an atypical component of the intersection \(V\cap (p+K)\). \(\square \)
2.2 Degrees of subgroups and periods
In this subsection, we consider a semiabelian variety G defined over \({\mathbb {C}}\). We identify smooth subvarieties \(X \subseteq G\) with the complex analytic manifolds associated to them through analytification [50].
For the degree computations in this subsection, it is convenient to work with an explicit compactification \({\overline{G}}_0\) of G and a specific ample line bundle \(L_0\) on \({\overline{G}}_0\). Nevertheless, the results obtained are independent of this specific choice. Let us consider the compactification \({\overline{G}}_0\) of G, the maps \(\overline{[n]}: {\overline{G}}_0 \rightarrow {\overline{G}}_0\) and \({\overline{\pi }}: {\overline{G}}_0 \rightarrow A\), and the line bundle \(M=M_{{\overline{G}}_0}\) from [30, Construction 5]. Furthermore, we choose a very ample symmetric line bundle N on the abelian quotient A of G. We then choose the line bundle \(L_0 = M \otimes {\overline{\pi }}^{*} N\) on \({\overline{G}}_0\). Indeed, this is an ample line bundle by [30, Lemma 3]. As \(\overline{[2]}^*M = M^{\otimes 2}\) and \(\overline{[2]}^*N = N^{\otimes 4}\), we can endow both M and N with canonical hermitian metrics \(h_M\) and \(h_N\) by using [62, Theorem 2.2]. These metrics are unique up to a non-zero scalar.
Let \(\exp _{G}: \textrm{Lie}(G) \rightarrow G\) be the (complex) Lie group exponential of G and write \(\Omega _G = \exp _G^{-1}(\{0_G\})\) for the periods of G. It is well known that \(\Omega _G\) is a discrete subgroup of \(\textrm{Lie}(G)\) of rank \(2g+t\) and we write \(V_G \subseteq \textrm{Lie}(G)\) for its \({\mathbb {R}}\)-linear span, which coincides with the preimage of the maximal compact subgroup \(K_G \subseteq G\) under \(\exp _G\); we use analogous notations for other semiabelian varieties.
The exact sequence
induces an exact sequence
restricting to a sequence
between the respective period lattices. Finally, we obtain an exact sequence
of \({\mathbb {R}}\)-vector spaces.
Starting from the (1, 1)-form \(c_1(N,h_N)\), we can define a symmetric, positive definite, \({\mathbb {R}}\)-bilinear form on \(V_A\); in fact, the pullback \(\exp _A^{*}c_1(N,h_N)\) is an invariant positive definite (1, 1)-form on the \({\mathbb {C}}\)-vector space \(\textrm{Lie}(A)=V_A\). We can hence use the one-to-one correspondence between Hermitian forms and symmetric \({\mathbb {R}}\)-bilinear forms (see e.g. [30, Section 4]). Write \(g_{\textrm{ab}}\) for the invariant Riemannian metric obtained on \(V_A\) in this way. We also describe an invariant Riemannian metric \(g_{\textrm{tor}}\) on \(V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t}\) as follows: The standard product decomposition \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^t = \mathbb {G}_{m}\times \cdots \times \mathbb {G}_{m}\) gives rise to a product decomposition
of the period lattice. We let \(g_{\textrm{tor}}\) be the unique invariant Riemannian metric on \(V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t}\) such that
form a \(g_{\textrm{tor}}\)-orthonormal basis of \(V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t}\).
In order to obtain a metric \(g_G\) on \(V_G\) from \(g_{\textrm{ab}}\) and \(g_{\textrm{tor}}\), we next describe a canonical splitting \(\sigma : V_G \rightarrow V_{{\mathbb {G}}_m^t}\) of (5). Consider the additive homomorphisms \(\lambda _1,\dots ,\lambda _t: G({\mathbb {C}}) \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) afforded by [30, Lemma 14]. We recall also that
coincides with the maximal compact subgroup \(K_G\) of \(G({\mathbb {C}})\). In addition, the functions \(\lambda _1,\dots ,\lambda _t\) satisfy a certain functoriality: Let \(\varphi : H \rightarrow G\) be a homomorphism of semiabelian varieties inducing a homomorphism \(\varphi _{\textrm{tor}}: \mathbb {G}_{m}^{t^\prime } \rightarrow \mathbb {G}_{m}^t\) of their maximal tori. Write \(X_i\) (resp. \(Y_j\)) for the standard algebraic coordinates on \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^{t}\) (resp. \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^{t^\prime }\)) so that we have \(\varphi _{\textrm{tor}}^*(X_u)=Y_1^{a_{ u1}}\ldots Y_{t^\prime }^{a_{u t^\prime }}\) with integers \(a_{uv}\) (\(1 \le u \le t\), \(1 \le v \le t^\prime \)). Let \(\lambda ^\prime _1,\dots ,\lambda ^\prime _{t^\prime }: H({\mathbb {C}}) \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) be given by invoking [30, Lemma 14] for H. On \(H({\mathbb {C}})\) there is then an identity
all these facts can be found with proofs in [30, Section 5.1].
The compositions \(\lambda _j \circ \exp _G: \textrm{Lie}(G) \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\), \(j=1,\dots ,t\), are \({\mathbb {R}}\)-linear and their common zero locus is precisely \(\textrm{Lie}(K_G)\). As G is a complex Lie group, multiplication-by-i (\(i = \sqrt{-1})\) induces an \({\mathbb {R}}\)-linear map \(I:\textrm{Lie}(G) \rightarrow \textrm{Lie}(G)\). (Note that I does not preserve \(\textrm{Lie}(K_G)\).) For each \(u \in \{1,\dots ,t\}\), we set
Lemma 2.1
Identifying \((2\pi i {\mathbb {R}})^t\) with \(V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t}\) in the obvious way, the \({\mathbb {R}}\)-linear map
splits the exact sequence (5) on the left.
This splitting is compatible with passing to subgroups: If \(H \subseteq G\) is an algebraic subgroup with maximal torus \(T \subseteq \mathbb {G}_{m}^t\), then we have \(\sigma (V_H) \subseteq V_T\) in \(V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t}\).
Proof
Writing \(\iota : V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t} \hookrightarrow V_{G}\) for the inclusion from (5), we have to show that \(\sigma \circ \iota \) is the identity on \(V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t}\). By functoriality (6), we can reduce to the case \(G=\mathbb {G}_{m}^t\) for this. We can furthermore restrict to the case \(t=1\) because of the product structure. In this case, we have \(\lambda _1(z) = \log |z|\) where z is the standard complex coordinate on \(\mathbb {G}_{m}\) (compare again [30, Section 5.1]). In addition, \(\exp _G\) is just the ordinary exponential function. For each real number r, we have thus
which completes the proof of the first assertion.
The second assertion follows from functoriality (6): Let \(X_1,\dots ,X_t\) be the standard algebraic coordinates on \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^t\). If \(X_1^{a_1}\ldots X_t^{a_t}-1\) vanishes on the subtorus \(T \subseteq \mathbb {G}_{m}^t\), (6) guarantees that \(a_1\lambda _1 + \cdots + a_t\lambda _t\) vanishes on \(H({\mathbb {C}})\). This yields a corresponding linear relation on the image of \(\sigma |_H\). Varying the binomial \(X_1^{a_1} \ldots X_t^{a_t}-1\) vanishing on T, the subspace \(V_T\) is precisely cut out by these linear relations. Thus we deduce \(\sigma (V_H) \subseteq V_T\). \(\square \)
The splitting (7) induces an \({\mathbb {R}}\)-linear isomorphism \(V_G = V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t} \times V_A\). Using this isomorphism, we obtain a Riemannian metric \(g_G = g_{\textrm{tor}} \times g_{\textrm{ab}}\) on \(V_G\). This allows us to consider the covolume \(\textrm{covol}_{g_G}(\Omega \subset V)\) of a discrete subgroup \(\Omega \) of \(V_G\) inside its \(\mathbb {R}\)-span V.
In what follows, for a semiabelian subvariety H of G, \({\overline{H}}\) indicates the closure of H in \({\overline{G}}\). Furthermore, we fix an arbitrary ample line bundle L on \({\overline{G}}\) once and for all.
Lemma 2.2
Let \(H \subseteq G\) be a semiabelian subvariety with maximal torus \(T \subseteq \mathbb {G}_{m}^t\) and maximal abelian quotient \(B \subseteq A\). Then,
for constants \(c_1,c_2 >0\) that depend only on \(\dim (G)\) and L.
If G is an abelian variety, the above inequalities can be sharpened to an equality [27, Lemma 3.1]. In the toric case, this is unfortunately not possible. In fact, the one-dimensional subtorus \(T \subseteq \mathbb {G}_{m}^2\) determined by the equation \(X_1^{a_1}X_2^{a_2}=1\), \(\gcd (a_1,a_2)=1\), in standard coordinates \(X_1,X_2\) on \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^2\) has degree \(|a_1|+|a_2|\) with respect to the line bundle \(\textrm{pr}_1^*{\mathcal {O}}(1) \otimes \textrm{pr}_2^*{\mathcal {O}}(1)\) on the standard compactification \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^2 \hookrightarrow {\mathbb {P}}^1 \times {\mathbb {P}}^1\), whereas \(\textrm{covol}(\Omega _T \subset V_T)=(|a_1|^2+|a_2|^2)^{1/2}\).
Proof of Lemma 2.2
Without loss of generality, we can assume that \({\overline{G}}={\overline{G}}_0\) and \(L=L_0\) for the proof of the lemma.
The corresponding diagram of algebraic groups induces a commutative diagram with exact rows
consisting of \({\mathbb {R}}\)-linear vector spaces. By Lemma 2.1, the restriction \(\sigma |_{V_H}: V_H \rightarrow V_T\) is a splitting of the upper row. It hence induces a \(g_G\)-orthogonal decomposition \(V_H = V_{T} \times V_B\) so that
By Lemma 2.3 below, we have
Therefore, it suffices to prove
and
We first prove the inequalities in (8). Choose an isomorphism \(T \approx \mathbb {G}_{m}^{t^\prime }\) so that the inclusion \(\iota : T \hookrightarrow \mathbb {G}_{m}^t\) is described by
in standard coordinates \(X_1,\dots ,X_t\) (resp. \(Y_1,\dots ,Y_{t^\prime }\)) on \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^t\) (resp. \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^{t^\prime }\)). The period lattice \(\Omega _T \subset \Omega _{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t}\) has the basis
and hence \(\textrm{covol}_{g_\textrm{tor}}(\Omega _T \subset V_T)=|\det ({\mathcal {A}}^\top {\mathcal {A}})|^{1/2}\) where \({\mathcal {A}}=(a_{uv}) \in {\mathbb {Z}}^{t \times t^\prime }\) and \({\mathcal {A}}^\top \) is its transpose. Alternatively, the torus \(T \subseteq \mathbb {G}_{m}^t\) is cut out by \((t-t^\prime )\) equations
Writing \({\mathcal {B}}\) for the matrix \((b_{uv}) \in {\mathbb {Z}}^{t \times (t-t^\prime )}\), the columns of \( {\mathcal {B}}\) are a \({\mathbb {Z}}\)-basis of the sublattice in \({\mathbb {Z}}^n\) that is spanned by all elements orthogonal to the columns of \({\mathcal {A}}\). We hence have \(|\det ({\mathcal {B}}^\top {\mathcal {B}})|=|\det ({\mathcal {A}}^\top {\mathcal {A}})|\) by [34, Theorem 1.9.10]. By the Cauchy-Binet formula, we have
where \({\mathcal {B}}_{{\underline{u}}} \in {\mathbb {Z}}^{(t-t^\prime )\times (t-t^\prime )}\) is the \({\underline{u}}\)-minor of \({\mathcal {B}}\). We claim that each \(|\det ({\mathcal {B}}_{{\underline{u}}})|\) is less than \(\deg _M({\overline{T}})\). After renaming, we may and do assume that \({\underline{u}}=\{1,2,\dots , t-t^\prime \}\) for this purpose. Let \({\mathcal {C}}_{{\underline{u}}} = (c_{uv}) \in {\mathbb {Z}}^{(t-t^\prime ) \times (t-t^\prime )}\) be an upper triangular matrix arising from \({\mathcal {B}}_{{\underline{u}}}\) by successive elementary row transformations. Then \(\det ({\mathcal {B}}_{{\underline{u}}})=\det ({\mathcal {C}}_{{\underline{u}}})=c_{1,1}c_{2,2}\ldots c_{t-t^\prime ,t-t^\prime }\). This is the same as the number of simple points one obtains by intersecting \({\overline{T}} \subseteq ({\mathbb {P}}^{1})^t\) with the linear hyperplanes
for sufficiently generic \(\delta _1,\dots , \delta _{t^\prime }\). This means nothing else than
By nefness, this is clearly bounded by
This concludes the proof of the right inequality in (8).
