Abstract
We give a mathematical definition of irregular conformal blocks in the genus-zero WZNW model for any simple Lie algebra, using coinvariants of modules for affine Lie algebras whose parameters match up with those of moduli spaces of irregular meromorphic connections: the open de Rham spaces. The Segal–Sugawara representation of the Virasoro algebra is used to show that the spaces of irregular conformal blocks assemble into a flat vector bundle over the space of isomonodromy times à la Klarès, and we provide a universal version of the resulting flat connection generalising the irregular KZ connection of Reshetikhin and the dynamical KZ connection of Felder–Markov–Tarasov–Varchenko.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction and main results
In this paper we pursue the viewpoint that a natural mathematical formulation of conformal field theory (CFT) lies within the geometry of moduli spaces of meromorphic connections, and we take a step in this direction.
The prototype are the Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov equations (KZ) [38], in the genus-zero Wess–Zumino–Novikov–Witten model (WZNW) for 2-dimensional CFT [43, 54, 55]. They were originally introduced as the partial differential equations satisfied by n-point correlators, and mathematically they amount to a flat connection on a vector bundle over the space of configurations of n-tuples of points in the complex plane [20].
The construction of the flat connection relies on representation-theoretic constructions for affine Lie algebras, and on the Segal–Sugawara representation of the Virasoro algebra on affine-Lie-algebra modules [39]. An alternative derivation is possible via deformation quantisation of the Hamiltonian system controlling isomonodromic deformations of Fuchsian systems on the Riemann sphere [30, 46], the Schlesinger system [48]. In particular the vector bundle where the KZ connection is defined comes from the quantisation of moduli spaces of meromorphic connections with tame/regular singularities (simple poles).
In this paper we develop a representation-theoretic setup for any simple finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra \(\mathfrak {g}\), in order to go beyond the case of regular singularities and allow for irregular/wild ones. We will thus define a family of modules for \(\mathfrak {g}\) and for the affine Lie algebra \(\widehat{\mathfrak {g}}\) associated with \(\mathfrak {g}\), which we call “singular” modules.Footnote 1 Their parameters match up with those of symplectic moduli spaces of (possibly irregular) meromorphic connections on the sphere, generalising Verma modules.
Indeed the regular case will correspond to “tame” modules \(V_{\lambda } \subseteq \widehat{V}_{\lambda }\), which are standard Verma modules for \(\mathfrak {g} \subseteq \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}\), whose defining representations depend on characters \(\mathfrak {b}^+ \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) and \(\widehat{\mathfrak {b}}^+ \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) for Borel subalgebras \(\mathfrak {b}^+ \subseteq \widehat{\mathfrak {b}}^+\)—corresponding to positive roots within the root system given by a Cartan subalgebra \(\mathfrak {h} \subseteq \mathfrak {b}^+\). Such characters are encoded by linear maps \(\lambda \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\), which in turn match up with local normal forms for (germs of) meromorphic connections around a simple pole via the natural residue-pairing \(\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g} dz \otimes \mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g} \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\), where \(\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g} = \mathfrak {g} \otimes \mathbb {C} (\!( z )\!)\) is the (formal) loop algebra of \(\mathfrak {g}\). Moreover, if G is the connected simply-connected Lie group integrating \(\mathfrak {g}\), then the G-action on the coadjoint G-orbit \(\mathcal {O} \subseteq \mathfrak {g}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) of the character corresponds to the gauge action on meromorphic connections on a trivial principal G-bundle. Repeating this construction at \(n \ge 1\) marked points on the sphere provides a finite-dimensional description of the moduli space of isomorphism classes of logarithmic connections with prescribed positions of the poles and residue orbits, defined on holomorphically trivial bundles: this is the open part \(\mathcal {M}^*_{{{\,\textrm{dR}\,}}} \subseteq \mathcal {M}_{{{\,\textrm{dR}\,}}}\) of the de Rham space, that enters into the nonabelian Hodge correspondence on (complex) curves. The full de Rham space \(\mathcal {M}_{{{\,\textrm{dR}\,}}}\) is obtained by removing the requirement that the bundle be holomorphically trivial, rather just topologically trivial [8, Rem. 2.1].
Hence classically there is a complex symplectic reduction of a product of coadjoint G-orbits \(\mathcal {O}_i \subseteq \mathfrak {g}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\), the moduli space
whose quantum counterpart is the vector space \(\mathscr {H} = \mathcal {H}_{\mathfrak {g}}\) of \(\mathfrak {g}\)-coinvariants of the tensor product \(\mathcal {H} = \bigotimes _i V_{\lambda _i}\) of tame modules: the space of WZNW covacua. If the level is integral, which we do not assume here, one would replace Verma modules by integrable ones; then dualising yields the space of vacua, i.e. the space of WZWN conformal blocks.
Now one very important feature are the deformations, both in the semiclassical and quantum setting. Namely as the positions of the simple poles vary the moduli spaces assemble into a symplectic fibre bundle
over the space \({{\,\textrm{Conf}\,}}_n(\mathbb {C}) \subseteq \mathbb {C}^n\) of (ordered) configurations of points on the complex affine line, equipped with a flat symplectic Ehresmann connection: it is the isomonodromy connection [31], defined here by the integrable (nonautonomous) Schlesinger system [48]. The leaves of this (nonlinear) connection are isomonodromic families of (linear) meromorphic connections, i.e. the monodromy data are kept locally constant.Footnote 2 Hence classically we find a flat symplectic fibre bundle.
On the quantum side one thus looks for a (linear) flat connection on the conformal block bundle, to yield identifications of different fibres up to the braiding of the marked points, analogously to the symplectomorphisms defined by the nonlinear isomonodromy connection. This natural flat connection is precisely the KZ connection, which is intrinsically defined via the slot-wise action of the Sugawara operator \(L_{-1} \in \mathfrak {Vir}\) on the tensor product \(\widehat{\mathcal {H}} = \bigotimes _i \widehat{V}_{\lambda _i}\) of tame modules for the affine Lie algebra, where \(\mathfrak {Vir}\) is the Virasoro algebra. The action is compatible with that of the Lie algebra of \(\mathfrak {g}\)-valued meromorphic functions on the punctured sphere, hence induces a well defined connection on the bundle of coinvariants.
This is the picture that we wish to generalise on the side of the representation theory of affine Lie algebras. Namely to define generalisations of Verma modules we look at the symplectic geometry of moduli spaces of irregular meromorphic connections, which has been studied in much greater generality: for arbitrary genus, complex reductive structure group, polar divisor, and for any nongeneric/twisted irregular types [8,9,10, 13, 16]. Intrinsic definitions allow for the construction of symplectic local systems of wild character varieties generalising the above, also entering the wild nonabelian Hodge correspondence on (complex) curves [5]. We concern ourselves here with the case of genus zero, of a simple group, and untwisted irregular types; cf. [7, 14] for terminology and motivation.
Hence the open de Rham spaces \(\mathcal {M}^*_{{{\,\textrm{dR}\,}}}\) are still defined. Importantly one now considers isomorphism classes of connections with higher-order poles, which have local moduli at each pole parametrising the principal parts—beyond the residue term. This may be formalised in terms of “deeper” coadjoint orbits of the dual Lie algebra \(\mathfrak {g}_p^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\), where
which is a Lie algebra of truncated \(\mathfrak {g}\)-currents, holomorphic at \(z = 0\). Indeed the residue-pairing matches \(\mathfrak {g}_p\) up with a space of meromorphic \(\mathfrak {g}\)-valued 1-forms, which we see as principal parts of (germs of) meromorphic connections on a trivial principal G-bundle at a wild singularity. The upshot is that one still has the description (1): now however one considers coadjoint \(G_p\)-orbit \(\mathcal {O}_i \subseteq \mathfrak {g}_p^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\), where
This is the group of \((p-1)\)-jets of bundle automorphisms of the trivial principal G-bundle on a (formal) disc, integrating \(\mathfrak {g}_p\). The diagonal G-action corresponds to a change of global trivialisation of the bundle, as in the tame case, cf. the proof of [8, Proposition 2.1].
Hence we will define modules \(W^{(p)}_{\chi } \subseteq \widehat{W}^{(p)}_{\chi }\) (at depth \(p \ge 1\)) for \(\mathfrak {g}_p\) and \(\widehat{\mathfrak {g}}\) respectively, whose defining representations depend on elements of \(\mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}_p \subseteq \mathfrak {g}_p^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\). In turn the latter correspond to characters for Lie subalgebras generalising the positive (affine) Borels, so that for \(p = 1\) they reduce to the usual tame modules (else they are “wild/irregular”). This is done in Def. 3.1, which is a variations of similar definitions considered elsewhere, and which is the best suited to our viewpoint on the moduli spaces (1). For example (10) has a more general scope than the “confluent Verma modules” of [34, 42], since we allow for an arbitrary simple Lie algebra and for arbitrary irregular singularities (of arbitrary Poincaré rank)—and we do not use the viewpoint of confluence. Also we do not work in Liouville theory, i.e. we do not consider modules for the Virasoro algebra as in [41]. The approach in this paper is closer to the “level subalgebra” of [21] (cf. also Sect. 14), or rather to one of its “more reasonable” variants (see Rem. 4 of op. cit.). The other variant is used in [22, § 2.8]: in this setup the natural pairing (15) matches the parameter of the modules with half of principal parts of irregular meromorphic connections, contrary to (10).Footnote 3 The other two important differences with [22] is that we work at noncritical level, and that our \(\mathfrak {g}_p\)-modules are highest-weight, leading to finite-dimensional spaces of coinvariants.
The singular modules enjoy several natural generalisations of the standard properties of tame modules, some of which we gather here. We will refer to “affine” modules when \(\widehat{\mathfrak {g}}\) is involved, and to “finite” modules when \(\mathfrak {g}_p\) is.
Theorem 1
-
The singular modules admit explicit PBW-generators (Cor. 5.1 and Cor. 5.2).
-
The singular modules are smooth (Lem. 5.2).Footnote 4
-
The singular modules are \(\mathfrak {h}\)-semisimple (Proposition 5.1), and the finite singular modules have finite-dimensional \(\mathfrak {h}\)-weight spaces (Proposition 5.2).
-
The finite singular modules are highest-weight \(\mathfrak {g}_p\)-modules (Lem. 5.4).
-
The singular modules are cyclically generated by a common eigenvector for the Sugawara operators \(\left\{ { L_n }\right\} _{n \ge p-1}\) (Proposition 7.1), which is a Gaiotto–Teschner irregular state of order \(p-1\) [28].
We also give a formula for the (finite) dimension of \(\mathfrak {h}\)-weight spaces of finite modules, generalising the usual Weyl characters of Verma modules, in (27). The combinatorial complexity still lies in the positive root lattice, so in the archetypal case of \(\mathfrak {g} = \mathfrak {sl}(2,\mathbb {C})\) there is a simple solution (see (29)).
After establishing these properties we consider tensor products of singular modules labeled by marked points on the Riemann sphere, and study their space \(\mathscr {H}\) of coinvariants for the action of \(\mathfrak {g}\)-valued meromorphic functions with poles at the marked points. Introducing generalisations of the standard filtrations/gradings of tame modules we prove the following.
Theorem 2
-
The space \(\mathscr {H}\) is canonically identified with the space of \(\mathfrak {g}\)-coinvariants for the tensor product of finite modules (Props. 9.1, 9.2 and 10.1).
-
The space \(\mathscr {H}\) is finite-dimensional if one module is tame (Cor. 9.1).
To ensure nontriviality of the space of coinvariants we explore two options: either replacing one of the modules at the marked points with its associated contragredient representation (see Proposition 10.2), or restricting the action of rational function to the subalgebra of those which vanish at an unmarked point (see Rem. 9.1).
Finally we consider deformations of the marked points, i.e. variations of the tame isomonodromy times. This is not the full set of isomonodromy times, as in the most general setup one may also vary the irregular types/classes and give nonlinear differential equations for the invariance of Stokes data along these deformation. This goes beyond the isomonodromy times of [37], but also going the “generic” case of [33]. We briefly discuss one natural setup to introduce a space of irregular isomonodromy times in § 6.4, and we plan to pursue its quantum version in future work, which should be more closely related to to [21, 22] (cf. the outlook section below).Footnote 5
Thus we allow for variations of marked points at finite distance on the sphere. Then we use the Sugawara operators to define a flat connection on the trivial vector bundle whose fibre is the tensor product of affine singular modules, and show this is compatible with the action of rational functions on the punctured sphere. Hence the spaces of coinvariants assemble into a flat vector bundle over the space of tame isomonodromy times, so in particular their dimension is a deformation-invariant—when finite.
Using the above results it is possible to give descriptions of the flat connections on the space \(\mathscr {H}\) of coinvariants. Considering all possible cases of our setup we recover as expected:
-
(1)
The KZ connection [38] (Sect. 9.2.1);
-
(2)
A variation of the Cartan term of the dynamical KZ connection [23] (Sect. 9.2.2), and the very same Cartan term with a slightly different setup (Sect. 14);
-
(3)
The general case of [46] (Sect. 9.2.3), which generalises the KZ connection;
-
(4)
A generalisation of op. cit. with nontrivial action on the module at infinity (§ 9.2.4).