For the left inequality in (8), we know from above that we may represent T as being cut out by Eq. (10) with \(|\det ({\mathcal {B}}^\top {\mathcal {B}})|^{1/2} = \textrm{covol}(\Omega _T \subset V_T)\). Furthermore, the Cauchy–Binet formula shows as well that
which bounds the intersection number in (11). The degree is just the sum of such numbers, whence the other inequality in (8).
For the equality (9), we note that
the second equality is [58, Lemma 3.8] and the third equality follows from the compatibility between algebraic and topological Chern classes acting on singular homology [19, Proposition 19.1.2] and the fact that the topological Chern class of a hermitian line bundle is given by its Chern form (see e.g. [22, Proposition on p. 141]). \(\square \)
The following is a straightforward application of basic intersection theory. In its proof, we use the notations from [19, Chapters 1 and 2]. We also use the specific compactification \({\overline{G}}_0\) and the line bundle \(L_0 = M \otimes {\overline{\pi }}^{*} N\) from above. This is admissible because the lemma is only invoked in the proof of Lemma 2.2.
Lemma 2.3
Let \(H \subseteq G\) be a semiabelian subvariety with maximal torus \(T \subseteq \mathbb {G}_{m}^t\) and maximal abelian quotient \(B \subseteq A\). Then,
Proof
A straightforward computation yields that
We show next that all addends in this sum are zero except the one for \(i=\dim (T)\). As the restriction \(\overline{[2]}|_{{\overline{H}}}: {\overline{H}} \rightarrow {\overline{H}}\) has degree \(2^{(\dim (T)+2\dim (B))}\), we have \(\overline{[2]}_*[{\overline{H}}] = 2^{\dim (T)+2\dim (B)} [{\overline{H}}]\). An iterated application of the projection formula [19, Proposition 2.5 (c)] to \(\overline{[2]}|_{{\overline{H}}}\) and the line bundles M and \({\overline{\pi }}^*N\) yields hence
Taking the degree of these 0-cycles, we obtain
making also use of the homogeneities \(\overline{[2]}^*M \approx M^{\otimes 2}\) and \(\overline{[2]}^*({\overline{\pi }}^*N) \approx ({\overline{\pi }}^*N)^{\otimes 4}\). This implies that
unless \(i=\dim (T)\). We deduce that
The restriction \({\overline{\pi }}|_{{\overline{H}}}: {\overline{H}} \rightarrow B\) is flat of relative dimension \(\dim (T)\). We can therefore pull back cycle classes on B to cycle classes on \({\overline{H}}\). In particular, we have \(({\overline{\pi }}|_{{\overline{H}}})^*([B]) = [{\overline{H}}]\) and \(({\overline{\pi }}|_{{\overline{H}}})^*([p])=[{\overline{\pi }}^{-1}(p) \cap {\overline{H}}]\) for every point \(p \in B\). Since N is ample, we can choose points \(p_1,\dots ,p_{m} \in A\), \(m = \deg _N(B)\), such that
Using [19, Proposition 2.5 (d)], we obtain
By construction, there exists a non-canonical isomorphism between each fiber \(({\overline{\pi }}_{{\overline{H}}})^{-1}(p)\) and \({\overline{T}}\) such that the restriction of M to \(({\overline{\pi }}_{{\overline{H}}})^{-1}(p)={\overline{H}} \cap {\overline{\pi }}^{-1}(p_i)\) corresponds to the restriction of M to \({\overline{T}}\). We infer that
Combining this with (12), we deduce
whence the assertion. \(\square \)
In preparation for the next lemma, we need to fix a norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert : \textrm{Lie}(G) \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}^{\ge 0}\) such that \(\Vert v \Vert = g_G(v,v)^{1/2}\) for all \(v \in V_G\) (i.e., we fix a norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert \) on \(\textrm{Lie}(G)\) extending the norm induced by the Riemannian metric \(g_G\) on \(V_G\)). For this purpose, let us note that the canonical decomposition \(V_G = V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t} \times V_A\) introduced above extends to a canonical decomposition
that is compatible with passing to subgroups \(H \subseteq G\) by Lemma 2.1. For the sequel, we keep fixed an arbitrary norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert \) such that the decomposition \(\textrm{Lie}(G) = IV_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t} \times V_G\) is orthogonal with respect to the associated bilinear form.
The following is an analog of Lemma 3.2 of [27].
Lemma 2.4
There exist constants \(c_3,c_4\), depending only on G and L, such that the following two assertions are true:
-
(1)
For each semiabelian subvariety \(H \subseteq G\), the period lattice \(\Omega _H \subseteq V_H\) has a basis \(\omega _1,\dots ,\omega _{2g^\prime +t^\prime }\) with \(\Vert \omega _i \Vert \le c_3 \deg _L({\overline{H}})\) (\(i \in \{1,\dots , 2g^\prime +t^\prime \}\)).
-
(2)
For each \(v \in \Omega _G + \textrm{Lie}(H)\), there exists a period \(\omega \in \Omega _G\) such that \(v-\omega \in \textrm{Lie}(H)\) and \(\Vert \omega \Vert \le \Vert v \Vert + c_4 \deg _L({\overline{H}})\).
Proof
Again, we can assume that \({\overline{G}}={\overline{G}}_0\) and \(L=L_0\) without loss of generality.
Given Lemma 2.2 above, the first part is a simple application of Minkowski’s Theorem (see [27, Lemma 3.2 (i)] for details).
For the second part, consider the orthogonal projection \(\psi : \textrm{Lie}(G) = IV_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t} \times V_G \rightarrow V_{G}\) and note that \(\psi (\textrm{Lie}(H)) = V_H\) for any semiabelian subvariety \(H \subseteq G\). Let now \(\omega _0 \in \Omega _G\) such that \(v - \omega _0 \in \textrm{Lie}(H)\) and let further \(\omega _1,\dots ,\omega _{2g^\prime +t^\prime } \) be a basis of \( \Omega _H\subseteq V_H\) as in (1). There exist \(r_1,\dots ,r_{2g^\prime +t^\prime } \in {\mathbb {R}}\) such that
For each \(i \in \{ 1, \dots , 2g^\prime +t^\prime \}\), let \(n_i\) be the unique integer such that \(0 \le r_i-n_i < 1\). Setting \(\omega = \omega _0 + n_1 \omega _1 + \cdots + n_{2g^\prime +t^\prime }\omega _{2g^\prime +t^\prime } \in V_G\), we have \(v - \omega \in \textrm{Lie}(H)\), \(\psi (\omega ) = \omega \) and thus
\(\square \)
2.3 Heights on semiabelian varieties
In this subsection, we let G be a semiabelian variety over a number field \(\mathbb {K}\subseteq {\mathbb {C}}\). Let \(h_L\) be an arbitrary Weil height associated to L. In this general setting, the second author proved the following theorem, which constitutes a proof of the bounded height conjecture for semiabelian varieties. We write \(G^{[s]}\) for the countable union of all algebraic subgroups having codimension \(\ge s\) in G for some fixed integer s. Recall that, for a subvariety \(V\subseteq G\), we have defined \(V^{oa}\) right before Theorem 2.1.
Theorem 2.2
[30] For any subvariety \(V \subseteq G\) the height \(h_L\) is bounded from above on the set \(V^{oa}(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\cap G^{[\dim (V)]}(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\).
We conclude this subsection with a further lemma.
Lemma 2.5
Let \(\Vert \cdot \Vert \) be the norm on \(\textrm{Lie}(G)\) introduced in the previous subsection. Then, there exists a constant \(c_5 = c_5(G) >0\) such that each \(p \in G(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) has a preimage \(v \in \textrm{Lie}(G)\) satisfying
Proof
Without loss of generality, we can assume \({\overline{G}}={\overline{G}}_0\) and \(L=L_0\) where \({\overline{G}}_0\) and \(L_0 = M \otimes {\overline{\pi }}^*N\) are as in the previous subsection. Since the line bundle \({\overline{\pi }}^*N\) is nef with empty base locus, there exists a constant \(c_6=c_6(G,N)>0\) such that
for all \(x \in G(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) [28, Theorem B.3.6 (b)]. Let \({\widehat{h}}_M: {\overline{G}}(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}) \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) be the canonical height associated with M by means of the homogeneity relation \(\overline{[2]}^*M = M^{\otimes 2}\). By [28, Theorem B.4.1], we have
for some constant \(c_7=c_7(M)>0\).
It is well known that the canonical height \({\widehat{h}}_M\) decomposes into non-negative local heights such that the local height associated with the archimedean place encoded by the embedding \({\mathbb {K}} \subseteq {\mathbb {C}}\) equals \(\sum _{i=1}^t |\lambda _i| : G({\mathbb {C}}) \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) (see e.g. [6, Proposition 4]). Writing
for some real number s, we conclude that \(p \in {\mathcal {K}}_{s_0}\) with
Note that each \({\mathcal {K}}_s\), \(s \ge 0\), is compact since it is a closed subset of the compact space \({\overline{G}}(\mathbb {C})\). Consequently, the preimage \(\exp _G^{-1}({\mathcal {K}}_1)\) is contained in a subset \({\mathcal {K}}^\prime + \Omega _G\) with \({\mathcal {K}}^\prime \subset \textrm{Lie}(G)\) compact. Choose a point \(p^\prime \in G(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) such that \([\lceil s_0 \rceil ](p^\prime )=p\). As each \(\lambda _i\) is a homomorphism, we have \(p^\prime \in {\mathcal {K}}_1\). By compactness, \(p^\prime \in {\mathcal {K}}_1\) has a preimage \(v^\prime \in \exp ^{-1}(p^\prime )\) with \(\Vert v' \Vert \ll _G 1\). Hence \(v= \lceil s_0 \rceil \cdot v^\prime \) is the desired preimage of p. \(\square \)
2.4 Subgroups of semiabelian varieties
We could not find a reference for the following lemma, but it should be well known to experts.
Lemma 2.6
Let G be a semiabelian variety over a field k. Then there exists a finite extension \(k^\prime /k\) such that all connected algebraic subgroups of G are defined over \(k^\prime \) (i.e., all connected subgroups of G are invariant under \(\textrm{Gal}({\overline{k}}/k^\prime )\)).
Note that the assertion of the above lemma is false for the finite subgroups generated by torsion points, hence requiring connectedness is necessary.
Proof
We first consider the (well-known) case where G is an abelian variety A. We start with proving that every connected algebraic subgroup \(B \subseteq A\) appears as the component containing \(0_A\) of the kernel of an endomorphism of A. In fact, there exists a connected algebraic subgroup \(C \subseteq A\) such that \(B + C = A\) and \(B \cap C\) is finite. Write \(\varphi : C/(B\cap C) \twoheadrightarrow C\) for the isogeny dual to the quotient map \(C \twoheadrightarrow C/(B \cap C)=A/B\), \(\iota : C \hookrightarrow A\) for the inclusion, and \(\pi : A \twoheadrightarrow A/B\) for the quotient map. Then the kernel of \(\iota \circ \varphi \circ \pi : A \rightarrow A\) has connected component B.
The endomorphism ring of \(A_{{\overline{k}}}\) is a finitely generated \({\mathbb {Z}}\)-module [38, Theorem 3 on p. 176], hence there exists a finite extension \(k^\prime \) of k such that every endomorphism of \(A_{{\overline{k}}}\) is defined over \(k^\prime \). By the above, any connected algebraic subgroup \(B \subseteq A\) is the connected component containing \(0_A\) of an algebraic subgroup \(B^\prime \subseteq A\) invariant under \(\textrm{Gal}({\overline{k}}/k^\prime )\) and hence likewise \(\textrm{Gal}({\overline{k}}/k^\prime )\)-invariant. This settles the case of abelian varieties.
For a general semiabelian variety G, we can reduce to this case. Note that we can assume that the maximal subtorus of G is split (i.e., equals \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^t\)) by replacing k with a finite extension. By the above, we also assume that all connected algebraic subgroups of A are defined over k. Under this assumption, we prove that the same is true for G. Let \(H \subseteq G\) be a connected algebraic subgroup with maximal subtorus \(T' \subseteq \mathbb {G}_{m}^t\) and maximal abelian quotient \(B \subseteq A\). Note that \(T'\) is split as a subtorus of a split torus so that we can arrange that \(T'=\mathbb {G}_{m}^{t^\prime }\). Recall that a semiabelian variety G defined over k is described by an extension class \(\eta _{G} \in \textrm{Ext}^1_k(A,T)\) where A is its maximal abelian quotient and T is its maximal subtorus (see e.g. [30, Subsections 1.1 and 1.2] and [51, Chapter VII]). Furthermore, the Weil–Barsotti formula (see [41, Section III.18] or the appendix to [36]) gives a canonical identification \(\textrm{Ext}^1_k(A,{\mathbb {G}}_m) = A^\vee (k)\). This means that we can decompose \(\eta _{G} = (\eta _{G,1},\ldots ,\eta _{G,t})\in A^\vee (k)^{t}\) and \(\eta _{H}=(\eta _{H,1},\dots ,\eta _{H,t^\prime }) \in B^\vee (\overline{\mathbb {Q}})^{t^\prime }\). Writing \(\iota : B \hookrightarrow A\) for the inclusion and \(\iota ^\vee : A^\vee \rightarrow B^\vee \) for its dual, each \(\eta _{H,i}\) is a \({\mathbb {Z}}\)-linear combination of some \(\iota ^\vee (\eta _{G,i}) \in B^\vee (k)\), \(1\le i \le t\). Consequently, all \(\eta _{H,i}\), \(1\le i\le t^\prime \), are contained in \(A^\vee (k)\) and thus H is defined over k. \(\square \)
2.5 An auxiliary lemma
The following assertion generalizes [9, Lemma 6].
Lemma 2.7
Let G be a semiabelian variety over a number field \({\mathbb {K}}\) such that all its connected subgroups are defined over \(\mathbb {K}\).
-
(a)
Let \(p \in G(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) and \(\sigma \in \textrm{Gal}(\overline{{\mathbb {K}}}/{\mathbb {K}})\) be such that \(p^{\sigma } - p\) is contained in a coset \(q + H\), \(q \in G(\mathbb {K})\). Then there exists a torsion point \(q^\prime \in G(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) such that \(p^{\sigma } - p \in q^\prime + H\) (i.e., \(p^{\sigma } - p\) is contained in a torsion coset of H).
-
(b)
There exists an integer \(e = e(\mathbb {K}) \ge 1\) such that the following is true: If \(p \in G(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) satisfies \(p^{\sigma } - p \in G({\mathbb {K}})\) for all \(\sigma \in \textrm{Gal}(\overline{{\mathbb {K}}}/{\mathbb {K}})\), then \([e](p) \in G({\mathbb {K}})\).
Proof
(a) Let \({\mathbb {L}}\) be a finite normal extension of \(\mathbb {K}\) such that \(p \in G({\mathbb {L}})\). Consider the image \(\chi (q) \in (G/H)({\mathbb {K}})\) under the quotient homomorphism \(\chi : G \rightarrow G/H\). We have to prove that \(\chi (q) = \chi (p^\sigma - p)\) is torsion. In fact, its \([{\mathbb {L}}:\mathbb {K}]\)-th multiple equals
(b) The argument of (a), applied to the trivial group \(H=1\), shows that \(p^\sigma - p \in G(\mathbb {K})\) is a torsion point. We can take \(e(\mathbb {K})\) to be the exponent of the finite group \(\textrm{Tors}(G) \cap G(\mathbb {K})\). Indeed, we have \([e](p^\sigma -p)=0\) for all \(\sigma \in \textrm{Gal}({\overline{\mathbb {K}}}/\mathbb {K})\), which is equivalent to \(([e](p))^\sigma =[e]p\) for all \(\sigma \in \textrm{Gal}({\overline{\mathbb {K}}}/\mathbb {K})\). Thus, we have \([e]p \in G(\mathbb {K})\). \(\square \)
3 An auxiliary proposition
In this section, we establish an important finiteness proposition needed in the course of our main proof. It generalizes Lemma 4 of [9], except for effectivity.
Proposition 3.1
Let G be a semiabelian variety defined over a number field \({\mathbb {K}}\) and \(C \subseteq G\) an irreducible algebraic curve defined over \(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}\) that does not lie in \(G^{[1]}\) (i.e., is not contained in a proper subgroup of G). For any integer \(e \ge 1\) and any number field \({\mathbb {K}}\), there are at most finitely many \(p \in (C \cap G^{[2]})(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) such that \([e](p) \in G({\mathbb {K}})\).
Before being able to prove the proposition, we have to start with some preparatory lemmas. In the following, G is a semiabelian variety defined over a number field \(\mathbb {K}\) and we assume that G is the extension of the abelian variety A by a split torus \({\mathbb {G}}^t_m\). Furthermore, \(C \subseteq G\) is an irreducible subcurve defined over \(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}\). We consider the compactification \({\overline{G}}\) of G and the line bundles M, N on G as in Sect. 2.2. In addition, we recall the decomposition
from [31, Section 2.2] and set \(M_i = M_{{\overline{G}}, i}^{(0)} \otimes M_{{\overline{G}}, i}^{(\infty )}\) for each \(i \in \{1,\dots , t\}\). Finally, we write \(\Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}}}\) for the set of places of \({\mathbb {K}}\) and \(\Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f}\) for the finite ones.
In the following lemma we use the Weil functions \(\lambda _{i,\nu }\), for \(i=1,\dots , t\) and \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}}}\), given by [59, Proposition 2.6].
Lemma 3.1
There exists a finite set of places \(S \subseteq \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f}\) and a finite set of rank \((t-1)\) matrices \({\mathcal {M}}^{(\alpha )} \in {\mathbb {Z}}^{(t-1) \times t}\), \(\alpha \in {\mathcal {I}}\), with the following property: For each \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f} \setminus S\) and \(x \in C({\mathbb {K}})\), there exists some \(\alpha _0 = \alpha _0(\nu , x) \in {\mathcal {I}}\) such that
Proof
We start with some geometric constructions. Let
be the extension class describing the semiabelian variety G. By [38, Theorem 1 on p. 77], there exist points \(x_1,\dots ,x_t \in A({\mathbb {K}})\) such that \(P_i = T_{x_i}^*N \otimes N^{\otimes -1}\) (\(1\le i \le t\)) where \(T_{x}: A \rightarrow A\) denotes the translation by \(x \in A({\mathbb {K}})\). As N is very ample and thus base-point free, there exist global sections \({\textbf{s}}_k\), \(1\le k \le k_0\), of N such that the divisors \(D_k=\textrm{div}_N({\textbf{s}}_k)\) satisfy \({\mathcal {O}}(D_k) \approx N\), and
We furthermore assume that \(0_A, x_i \notin \textrm{supp}(D_k)\) for all \(i \in \{1,\dots , t\}\) and \(k \in \{1,\dots ,k_0\}\). Let us set \(E_{k,k^\prime }^{(i)} = T_{x_i}^{*}D_k -D_{k^\prime }\) and notice that
and
for all \(i \in \{1,\dots ,t\}\) and \(k,k^\prime \in \{1,\dots ,k_0 \}\).
With each divisor \(D_k\), \(1\le k \le k_0\), and each place \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}}}\), we can assign a Néron function
(compare [32, Theorem 11.1.1]); the Néron functions \((\lambda _{D_k,\nu })_{\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}}}}\) are only unique up to \(\Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}}}\)-constants and we make here a choice once and for all. By [32, Corollary 10.3.3], the disjointness property (15) implies that there exists a finite set \(S_0 \subseteq \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f}\) such that
for all \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f}\setminus S_0\) and all \(x \in A({\mathbb {C}}_\nu )\). By [32, Theorem 11.1.1 (1) and (4)], the function
is a Néron function for the divisor \(E_{k,k^\prime }^{(i)} = T_{x_i}^{*}D_k -D_{k^\prime }\), \(k,k^\prime \in \{1,\dots , k_0 \}\). Define the open subsets \(U_{k,k^\prime }^{(i)} = A \setminus \textrm{supp}(E_{k,k^\prime }^{(i)})\). By applying (15) twice, we obtain
In other words, \(\bigcup _{1\le k,k^\prime \le k_0} U_{k,k^\prime }^{(i)} = A\) for all \(1\le i\le t\). Furthermore, the restriction of the line bundle \(P_i\) to \(U_{k,k^\prime }^{(i)}\) is trivial, so that we can fix isomorphisms \(\phi _{k,k^\prime }^{(i)}: P_i|_{U_{k,k^\prime }^{(i)}} \rightarrow U_{k,k^\prime }^{(i)} \times {\mathbb {A}}^1\). Projecting to the second factor induces “toric coordinates”
(\(1\le i \le t\), \(1\le k, k^\prime \le k_0\)). There exists a finite subset \(S_1 \subseteq \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}}, f}\) such that
for all \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}}, f} \setminus S_1\).Footnote 1 From the definition of \(\lambda _{i,\nu }\), \(1\le i \le t\), in [59, (2.6.3)], we know that
for all \(x \in \pi ^{-1}\big (U^{(i)}_{k,k^\prime }\big )({\mathbb {C}}_\nu )\). Consequently, we have
for all \(x \in \pi ^{-1}(U^{(i)}_{k,k^\prime })({\mathbb {C}}_\nu )\) and \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}}, f} \setminus S_1\).