In particular the semiclassical limit of the flat connections indeed yields isomonodromy systems for irregular meromorphic connections on the sphere, as wanted.
Note the last two items in principle descend from a more general setup, where the point at infinity is not fixed, provided one can show how horizontal sections transform under the pull-back diagonal \({{\,\textrm{PSL}\,}}(2,\mathbb {C})\)-action. Going in this direction, in Sect. 13 we prove that horizontal sections of the bundle of coinvariants are naturally equivariant under the action of the subgroup of affine transformations of the affine line, with the explicit transformation (67).
Finally we abstract the formulæ for the reduced connections and define a family of universal ones: these are connections \(\nabla _p\) on the trivial vector bundle with fibre \(U (\mathfrak {g}_p )^{\otimes n}\) for \(p \ge 1\), over the space of tame isomonodromy times, which induce the above connections on \(\mathscr {H}\) by taking representations.Footnote 6 Since all induced connections are flat and well defined on \(\mathfrak {g}\)-coinvariants, it is natural to conjecture that the same holds for the universal connections before taking representations.
Theorem 3
(Thms. 12.1 and 12.2, and Proposition 12.1) The connection \(\nabla _p\) is flat, and descends to a connection on \(\mathfrak {g}\)-coinvariants of the tensor power \(U (\mathfrak {g}_p)^{\otimes n}\).
These results show the singular modules provide a solid mathematical notion of irregular conformal blocks in the genus-zero WNZW model [28, 56].
Recall irregular conformal blocks are central objects in the recent literature on the asymptotically-free extension of the Alday–Gaiotto–Tachikawa correspondence (AGT) [1, 26], which however is formulated in Virasoro/Liouville theory. Irregular extensions in Liouville theory have been obtained within the formalism of Whittaker modules, e.g. [24, 41]; in principle it should be possible to relate the latter with our construction for \(\mathfrak {g} = \mathfrak {sl}(2,\mathbb {C})\), in view of the duality between Liouville theory and the \(H_3^+\)-WZNW model [47] (then in turn our construction should generalise [27] beyond \(\mathfrak {sl}(2,\mathbb {C})\), which is compatible with the duality [47]).
2 Layout of the paper
In Sect. 3 we consider a depth \(p \ge 1\) to introduce singular Lie algebras \(\mathfrak {S}^{(p)} \subseteq \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}\), singular characters \(\chi :\mathfrak {S}^{(p)} \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\), and affine/finite induced singular modules \(W^{(p)}_{\chi } \subseteq \widehat{W}_{\chi }\).
In Sect. 4 we explicitly match up the data \((p,\chi )\) with the local moduli for the isomorphism class of (the germ of) an irregular meromorphic connection.
In Sect. 5 we introduce countable PBW-bases \(\mathcal {B}_W \subseteq W\) of the finite singular modules, as well as gradings and filtrations on the finite and affine singular modules: notably gradings \(\mathcal {F}^+_{\bullet }\) and \(\widehat{\mathcal {F}}^{\pm }_{\bullet }\) for the degree in the variable “z”, their associated filtrations, and then \(\mathfrak {h}\)-weight gradings.
In Sect. 6 we introduce left-module structures on (graded/restricted) dual vector spaces \(\widehat{W}^* \twoheadrightarrow W^*\).
In Sect. 7 we introduce the Sugawara operators \(L_n\) for \(n \in \mathbb {Z}\), and prove that the cyclic vector \(w \in W \subseteq \widehat{W}\) is a common eigenvector for \(L_n\) with \(n \ge p-1\). This concludes proving the properties of Thm. 1.
In Sect. 8 we define the spaces of irregular covacua \(\mathscr {H}\). They are quotients of tensor products \(\mathcal {H} \subseteq \widehat{\mathcal {H}}\) of finite/affine singular modules labeled by marked points on the Riemann sphere with respect to the action of \(\mathfrak {g}\)-valued meromorphic functions (and we globalise the action introducing suitable sheaves over the space of tame isomonodromy times).
In Sects. 9 and 10 we study coinvariants, and we prove Theorem 2 using the material of Sects. 5 and 6.
In Sect. 11 we introduce the flat connection on the bundle of coinvariants, using the Sugawara operator \(L_{-1}\) and fixing the point at infinity. In § 9.2 we give explicit formulæ for the reduced connection.
In Sect. 12 we introduce the universal connection \(\nabla _p\) at depth \(p \ge 1\), on the trivial vector bundle with fibre \(U (\mathfrak {g}_p)^{\otimes n}\) over the (restricted) space of tame isomonodromy times, and we prove Theorem 3.
In Sect. 13 we introduce the action of Möbius transformations on horizontal sections of the bundle of coinvariants, and establish equivariance under affine transformations.
Finaly in Sect. 14 we slightly modify the setup of Sect. 3 to generalise the dynamical KZ connection, i.e. [23, Eq. 3].
Some standard notion is recalled in the appendix A, while some lengthy computations are gathered in B.
Affine spaces, vector spaces, vector bundles, associative/Lie algebras and tensor products are defined over \(\mathbb {C}\)—unless otherwise specified.
The end of a remark is signaled by a “\(\triangle \)”.
3 Setup
Let \(\mathfrak {g}\) be a finite-dimensional simple Lie algebra, and \(\mathfrak {h} \subseteq \mathfrak {g}\) a Cartan subalgebra. Let then \(\mathcal {R}^+ \subseteq \mathcal {R} \subseteq \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) be a choice of positive roots within the root system \(\mathcal {R} = \mathcal {R} \bigl ( \mathfrak {g}, \mathfrak {h} \bigr )\), and \(\mathcal {R}^- {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}- \mathcal {R}^+\) the subset of negative roots. There is a triangular/Cartan decomposition
where \(\mathfrak {n}^{\pm }\) is the maximal positive/negative nilpotent subalgebra defined by the subset of positive/negative roots:
Equip \(\mathfrak {g}\) with the minimal nondegenerate \({{\,\textrm{ad}\,}}_{\mathfrak {g}}\)-invariant symmetric bilinear form \(( \cdot \mid \cdot ) :\mathfrak {g} \otimes \mathfrak {g} \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\)—so the highest root has length \(\sqrt{2}\). Consider then the (formal) loop algebra
and let \(\widehat{\mathfrak {g}}_{(\cdot \mid \cdot )} = \widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \simeq \mathcal {L} \mathfrak {g} \oplus \mathbb {C} K\) be the associated affine Lie algebra. The Lie bracket of \(\widehat{\mathfrak {g}}\) is defined by \(K \in \mathfrak {Z}(\widehat{\mathfrak {g}})\) and
where \(c :\mathcal {L} \mathfrak {g} \wedge \mathcal {L} \mathfrak {g} \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) is the Lie-algebra cocycle defined by
and where in turn \({{\,\textrm{Res}\,}}_{z = 0} \bigl ( \omega \bigr ) {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}f_{-1}\) for \(\omega = \sum _i f_i z_i dz \in \mathbb {C} (\!( z )\!) dz\).
Then there is an analogous decomposition \(\widehat{\mathfrak {g}} = \widehat{\mathfrak {n}}^- \oplus \widehat{\mathfrak {h}} \oplus \widehat{\mathfrak {n}}^+\), where
Finally let \(\mathfrak {b}^{\pm } {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\mathfrak {h} \oplus \mathfrak {n}^{\pm }\) be the positive/negative Borel subalgebras associated with the sets of positive/negative roots, and \(\widehat{\mathfrak {b}}^{\pm } {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}(\mathfrak {b}^{\pm } \otimes 1) \oplus z \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \oplus \mathbb {C}K\).
Hereafter we drop the “\(\otimes 1\)” from the notation for vector subspaces of the constant part \(\mathfrak {g} \subseteq \mathcal {L} \mathfrak {g}\), and the subscripts from the Lie brackets.
Remark
The dual Coxeter number \(h^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) of the quadratic Lie algebra \(\bigl ( \mathfrak {g}, ( \cdot \mid \cdot ) \bigr )\) is half of the eigenvalue for the adjoint action of the standard quadratic tensor on \(\mathfrak {g}\) [35].
More precisely let \((X_k)_k\) be a basis of \(\mathfrak {g}\), \((X^k)_k\) the \((\cdot \mid \cdot )\)-dual basis, and define
i.e. intrinsically the element corresponding to \({\text {Id}}_{\mathfrak {g}} \in \mathfrak {g} \otimes \mathfrak {g}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) in the duality \(\mathfrak {g}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \simeq \mathfrak {g}\) induced by \(( \cdot \mid \cdot )\). The projection of \(\Omega \) to the universal enveloping algebra is the quadratic Casimir
which is a central element—by the invariance of \(( \cdot \mid \cdot )\). The adjoint action of C on \(\mathfrak {g}\) is thus a homothety, and we define \(h^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) by
We will also need a generalisation of the standard quadratic tensor \(\Omega \). For \(m,l \in \mathbb {Z}\) define
with the shorthand notation \(X z^i = X \otimes z^i\) for \(X \in \mathfrak {g}\) and \(i \in \mathbb {Z}\). Then the identity \([C,X] = \sum _k \bigl [ X_kX^k,X \bigr ] = 0\), valid for all \(X \in \mathfrak {g}\), also implies
\(\triangle \)
3.1 Singular modules
For an integer \(p \ge 1\) consider the singular Lie subalgebra \(\mathfrak {S}^{(p)} \subseteq \widehat{\mathfrak {b}}^+\) (of depth p), defined by
so that \(\mathfrak {S}^{(1)} = \widehat{\mathfrak {b}}^+\).
Lemma 3.1
There is an identification of abelian Lie algebras
Proof
We can define a linear surjection \(\pi :\mathfrak {S}^{(p)} \twoheadrightarrow \mathfrak {h}_p \oplus \mathbb {C}K\) with kernel
by setting
where \(f \in \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \), \(a \in \mathbb {C}\), \(H_i \in \mathfrak {h}\), and \(X_i \in \mathfrak {n}^+\) for \(i \in \left\{ { 0,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}},p-1}\right\} \). \(\square \)
Characters of (7) are coded by linear maps \(\mathfrak {S}^{(p)}_{{{\,\textrm{ab}\,}}} \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\), i.e. by elements of \(\mathfrak {h}_p^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) plus the choice of a level \(\kappa \in \mathbb {C}\) for the central element—using (8). We split the notation: for \(p = 1\) write \(\lambda \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) the linear map, and for \(p \ge 2\) write it \((\lambda ,q) \in \mathfrak {h}_p^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\), where
We will refer to \(\chi = \chi (\lambda ,q,\kappa ) :\mathfrak {S}^{(p)} \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) as a singular character (of depth p), and we denote \(\mathbb {C}_{\chi }\) the 1-dimensional left \(U \bigl ( \mathfrak {S}^{(p)} \bigr )\)-module defined by it. We also refer to \(\lambda \) as the tame part of the singular character, and to q as the wild part.
Remark
This hints to the dictionary with irregular meromorphic connections on the Riemann sphere: \(\lambda \) corresponds to a semisimple formal residue at a simple pole (a tame/regular singularity), and q to an untwisted irregular type at a higher-order pole (a wild/irregular singularity), see Sect. 4.
We will use the uniform notation \(\lambda = a_0\) when this distinction is not relevant. \(\triangle \)
Definition 3.1
(Affine singular modules)
-
The affine singular module (of depth p) for the singular character \(\chi \) is
$$\begin{aligned} \widehat{W} = \widehat{W}^{(p)}_{\chi } {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}{\text {Ind}}_{U \bigl ( \mathfrak {S}^{(p)} \bigr )}^{U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \bigr )} \mathbb {C}_{\chi } = U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \bigr ) \otimes _{U \bigl ( \mathfrak {S}^{(p)} \bigr )} \mathbb {C}_{\chi } \, . \end{aligned}$$(10) -
We write \(\widehat{V} = \widehat{V}_{\chi } {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\widehat{W}^{(1)}_{\chi }\), and call it the tame affine module for the character \(\chi = \chi (\lambda ,\kappa ) :\widehat{\mathfrak {b}}^+ \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\).
The latter item is the standard definition of an affine Verma module, and by definition these are level-\(\kappa \) modules.Footnote 7
Now denote \(w = [1 \otimes 1] \in \widehat{W}\) the canonical cyclic vector; then using (8) and (9) yields
plus \(K w = \kappa w\). This generalises the relations satisfied by the highest-weight vector in a tame module.
Consider now the subspace
Because of (11) it equals \(\widehat{W}^- = U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {n}}^- \bigr ) w\), so it is naturally a left \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {n}}^- \bigr )\)-module with cyclic vector w—and it is canonically isomorphic to \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {n}}^- \bigr )\) as vector space. Further matching up cyclic vectors yields an isomorphism \(\widehat{W}^- \simeq \widehat{V}\) of left \(U \bigl ( \mathfrak {g} \bigl [ z^{-1} \bigr ] \bigr )\)-modules, regardless of \(p \ge 1\) and \(q \in \bigl ( \mathfrak {h}_p \big /\mathfrak {h} \bigr )^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\). Note we implicitly use a \(\mathbb {C}\)-basis of \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \bigr )\) as provided by the Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem (PBW) for countable-dimensional Lie algebras.
Consider then the subspace
which is naturally a left \(U \bigl ( \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \bigr )\)-module, and which will play a more important role. An inductive proof on the length of monomials—with base (11)—shows that \(z^p \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket W = (0)\), so the \(\mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \)-action factorises through the finite-dimensional quotient \(\mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \twoheadrightarrow \mathfrak {g}_p\), so (12) is naturally a left \(U(\mathfrak {g}_p)\)-module. Further \(W = U \bigl ( \mathfrak {n}^-_p \bigr ) w\) since \(\mathfrak {b}^+_p w = \mathbb {C} w\), so in particular \(W \simeq U (\mathfrak {n}^-_p )\) as vector spaces, independently of \(\chi \).
Remark
Here we use the triangular decomposition \(\mathfrak {g}_p = \mathfrak {n}^-_p \oplus \mathfrak {h}_p \oplus \mathfrak {n}^+_p\) and the inclusion \(\mathfrak {b}^+_p = \mathfrak {n}^+_p \oplus \mathfrak {h}_p \subseteq \mathfrak {g}_p\). \(\triangle \)
One has \(\mathfrak {n}^+_p = \bigl [ \mathfrak {b}_p^+,\mathfrak {b}_p^+ \bigr ]\) and \(\bigl ( \mathfrak {b}_p^+ \bigr )_{{{\,\textrm{ab}\,}}} \simeq \mathfrak {h}_p\), so by (11) there is a canonical identification
where we keep the notation \(\chi :\mathfrak {b}^+_p \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) for the character defined by \((\lambda ,q) \in \mathfrak {h}_p^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\)—the level \(\kappa \) is lost.
Definition 3.2
(Finite singular modules)
-
We call \(W = W^{(p)}_{\chi } \subseteq \widehat{W}\) the finite singular module (of depth p) for the singular character \(\chi \).
-
We write \(V = V_{\chi } = W^{(1)}_{\chi }\), and call it the tame finite singular module for the character \(\chi = \chi (\lambda ) :\mathfrak {b}^+ \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\).
The latter item is the standard definition of a finite Verma module. Analogously to the above, the finite tame module is canonically embedded as a \(U(\mathfrak {g})\)-submodule, namely as the subspace \(\widehat{W}^- \cap W = U(\mathfrak {g}) w \subseteq W\).
On the whole there is an identification of left \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {n}}^- \bigr )\)-modules
independent of \(\chi \).
3.2 Algebricity
The structure of \(\widehat{W}\) as left-module is controlled by algebraic elements, not by arbitrary formal power series.
More precisely define
and then \(\widehat{\mathfrak {g}}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}} \twoheadrightarrow \mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}}\) using the restriction of the cocycle (3). These are the algebraic loop algebra and the algebraic affine Lie algebra of \(\mathfrak {g}\), respectively. Replacing “\(\mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \)” by “\(\mathfrak {g} [z]\)” in (10) then yields left \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}} \bigr )\)-modules, temporarily denoted \(\widehat{W}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}}\), generated by a cyclic vector \(w_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}} \in \widehat{W}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}}\).
On the other hand the modules \(\widehat{W}\) are left \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}} \bigr )\)-modules via the inclusion \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}} \bigr ) \hookrightarrow U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \bigr )\), and composing with the canonical projection
yields a linear map \(\iota :U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}} \bigr ) \rightarrow \widehat{W}\).
Lemma 3.2
The map \(\iota \) induces an isomorphism \(\widehat{W}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}} \simeq \widehat{W}\) of left \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}} \bigr )\)-modules.
Proof
By (11) the map \(\iota \) is surjective, since \(\widehat{W}\) is generated by the cyclic vector over \(U \bigl ( \mathcal {L} \mathfrak {g}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}} \bigr )\). Its kernel is
\(\square \)
Hence the action of meromorphic \(\mathfrak {g}\)-valued functions on the singular modules is given by Laurent polynomials only. We will drop the subscript “alg” from all notations.
4 Relation with (irregular) meromorphic connections
There are canonical vector space isomorphisms \(\bigl ( \mathfrak {g} \otimes z^i \bigr )^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \simeq \mathfrak {g} \otimes z^{-(i + 1)} dz\), for \(i \in \mathbb {Z}\). They are induced from the nondegenerate \(\mathcal {L}G\)-invariant residue-pairing
where \(\mathcal {L} \mathfrak {g} dz {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\mathfrak {g} \otimes \mathbb {C} (\!( z )\!) dz\), G is a connected simply-connected (simple) Lie group with Lie algebra \(\mathfrak {g}\), and \(\mathcal {L} G\) the associated loop group.
Thus after fixing a level \(\kappa \in \mathbb {C}\) the families of singular modules (10) and (13) are both naturally parametrised by elements
Namely the residue term \(\Lambda z^{-1} dz \in \mathfrak {h} \otimes z^{-1} dz\) corresponds to the tame part \(\lambda \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) of a singular character, and the irregular type
is such that \(d\, ( A_i z^{-i}) = -i A_i z^{-i-1} dz \in \mathfrak {h} \otimes z^{-i-1} dz\) corresponds to the wild part \(a_i \in \bigl ( \mathfrak {h} \otimes z^i \bigr )^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\). The meromorphic 1-forms (16) should be thought of as principal parts of germs of meromorphic connections at a point on a Riemann surface (with semisimple formal residue and untwisted irregular type; here we are considering “very good” orbits in the terminology of [14]).
As mentioned in the introduction, the crucial facts are:
-
(1)
\(\mathfrak {g}_p = {{\,\textrm{Lie}\,}}(G_p)\), where \(G_p {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}G \bigl ( \mathbb {C} \llbracket z \rrbracket \bigl /z^p \mathbb {C} \llbracket z \rrbracket \bigr )\) is the group of \((p-1)\)-jets of bundle automorphisms for the trivial principal G-bundle on a (formal) disc;
-
(2)
The level-zero complex symplectic reduction for the diagonal G-action—on products of coadjoint \(G_p\)-orbits—yields a description of an open de Rham space \(\mathcal {M}^*_{{{\,\textrm{dR}\,}}}\), viz. a moduli spaces of isomorphism classes of irregular meromorphic connections on a holomorphically trivial principal bundle over the Riemann sphere (with prescribed positions of poles and irregular types [10, § 5]; see [8] for \(G = {{\,\textrm{GL}\,}}_m(\mathbb {C})\)).
Moreover the diagonal G-action will correspond to taking \(\mathfrak {g}\)-coinvariants for the tensor product of finite singular modules, generalising the tame case (see Sects. 9 and 10).
Remark 4.1
(Birkhoff groups/Lie algebras) Consider the subgroup \(B_p \subseteq G_p\) of elements with constant term 1. Then G acts on \(B_p\) by conjugation, and there are natural identification \(G_p \simeq G < imes B_p\) and \(\mathfrak {g}_p \simeq \mathfrak {g} < imes \mathfrak {b}_p\), where \(\mathfrak {b}_p = {{\,\textrm{Lie}\,}}(B_p)\).Footnote 8 This yields a vector space decomposition \(\mathfrak {g}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}_p \simeq \mathfrak {g}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \oplus \mathfrak {b}_p^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\): in the duality (15) the former summand corresponds to formal residues with zero irregular types, and the latter to irregular types with zero residue (so in particular \(q \in \mathfrak {b}_p^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\)). \(\triangle \)
5 Bases, gradings and filtrations
Denote \(\Pi = \left\{ {\theta _i}\right\} _i \subseteq \mathcal {R}^+\) the set of simple roots, and choose an order \(\mathcal {R}_+ = (\alpha _1, {{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}}, \alpha _s)\) for the set of positive roots. If \(r {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}{{\,\textrm{rk}\,}}(\mathfrak {g})\) we may assume \(\theta _i = \alpha _i\) for \(i \in \left\{ { 1,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}},r}\right\} \). Let then \((F_{\alpha })_{\alpha \in \mathcal {R}^+}\) and \((E_{\alpha })_{\alpha \in \mathcal {R}^+}\) be bases of \(\mathfrak {n}^-\) and \(\mathfrak {n}^+\) with \((F_{\alpha }, E_{\alpha }) \in \mathfrak {g}_{-\alpha } \oplus \mathfrak {g}_{\alpha }\), and such that \(( F_{\alpha }, H_{\alpha } {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}[E_{\alpha },F_{\alpha }],E_{\alpha } )\) is an \(\mathfrak {sl}_2\)-triple. (We may at times write \(E_{-\alpha } {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}F_{\alpha }\) for the sake of a uniform notation.)
In particular \((H_{\theta })_{\theta \in \Pi }\) is a basis of \(\mathfrak {h}\), and we get a (ordered) Cartan–Weyl basis of \(\mathfrak {g}\):
For a multi-index \({\varvec{n}} \in \mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0}^{2s + r}\) define
By the PBW theorem these monomials provide a \(\mathbb {C}\)-basis of \(U (\mathfrak {g})\).
5.1 PBW-bases of singular modules
Let \({\varvec{\beta }} = (\beta _i)_{i \ge 0}\) be a sequence of non-negative integers with finite support, and consider another sequence with values in the index set of the Cartan–Weyl basis (17), i.e. \({\varvec{k}} = (k_i)_{i \ge 0} \in \left\{ {1,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}},r+2s }\right\} ^{\mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0}}\). Then define
Lemma 5.1
(PBW-basis of algebraic affine enveloping algebras) A \(\mathbb {C}\)-basis of \(U \bigl ( \mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}} \bigr )\) is given by
where \({\varvec{\beta }}'\) is nonincreasing, \({\varvec{\beta }}\) is nondecreasing, and \(k'_j \le k'_{j+1}\) (resp. \(k_j \le k_{j+1}\)) if \(\beta _j = \beta _{j+1}\) (resp. \(\beta '_j = \beta '_{j+1}\)).
This is one statement of the PBW theorem for the countable-dimensional Lie algebra \(\mathcal {L} \mathfrak {g}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}} = \mathfrak {g} \otimes \mathbb {C} \bigl [ z^{\pm 1} \bigr ]\)—we have monomials over a totally ordered basis.
Corollary 5.1
(PBW-basis of affine singular modules) A \(\mathbb {C}\)-basis of the affine singular module \(\widehat{W}\) can be extracted from
where \({\varvec{\beta }}'\), \({\varvec{k}}'\), \({\varvec{n}}\), \({\varvec{k}}\), and \({\varvec{\beta }}\) are as above.
Proof
The family generates over \(\mathbb {C}\) since \( U \bigl ( \mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g}_{{{\,\textrm{alg}\,}}} \bigr ) w = \widehat{W}\), and using Lem. 5.1. \(\square \)
Remark
In (19) one may take \({\varvec{\beta }}\) bounded above by \(p-1\), as \(z^p \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket w = (0)\). \(\triangle \)
Using this set of generators we can prove smoothness.
Lemma 5.2
The singular modules are smooth.
Proof
This is clear in the finite case, as \(z^p \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket W = (0)\).
In the affine case choose \(X \in \mathfrak {g}\) and an element \(\widehat{w} = X_{{\varvec{k}}'} z^{-{\varvec{\beta }}'} X^{{\varvec{n}}} X_{{\varvec{k}}} z^{{\varvec{\beta }}} w\) of (19). Then the vanishing \(X z^{N} \widehat{w} = 0\) holds for
and the conclusion follows since (19) is a set of generators. \(\square \)
Lemma 5.3
(PBW-basis of depth-p finite enveloping algebras) A \(\mathbb {C}\)-basis of \(U \bigl ( \mathfrak {g}_p \bigr )\) is given by
where \({\varvec{n}}\), \({\varvec{k}}\) and \({\varvec{\beta }}\) are as above, with the condition of Rem. 5.1. Moreover restricting to \(X_i, X_{k_j} \in \mathfrak {n}^-\) for \(i \in \left\{ { 1,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}}, 2s+r }\right\} \) and \(j \ge 0\) yields a \(\mathbb {C}\)-basis of \(U (\mathfrak {n}^-_p )\).
This is one statement of the PBW theorem for the finite-dimensional Lie algebras \(\mathfrak {g}_p\) and \(\mathfrak {n}^-_p\).
Corollary 5.2
(PBW-basis of finite singular modules) A \(\mathbb {C}\)-basis of the finite singular module \(W \subseteq \widehat{W}\) is given by
where all conditions of Lem. 5.3 apply.
Proof
The family generates since \(W = U (\mathfrak {n}^-_p ) w\), and using Lem. 5.3 (the generating part). But \(U(\mathfrak {n}_p^-)\) has trivial intersection with the annihilator of w, hence the family is free by Lem. 5.3 (the linear independence part). \(\square \)
In particular W is a free rank-1 left \(U(\mathfrak {n}^-_p)\)-module.
5.2 Gradings for z-degree
We first define two positive \(\mathbb {Z}\)-gradings on \(\widehat{W}\).