For every point \(p \in C({\mathbb {K}})\), every \(i \in \{1,\dots , t\}\) and every \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f} \setminus S_0\), we can use (16) to pick \(k_i, k^\prime _i\in \{1, \dots , k_0\}\), which may depend on \(p,i,\nu \), such that
in particular, this means \(\pi (p), \pi (p) + x_i \in U_{k_i,k_i^\prime }^{(i)}\). It follows that
so that
for all \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f}\setminus (S_0\cup S_1)\). Set \(U=\pi ^{-1}(U^{(1)}_{k_1,k_1^\prime }) \cap \cdots \cap \pi ^{-1}(U^{(t)}_{k_t,k_t^\prime })\) and consider the map
Note that, although \(\varphi _p\) depends on p, there are at most finitely many choices for this map. Therefore, there is a finite set \(\{p_1,\dots ,p_r\}\subseteq {\mathbb {G}}_m^t ({\overline{\mathbb {K}}})\) of points and subcurves \(C_1,\dots ,C_s \subseteq {\mathbb {G}}_m^t\), independent of p and \(\nu _0\) such that the Zariski closure of \(\varphi _p(C \cap U) \subseteq {\mathbb {G}}_m^t\) is among the elements of \(\{p_1,\dots ,p_r, C_1,\dots ,C_s\}\). By Lemma 3.2 below, we obtain a finite set \(S_2 \subseteq \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f}\) and matrices \({\mathcal {M}}^{(\alpha )} \in {\mathbb {Z}}^{(t-1) \times t}\) of rank \((t-1)\), \(\alpha \in {\mathcal {I}}\), such that for each \(x = (x_1,\dots ,x_t) \in \varphi _p(C \cap U)\), there exists \(\alpha _0 \in {\mathcal {I}}\) satisfying
for every \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f} \setminus (S_0 \cup S_1 \cup S_2)\) and all \(x \in \varphi _p(C \cap U)\). Applying this for \(x=\varphi _p(p)\), we obtain the assertion of the lemma, as \(\lambda _{i,\nu } = - \log |z_{k,k^\prime }^{(i)}|_\nu \). \(\square \)
Lemma 3.2
Let \(C \subseteq {\mathbb {G}}_{m,{\mathbb {K}}}^t\) be an irreducible curve. There exist finitely many places \(S \subseteq \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f}\) and a finite set of rank \((t-1)\) matrices \({\mathcal {M}}^{(\alpha )} \in {\mathbb {Z}}^{(t-1) \times t}\), \(\alpha \in {\mathcal {I}}\), with the following property: For each \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f} \setminus S\) and \({\underline{z}} = (z_1,\dots ,z_t) \in C({\mathbb {K}})\), there exists some \(\alpha _0 = \alpha _0(\nu , {\underline{z}}) \in {\mathcal {I}}\) such that
Proof
Let us first consider the case \(t=2\). (The case \(t=1\) is evidently trivial.) The curve \(C \subseteq {\mathbb {G}}_m^2\) can be written as the the zero set of a non-zero polynomial
Let \(S \subseteq \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}}, f}\) be a finite subset such that \(|a_{i_1,i_2}|_\nu \in \{0,1\}\) for all \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f} \setminus S\) and all \(i_1,i_2 \in {\mathbb {Z}}\). Fix \({\underline{z}} = (z_1,z_2) \in C({\mathbb {K}})\) and \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f} \setminus S\). As
there exist distinct pairs \((j_1,j_2)\) and \((k_1,k_2)\) such that
and
We infer a non-trivial relation
Varying \(z\in C({\mathbb {K}})\), we obtain at most finitely many different equations of this form, one of which has to be satisfied for every point \(z \in C({\mathbb {K}})\) and every \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}}, f}\setminus S\). Thus we obtain (17) in case \(t=2\).
For the case \(t>2\), we can assume that there exists an integer \(t_0 \in \{1,\dots ,t\}\), such that the projections \(\textrm{pr}_i|_C: C \rightarrow {\mathbb {P}}^1_{\mathbb {K}}\), \(1\le i \le t_0\), are dominant, and each image \(\textrm{pr}_i(C)\), \(t_0 + 1 \le i \le t\), is a point. We can enlarge \(S \subseteq \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}}, f}\) such that \( \log |z_{t^\prime }|_\nu = 0\), \(t_0 + 1\le t^\prime \le t\), for all \({\underline{z}} \in C({\mathbb {K}})\).
Let \({\underline{z}} \in C({\mathbb {K}})\) be an arbitrary point as in the assertion of the lemma. There is nothing to prove if \(\log |z_i|_\nu = 0\) for all \(i \in \{1,\dots ,t_0 \}\). After renaming the first \(t_0\) coordinates, we can therefore assume that \(\log |z_1|_\nu \ne 0\). For each \(t^\prime \in \{2,\dots , t\}\), applying the above to the projection \(\textrm{pr}_{1,t^\prime }(C) \subset {\mathbb {G}}_m^2\), we conclude that
for one of finitely many pairs \((b_1, b_2) \ne (0,0)\). In fact, we can and do assume that \(b_2 \ne 0\) for each of these pairs.
For each point \({\underline{z}} \in C({\mathbb {K}})\), we combine these \(t-1\) relations to a matrix relation
where \({\mathcal {M}} \in {\mathbb {Z}}^{(t-1) \times t}\) has rank \((t-1)\). Clearly, we obtain only finitely many matrices \({\mathcal {M}}\) in this process, which concludes the proof of the lemma. \(\square \)
Lemma 3.3
For every finite subset \(S \subseteq \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f}\), the subgroup
has finite rank.
Proof
By the Mordell–Weil theorem (see e.g. [38, Appendix II]), the group \(A({\mathbb {K}})\) is finitely generated. Let \(\gamma _1,\dots ,\gamma _n\) be generators of \(A({\mathbb {K}})\). For each \(\gamma _j\), \(1\le j \le n\), we can find a preimage \(\gamma ^\prime _j \in \pi ^{-1}(\gamma _j) \in G({\mathbb {K}})\). Possibly enlarging S, we may additionally assume that \(\lambda _{i,\nu }(\gamma ^\prime _j)=0\) for all \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f} \setminus S\), \(1\le i\le t\) and \(1\le j \le n\). Let additionally \(\Gamma ^\prime (S) \subseteq {\mathbb {G}}_m^t(\overline{{\mathbb {Q}}})\) be the S-units in the maximal torus of G. By Dirichlet’s S-unit theorem [40, Corollary I.11.7], the group \(\Gamma ^\prime (S)\) is finitely generated. As
the group \(\Gamma ({\mathbb {K}},S)\) is likewise finitely generated. \(\square \)
With the preceding preparations, we can finally come back to the main result of this subsection.
Proof of Proposition 3.1
Replacing C with [e](C), we may assume that \(e=1\). This means that we have to show that the set \((C \cap G^{[2]})({\mathbb {K}})\) is finite. We can also assume that C is not a translate \(H_0 + p\) where \(H_0 \subseteq G\) is a subgroup (of dimension 1) and \(p \in G(\overline{{\mathbb {Q}}})\). In fact, if such a translate \(H_0 + p\) intersects a subgroup \(H \subseteq G\) of codimension 2, then \(H_0 + p \subseteq H_0+ H \subseteq G^{[1]}\). By Lemma 3.3 and the Mordell–Lang conjecture for semiabelian varieties that was proven by Faltings [18], McQuillan [37], and Vojta [59], the set \(C({\mathbb {K}}) \cap \Gamma ({\mathbb {K}},S)\) is finite for every finite subset \(S \subseteq \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f}\). Furthermore, the proposition follows from Faltings’ proof of the Mordell conjecture [17] if \(t=0\) (i.e., G is an abelian variety).
We prove the general case of the proposition by induction on t. For the inductive step, it remains to prove that \((C \cap G^{[2]})({\mathbb {K}}) \setminus \Gamma ({\mathbb {K}},S)\) is finite.
Let \(S \subseteq \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f}\) and \({\mathcal {M}}^{(\alpha )} \in {\mathbb {Z}}^{(t-1) \times t}\), \(\alpha \in {\mathcal {I}}\), be as in Lemma 3.1 above. Each matrix \({\mathcal {M}}^{(\alpha )}\) determines a 1-dimensional subgroup \(H^{(\alpha )} \subseteq {\mathbb {G}}_m^t\) of the maximal torus and thus a quotient homomorphism \(\varphi ^{(\alpha )}: G \rightarrow G/H^{(\alpha )}\) to a semiabelian variety \(G^{(\alpha )} = G/H^{(\alpha )}\). The image \(\varphi ^{(\alpha )}(C)\) is an irreducible algebraic subcurve of \(G^{(\alpha )}\); for else C is a translate of the subgroup \(H^{(\alpha )}\). In addition, the curve \(\varphi ^{(\alpha )}(C)\) is not contained in \((G^{(\alpha )})^{[1]}\) or else \(C \subseteq G^{[1]}\), which contradicts our assumptions. By our inductive assumption, we already know that the set \((\varphi ^{(\alpha )}(C)\cap (G^{(\alpha )})^{[2]})(\mathbb {K}) \) is finite.
Consider now a subgroup \(H \subseteq G\) of codimension \(\ge 2\) containing a point \(x \in C({\mathbb {K}}) \setminus \Gamma ({\mathbb {K}},S)\). There exists some \(\nu _0 \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}},f} \setminus S\) such that \((\lambda _{1,\nu _0}(x), \dots , \lambda _{t,\nu _0}(x))\) is non-zero. Note that this implies that the subgroup H has a non-trivial maximal subtorus \(T \subseteq {\mathbb {G}}_m^{t}\); in fact, otherwise every point \(x \in H({\mathbb {K}})\) would satisfy \(\lambda _{1,\nu _0}(x)= \cdots = \lambda _{t,\nu _0}(x)=0\). There exists some \(\alpha _0 \in {\mathcal {I}}\) such that
As \({\mathcal {M}}^{(\alpha _0)}\) has maximal rank \(t-1\), any \((a_1,\dots ,a_t) \in {\mathbb {Z}}^t\) such that
is a \({\mathbb {Q}}\)-linear combination of rows in \({\mathcal {M}}^{(\alpha _0)}\). In particular, this is true for the equations describing the subtorus \(T \subseteq {\mathbb {G}}_m^t\). We deduce that \(H^{(\alpha _0)} \subseteq T \subseteq H\) so that \(\varphi ^{(\alpha _0)}(H)\) is a subgroup of codimension \(\ge 2\) in \(G^{(\alpha _0)}\). Thus, there are only finitely many possible choices for \(\varphi ^{(\alpha _0)}(x) \in \varphi ^{(\alpha _0)}(C)(\mathbb {K}) \cap (G^{(\alpha _0)})^{[2]}\)—independent of the subgroup \(H \subseteq G\). As \(\varphi ^{(\alpha _0)}|_C : C \rightarrow \varphi ^{(\alpha _0)}(C)\) is finite, this leaves only finitely many possibilities for \(x \in C(\mathbb {K})\). We conclude that \((C \cap G^{[2]}) ({\mathbb {K}})\setminus \Gamma ({\mathbb {K}},S)\) is finite. \(\square \)
4 Unlikely intersections of bounded height
In this section, we prove the following intermediate result towards Theorem 1.1. Its proof is based on o-minimal counting techniques and modeled after [27].