Definition 5.1
Choose \(k \in \mathbb {Z}\). Then:
-
the subspace \(\widehat{\mathcal {F}}^-_k = \widehat{\mathcal {F}}^-_k\bigl ( \widehat{W} \bigr ) \subseteq \widehat{W}\) is the \(\mathbb {C}\)-span of the vectors of (19) with \(\sum _i \beta '_i = k\);
-
the subspace \(\widehat{\mathcal {F}}^+_k = \widehat{\mathcal {F}}^+_k \bigl (\widehat{W}\bigr ) \subseteq \widehat{W}\) is the \(\mathbb {C}\)-span of the vectors of (19) with \(\sum _i \beta _i = k\).
By definition \(\widehat{\mathcal {F}}^-_0 = W\), \(\widehat{\mathcal {F}}^+_0 = \widehat{W}^-\), and
In particular \(\bigl (\widehat{W},\widehat{\mathcal {F}}^-_{\bullet } \bigr )\) is a \(\mathbb {Z}\)-graded \(\mathfrak {g} \bigl [ z^{-1} \bigr ]\)-module, where \(\mathfrak {g} \bigl [ z^{-1} \bigr ]\) is a \(\mathbb {Z}\)-graded Lie algebra with grading defined by \(\deg (\mathfrak {g} \otimes z^{-i}) = i\).
The other grading instead does not yield a graded module; but we can obtain one inducing a (positive) grading on \(W \subseteq \widehat{W}\).
Definition 5.2
For \(k \in \mathbb {Z}\) set \(\mathcal {F}^+_k {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\widehat{\mathcal {F}}^+_k \cap W\).
It follows that \(\mathcal {F}^+_0 = U(\mathfrak {g}) w \subseteq W\), and
so the space \(\bigl (W,\mathcal {F}^+_{\bullet } \bigr )\) is a \(\mathbb {Z}\)-graded \(\mathfrak {n}^- \llbracket z \rrbracket \)-module, where \(\mathfrak {n}^- \llbracket z \rrbracket \) is a \(\mathbb {Z}\)-graded Lie algebra with grading defined by \(\deg (\mathfrak {n}^- \otimes z^i) = i\).
5.3 Filtrations
We consider the filtration \(\widehat{\mathcal {F}}^-_{\le \bullet }\) on \(\widehat{W}\) associated with the grading of Def. 5.1 for the negative z-degree. It follows from (22) that
for \(k,i \ge 0\).
Finally we consider on \(U (\mathfrak {g}) w = U (\mathfrak {n}^-) w \subseteq W\) the natural filtration \(\mathcal {E}_{\le \bullet }\) induced from that of \(U (\mathfrak {n}^-)\), so that \(\mathcal {E}_{\le 0} = \mathbb {C} w\). Note
and further \(\mathfrak {n}^-\) acts nontrivially on the associated graded of \(\bigl ( U(\mathfrak {g})w, \mathcal {E}_{\le \bullet } \bigr )\):
where as customary \({{\,\textrm{gr}\,}}(\mathcal {E})_k {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\mathcal {E}_{\le k} \big /\mathcal {E}_{\le k-1}\) for \(k \in \mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0}\)—and \(\mathcal {E}_{\le -1} {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}(0)\).
5.4 Weight gradings
For \(\mu \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) define
and analogously \(\mathcal {F}_{\mu }(W) = \mathcal {F}_{\mu } {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}W \cap \widehat{\mathcal {F}}_{\mu } \subseteq W\).
Proposition 5.1
The singular modules are \(\mathfrak {h}\)-semisimple, i.e.
Proof
This follows from the fact that all elements of (19) and (21) are \(\mathfrak {h}\)-weight vectors, which in turn is proven recursively using the identities
for \(\alpha \in \mathcal {R}\), \(H,H' \in \mathfrak {h}\), \(i \in \mathbb {Z}\) and \(\widehat{w} \in \widehat{\mathcal {F}}_{\mu }\). \(\square \)
Remark
In the finite case one may define the \(\mathfrak {h}_p\)-weight spaces, i.e. the subspaces of vectors \(\widehat{w} \in W\) such that \(H z^i \widehat{w} = \langle \mu _i, H z_i \rangle \widehat{w}\) for \({\varvec{\mu }} = (\mu _0,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}},\mu _{p-1}) \in \mathfrak {h}_p^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\). However the very first recursion fails for \(p \ge 2\): if \(H \in \mathfrak {h}\) is such that \(\langle \alpha ,H \rangle \ne 0\) then
where w is the cyclic vector, so the finite singular modules are not \(\mathfrak {h}_p\)-semisimple. \(\triangle \)
The proof of Proposition 5.1 implies all weights are contained inside \(\lambda + Q \subseteq \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\), where \(Q {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\mathbb {Z} \mathcal {R}\) is the root lattice.
Remark
Consider the z-linear extension of the adjoint action \(\mathfrak {h} \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(\mathfrak {g})\) on \(\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g}\). Decomposing \(\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g} = \bigoplus _{\alpha \in \mathcal {R}} \mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g}_{\alpha } \oplus \mathcal {L} \mathfrak {h}\) we see \(\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g}\) is naturally a \(\mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\)-graded Lie algebra (with nontrivial weights still given by \(\mathcal {R} \cup \left\{ {0}\right\} \)), and the proof of Proposition 5.1 shows the singular modules are \(\mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\)-graded. \(\triangle \)
In the finite case one can go further recovering the standard notion of positivity. Namely \(\bigl ( \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}},\preceq \bigr )\) is a poset by defining \(\mu ' \preceq \mu \) by \(\mu - \mu ' \in Q_+\), where \(Q_+ {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0} \mathcal {R}^+ \subseteq Q\) is the positive root lattice.
Lemma 5.4
One has \(\mathcal {F}_{\lambda } = \mathbb {C} w\) and \(W = \bigoplus _{\mu \preceq \lambda } \mathcal {F}_{\mu }\).
Proof
It follows from the fact that W is generated over \(U( \mathfrak {n}^-_p )\) by a \(\mathfrak {h}_p\)-weight vector annihilated by \(\mathfrak {n}^+_p\): it is a highest-weight \(\mathfrak {g}_p\)-module. \(\square \)
In particular (21) consists of weight vectors, and the line \(\mathbb {C} w \subseteq W\) has the highest weight.
In view of Lem. 5.4 the weight spaces are naturally parametrised by elements \(\nu \in Q_+\), via \(\mathcal {F}_{\nu } {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\mathcal {F}_{\lambda - \nu }\). Now for an element \(\nu \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) denote
so that the cardinality of \({{\,\textrm{Mult}\,}}_{\mathcal {R}^+}(\nu )\) is the finite number of ways of expressing \(\nu \) as a \(\mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0}\)-linear combination of positive roots. In particular \({{\,\textrm{Mult}\,}}_{\mathcal {R}^+}(0) = \left\{ { {\varvec{0}} }\right\} \), and \({{\,\textrm{Mult}\,}}_{\mathcal {R}^+}(\nu ) = \varnothing \) for \(\nu \not \in Q_+\).
Finally for \({\varvec{m}} \in \mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0}^{\mathcal {R}^+}\) denote
which is the finite set of weak p-compositions of the integers \(m_{\alpha } \ge 0\).Footnote 9 In particular \({{\,\textrm{WComp}\,}}_1 ({\varvec{m}})\) is a singleton containing the element \({\varvec{\varphi }}\) with \(\varphi _{\alpha }(0) = m_{\alpha }\) for all \(\alpha \in \mathcal {R}^+\).
Proposition 5.2
For \(\nu \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) one has
where \(\left( {\begin{array}{c}{\varvec{m}}+p-1\\ {\varvec{m}}\end{array}}\right) {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\prod _{\alpha \in \mathcal {R}^+} \left( {\begin{array}{c}m_{\alpha }+p-1\\ m_{\alpha }\end{array}}\right) \).
Proof
Choose \(\mu \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) and set \(\nu = \lambda - \mu \). Then for \({\varvec{m}} \in {{\,\textrm{Mult}\,}}_{\mathcal {R}^+}(\nu )\) and \({\varvec{\varphi }} \in {{\,\textrm{WComp}\,}}_p ({\varvec{m}})\) consider the vector
The family \(\left\{ { w^{{\varvec{\varphi }}} }\right\} _{{\varvec{\varphi }}} \subseteq W\) is free since it consists of distinct elements extracted from (21) (beware of the ordering in the product), and by construction \(w^{{\varvec{\varphi }}} \in \mathcal {F}_{\nu }\).
Conversely the vectors (28) exhaust (21), from which one can extract a basis of \(\mathcal {F}_{\nu }\), so the conclusion follows from standard combinatorial identities. \(\square \)
Thus Proposition 5.2 strengthen Lem. 5.4: the given sum is empty for \(\nu \not \in Q_+\), and \({{\,\textrm{WComp}\,}}_p ({\varvec{0}})\) is a singleton containing the element \({\varvec{\varphi }}\) with \(\varphi _{\alpha }(i) = 0\) for \(i \in \left\{ {0,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}},p-1}\right\} \).
As expected (27) generalises the standard fact that \(\dim \bigl ( \mathcal {F}_{\nu } \bigr ) = \left| {{{\,\textrm{Mult}\,}}_{\mathcal {R}^+}(\nu )}\right| \) for Verma modules, i.e. it generalises the character of Verma modules. The difference in the general case is that one must also specify a z-degree for each occurrence of a positive root.
Remark
This notion of positivity is lost with the (finite) modules of Sect. 14: in particular they have infinite-dimensional weight spaces and are less suited to yield irregular versions of conformal blocks. \(\triangle \)
For example consider the case where \(\nu = \theta \in \Pi \) is a simple root. One has \({{\,\textrm{Mult}\,}}_{\mathcal {R}^+}(\theta ) = \left\{ { {\varvec{m}}^{\theta } }\right\} \), with \({\varvec{m}}^{\theta }_{\alpha } {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\delta _{\theta ,\alpha }\). Also \({{\,\textrm{WComp}\,}}_p ({\varvec{m}}^{\theta }) = \left\{ { {\varvec{\varphi }}^{\theta ,i}}\right\} _i\), where
Hence \(X_{{\varvec{\varphi }}^{\theta ,i}} = X_{-\theta } z^i\), so we recover
Remark
It follows from the above that
Hence the module W is locally \(\mathfrak {n}^+\llbracket z \rrbracket \)-finite, i.e. the vector spaces \(U \bigl ( \mathfrak {n}^+ \llbracket z \rrbracket \bigr ) \widehat{w} \subseteq W\) are finite-dimensional for all \(\widehat{w} \in W\).
One is tempted to say that W lies in a “Bernstein–Gelfand–Gelfand category \(\mathcal {O} \llbracket z \rrbracket \)” [32]—of \(\mathfrak {h}\)-semisimple finitely generated left \(U \bigl ( \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket )\)-modules which are locally \(\mathfrak {n}^+\llbracket z \rrbracket \)-finite. \(\triangle \)
5.4.1 Archetypal case
One may get to the end of this story when \(\mathfrak {g} = \mathfrak {sl}(2,\mathbb {C})\) with the standard basis (F, H, E) and the standard \(A_1\)-root system \(\mathcal {R} = \left\{ { \pm \alpha }\right\} \), where \(\alpha \) is positive and \(\langle \alpha ,H \rangle = 2\). Then \(Q_+ = \mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0} \alpha \), so simply \({{\,\textrm{Mult}\,}}_{\mathcal {R}^+} (\nu ) = \left\{ { m }\right\} \) for elements \(\nu = m\alpha \) with \(m \in \mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0}\).
Thus (27) reduces to
In the tame case one recovers the line generated by \(F^m v\), whereas in the general case a basis is given by
6 Dual modules
In view of Proposition 5.1 we consider the restricted duals of the \(\mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\)-graded singular modules, i.e. the \(\mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\)-graded vector spaces
They are naturally equipped with a right \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \bigr )\)- and \(U \bigl ( \mathfrak {g}_p \bigr )\)-module structure (respectively), namely
and analogously in the finite case.
To get a left action compose with a Lie algebra morphism \(\widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \rightarrow \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\) (resp. \(\mathfrak {g}_p \rightarrow \mathfrak {g}_p^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}})\), or rather with the induced ring morphism \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \bigr ) \rightarrow U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}} \bigr ) = U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \bigr )^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\) (resp. \(U (\mathfrak {g}_p) \rightarrow U(\mathfrak {g}_p)^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\)). In particular a Lie algebra morphism \(\theta :\mathfrak {g} \rightarrow \mathfrak {g}^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\) has a unique \(\mathbb {Z}\)-graded extension \(\widehat{\theta } :\mathcal {L} \mathfrak {g} \rightarrow \mathcal {L} \bigl ( \mathfrak {g}^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}} \bigr ) = \bigl (\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g}\bigr )^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\): in the finite case one can then consider the restriction \(\widehat{\theta } :\mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \rightarrow \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket ^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\), which is compatible with the projections \(\mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \twoheadrightarrow \mathfrak {g}_p\) and \(\mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket ^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}} \twoheadrightarrow \mathfrak {g}_p^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\); in the affine case one may further ask that \(\theta \) is \((\cdot \mid \cdot )\)-orthogonal, and extend the definition by \(\widehat{\theta }(K) {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}-K\).
In what follows we only consider morphisms of this type.
Definition 6.1
(Dual singular modules) The affine (resp. finite) \(\theta \)-dual singular module \(\widehat{W}_{\theta }^*\) (resp. \(W_{\theta }^*\)) is the left \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \bigr )\)-module (resp. \(U(\mathfrak {g}_p)\)-module) defined by the morphism \(\theta :\mathfrak {g} \rightarrow \mathfrak {g}^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\).
The \(U \bigl ( \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket )\)-linear inclusion map \(W \hookrightarrow \widehat{W}\) then dually corresponds to a \(U \bigl ( \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket )\)-linear restriction map \(\widehat{W}_{\theta }^* \twoheadrightarrow W_{\theta }^*\).
Remark 6.1
(Dual/contragredient modules) Basic examples of morphisms \(\theta :\mathfrak {g} \rightarrow \mathfrak {g}^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\) preserving \(( \cdot \mid \cdot )\) are the tautological \(\theta _0 = -{\text {Id}}_{\mathfrak {g}}\), and the transposition \(\theta _1\), defined by
We refer to \(\theta _0\)-duals simply as dual modules, and to \(\theta _1\)-duals as contragredient modules. \(\triangle \)
Consider then the element \(\psi \in W^*\) dual to the cyclic vector in the basis (21), i.e. \(\langle \psi ,w \rangle = 1\) and \(\psi \) vanishes on all other vectors of (21)—whence \(\mathcal {F}_{\lambda }^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} = \mathbb {C} \psi \).
Assume hereafter that \(\theta (\mathfrak {h}) = \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\) (up to conjugating \(\theta \) by an inner automorphism of \(\mathfrak {g}\)), and canonically identify \(\mathfrak {h} \simeq \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\) and their duals. Then we have a well defined pull-back map \(\theta ^* \in {{\,\textrm{GL}\,}}(\mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}})\), which we extend z-linearly to \(\bigl ( \mathfrak {h} \otimes z^i \bigr )^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \simeq \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \otimes z^i\). Moreover by orthogonality the subspace \(\mathfrak {n}^+ \oplus \mathfrak {n}^- \subseteq \mathfrak {g}\) is \(\theta \)-stable.
Lemma 6.1
The vector \(\psi \in W^*\) satifies the relations
Proof
Use (11), (23), \(z^p \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket W = (0)\), and the fact that \(\widehat{\theta } :\mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \rightarrow \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket ^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\) preserves the z-grading of Def. 5.2. \(\square \)
In particular \(\mathfrak {n}^- \llbracket z \rrbracket \psi = (0)\) in the dual case, and \(\mathfrak {n}^+ \llbracket z \rrbracket \psi = (0)\) in the contragredient case.
6.1 Dual weight grading
Denote \(\theta _{*} {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\bigl ( \theta ^* \bigr )^{-1} = \bigl ( \theta ^{-1} \bigr )^*\), and introduce the notation \(\widehat{\mathcal {F}}^*_{\mu } \subseteq \widehat{W}^*_{\theta }\) and \(\mathcal {F}^*_{\mu } \subseteq W^*_{\theta }\) for the \(\mathfrak {h}\)-weight spaces.
Lemma 6.2
One has \(\widehat{\mathcal {F}}_{\mu }^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} = \widehat{\mathcal {F}}^*_{\theta ^*\mu }\) and \(E_{\alpha } z^i \widehat{\mathcal {F}}_{\mu }^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \subseteq \widehat{\mathcal {F}}_{\mu + \theta _{*}\alpha }^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\), for \(\mu \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\), \(\alpha \in \mathcal {R}\), \(i \in \mathbb {Z}\), and analogously in the finite case—restricting to \(i \in \mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0}\).
Proof
Let \(\widehat{{\text {I}}}_{\nu } :\widehat{W} \rightarrow \widehat{W}\) be the idempotent for the direct summand \(\widehat{\mathcal {F}}_{\mu } \subseteq \widehat{W}\), viz. the endomorphism such that \({\widehat{{\text {I}}}_{{{\mu }}\big |_{\widehat{W}(\mu ')}}} = \delta _{\mu ,\mu '} {\text {Id}}_{\widehat{W}(\mu ')}\). Then by definition \(\widehat{\psi } \in \widehat{\mathcal {F}}_{\mu }^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) means \(\widehat{\psi } = \widehat{\psi } \circ \widehat{{\text {I}}}_{\mu }\), and by construction
Hence for \(\widehat{w} \in \widehat{W}\) one has
whence the inclusion \(\widehat{\mathcal {F}}_{\mu }^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \subseteq \widehat{\mathcal {F}}^*_{\theta ^*\mu }\), and the equality follows from (31).
The latter inclusion follows from \(\theta (E_{\alpha })z^i \widehat{\mathcal {F}}_{\mu } \subseteq \widehat{\mathcal {F}}_{\mu - \theta _{*}\alpha }\) for \(\alpha \in \mathcal {R}\), which is a straightforward computation using (2).
The same pair of arguments applies verbatim to the finite case. \(\square \)
Hence (31) is the \(\mathfrak {h}\)-weight decomposition of \(\theta \)-dual singular modules, and the weights are contained inside \(\theta ^*(\lambda + Q) \subseteq \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) (resp. \(\theta ^* (\lambda + Q^+)\)) in the affine (resp. finite) case. By Lem. 5.4 we conclude that \(\psi \in W^*_{\theta _0}\) is a lowest-weight vector of lowest weight \(\theta _0^*\lambda = -\lambda \), whereas \(\psi \in W^*_{\theta _1}\) is a highest-weight vector of highest weight \(\theta _1^*\lambda = \lambda \).
In particular in the contragredient case matching the cyclic vector with its dual yields a canonical morphism \(\Phi :W \rightarrow W^*_{\theta _1}\), hence a generalisation of the Shapovalov form
This may be degenerate, particularly since the image of the canonical morphism is the submodule
which in general is a proper submodule. Nonetheless we can recursively find the obstruction for \(\psi \) to generate the \(\theta \)-dual module. To give a necessary condition consider the vector
By Lem. 6.2 a linear form \(\widehat{\psi } \in W'_{\theta }\) that vanishes on \(\mathcal {B}_W \setminus \left\{ {\widehat{w}}\right\} \) must lie in the span of \(\left\{ { \theta ^{-1}(E_{\alpha }) \psi , {{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}}, \theta ^{-1}(E_{\alpha })z^{p-1} \psi }\right\} \subseteq \mathcal {F}_{\lambda - \alpha }^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\), so consider a generic element
Using \(z^p \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket W = (0) = \mathfrak {n}^+ \llbracket z \rrbracket w\) and \(\langle \psi ,w \rangle = 1\) yields
so we need the highest irregular part to be regular (cf. Sect. 8).
Conversely we have the following.
Proposition 6.1
One has \(W'_{\theta } = W^*_{\theta }\) for parameters \((\lambda ,q)\) in a dense subspace of the affine space \(\mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}_p\)—with respect to the strong/classical topology.
Proof
Clearly \(\mathcal {F}_{\lambda }^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \subseteq W'_{\theta }\), and then we reason recursively on the \(\mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\)-weight space decomposition of W.
Choose \(\widehat{w} \in \mathcal {B}_W \cap \mathcal {F}_{\mu }\), and consider the vectors \(\widehat{w}_{\alpha }(k) {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}E_{-\alpha } z^k \widehat{w} \in \mathcal {F}_{\mu - \alpha }\), for \(\alpha \in \mathcal {R}^+\) and \(k \in \left\{ { 0,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}},p-1}\right\} \). As \(\widehat{w}\), \(\alpha \) and k vary, the vectors \(\widehat{w}_{\alpha }(k)\) exhaust \(\mathcal {B}_W \cap \mathcal {F}_{\mu - \alpha }\), so we must find coefficients \(b_{ij} \in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(\left\langle { \widehat{\psi }_{\alpha }(i),\widehat{w}_{\alpha }(k) }\right\rangle = \delta _{ik}\), where
and where \(\widehat{\psi } \in \mathcal {F}_{\mu }^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) is the dual of \(\widehat{w}\)—lying in \(W'_{\theta }\) by the recursive hypothesis.
Now one has
hence the given condition means \(BM = {\text {Id}}_{\mathbb {C}^p}\), where B and M are the p-by-p matrices with coefficients \(B_{ij} = b_{ij}\) and \(M_{jk} = \left\langle { \widehat{\psi },E_{\alpha } z^j E_{-\alpha } z^k \widehat{w} }\right\rangle \), respectively (the latter selects the component of \(E_{\alpha } z^j E_{-\alpha } z^k \widehat{w} \in \mathcal {F}_{\mu }\) along the line \(\mathbb {C} \widehat{w}\), in the basis (21)). A solution exists if and only if \(\det (M) \ne 0\).
Now the determinant of \(M = M(\widehat{w},\alpha )\) is a degree-p polynomial whose coefficients depend polynomially on \((\lambda ,q)\), hence it amounts to a polynomial function \(\mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}_p \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\). Thus \(W'_{\theta } = W^*_{\theta }\) by taking \((\lambda ,q)\) in a countable intersection of open dense subsets. \(\square \)
Finally we can choose a complementary subspace to W inside \(\widehat{W}\), and extend \(\psi :W \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) by zero to the whole of \(\widehat{W}\)—e.g. extract a PBW-basis from (19). Then one can consider the module \(\widehat{W}'_{\theta } \subseteq \widehat{W}^*_{\theta }\) generated by this extension over \(\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g}\), and define gradings/filtrations on \(\widehat{W}'_{\theta } \twoheadrightarrow W'_{\theta }\) analogously to §§ 3.2 and 3.3, using the generating set (18), the basis (20), and the standard filtration of \(U \bigl ( \theta ^{-1} (\mathfrak {n}^+) \bigr )\). These satisfy the analogous identities of (22)–(25).
7 Segal–Sugawara operators
For \(n \in \mathbb {Z}\) define
where \((X_k)_k\) and \((X^k)_k\) are \(( \cdot \mid \cdot )\)-dual bases of \(\mathfrak {g}\), \(\kappa \ne -h^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) is a noncritical level, and in the normal-ordered product one puts elements of \(\mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \subseteq \mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g}\) to the right.
The Sugawara operators (33) (due to Segal in this particular form) are well-defined elements of the level-\(\kappa \) completion of \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \bigr )\) with respect to the system of left ideals \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \bigr ) z^{\bullet } \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket {{\,\mathrm{\subseteq }\,}}U\bigl (\widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \bigr )\). If follows from Lem. 5.2 that there are well-defined actions of (33) on the modules \(W \subseteq \widehat{W}\).
7.1 Cyclic vector as Sugawara eigenvector
The cyclic vector \(w \in \widehat{W}\) is a common eigenvector for the Sugawara operators when \(n \gg 0\). To get explicit formulæ for the eigenvalues we recall further euclidean properties of the Cartan–Weyl basis (17).
Remark 7.1
(On bases and dualities) Recall that \((H_{\alpha } \mid H_{\alpha }) E^{\pm \alpha } = 2 E_{\mp \alpha }\). Using the pairing \(( \cdot \mid \cdot ) :\mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \otimes \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) induced by the minimal-form duality \(\mathfrak {h} \simeq \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) this can be written \(2 E^{\pm \alpha } = (\alpha \mid \alpha ) E_{\mp \alpha }\).
Then we replace the simple-root basis of \(\mathfrak {h}\) with a \(( \cdot \mid \cdot )\)-orthonormal basis, denoted \((H_k)_k\)—i.e. we “divide” by the Cartan matrix—, and for \(i \in \mathbb {Z}\) we transfer the basis and the pairings to \(\mathfrak {g} \otimes z^i\) and \(\bigl ( \mathfrak {g} \otimes z^i \bigr )^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \simeq \mathfrak {g}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \otimes z^i\) using the canonical vector space isomorphism \(\mathfrak {g} \simeq \mathfrak {g} \otimes z^i\). Then one has the tautological basis-independent identity
\(\triangle \)
Denote as customary \(\rho {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\frac{1}{2} \sum _{\alpha \in \mathcal {R}^+} \alpha \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) the half-sum of positive roots.
Proposition 7.1
The cyclic vector w is a common eigenvector for the operators (33) with \(n \ge p-1\). If \(n > 2(p-1)\) then \(L_n w = 0\), else \(L_n w = l_n w\) with
and
Proof
Postponed to § B.1. \(\square \)
Hence the cyclic vector is a Gaiotto–Teschner irregular state of order \(p-1\) [28] arising from affine Lie algebras.
Remark 7.2
This generalises the standard fact that \(L_n v = 0\) for \(n > 0\), and that v is an \(L_0\)-eigenvector, with nonzero eigenvalue for generic values of \(\lambda \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\). Namely if \(p = 1\) then (35) reduces to
reverting to the notation \(\lambda = a_0\), which recovers the conformal weight corresponding to the action of the quadratic Casimir (4). \(\triangle \)
7.2 Action on finite modules
Later we will use the action of the operator \(L_{-1}\) on the finite module \(W \subseteq \widehat{W}\).