Proposition 4.1
Let \(C\) be an irreducible curve in G not contained in \(G^{[1]}\). Then there are at most finitely many points in \( (C\cap G^{[2]})(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) of bounded height.
In the sequel, \(c_1,c_2,\dots \) denote positive constants that only depend on the semiabelian variety G and on the curve C. We also assume throughout this section that the number field \(\mathbb {K}\) is sufficiently large such that all connected algebraic subgroups of G are invariant under \(\textrm{Gal}({\overline{\mathbb {K}}}/\mathbb {K})\), which we may do by Lemma 2.6.
4.1 Some complexity estimates
For each point \(p \in G(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\), we write \(\langle p\rangle =q +H_p \) for the smallest torsion coset of G containing p, where \(H_p\) is a connected algebraic subgroup of G and \(q \in \textrm{Tors}(G)\).
We define the complexity of a torsion coset \(q+H\) to be
for later use. We recall that L is an ample line bundle on \({\overline{G}}\) that we have fixed before Lemma 2.2.
The following two lemmas will allow us to bound \(\Delta (\langle p\rangle )\) in terms of the degree of p and its height.
Lemma 4.1
For each point \(p \in G(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\), there is a torsion point \(q \in \textrm{Tors}(G)\) of order
such that \(p \in q + H_p\).
Proof
There is a commutative diagram of homomorphisms
with exact rows and columns (compare [30, Lemma 1]). By definition, \(\varphi _{H_p}(p)\) is a torsion point, and we have to bound its order in terms of \([\mathbb {K}(p):\mathbb {K}]\). By [27, Lemma 9.3], we know that \(\varphi _B(\pi _G(p))\) is a torsion point of order
Consider the point \(p^\prime = [m_1](p) \in G(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\). Its image \(\varphi _{H_p}(p^\prime )\) is a torsion point in \(G/H_p\). Furthermore, it is contained in the maximal torus \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^t/T\) of \(G/H_p\) as
Being a quotient of a \(\mathbb {K}\)-split torus \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^t\), the torus \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^t/T\) is also \(\mathbb {K}\)-split (i.e., isomorphic over \(\mathbb {K}\) to some \(\mathbb {G}_{m}^{t^\prime }\)). Using the elementary structure of cyclotomic fields, we infer hence that the torsion point \(\varphi _{H_p}(p^\prime )\) has order
As \(\varphi _{H_p}(p)\) has order \(\le m_1 m_2\), this concludes the proof. \(\square \)
Lemma 4.2
For each point \(p \in G(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\), we have
The assertion of the lemma is well known from the transcendence theory of commutative algebraic groups. For abelian varieties, it is proven in [8, Théorème 1.4]—with completely explicit constants \(c_7, c_8, c_9\)—relying on a theorem of Bertrand [6, Théorème 2], polarization estimates due to Gaudron and Rémond [23], as well as other tools from transcendental number theory. Unfortunately, such a result does not seem to be in the literature for semiabelian varieties. Therefore, we derive the lemma directly from linear forms in logarithms of semiabelian varieties. In this way, the asserted degree bound follows from the bound on the degree of an obstruction subgroup.
Proof
We first fix a basis \(\omega _1,\dots ,\omega _{2g+t}\) of the period lattice \(\Omega _G\).
Let \(p \in G(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\). We recall that \(\langle p \rangle = q+H_p \) for some \(q\in \textrm{Tors}(G)\) which implies \(\langle p -q\rangle = H_p \). Using Lemma 4.1 and easy estimates for the height (recall that torsion points have uniformly bounded height) we may replace p by \(p-q\) and therefore assume \(\langle p \rangle = H_p \), so \(p\in H_p(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\).
By the assumption on \(\mathbb {K}\), all connected algebraic subgroups of G are defined over \(\mathbb {K}\). The tangent space \(\textrm{Lie}(H_p)\) is hence defined over \(\mathbb {K}\). Lemma 2.5 yields a preimage v of p under the group exponential \(\exp _G\) such that
We do not necessarily have \(v \in \textrm{Lie}(H_p)\), but there exists a period \(\omega = n_1 \omega _1 + \cdots + n_{2g+t} \omega _{2g+t} \in \Omega _G\) such that \(v - \omega \in \textrm{Lie}(H_p)\). We consider the homomorphism
Our choice of \(\psi \) is such that
We now let U be the \(\mathbb {K}\)-subspace \(\textrm{Lie}(\psi )^{-1}(\textrm{Lie}(H_p))\) of \( \textrm{Lie}(G \times G^{2g+t})\). Then, we can find \(\mathbb {K}\)-subspaces \(W_1,\dots , W_m\subseteq \textrm{Lie}(G \times G^{2g+t})\) each of codimension 1 such that \(U=\bigcap _{i=1}^{m}W_i\).
We apply [21, Théorème 1] m times with
-
(1)
the semiabelian variety \({\textbf{G}}\) therein being the product \(G \times G^{2g+t}\),
-
(2)
\({\textbf{p}}\) being the point \((p,0_{G^{2g+t}}) \in {\textbf{G}}(\mathbb {K})\),
-
(3)
\({\textbf{u}}\) being its logarithm \((v,\omega _1,\dots ,\omega _{2g+t})\),
-
(4)
W being one of the codimension-1 \(\mathbb {K}\)-subspaces \(W_i\), \(i=1,\dots , m\), and
-
(5)
the real parameters E, D, a being set such that
$$\begin{aligned} E= & {} e, \ D=[\mathbb {K}:{\mathbb {Q}}], \\ \log (a)= & {} \max \left\{ 1, h_L(p), \frac{e^2(\Vert v \Vert ^2 + \Vert \omega _1 \Vert ^2 + \cdots + \Vert \omega _{2g+t} \Vert ^2)}{D}\right\} , \end{aligned}$$
we obtain connected algebraic subgroups \(\widetilde{{\textbf{G}}}_i\) with \((p,0_{G^{2g+t}}) \in \widetilde{{\textbf{G}}}_i(\mathbb {K}) \subseteq (G \times G^{2g+t})(\mathbb {K})\) and
-
(1)
\((v,\omega _1,\dots , \omega _{2g+t}) \in \textrm{Lie}(\widetilde{{\textbf{G}}}_i)\),
-
(2)
\(\textrm{Lie}(\widetilde{{\textbf{G}}}_i) \subseteq W_i\), and
-
(3)
\(\deg _{L^\prime }(\widetilde{{\textbf{G}}}_i) \le c_{10} [\mathbb {K}(p):\mathbb {K}]^{c_{11}} h_L(p)^{c_{12}}\) where \(L^\prime = \textrm{pr}_0^*L \otimes \cdots \otimes \textrm{pr}_{2g+t}^*L\).
Since \((p,0_{G^{2g+t}}) \in \bigcap _{i=1}^m \widetilde{{\textbf{G}}}_i(\mathbb {K})\) and \(H_p=\langle p\rangle \) we have \(H_p\times \{ 0_{G^{2g+t}} \}\subseteq \bigcap _{i=1}^m \widetilde{{\textbf{G}}}_i\). But (2) implies that \(\bigcap _{i=1}^m\textrm{Lie}(\widetilde{{\textbf{G}}}_i) \subseteq \bigcap _{i=1}^m W_i=\textrm{Lie}(\psi )^{-1}(\textrm{Lie}(H_p))=U\) and thus
Thus, \(H_p \times \{0_{G^{2g+t}}\}\) is the identity component of the algebraic subgroup \(\bigcap _{i=1}^m\widetilde{{\textbf{G}}}_i \cap (G \times \{0_{G^{2g+t}}\})\). Using Bézout’s Theorem (see e.g. [57, Corollary 2.26]) for the Segre embedding, we can hence deduce that
\(\square \)
By Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2 , we have
for each point \(p \in G(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\).
4.2 Definability of the exponential map
The following lemma prepares our application of o-minimal counting techniques, for which we need that a suitable restriction of the exponential map \(\exp _G: \textrm{Lie}(G) \rightarrow G({\mathbb {C}})\) is definable in the o-minimal structure \({\mathbb {R}}_{\textrm{an},\textrm{exp}}\) [54]. To make this precise, we need to fix some additional notations and identifications first.
A definable manifold is a pair \((M,\{\varphi _i: U_i \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}^n\}_{1\le i \le K})\) consisting of a real-analytic manifold M and a collection \(\{\varphi _i: U_i \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}^n\}_{1\le i \le K}\) of finitely many real-analytic charts covering M such that the sets \(\varphi _i(U_i \cap U_j)\) (\(1 \le i,j \le K\)) and the transition maps
are definable in \({\mathbb {R}}_{\textrm{an},\textrm{exp}}\). In this situation, a subset \(X \subseteq M\) is called definable if every \(\varphi _i(U_i \cap X) \subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^n\) is definable. A map \(f: M \rightarrow N\) between definable manifolds is called definable if the associated graph manifold is definable as a subset of the definable manifold \(M \times N\).
We endow \(\textrm{Lie}(G)\) with the structure of a definable manifold by taking a fixed \({\mathbb {R}}\)-linear isomorphism \(\iota : \textrm{Lie}(G) \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}^{2(g+t)}\) such that \(\iota (\Omega _G) \subseteq {\mathbb {Q}}^{2(g+t)}\) as a (global) chart. Let \({\mathcal {F}}_G^\prime \subset V_G\) be a fundamental parallelepiped of the lattice \(\Omega _G \subset V_G\). Recalling the decomposition \(I V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t} \times V_{G}\) from (13), we set \({\mathcal {F}}_G = IV_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t} \times {\mathcal {F}}^\prime _G\). It is easy to see that \({\mathcal {F}}_G^\prime \) and \({\mathcal {F}}_G\) are definable (as subsets of the definable manifold \(\textrm{Lie}(G)\)); they are also canonically definable manifolds.
Furthermore, we can choose a projective embedding \(\kappa : G \hookrightarrow {\mathbb {P}}^N_{{\mathbb {K}}}\) associated with the global sections of the very ample line bundle L. To endow the real-manifold \(G({\mathbb {C}})\) with the structure of a definable manifold, we use the \((N+1)\) charts induced from the standard covering of \({\mathbb {P}}^N_{{\mathbb {K}}}\) by open affine subsets.
With these preparations, we can finally state the next lemma.
Lemma 4.3
Considering \({\mathcal {F}}_G\) and \(G({\mathbb {C}})\) as definable manifolds in the sense above, the restriction \(\exp _G|_{{\mathcal {F}}_G}: {\mathcal {F}}_G \rightarrow G({\mathbb {C}})\) is definable.