Using \(z^p \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket W = (0)\) we see nonvanishing terms arise for \(1 - p \le j \le p\) in (33), and resolving the ordered product yields
As expected \(L_{-1} \widehat{w} \not \in W\), but it can be put back into the finite module via the loop-algebra action (see Sect. 9).
Remark
We see (36) generalises the usual formula from the tame case:
\(\triangle \)
8 Irregular conformal blocks: first version
Consider the Riemann sphere \(\Sigma {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\mathbb {C}P^1\), choose an integer \(n \ge 1\) and mark points \(p_1, {{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}}, p_n \in \Sigma \). Denote \(J = \left\{ { 1, {{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}}, n }\right\} \) the ordered set of labels for the points and \({\varvec{p}} = ( p_1, {{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}}, p_n)\) the ordered set of points.
Let \(\mathscr {O}_{\Sigma }\) be the structure sheaf of regular functions on \(\Sigma \), seen as a (smooth) complex projective curve. Then consider the stalks \(\mathscr {O}_j = \mathscr {O}_{\Sigma ,p_j}\) at the marked points, their (unique) maximal ideals \(\mathfrak {M}_j = \mathfrak {M}_{p_j} \subseteq \mathscr {O}_j\) of germs of functions vanishing at \(p_j\), the completions \(\widehat{\mathscr {O}}_j {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\varprojlim _n \mathscr {O}_j \big /\mathfrak {M}^n_j\), and their field of fractions \(\widehat{\mathscr {O}}_j \hookrightarrow \widehat{\mathscr {K}}_j\).
Remark
If \(z_j\) is a local coordinate on \(\Sigma \) vanishing at \(p_j\) then
More generally this follows by choosing a uniformiser, i.e. a generator of the maximal ideal(s). \(\triangle \)
Then consider the loop algebras \((\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g})_j {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\mathfrak {g} \otimes \widehat{\mathscr {K}}_j\) and the associated affine Lie algebras \(\widehat{\mathfrak {g}}_j \twoheadrightarrow (\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g})_j\). There are canonical isomorphisms \(\widehat{\mathfrak {g}}_i \simeq \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}_j\) for \(i,j \in J\), and the subscripts distinguish the local picture at the marked points.
Now for \(j \in J\) further choose an integer \(r_j \ge 1\), and set up singular modules as in Sect. 3. Hence consider the Lie subalgebras \(\mathfrak {S}^{(r_j)} \subseteq \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}_j\), a common level \(\kappa \in \mathbb {C}\) for the central elements, and singular characters \(\chi _j = \chi (\lambda _j,q_j,\kappa )\), where \(\lambda _j \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) and
This yields singular modules \(W^{(r_j)}_{\chi _j} {=}{:}W_j \subseteq \widehat{W}_j {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\widehat{W}^{(r_j)}_{\chi _j}\), and we consider the vector spaces
where \({\varvec{\chi }} = ( \chi _j )_{j \in J}\). Clearly \(\mathcal {H} \subseteq \widehat{\mathcal {H}}\), and the dependence on the choice of marked points is void (it becomes relevant after considering the action of \(\mathfrak {g}\)-valued meromorphic functions in Sect. 6.2).
The spaces (38) are endowed with natural structures of left modules for the associative algebras \(U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \bigr )^{\otimes n} \simeq \bigotimes _{j \in J} U \bigl ( \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}_j \bigr )\) and \(\bigotimes _{j \in J} U \bigl ( \mathfrak {g}_{r_j} \bigr )\), respectively.
Moreover for indices \(i \ne j \in J\) denote \(\iota ^{(ij)} :U(\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g})^{\otimes 2} \rightarrow U(\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g})^{\otimes n}\) the natural inclusion on the i-th and j-th slot, defined on pure tensors by
for \(i < j\), and analogously for \(i > j\). Finally define \(\iota ^{(ii)} :U(\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g})^{\otimes 2} \rightarrow U(\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g})^{\otimes n}\) by \(X \otimes Y \mapsto 1^{\otimes i-1} \otimes X Y \otimes 1^{\otimes n - i}\). This yields an action of quadratic loop-algebra tensors on (38).
8.1 Tame isomonodromy times
We now vary part of the parameters defining the spaces (38), namely the marked points. An admissible deformation is one where they do not coalesce, so marked points vary inside the configuration space
of ordered n-tuples of (labeled) points on \(\Sigma \).
The space \(C_n\) is the space of tame isomonodromy times. It is a complex manifold of dimension n.
Remark
The terminology points again to meromorphic connections on the sphere, cf. introduction.
Let us repeat that the positions of the poles and the irregular types together control Stokes data of irregular meromorphic G-connections over the sphere. In turn Stokes data generalise the conjugacy class of the monodromy representation \(\nu :\pi _1 \bigl ( \Sigma ^{\circ },b \bigr ) \rightarrow G\), where \(\Sigma ^{\circ } {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\Sigma \setminus \left\{ { p_j }\right\} _{j \in J}\) is the punctured sphere with the poles removed and \(b \in \Sigma ^{\circ }\) a base point [9].
Then one may consider admissible deformations of the connections along which Stokes data (locally) do not vary, which yields by definition isomonodromic deformations. This can be set up as a system of nonlinear differential equations where the positions of the poles and the irregular types are precisely the independent variables, hence they become the “times” of isomonodromic deformations: the positions of the poles are the tame/regular times, and the rest are the wild/irregular ones.
Geometrically these differential equations constitute a nonlinear flat/integrable symplectic connection in the local system of moduli spaces \(\mathcal {M}^*_{{{\,\textrm{dR}\,}}}\) of meromorphic connections, as the marked points and the irregular types vary (i.e. as the wild Riemann surface structure on the sphere varies [13]). \(\triangle \)
Remark 8.1
Let \(\Sigma \supseteq U \xrightarrow {z}{} \mathbb {C}\) be a local affine chart on \(\Sigma \)—so \(\Sigma \simeq \mathbb {C} \cup \left\{ {\infty }\right\} \). Then coordinates on the open subset \(C_n(U) {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}{{\,\textrm{Conf}\,}}_n(U) \subseteq C_n\) are given by \({\varvec{t}} :C_n(U) \rightarrow \mathbb {C}^n\), where \({\varvec{t}} = (t_j)_{j \in J}\) and \(t_j ({\varvec{p}}) {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}z(p_j)\)—so \(C_n(U) \simeq {{\,\textrm{Conf}\,}}_n (\mathbb {C})\), and \(C_n \simeq {{\,\textrm{Conf}\,}}_n (\mathbb {C}) \cup {{\,\textrm{Conf}\,}}_{n-1} (\mathbb {C})\). This yields an atlas on the configuration space. \(\triangle \)
Now for a J-tuple \({\varvec{\chi }}\) of singular characters we consider the vector bundles \(\widehat{{\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}} = \widehat{\mathcal {H}}_{\bullet ,{\varvec{\chi }}} \rightarrow C_n\) and \({\varvec{\mathcal {H}}} = \mathcal {H}_{\bullet ,{\varvec{\chi }}} \rightarrow C_n\), whose fibres over \({\varvec{p}} \in C_n\) are the spaces (38), respectively. We have an inclusion \({\varvec{\mathcal {H}}} \subseteq \widehat{{\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}}\), and global vector bundle trivialisations:
by (14), and the simpler
by \(W_j \simeq U \bigl (\mathfrak {n}^-_{r_j} \bigr )\). The point here is that both vector space isomorphisms do not depend on the choice of marked points (nor on the character, cf. 6.4).
8.2 Action of meromorphic functions: punctual version
Given marked points \(p_j \in \Sigma \) consider the effective divisor \(D {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\sum _{j \in J} \bigl [ p_j \bigr ]\) on \(\Sigma \), and denote as customary \(\mathscr {O}_{*D} ( \Sigma ) = \mathscr {O}_{\Sigma ,*D} (\Sigma )\) the vector space of meromorphic functions along \(\Sigma \) with poles at most on (the support of) D. Then let \(\mathfrak {g}_{*D} (\Sigma ) {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\mathfrak {g} \otimes \mathscr {O}_{*D} (\Sigma )\) be the Lie algebra of \(\mathfrak {g}\)-valued such meromorphic functions, with bracket coming from \(\mathfrak {g}\):
Taking Laurent expansions at \(p_j\) yields a linear map \(\tau _j :\mathscr {O}_{*D}(\Sigma ) \rightarrow \widehat{\mathscr {K}}_j\), and tensoring with \(\mathfrak {g}\) a linear map \(\mathfrak {g}_{*D}(\Sigma ) \rightarrow \mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g}_j \subseteq \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}_j\).
Remark
If \(z_j\) is a local coordinate on \(\Sigma \) vanishing at \(p_j\), and \(f \in \mathscr {O}_{*D}(\Sigma )\), then there are coefficients \(f_i \in \mathbb {C}\) such that
where \({{\,\textrm{ord}\,}}_p(f) \ge 0\) is the order of \(p \in \Sigma \) as a pole of f. \(\triangle \)
Thus there is an arrow
Using (2), and the fact that the sum of the residues of a meromorphic 1-form on \(\Sigma \) vanishes, shows that (40) is a morphism of Lie algebras.
Then the action \(\tau :\mathfrak {g}_{*D}(\Sigma ) \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl} \bigl ( \widehat{\mathcal {H}} \bigr )\) endows \(\widehat{\mathcal {H}}\) with a left \(\mathfrak {g}_{*D}(\Sigma )\)-module structure.
Definition 8.1
(Irregular covacua, first version) The space of irregular covacua at the pair \(({\varvec{p}},{\varvec{\chi }})\) is the space of coinvariants of the \(\mathfrak {g}_{*D}(\Sigma )\)-module \(\widehat{\mathcal {H}}\):
Remark
In our terminology (41) would be better called the space of singular covacua, and be irregular/wild when \(r_j \ge 2\) for some \(j \in J\). \(\triangle \)
The space of vacua is the dual of (41), and provides a mathematical construction of an irregular version of conformal blocks:
Note we invert the usual usage of the dagger, since in this paper we focus on the space of coinvariants of \(\widehat{\mathcal {H}}\)—rather than the space of invariants of its dual (cf. [6]).
By (40), the fundamental identity inside the space of covacua is
for \(i \in J\), where square brackets denote equivalence classes modulo \(\mathfrak {g}_{*D}(\Sigma ) \widehat{ \mathcal {H}}_{{\varvec{p}},{\varvec{\chi }}}\).
8.3 Action of meromorphic functions: global version
Now we want to globalise the action (40) over the space of configurations of n-tuples of points on the sphere, i.e. we want a map of sheaves of Lie algebras on \(C_n\).
To define the domain sheaf consider the projection
Then set
so that \(\pi _{\Sigma } :Y \twoheadrightarrow C_n\) is the universal family of n-pointed spheres.
Now for \(j \in J\) define the hyperplane \(P_j {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\left\{ { p = p_j }\right\} \subseteq \Sigma ^{n+1}\), consider the effective divisor \(\mathcal {D} {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\sum _{j \in J} \bigl [ Y \cap P_j \bigr ]\) on Y, and let \(\mathscr {O}_{*\mathcal {D}} = \mathscr {O}_{Y,*\mathcal {D}}\) be the sheaf of meromorphic functions on Y with poles at most along (the support of) \(\mathcal {D}\). Then we have the push-forward sheaf \((\pi _{\Sigma })_{*} \mathscr {O}_{*\mathcal {D}}\) on \(C_n\), and by tensoring we obtain the sheaf of Lie algebras \(\mathfrak {g}_{*\mathcal {D}} {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\mathfrak {g} \otimes (\pi _{\Sigma })_{*} \mathscr {O}_{*\mathcal {D}}\).
Remark
If \(U' \subseteq C_n\) is open then \(\mathfrak {g}_{*\mathcal {D}} (U')\) is then the Lie algebra of \(\mathfrak {g}\)-valued meromorphic functions on \(\Sigma \times U'\), such that the restriction to \(\Sigma \times \left\{ { {\varvec{p}} }\right\} \simeq \Sigma \) has poles at most at the set \(\left\{ { p_j }\right\} _{j \in J}\) for all \({\varvec{p}} \in U'\), as wanted. \(\triangle \)
Now for \(U' \subseteq C_n\) open we consider the Laurent expansion \(\tau _j(U') (f)\) of functions \(f \in \mathcal {O}_{*\mathcal {D}} \bigl ( \pi _{\Sigma }^{-1}(U') \bigr )\) along the divisor \(Y \cap P_j\). Then tensoring with \(\mathfrak {g}\) yields a map of sheaves
where \(\mathscr {O}_{C_n}\) is the structure sheaf on the configuration space.
Remark
If \(z_j\) is a local coordinate on \(\Sigma \) vanishing at \(p_j\), \(U' = {{\,\textrm{Conf}\,}}_n(U)\) for \(U \subseteq \Sigma \) an open affine subset, and \(f \in (\pi _{\Sigma })_{*} \mathscr {O}_{*\mathcal {D}} (U')\), then there are suitable functions \(f_i :U' \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) such that
using the local coordinates \((t_j)_{j \in J}\) on \(U' \subseteq C_n\) of Rem. 8.1. By definition the functions \(f_i\) may have poles on the hyperplanes \(\left\{ { t_i = t_j }\right\} \subseteq \mathbb {C}^n\). \(\triangle \)
Finally summing the action over each slot of the tensor product we have a sheaf-theoretic analogue of (40), acting on sections of \(\widehat{{\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}}\).
8.4 Irregular isomonodromy times
One may add the other possible deformations, e.g. with the following setup.
Recall the regular parts of the Cartan subalgebra and its dual are the complements of (co)root hyperplanes:
and analogously for \(\mathfrak {h} \otimes z^i\) and its dual.
Then consider irregular parts \(q_j \in \mathfrak {b}_{r_j}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) such that the most irregular coefficient \((a_j)_{r_j-1}\) is regular, and define an admissible deformation of as one in which the most irregular coefficient does not cross coroot hyperplanes.
Remark
This is the analogous condition as for the marked points: the open charts \(C_n(\mathbb {C}) \subseteq \mathbb {C}^n\) are regular parts for Cartan subalgebras of rank-n type-A simple Lie algebras. \(\triangle \)
Doing so we get to the space of isomonodromy times
where
and in turn \((\mathfrak {h} \otimes z^i)_{{{\,\textrm{reg}\,}}} {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\left\{ { Hz^i | H \in \mathfrak {h}_{{{\,\textrm{reg}\,}}} }\right\} \subseteq \mathfrak {h} \otimes z^i\) for \(i \in \mathbb {Z}\).
The space (44) is a complex manifold of dimension \(d = n + r \sum _{j \in J} (r_j - 1)\), where \(r = {{\,\textrm{rk}\,}}(\mathfrak {g})\). As expected it coincides with the space of tame isomonodromy times if \(r_j = 1\) for \(j \in J\).
Remark
If there is just one irregular module \(W_j\) with \(r_j = 2\) then
and one recovers the base space for the FMTV connection [23]—up to the canonical vector space isomorphism \(\mathfrak {h} \otimes z \simeq \mathfrak {h}\). If further the variations of marked points are neglected then (44) becomes the base space for the “Casimir” connection of De Concini and Millson–Toledano Laredo (DMT) [40, 52]. \(\triangle \)
Then in (38) one can let both \({\varvec{p}} \in C_n\) and \({\varvec{\chi }} \in \prod _{j \in J} \bigl ( \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}_{r_j} \bigr )_{{{\,\textrm{reg}\,}}}\) vary, getting a vector bundle over the base space (44). This also comes with a canonical vector bundle trivialisation, reasoning in the same way as for \({\varvec{\mathcal {H}}} \subseteq \widehat{{\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}}\) (namely (14) is also independent of \(\chi \)).
Finally one may extend the sheaf \(\mathfrak {g}_{*\mathcal {D}}\) trivially along the Cartan directions. Namely the projection \(\pi _{{\varvec{C_n}}} :{\varvec{B}} \twoheadrightarrow C_n\) is open, so one may take the naïf pullback sheaf:
9 Conformal blocks in terms of finite modules: first version
Throughout this section fix a pair \(({\varvec{p}},{\varvec{\chi }})\) to define the spaces \(\mathcal {H} \subseteq \widehat{\mathcal {H}}\) as in (38). Compose the inclusion \(\mathcal {H} \hookrightarrow \widehat{\mathcal {H}}\) with the canonical projection \(\pi _{\mathscr {H}} :\widehat{\mathcal {H}} \twoheadrightarrow \mathscr {H}\) to obtain a map \(\iota :\mathcal {H} \rightarrow \mathscr {H}\).
To study the image of \(\iota \) consider the tensor product filtration
where \(\bigl ( \widehat{\mathcal {F}}^-_j \bigr )_{\le \bullet }\) is the filtration defined in § 3.3 on \(\widehat{W}_j\). By definition \(\widehat{{\varvec{\mathcal {F}}}}^-_{\le 0} = \mathcal {H}\), and we push (45) forward to a filtration \(\widehat{\mathscr {F}}^-_{\le \bullet }\) on \(\mathscr {H}\), along the surjection \(\pi _{\mathscr {H}}\). Note \(\widehat{\mathscr {F}}^-_{\le \bullet }\) is exhaustive, since \(\widehat{\pmb {\mathcal {F}}}^-_{\le \bullet }\) is.
Proposition 9.1
The map \(\iota \) is surjective,
Proof
We will show that \(\widehat{\mathscr {F}}^-_{\le k}\) lies in the image of \(\iota \) by induction on \(k \ge 0\). The base is given by \(\widehat{\mathscr {F}}^-_{\le 0} = \pi _{\mathscr {H}} \bigl ( \mathcal {H} \bigr )\).
Now we use (43) for a function \(f_i \in \mathscr {O}_{*D}(\Sigma )\) with a pole at \(p_i\), and only there. Such a function is e.g. defined by \(f_i(z) = (z - t_i)^{-m}\), with the notations of Rem. 8.1, working in a local chart containing \({\varvec{p}}\).
Hence \(\tau _j \bigl (f_i\bigr ) \in \widehat{\mathscr {O}}_j\) for \(j \ne i\), and if \(\widehat{{\varvec{w}}} \in \widehat{{\varvec{\mathcal {F}}}}^-_{\le k}\) the rightmost identity of (24) shows that the right-hand side of (43) lies in \(\widehat{\mathscr {F}}^-_{\le k}\). Then by induction the image of \(\iota \) contains \(\widehat{\mathscr {F}}^-_{\le k}\) and all the vectors on the left-hand side of (43), and the conclusion follows from the leftmost identity of (24). \(\square \)
Proposition 9.2
One has \({{\,\textrm{Ker}\,}}(\iota ) = \mathfrak {g} \mathcal {H} \subseteq \mathcal {H}\).
Proof
Consider an element \(\widehat{{\varvec{w}}} = \tau (X \otimes f) \widehat{{\varvec{u}}}\) with \(\widehat{{\varvec{u}}} = \bigotimes _{j \in J} \widehat{u}_j \in \widehat{\mathcal {H}}\), \(f \in \mathfrak {g}_{*D}(\Sigma )\) and \(X \in \mathfrak {g}\).
If the function f is noncostant then it has a pole, say at \(p_j \in \Sigma \). It follows that \(\tau _j(f) \not \in \widehat{\mathscr {O}}_j\), whence \(X \otimes \tau _j (f)^{(j)} \widehat{u}_j \not \in \bigl ( \widehat{\mathcal {F}}^+_j \bigr )_{\le 0}\) by (22), and \(\widehat{{\varvec{w}}} \not \in \mathcal {H} = \widehat{{\varvec{\mathcal {F}}}}^+_{\le 0}\).
Thus to have element of the kernel we must restrict to \(f \in \mathbb {C}\). Then using (22) again we see that \(X \otimes f = X \otimes \tau _j(f) \in \mathfrak {g}\) preserves the grading \(\bigl ( \widehat{\mathcal {F}}^-_j \bigr )_{\bullet }\) on \(\widehat{W}_j\), so \((X \otimes f) \widehat{u}_j \in W_j = \bigl ( \widehat{\mathcal {F}}^-_j \bigr )_0\) implies \(\widehat{u}_j \in W_j\).
Conversely \(\mathfrak {g} \mathcal {H} \subseteq \mathfrak {g}_{*D} (\Sigma ) \widehat{\mathcal {H}} \cap \mathcal {H}\) lies in the kernel. \(\square \)
Hence there is an identification \(\mathscr {H} \simeq \mathcal {H} _{\mathfrak {g}} = \mathcal {H} \big /\mathfrak {g} \mathcal {H}\), generalising the analogous standard fact for the tame case.
To go further one may appeal to the tensor product of the weight grading of § 3.4, which is a \(\bigl ( \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \bigr )^{J}\)-grading on \(\mathcal {H}\). Namely we consider the subspaces
By (40) the subspace \({\varvec{\mathcal {F}}}_{{\varvec{\mu }}}\) lies inside the weight space of weight \(\left| {{\varvec{\mu }}}\right| {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\sum _j \mu _j \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) for the tensor product \(\mathfrak {h}\)-action.
If \(\left| { {\varvec{\mu }}}\right| \ne 0\) then \({\varvec{\mathcal {F}}}_{{\varvec{\mu }}} \subseteq \mathfrak {h} {\varvec{\mathcal {F}}}_{{\varvec{\mu }}}\) is annihilated by \(\pi _{\mathscr {H}}\), so we still have a surjective map
and by construction the \(\mathfrak {h}\)-action is trivialised on this subspace.
Remark
The condition \(\left| {{\varvec{\mu }}}\right| = 0\) is reminiscent of meromorphic connections: it is equivalent to the vanishing of the sum of the residues over \(\Sigma \)—in the duality (15). \(\triangle \)
9.1 Auxiliary tame module
Suppose one of the modules is tame, e.g. the last one: \(r_n = 1\) and \(W_n = V_n\). Then we split the tensor product as
where \(J' {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}J \setminus \left\{ {n}\right\} \), and we embed
where \(v_n \in V_n\) is the cyclic/highest-weight vector.
Proposition 9.3
One has \(\iota ({\mathcal {H}'}) = \mathscr {H}\).
Proof
Denote \(\mathcal {E}^{(n)}_{\le \bullet }\) the filtration on \(U(\mathfrak {g}) v_n \subseteq V_n\) defined in § 3.3, which is exhaustive in this (tame) case. We will prove by induction on \(k \ge 0\) that \(\iota \bigl ( \mathcal {H}'\bigr )\) contains the classes of all vectors inside \(\mathcal {H}' \otimes \mathcal {E}^{(n)}_{\le k}\), noting the base follows from the identity \(\mathcal {E}^{(n)}_{\le 0} = \mathbb {C} v_n\).
For the inductive step we use the constant version of (43). For \(X \in \mathfrak {g}\) this shows that the class of \(X^{(n)} \widehat{{\varvec{w}}}\) lies in \(\iota \bigl ( \mathcal {H}' \bigr )\) as soon as that of \(\widehat{{\varvec{w}}} \in \mathcal {H}' \otimes \mathcal {E}^{(n)}_{\le k}\) does, which is precisely the inductive hypothesis. Hence the conclusion follows from (25). \(\square \)
Now \(\mathbb {C} v_n = \mathcal {F}_{\lambda _n} (V_n)\), so (47) yields a surjection:
writing \(\left| {{\varvec{\mu }}}\right| = \sum _{j \in J'} \mu _j\in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) analogously to the above, and where \({\varvec{\mathcal {F}}}'_{{\varvec{\mu }}} \subseteq \mathcal {H}'\) is the tensor product of the weight-gradings over \(J' \subseteq J\) (analogously to (46)). Note the direct sum is just the weight space of weight \(-\lambda _n \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) for the (tensor) action of \(\mathfrak {h}\) on \(\mathcal {H}'\); let us temporarily denote this space by \(\mathcal {H}'(-\lambda _n)\).
Lemma 9.1
The kernel of (48) equals \(\mathfrak {n}^+ \mathcal {H}' \cap \mathcal {H}'(-\lambda _n) \subseteq \mathcal {H}'(-\lambda _n)\).
Proof
We must show that no coinvariants can arise from the residual \(\mathfrak {n}^-\)-action.
To this end recall \(\mathfrak {n}^-\) has nontrivial action on the associated graded of the filtration \(\mathcal {E}_{\le \bullet }\) of § 3.3: more precisely (26) yields
for \(k \in \mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0}\); but there can be no vanishing of components in the latter direct summand since \(V_n\) is freely generated over \(U(\mathfrak {n}^-)\), and this applies in particular to \(v_n \in \mathcal {E}^{(n)}_{\le 0} \simeq {{\,\textrm{gr}\,}}\bigl (\mathcal {E}^{(n)}_0 \bigr )\). \(\square \)
The punchline is the final identification
7.1.1. On dimensions. To go further we use the results of § 3.4; in particular we employ the notation \(\mathcal {F}_{\nu } (W_j) {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\mathcal {F}_{\lambda _j - \nu } \subseteq W_j\) for \(\nu \in Q^+\)—i.e. we parametrise the weights \(\mu _j = \lambda _j - \nu \preceq \lambda _j\) by \(\nu \in Q^+\).
By definition the weight space of weight \(-\lambda _n \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) for the \(\mathfrak {h}\)-action on \(\mathcal {H}'\), denoted \(\mathcal {H}'(-\lambda _n)\) above, is the direct sum of the spaces \({\varvec{\mathcal {F}}}'_{{\varvec{\nu }}} \subseteq \mathcal {H}'\) such that \(0 = \lambda _n + \sum _{j \in J'} (\lambda _j - \nu _j)\), so only elements such that \(\left| {{\varvec{\nu }}}\right| = \left| {{\varvec{\lambda }}}\right| \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) will contribute to coinvariants. This actually depends on the sum of the tame parts of the singular characters, hence we ought to change notation:
Proposition 9.4
The \(\mathfrak {h}\)-weight space \(\mathcal {H}'_{\left| {{\varvec{\lambda }}}\right| } \subseteq \mathcal {H}'\) has dimension
Proof
It follows from (27), taking the products of the dimensions of the weight spaces \(\mathcal {F}_{\nu _j} \subseteq W_j\).