Proof
We use again the decomposition \(\textrm{Lie}(G) = I V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t} \times V_{G}\). For each \(x \in I V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t}\) and \(y \in V_{G}\), we have \(\exp _G(x+y)=\exp _G(x) + \exp _G(y)\) as G is commutative. As the group law \(G({\mathbb {C}}) \times G({\mathbb {C}}) \rightarrow G({\mathbb {C}})\) is algebraic and hence definable, it suffices to prove that the restrictions of \(\exp _G\) to \(IV_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t}\) and to \({\mathcal {F}}_G^\prime \) are definable. By compactness, the restriction of \(\exp _G\) to \({\mathcal {F}}_G^\prime \) is definable (even in \({\mathbb {R}}_{\textrm{an}}\)).
It hence remains to prove the definability of \(\exp _G|_{IV_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t}}\) and using the fact that the group law is algebraic once again, we can even assume \(t=1\) without loss of generality. In this situation, the identification \(\Omega _{\mathbb {G}_{m}} = {\mathbb {Z}} \cdot (2\pi i)\) yields \(IV_{{\mathbb {G}}_m} = {\mathbb {R}}\) and \(\exp _G|_{IV_{\mathbb {G}_{m}}} = \exp (c \cdot x)\) for some real constant c. In any case, we see that \(\exp _G|_{IV_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t}}\) is definable. \(\square \)
4.3 O-minimal counting
Recall that Lemma 4.3 provides us with a fundamental domain \({\mathcal {F}}_G\subseteq I V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t} \times V_{G}\) so that \(\exp _G|_{{\mathcal {F}}_G}: {\mathcal {F}}_G \rightarrow G({\mathbb {C}})\) is definable in the o-minimal structure \({\mathbb {R}}_{\textrm{an},\textrm{exp}}\).
We are also going to identify \(I V_{\mathbb {G}_{m}^t} \times V_{G}\) with \(\mathbb {R}^{2t+2g}\) by choosing a basis so that the period lattice \(\Omega _G\) corresponds to \(\mathbb {Z}^{t+2g}\) in \( V_{G}\).
We let
This is a definable set of dimension 2 (see [27, Lemma 6.2]).
We have an induced embedding of \(\textrm{End}(\textrm{Lie}(G))\) in \(M_{2t+2g}(\mathbb {R})\), which we identify with \(\mathbb {R}^{(2t+2g)^2}\). This will allow us to see each \(\textrm{Lie}(H)\subseteq \textrm{Lie}(G)\) as the kernel of a matrix.
We consider the definable set
We see it as a family with parameters in \(M_{2t+2g}(\mathbb {R})\) and fibers
We moreover set, for some \(T\ge 1\),
where \(H(\cdot )\) is the exponential height on \( \mathbb {Q}^{2t+2g}\).
Finally, we let \(\pi _1\) and \(\pi _2\) be the projection maps from \(\mathbb {R}^{2t+2g} \times \mathbb {R}^{2t+2g}\) to the first and the second factor respectively.
The following statement is a special case of [27, Corollary 7.2].
Lemma 4.4
For every \(\epsilon >0\) there exists a constant \(c=c(Z,\epsilon )>0\) that satisfies the following property. If \(T\ge 1\) and \(\Sigma \subseteq Z_{\psi _0}(\mathbb {Q},T)\) with \(|\pi _2(\Sigma )| >cT^\epsilon \), there exists a continuous and definable function \(\beta :[0,1]\rightarrow Z_{\psi _0}\) such that
-
(1)
the composition \(\pi _1\circ \beta \) is semialgebraic and its restriction to (0, 1) is real analytic;
-
(2)
the composition \(\pi _2\circ \beta \) is non-constant;
-
(3)
we have \(\pi _2(\beta (0))\in \pi _2(\Sigma )\).
We are also going to need the following consequence of Ax’s Theorem [1].
Lemma 4.5
Let \(\gamma :[0,1]\rightarrow \textrm{Lie}(G)\) be real semialgebraic and continuous with \(\gamma |_{(0,1)}\) real analytic. The Zariski closure in G of the image of \(\exp _G \circ \gamma \) is a coset of G.
Proof
In [27, Theorem 5.4] Habegger and Pila formulated and proved this statement for abelian varieties. The exact same proof works in our case as Ax’s Theorem holds for semiabelian varieties. \(\square \)
4.4 Conclusion
In order to prove Proposition 4.1 we suppose there is a real number B and infinitely many points \(p\in (C\cap G^{[2]})(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) with \({\widehat{h}}_L(p)\le B\). Note that, by Northcott’s Theorem, we have that the degree over \(\mathbb {K}\) of such points must tend to infinity.
Let p be one of these points. Then, \(p\in \langle p \rangle =H_p+q\) for some \(q \in \textrm{Tors}(G)\) and \(\dim H_p\le \dim G-2\). We assume that q is of minimal order.
By our assumption on \(\mathbb {K}\) we have that all \(\textrm{Gal}({\overline{\mathbb {K}}}/\mathbb {K})\)-conjugates of p lie in an algebraic subgroup of G of codimension at least 2. Actually we have \(\langle p^\sigma \rangle = H_p+q^\sigma \) for all \(\sigma \in \textrm{Gal}({\overline{\mathbb {K}}}/\mathbb {K})\) and thus \(\Delta ( \langle p^\sigma \rangle )=\Delta ( \langle p \rangle )\).
We let \(z_\sigma , r_\sigma \in \log _G(C)\) be the logarithms of \(p^\sigma \) and \(q^\sigma \) in our fundamental domain, i.e., \(\exp _G(z_\sigma )=p^\sigma \) and \(\exp _G(r_\sigma )=q^\sigma \). Since we have identified \(\Omega _G\) with \(\mathbb {Z}^{t+2g} \) in \(V_G\) and \(r_\sigma \in {\mathcal {F}}_G\), we have that \(r_\sigma \in \{0\} \times \mathbb {Q}^{t+2g}\) and \(H(r_\sigma )=\textrm{ord}(q^\sigma )\).
Now, Lemma 2.5 provides us with a \(v_\sigma \in \Omega _G+\textrm{Lie}(H_p)\) such that \(\exp _{G}(v_\sigma )=p^\sigma -q^\sigma \) and
as \(h_L(p)\le B\).
We compare \(\Vert v_\sigma \Vert \) and \(\Vert z_\sigma -r_\sigma \Vert \). Since their image via \(\exp _{G}\) coincide, the difference between \(v_\sigma \) and \(z_\sigma -r_\sigma \) is a period, which must project to the identity on \(IV_{{\mathbb {G}}_m^t}\). Therefore, the projections of these two elements on \(IV_{{\mathbb {G}}_m^t}\) coincide. Moreover, the projection of \(z_\sigma -r_\sigma \) on \(V_G\) is bounded, therefore
Moreover, Lemma 2.4(2) guarantees that there exists \(\omega _\sigma \in \Omega _G\) with \(z_\sigma -(r_\sigma +\omega _\sigma )\in \textrm{Lie}(H_p)\) and
We conclude
and therefore we have
by (18). Set \(d_p:=[\mathbb {K}(p):\mathbb {K}]\). Then,
where \(\psi _0\) is a matrix whose kernel is \(\textrm{Lie}(H_p)\).
We now apply Lemma 4.4 with \(\epsilon =1/(2c_{24})\), \(T=c_{23} d_p^{c_{24}}\) and \(\Sigma =\Sigma _p\). For \(d_p\) large enough, we have \(c(c_{23} d_p^{c_{24}})^\epsilon <d_p\) and therefore
Lemma 4.4 then ensures the existence of a continuous and definable function \(\beta :[0,1]\rightarrow Z_{\psi _0}\) satisfying
-
(1)
the composition \(\pi _1\circ \beta \) is semialgebraic and its restriction to (0, 1) is real analytic;
-
(2)
the composition \(\pi _2\circ \beta \) is non-constant;
-
(3)
we have \(\pi _2(\beta (0))\in \pi _2(\Sigma )\).
We now consider the quotient \(\phi :G\rightarrow G/H_p\) and the corresponding \(\textrm{Lie}(\phi ):\textrm{Lie}(G)\rightarrow \textrm{Lie}(G/H_p)\) whose kernel is the kernel of \(\psi _0\).
We note that by definition
We apply Lemma 4.5 with \(\gamma =\textrm{Lie}(\phi )\circ \pi _1\circ \beta \). The Zariski closure of the image of \({\exp _{G/H_p}}\circ \gamma \) is a coset of \(G/H_p\). On the other hand, the Zariski closure of the image of \({\exp _{G}}\circ \pi _2\circ \beta \) is contained in C. This containment cannot be strict because \(\pi _2\circ \beta \) is non-constant.
Therefore, the Zariski closure of the image of \(\phi \circ {\exp _{G}}\circ {\pi _2}\circ \beta \) equals \(\phi (C)\) and is a one dimensional coset that must be a torsion coset because it contains the torsion point \(\phi (\pi _2(\beta (0)))\).
Since \(G/H_p\) has dimension at least 2 it follows that \(C\) is contained in a proper algebraic subgroup of G. This contradicts our hypothesis and therefore \(d_p\) must be uniformly bounded and Proposition 4.1 is proved.
5 Proof of Theorem 1.1
5.1 Preparations
We recall that G is a semiabelian variety defined over a number field \({\mathbb {K}}\), which is given by an exact sequence
We recall that L is an ample line bundle on \({\overline{G}}\) that we have fixed before Lemma 2.2.
We prove the theorem by induction on \(\dim (G)\). If \(\dim (G)=1\), then \(G^{[2]}=\emptyset \) and there is nothing to prove. If \(\dim (G)=2\), then \(G^{[2]}= \textrm{Tors}(G)\) and the theorem is a consequence of the Manin–Mumford conjecture for semiabelian varieties proven by Hindry [26]. These two cases serve as the basis of our induction.
For the induction step, we assume now that the theorem is already proven for all semiabelian varieties of dimension strictly less than \(\dim (G) > 2\). Let \(p_0 + G_0\), \(p_0 \in C({\overline{\mathbb {Q}}})\), be the smallest coset containing \(C\). Although \(C\) is by assumption not contained in any proper algebraic subgroup of G, we may have \(G_0 \ne G\).
We make an elementary observation on the dimension of \(G_0\).
Lemma 5.1
Let \(H \subset G\) be a semiabelian subvariety of codimension at least 2 and \(q \in \textrm{Tors}(G)\). If the intersection \(C\cap (q + H)\) is non-empty, then \(G_0 + H=G\). In particular, it holds that \(\dim (G_0) \ge 2\) if \(C\cap G^{[2]}\) is non-empty.
Proof
Note that \(G_0 + H\) is a connected algebraic subgroup of G. Choose a point \(p \in (C\cap (q + H))(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\). As \(C\subseteq p + G_0 \subseteq q + G_0 + H\), we have \(G=G_0 + H\) because \(C\) is not contained in a proper torsion coset. \(\square \)
In the sequel, we hence assume that \(\dim (G_0)\ge 2\).
5.2 An auxiliary surface
We consider the difference map
and the irreducible variety S that is the Zariski-closure of \(\Delta (C\times C) = C- C\) in G.
It is easy to see that \(G_0\) is the minimal coset containing S: In fact, any coset containing S is a connected algebraic subgroup because of \(0_G \in S\). If \(H \subseteq G\) is a subgroup containing S, we have
and thus \(G_0 \subseteq G_0 \cap H\) as \(G_0\) is the minimal subgroup that contains a translate of \(C\).
In the next lemma, we collect some basic properties of S.
Lemma 5.2
S has dimension 2 and is not \(G_0\)-anomalous in itself.
Proof
For the sake of contradiction, assume that \(S = C-C\) is an irreducible curve. Then, the translated curve \(C^\prime = C- p_0\) satisfies \(C^\prime - C^\prime \subseteq C^\prime \) and is hence a one-dimensional algebraic subgroup. As \(C\) is just a translate of this subgroup, this gives a contradiction to our assumption that \(\dim (G_0) \ge 2\).
The second part of the statement was proven above. \(\square \)
The Structure Theorem 2.1 applied to S in \(G_0\) gives a finite set \(\Phi _S\) of proper abelian subvarieties of \(G_0\) such that
where each \({\mathscr {Z}}_H\) is a finite union of subvarieties \(W\subset S\cap (p+H )\), for some \(p\in G_0(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\), with \(\dim W \ge 1\) and \(\dim W \ge \dim S - \textrm{codim}H +1=3-\textrm{codim}H\). Note that Lemma 5.2, implies that all the W in the finite union above are curves. Moreover, all the H that give a contribution to the above union have codimension at least 2.
We may then conclude that there exist finitely many irreducible algebraic curves \(C_i \subset S\), \(1 \le i \le N\), such that
Each curve \(C_i\), \(1 \le i \le N\), is contained in a coset \(p_i + H_i \subset G_0\) with \(p_i \in C_i(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) and \(H_i \subset G_0\) a subgroup of codimension at least 2; for the sequel, we stipulate that each coset \(p_i + H_i\) is the minimal coset containing \(C_i\).
5.3 A height comparison
The restriction \(\Delta |_{C\times C}: C\times C\rightarrow S\) is a dominant, generically finite map. The following standard lemma allows us to bound the height of most \(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}\)-points on \(C\times C\) by the height of their images in S.
Proposition 5.1
Let X (resp. Y) be an irreducible algebraic variety defined over \(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}\), L (resp. M) an ample line bundle on X (resp. Y). Assume furthermore that \(\dim X=\dim Y\) and let \(f:X\rightarrow Y\) be a dominant morphism over \(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}\). Set
Then there exist constants \(c_1, c_2 > 0\) such that
for all points \(x \in X(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) with \(f(x) \notin Z(f)\).
By upper semicontinuity of the fiber dimension [24, Théorème 13.1.3], the set Z(f) is closed. In addition, it is easy to show that Z(f) has codimension \(\ge 2\) in Y. In our application to surfaces X and Y, this means that Z(f) is a finite set of points.
Proof
This follows from [53, Theorem 1]. The height inequality obtained in loc.cit. is of the desired form (20), but only valid for all points in a (not determined) Zariski open dense subset \(U \subseteq Y\); we hence have to verify that we can ensure \(Y \setminus U \subseteq Z(f)\).
Let W be an irreducible component of \(Y \setminus U\) that does not lie in Z(f). We have that \(f^{-1}(W)\) consists of m irreducible components \(V_1, \dots ,V_m\). If \(\dim (V_i)>\dim (W)\), then \(f(V_i) \subseteq Z(f)\). So it suffices to consider points on the irreducible components \(V_i\) such that \(\dim (V_i)=\dim (W)\). For each of these, we can again apply [53, Theorem 1] to \(f|_{V_i}:V_i\rightarrow W\). We get that (20) holds for all \(x\in V_i(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) such that \(f(x)\in U'\) for some Zariski open dense \(U'\subseteq W\). If \(W\setminus U'\subseteq Z(f)\) we are done, otherwise we repeat the same argument with \(W\setminus U'\) instead of W. We only need to do this finitely many times as \(\dim (W\setminus U')<\dim (W)\). \(\square \)
Applying this lemma to the restriction \(\Delta |_{C\times C}: C\times C\rightarrow S\), we obtain a finite set of \(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}\)-rational points \(Z \subset S(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) and constants \(c_1,c_2>0\) such that
whenever \(p-p' \notin Z\) for points \(p,p' \in C(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\).
5.4 Enlarging the number field \(\mathbb {K}\)
There exists a finite extension \(\mathbb {K}^\prime /\mathbb {K}\) such that the following conditions are satisfied:
-
(1)
all connected algebraic subgroups of G are defined over \(\mathbb {K}^\prime \) (Lemma 2.6),
-
(2)
we have \(p_0 \in G(\mathbb {K}^\prime )\), \(p_i \in G(\mathbb {K}^\prime )\) (\(1\le i \le N\)), and \(Z \subset S(\mathbb {K}^\prime )\), and
-
(3)
the curve \(C\subset G\) as well as the curves \(C_i \subset G_0\) (\(1\le i \le N\)) in (19), are defined over \(\mathbb {K}^\prime \).
Replacing \(\mathbb {K}\) with \(\mathbb {K}^\prime \), we can assume that the above conditions are already satisfied for \(\mathbb {K}\).
5.5 Some reductions
Recall that we have to show that the set \((C\cap G^{[2]})(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) is finite. For this purpose, we consider a point \(p\in (C\cap G^{[2]})(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\). Denote by \(H \subset G\) a semiabelian subvariety of codimension at least 2 and \(q \in \textrm{Tors}(G)\) such that \(p \in q + H\). Recall that \(G_0 + H=G\) by Lemma 5.1.
Set \(p^\prime = p - p_0 \in S(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\). For each \(\sigma \in \textrm{Gal}(\overline{{\mathbb {K}}}/{\mathbb {K}})\), we define
Considering tangent spaces at \(0_G\), we obtain
As the intersection \(G_0 \cap (q^\sigma - q + H)\) is a torsion translate of \(G_0 \cap H\) in \(G_0\), the point \(r_{p,\sigma }\) is contained in \(S \cap (G_0)^{[2]}\).
Lemma 5.3
There are at most finitely many points \(p\in (C\cap G^{[2]})(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) such that \(r_{p,\sigma } \in Z\) for all \(\sigma \in \textrm{Gal}({\overline{\mathbb {K}}}/\mathbb {K})\).
Proof
Assume that \(p \in (C\cap G^{[2]})(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) is such that \(r_{p,\sigma } = p^\sigma - p \in Z \subset G(\mathbb {K})\) for all \(\sigma \in \textrm{Gal}({\overline{\mathbb {K}}}/\mathbb {K})\). By Lemma 2.7(b), there exists an integer \(e = e(\mathbb {K}) \ge 1\), which is independent of p, such that \([e](p) \in G(\mathbb {K})\). By Proposition 3.1, there are at most finitely many \(p \in (C\cap G^{[2]})(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) with this property. \(\square \)
Lemma 5.4
There are at most finitely many points \(p\in (C\cap G^{[2]})(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) such that there exists an automorphism \(\sigma \in \textrm{Gal}({\overline{\mathbb {K}}}/\mathbb {K})\) with \(r_{p,\sigma } \in S^{\textrm{oa}}(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}) \setminus Z\).
Proof
Let \(p \in (C\cap G^{[2]})(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) and \(\sigma \in \textrm{Gal}({\overline{\mathbb {K}}}/\mathbb {K})\) be such that \(r_{p,\sigma } \in S^{\textrm{oa}} (\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\setminus Z\). Recall that we have also \(r_{p,\sigma } \in (G_0)^{[2]}(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) as noted above. By the (proven) bounded height conjecture for semiabelian varieties (Theorem 2.2), we conclude that \(h_L(r_{p,\sigma }) \le c_3\) for some positive constant \(c_3=c_3(S)\) that is independent of p. Using (21), we obtain that \(2h_L(p) \le c_1 c_3 + c_2\). The asserted finiteness follows hence from Proposition 4.1. \(\square \)
By these two above lemmas, it suffices to prove that there are at most finitely many points \(p \in (C\cap G^{[2]})(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) such that there exists some \(\sigma \in \textrm{Gal}({\overline{\mathbb {K}}}/\mathbb {K})\) satisfying \(r_{p,\sigma } \in S(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}) \setminus (S^{\textrm{oa}}(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}) \cup Z)\). By Lemma 2.7(a), the fact that \(r_{p,\sigma } \in C_i\) implies that \(p_i+H_i\) is a torsion coset; this means that there exists \(p_i^\prime \in \textrm{Tors}(G_0)\) with \(p_i+H_i = p_i^\prime +H_i\). (Note that we cannot assume that \(p_i^\prime \in C_i(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\).)
After relabeling, we may assume that \(p_i+H_i\), \(1\le i \le N\), is a torsion coset if and only if \(1\le i \le N^\prime \). For each \(1\le i \le N^\prime \), we choose a torsion point \(p_i^\prime \in \textrm{Tors}(G_0)\) such that \(p_i+H_i=p_i^\prime +H_i\).
Lemma 5.5
There are at most finitely many points \(p \in C(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) contained in a torsion coset \(q+H\) where \(q \in \textrm{Tors}(G)\) and \(H \subset G\) is a subgroup of codimension \(\ge 2\) satisfying \(H \not \supseteq H_i\) for all \(i \in \{1, \dots , N^\prime \}\).
Proof
Let \(p \in C(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) be contained in a torsion coset \(q+H\) as in the lemma. Using Lemmas 5.3 and 5.4 , we may assume that there exists some \(\sigma \in \textrm{Gal}({\overline{\mathbb {K}}}/\mathbb {K})\) such that \(r_{p,\sigma } \in S(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}) \setminus (S^{\textrm{oa}}(\overline{\mathbb {Q}}) \cup Z)\). As observed above, we have \(r_{p,\sigma } \in C_i(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) for some \(i \in \{1,\dots , N^\prime \}\).
By the minimality assumption on \(H_i\), the translate \(C_i^\prime = C_i - p_i^\prime \subseteq H_i\) cannot be \(H_i\)-anomalous in \(C_i^\prime \). As \(H \not \supseteq H_i\), the intersection \(H \cap H_i\) is a proper subgroup of \(H_i\). Thus we infer \(r_{p,\sigma } - p_i^\prime \in (C_i^\prime \cap H_i^{[1]})(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) from the fact that \(r_{p,\sigma }\) lies in \( (p_i^\prime + H_i) \cap (q^\sigma -q + H)\).
An application of Theorem 2.2 for the curve \(C_i^\prime \subseteq H_i\) yields an upper bound on the height \(h_L(r_{p,\sigma } - p_i^\prime )\) that is independent of p. As \(p_i'\) is torsion we have a bound on \(h_L(r_{p,\sigma })\), and \(r_{p,\sigma }\not \in Z\) implies that the height of p is bounded. Proposition 4.1 yields the asserted finiteness. \(\square \)
5.6 Applying the inductive hypothesis
We conclude the proof of Theorem 1.1 by dealing with the remaining points in \(C\cap G^{[2]}\) by induction on \(\dim (G)\). Note that this is the only part of the argument where the inductive hypothesis is actually used.
Lemma 5.6
For each \(i \in \{1, \dots , N^\prime \}\), there are at most finitely many points \(p \in C(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) contained in a torsion coset \(q+H\) where \(q \in \textrm{Tors}(G)\) and \(H \subset G\) is a subgroup of codimension \(\ge 2\) satisfying \(H \supseteq H_i\).
Proof
Again, let \(p \in C(\overline{\mathbb {Q}})\) be contained in a torsion coset \(q+H\) as in the lemma. We consider the quotient map \(\varphi _i: G \rightarrow G/H_i\) and note that \(\varphi _i(C)\) is not contained in a proper algebraic subgroup of \(G/H_i\) because otherwise C would be contained in a proper algebraic subgroup of G. Moreover, it is not a point. Indeed, this would imply that \(C\) is contained in a coset of \(H_i\) which would be strictly contained in a coset of \(G_0\), contradicting the minimality of \(G_0\).
Now, as p is sent to \(\varphi _i(C) \cap (G/H_i)^{[2]}\) and \(\dim (G/H_i)<\dim (G)\), the lemma follows from our inductive hypothesis. \(\square \)
On combining Lemmas 5.5 and 5.6 , we obtain Theorem 1.1 immediately.
Notes
Indeed, \(z_{k,k^\prime }^{(i)}(0_G)\) is an algebraic number so the first equality is clear. For the second equality, note that if \(\lambda _{D,\nu }\!: (X \setminus \textrm{supp}(D) )(\mathbb {C}_\nu ) \rightarrow \mathbb {R}\), \(\nu \in \Sigma _{{\mathbb {K}}}\), is the collection of Weil functions associated with an arbitrary Néron divisor D on a \({\mathbb {K}}\)-algebraic variety X, then for every point \(x\in (X \setminus \textrm{supp}(D))({\mathbb {K}})\) we have \(\lambda _{\nu }(x) = 0\) for almost all places \(\nu \) of \({\mathbb {K}}\) (see [32, Section 10.2]). A closer look at the Néron–Tate limit process reveals that the same is then also true for the canonical heights on abelian varieties (see [16, Equation (19)]).
References
Ax, J.: Some topics in differential algebraic geometry. I. Analytic subgroups of algebraic groups. Am. J. Math. 94, 1195–1204 (1972)
Barroero, F., Capuano, L.: Unlikely intersections in families of abelian varieties and the polynomial Pell equation. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 120(2), 192–219 (2020)
Barroero, F., Capuano, L., Mérai, L., Ostafe, A., Sha, M.: Multiplicative and linear dependence in finite fields and on elliptic curves modulo primes. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2022(20), 16094–16137 (2022)
Barroero, F., Dill, G.A.: Distinguished categories and the Zilber–Pink conjecture (2021). submitted, arXiv:2103.07422
Barroero, F., Dill, Gabriel G.A.: On the Zilber–Pink conjecture for complex abelian varieties. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 55(1), 261–282 (2022)
Bertrand, D.: Minimal heights and polarizations on group varieties. Duke Math. J. 80(1), 223–250 (1995)
Bertrand, D.: Generalized Jacobians and Pellian polynomials. J. Théor. Nombres Bordx. 27(2), 439–461 (2015)
Bosser, V., Gaudron, É.: Logarithmes des points rationnels des variétés abéliennes. Can. J. Math. 71(2), 247–298 (2019)
Bombieri, E., Habegger, P., Masser, D., Zannier, U.: A note on Maurin’s theorem. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. 21(3), 251–260 (2010)
Bombieri, E., Masser, D., Zannier, U.: Intersecting a curve with algebraic subgroups of multiplicative groups. Int. Math. Res. Not. 20, 1119–1140 (1999)
Bombieri, E., Masser, D., Zannier, U.: Intersecting curves and algebraic subgroups: conjectures and more results. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 358(5), 2247–2257 (2006)
Bombieri, E., Masser, D., Zannier, U.: Anomalous subvarieties—structure theorems and applications. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 19, 33 (2007)
Bombieri, E., Masser, D., Zannier, U.: On unlikely intersections of complex varieties with tori. Acta Arith. 133(4), 309–323 (2008)
Carrizosa, M.: Petits points et multiplication complex. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 16, 3016–3097 (2009)
Chambert-Loir, A.: Relations de dépendance et intersections exceptionnelles, Astérisque (2012), no. 348, Exp. No. 1032, viii, 149–188, Séminaire Bourbaki: Vol. 2010/2011. Exposés 1027–1042
Call, G.S., Silverman, J.H.: Canonical heights on varieties with morphisms. Compos. Math. 89(2), 163–205 (1993)
Faltings, G.: Endlichkeitssätze für abelsche Varietäten über Zahlkörpern. Invent. Math. 73(3), 349–366 (1983)
Faltings, G.: The general case of S. Lang’s conjecture. Barsotti Symposium in Algebraic Geometry. Abano Terme. Perspect. Math., vol. 15, pp. 175–182. Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1991)
Fulton, W.: Intersection theory, 2nd edn. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics], vol. 2. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1998)
Galateau, A.: Une minoration du minimum essentiel sur les variétés abéliennes. Comment. Math. Helv. 85(4), 775–812 (2010)
Gaudron, É.: Mesures d’indépendance linéaire de logarithmes dans un groupe algébrique commutatif. Invent. Math. 162(1), 137–188 (2005)
Griffiths, P., Harris, J.: Principles of Algebraic Geometry. Wiley Classics Library. Wiley, New York (1994). Reprint of the 1978 original
Gaudron, É., Rémond, G.: Polarisations et isogénies. Duke Math. J. 163(11), 2057–2108 (2014)
Grothendieck, A.: Éléments de géométrie algébrique. IV. Étude locale des schémas et des morphismes de schémas. III, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 28, 255 (1966)
Habegger, P.: On the bounded height conjecture. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 5, 860–886 (2009)
Hindry, M.: Autour d’une conjecture de Serge Lang. Invent. Math. 94(3), 575–603 (1988)
Habegger, P., Pila, J.: O-minimality and certain atypical intersections. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 49(4), 813–858 (2016)
Hindry, M., Silverman, J.H.: Diophantine Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. An introduction, vol. 201. Springer, New York (2000)
Kirby, J.: The theory of the exponential differential equations of semiabelian varieties. Sel. Math. (N.S.) 153, 445–486 (2009)
Kühne, L.: The bounded height conjecture for semiabelian varieties. Compos. Math. 156(7), 1405–1456 (2020)
Kühne, L.: Points of small height on semiabelian varieties. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 24(6), 2077–2131 (2022)
Lang, S.: Fundamentals of Diophantine Geometry. Springer, New York (1983)
Laurent, M.: Équations diophantiennes exponentielles. Invent. Math. 78(2), 299–327 (1984)
Martinet, J.: Perfect Lattices in Euclidean Spaces. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 327. Springer, Berlin (2003)
Maurin, G.: Courbes algébriques et équations multiplicatives. Math. Ann. 341(4), 789–824 (2008)
Moret-Bailly, L.: Familles de courbes et de variétés abéliennes sur \({\mathbb{P}}^1\). I. Descente des polarisations, no. 86, Seminar on Pencils of Curves of Genus at Least Two, pp. 109–124 (1981)
McQuillan, M.: Division points on semi-abelian varieties. Invent. Math. 120(1), 143–159 (1995)
Mumford, D.: Abelian Varieties. Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Studies in Mathematics, No. 5, Published for the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay. Oxford University Press, London (1970)
Masser, D., Zannier, U.: Torsion points on families of simple abelian surfaces and Pell’s equation over polynomial rings. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 179, 2379–2416 (2015). With an appendix by E. V. Flynn
Neukirch, J.: Algebraic Number Theory. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschasten [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 322. Springer, Berlin. Translated from the 1992 German original and with a note by Norbert Schappacher. With a foreword by G, Harder (1999)
Oort, F.: Commutative group schemes. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 15. Springer, Berlin-New York (1966)
Pink, R.: A combination of the conjectures of Mordell–Lang and André–Oort, Geometric Methods in Algebra and Number Theory. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 235, pp. 251–282. Birkhäuser, Boston (2005)
Pink, R.: A common generalization of the conjectures of André-Oort, Manin–Mumford, and Mordell–Lang (2005). Available from http://www.math.ethz.ch/~pink
Pila, J., Wilkie, A.J.: The rational points of a definable set. Duke Math. J. 133(3), 591–616 (2006)
Ratazzi, N.: Intersection de courbes et de sous-groupes et problèmes de minoration de dernière hauteur dans les variétés abéliennes C.M. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 585, 1575–1633 (2008)
Raynaud, M.: Courbes sur une variété abélienne et points de torsion. Invent. Math. 71(1), 207–233 (1983)
Rémond, G., Viada, E.: Problème de Mordell-Lang modulo certaines sous-variétés abéliennes. Int. Math. Res. Not. 35, 1915–1931 (2003)
Rémond, G.: Inégalité de Vojta généralisée. Bull. Soc. Math. France 133(4), 459–495 (2005)
Schmidt, H.: Pell’s equation in polynomials and additive extensions. Q. J. Math. 68(4), 1335–1355 (2017)
Serre, J.-P.: Géométrie algébrique et géométrie analytique. Ann. Inst. Fourier Grenoble 6, 1–42 (1955–1956)
Serre, J.-P.: Algebraic Groups and Class Fields. Graduate Texts in Mathematics vol. 117. Springer, New York (1988). Translated from the French
Silverman, J.H.: The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 106, Springer, New York (1992). Corrected reprint of the 1986 original
Silverman, J.H.: Height estimates for equidimensional dominant rational maps. J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 26(2), 145–163 (2011)
van den Dries, L., Miller, C.: On the real exponential field with restricted analytic functions. Isr. J. Math. 85(1–3), 19–56 (1994)
Viada, E.: The intersection of a curve with algebraic subgroups in a product of elliptic curves. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 21, 47–75 (2003)
Viada, E.: The intersection of a curve with a union of translated codimension-two subgroups in a power of an elliptic curve. Algebra Number Theory 2(3), 249–298 (2008)
Vogel, W.: Lectures on Results on Bezout’s Theorem. Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Lectures on Mathematics and Physics, vol. 74, Published for the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay. Springer, Berlin (1984). Notes by D. P. Patil
Voisin, C.: Hodge Theory and Complex Algebraic Geometry. I, english ed., Cambridge studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 76. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007). Translated from the French by Leila Schneps
Vojta, P.: Integral points on subvarieties of semiabelian varieties. I. Invent. Math. 126(1), 133–181 (1996)
Wüstholz, G.: Algebraische Punkte auf analytischen Untergruppen algebraischer Gruppen. Ann. Math. (2) 129(3), 501–517 (1989)
Zannier, U.: Some Problems of Unlikely Intersections in Arithmetic And Geometry. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 181. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2012). With Appendixes by David Masser
Zhang, S.: Small points and Adelic metrics. J. Algebr. Geom. 4(2), 281–300 (1995)
Zilber, B.: Exponential sums equations and the Schanuel conjecture. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 65(1), 27–44 (2002)
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the referee for carefully reading the paper and providing several suggestions that significantly improved the article. They moreover thank thank Éric Gaudron and Philipp Habegger for comments and feedback. FB was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 165525. LK was supported by an Ambizione Grant of the Swiss National Science Foundation. LK also received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 101027237.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Universitá degli Studi Roma Tre within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Barroero, F., Kühne, L. & Schmidt, H. Unlikely intersections of curves with algebraic subgroups in semiabelian varieties. Sel. Math. New Ser. 29, 18 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-022-00823-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-022-00823-w