The dimension is finite since for \(\nu \in Q_+\) there are finitely many \(J'\)-tuples \({\varvec{\nu }} \in \bigl ( Q^+ \bigr )^{J'}\) such that \(\left| {{\varvec{\nu }}}\right| = \nu \)—analogously to \(\left| {{{\,\textrm{Mult}\,}}_{\mathcal {R}^+} (\nu )}\right| < \infty \). \(\square \)
We deduce the following.
Corollary 9.1
If one module is tame then the space (41) is finite-dimensional for all choices of marked points and singular characters.
In particular the weight space is trivial if \(\left| {{\varvec{\lambda }}}\right| \not \in Q^+\), and the simplest nontrivial case is when \(\left| {{\varvec{\lambda }}}\right| = 0\). Then \(\left| {{\varvec{\nu }}}\right| = 0\) implies \(\nu _j = 0\) for \(j \in J'\), so \(\mathcal {H}'_0\) is the line generated by the tensor product \(\bigotimes _{i \in J'} w_i\) of the cyclic vectors \(w_i \in W_i\).
The next nontrivial example is when \(\left| {{\varvec{\lambda }}}\right| = \theta \in \Pi \) is a simple root. Now \(\left| {{\varvec{\nu }}}\right| = \theta \) implies \({\varvec{\nu }} \in \left\{ { {\varvec{\nu }}^{\theta ,i} }\right\} _i\), with \(\nu ^{\theta ,i}_j = \delta _{ij} \theta \) for \(i,j \in J'\). Then one finds the singleton \({{\,\textrm{Mult}\,}}_{\mathcal {R}^+} \bigl ( \nu ^{\theta ,i}_j \bigr ) = \left\{ { \delta _{ij} {\varvec{m}}^{\theta }}\right\} \), with \(m^{\theta }_{\alpha } = \delta _{\alpha \theta }\). On the whole (51) reduces to
independently of the choice of simple root.
A basis is given by the pure tensors
for \(i \in J'\) and \(j \in \left\{ { 0,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}},r_i-1}\right\} \).
Remark 9.1
One way to ensure coinvariants are nontrivial is the following: for a given configurations of points \({\varvec{p}} = (p_j)_{j \in J}\) consider the Lie subalgebra of \(\mathfrak {g}\)-valued meromorphic functions with poles at \(p_j\), and further with a zero elsewhere, say at \(p' \in \Sigma \setminus \left\{ { p_j}\right\} _j\). Then the proof of Proposition 9.1 can easily be adapted working in the chart where \(p' = \infty \)—as the function \(f_i(z) = (z - t_i)^{-m}\) vanishes at infinity.
Thus there is still a surjection of \(\mathcal {H}\) on the space of coinvariants, and similarly to Proposition 9.2 only constant functions lie in the kernel. Hence in this setup the kernel is trivial and \(\mathcal {H} \ne (0)\) itself is the space of coinvariants.
Another way to ensure nontriviality is to put a \(\theta \)-dual module in the tensor product (introduced in Sect. 6). Further when it is tame then one still has a finite-dimensional space, see Sect. 10. \(\triangle \)
9.1.1 Archetypal case
Consider the same setup of Sect. 3.4.1 for \(\mathfrak {g} = \mathfrak {sl}(2,\mathbb {C})\). In this case \(\left| {{\varvec{\lambda }}}\right| = m \alpha \) for an integer \(m \ge 0\).
Proposition 9.5
One has
A basis is provided by the pure tensors
where \(\Phi \in {{\,\textrm{WComp}\,}}_{R} (m)\)—identifying \(\left\{ {1,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}},R}\right\} \simeq \coprod _{j \in J'} \left\{ { 0,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}}, r_j-1}\right\} \).
Proof
Fix an integer \(m \ge 0\) and look for \({\varvec{\nu }} \in (\mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0} \alpha )^{J'}\) satisfying \(\left| {{\varvec{\nu }}}\right| = m \alpha \). Such elements are given by weak \(J'\)-compositions of m, i.e. functions \(\phi :J' \rightarrow \mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0}\) satisfying \(\sum _{j \in J'} \phi (j) = m\), with bijection
Then by definition \({{\,\textrm{Mult}\,}}_{\mathcal {R}^+} \bigl ( \nu ^{\phi }_j \bigr ) = \left\{ { \phi (j) }\right\} \) for \(j \in J'\), so we need only give elements \(\varphi _j \in {{\,\textrm{WComp}\,}}_{r_j} \bigl ( \phi (j) \bigr )\) to allocate the z-degrees of the occurrences of \(-\alpha \) at each slot of the tensor product.
The data of \(\phi \) and \({\varvec{\varphi }} = (\varphi _j)_j\) is equivalent to that of the weak R-composition \(\Phi :R \rightarrow \mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0}\) defined by \(\Phi (i,j) = \varphi _j(i)\), and the result follows. \(\square \)
Remark
In the tame case (52) simplifies to
and a basis is given by the pure tensors
This is somehow the opposite of (30): there we had an arbitrary singular module, here we have a tensor product of arbitrarily many tame modules. \(\triangle \)
10 Irregular conformal blocks: second version
We now vary the setup of Sect. 8 giving a special role to one of the marked points (e.g. the last one): choose a \((\cdot \mid \cdot )\)-orthogonal morphism \(\theta :\mathfrak {g} \rightarrow \mathfrak {g}^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\) and at the last marked point put a \(\theta \)-dual module \(\widehat{W}'_{\theta } \twoheadrightarrow W'_{\theta }\) as defined in Sect. 6.
In this case the tensor product splits as
where \(J' = J \setminus \left\{ {n}\right\} \) as in § 7.1—and omitting the subscript \(\theta \). These are naturally subspaces of \({{\,\textrm{Hom}\,}}( \widehat{W}_n,\widehat{\mathcal {H}}' )\) and \({{\,\textrm{Hom}\,}}( W_n,\mathcal {H}')\), respectively, where \(\mathcal {H}'\) is as in § 7.1 and \(\widehat{\mathcal {H}}' {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\bigotimes _{j \in J'} \widehat{W}_j\). Moreover they still assemble into trivial vector bundles \(\widehat{{\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}} \twoheadrightarrow {\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}\) over the space \(C_n = {{\,\textrm{Conf}\,}}_n(\Sigma )\)—but also over the full space (44) of isomonodromy times.
The Lie algebra of \(\mathfrak {g}\)-valued meromorphic functions on \(\Sigma \) acts on the leftmost tensor product of (53). Thinking in terms of linear maps \(\widehat{{\varvec{\psi }}} :\widehat{W}_n \rightarrow \widehat{\mathcal {H}}'\), and using (40) and the dual actions of Sect. 6, one has the formula
where \(X \in \mathfrak {g}\), \(f \in \mathscr {O}_{*D}(\Sigma )\) and \(\widehat{w} \in \widehat{W}_n\). Taking coinvariants of the resulting left module yields a second version of the space of irregular covacua, still denoted \(\mathscr {H}\): again the space of vacua \(\mathscr {H}^{\dagger }\) is defined as in (42), and provides a second version of irregular conformal blocks. Moreover the material of Sect. 8 goes through, and there is an action of the sheaf of Lie algebras \(\mathfrak {g}_{*\mathcal {D}}\) on sections of \(\widehat{{\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}}\) and \({\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}\).
10.1 On coinvariants
Consider first the natural inclusion \(\iota :\widehat{W}'_n \otimes \mathcal {H}' \hookrightarrow \widehat{\mathcal {H}}\), which can be composed with the canonical projection \(\pi _{\mathscr {H}} :\widehat{\mathcal {H}} \rightarrow \mathscr {H}\).
Reasoning as in Proposition 9.1 (which may be thought of as the case \(\widehat{W}'_n = \mathbb {C}\)) shows this composition is surjective. Then reasoning as in Proposition 9.2 shows the kernel is obtained from the action of meromorphic functions with no poles at \(\left\{ { p_1,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}},p_{n-1} }\right\} \subseteq \Sigma \), but only (at most) at the point \(p_n\). Hence there is a vector space isomorphism
thinking of \(p_n \in \Sigma \) as a divisor.
Now a function with a pole at most at \(p_n\) is either constant, or its Laurent expansion at \(p_n\) lies in \(z_n^{-1} \mathfrak {g} \bigl [ z_n^{-1} \bigr ] \subseteq (\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {g})_n\), where as usual \(z_n\) is a local coordinate on \(\Sigma \) vanishing at \(p_n\). Hence a coinvariant function is uniquely determined by its restriction to \(W_n \subseteq \widehat{W}_n\), and since now poles are not allowed we get the following.
Proposition 10.1
There is a canonical vector space identification
Thus in this case as well we can reduce the discussion to \(\mathfrak {g}\)-coinvariants for the tensor product of finite modules.
Now suppose the dual module is tame, and adapt the discussion of § 7.1. We see there is a surjective map \(\mathcal {H}' \rightarrow \mathscr {H}\), where again \(\mathcal {H}' = \bigotimes _{j \in J'} W_j\)—embedded in \(\mathcal {H}\) via \({\varvec{\widehat{w}}} \mapsto \psi \otimes {\varvec{\widehat{w}}}\), where \(\psi \in V'_n\) is the cyclic vector. Reasoning as in Lem. 9.1 the \(\theta ^{-1}(\mathfrak {n}^-)\)-action cannot give coinvariant elements, so we are left with the action of \(\mathfrak {h} \oplus \theta ^{-1}(\mathfrak {n}^+)\).
In the dual case where \(\theta = \theta _0 = -{\text {Id}}_{\mathfrak {g}}\) we have \(\theta ^{-1}(\mathfrak {n}^+) = \mathfrak {n}^+\), so we are essentially back to § 7.1.1. The contragredient case where \(\theta = \theta _1\) (the transposition) instead allows to go further. In this case \(\theta ^{-1}(\mathfrak {n}^+) = \mathfrak {n}^-\), whence a new identification \(\mathscr {H} \simeq \mathcal {H}'_{\mathfrak {b}^-}\), and to trivialise the \(\mathfrak {h}\)-action we consider again the zero-weight subspace inside \(\mathcal {H}'\). This is again (50), whose (finite) dimension is given in Proposition 9.4.
Finally in this setup we can recover nontriviality, as follows. Recall we attach weights \({\varvec{\lambda }} = (\lambda _j)_{j \in J} \in \bigl ( \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \bigr )^{J}\) to the marked points, and that we consider the sum \(\left| {{\varvec{\lambda }}}\right| = \sum _{j \in J} \lambda _j \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\). The weight space is \(\mathcal {H}'_{\left| {{\varvec{\lambda }}}\right| } \subseteq \mathcal {H}'\), hence
Compare with (49): as expected the roles of the nilpotent subalgebras \(\mathfrak {n}^{\pm }\) are exchanged—by \(\theta \).
Proposition 10.2
Suppose \(n \ge 3\) and \(\left| {{\varvec{\lambda }}}\right| \in Q^+\): then the space of coinvariants is nontrivial—for any choice of wild parts.
A fortiori then nontriviality holds if the n-th module is not tame.
Proof
For \(\widehat{w} \in \mathcal {F}_{\left| {\lambda }\right| }(W_1) \subseteq W_1\) consider the pure tensor
(In brief put the cyclic in all slots except the first, and put a vector of suitable weight in the first slot.) An argument analogous to the proof of Lem. 9.1 shows that \({\varvec{\widehat{w}}}_i \not \in \mathfrak {n}^-\mathcal {H}'\), which means exactly that \(\bigl [ \widehat{{\varvec{w}}}_i \bigr ] \ne 0\) inside \(\mathscr {H}\).
More precisely denote \(\mathcal {E}^{(j)}_{\le \bullet }\) the filtration on \(U(\mathfrak {g}) w_j = U(\mathfrak {n}^-) w_j \subseteq W_j\) induced from \(U(\mathfrak {n}^-)\), as in § 3.3, with associated grading \({{\,\textrm{gr}\,}}\bigl ( \mathcal {E}^{(j)} \bigr )_{\bullet }\). Then consider the tensor product \(\mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0}^{J''}\)-grading
Using (26) yields
for \({\varvec{k}} \in \mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0}^{J''}\), where \(\varepsilon _i \in \mathbb {Z}^{J''}\) is the i-th vector of the canonical \(\mathbb {Z}\)-basis. Again the vanishing of components in the latter direct summands cannot happen, since the \(U(\mathfrak {n}^-)\)-action is free on singular modules. \(\square \)
Remark
If \(n = 2\) instead simply \(\mathscr {H} \simeq \mathcal {F}_{\nu }(W) \big /\bigl ( \mathfrak {n}^- W \cap \mathcal {F}_{\nu } (W) \bigr )\) for \(\nu \in Q^+\), and we must further distinguish the tame/wild case.
In the tame case \(V = \mathfrak {n}^- V \oplus \mathbb {C} v\), so nontriviality implies \(v \in \mathcal {F}_{\nu }\): this forces \(\nu = 0\) and \(\mathscr {H} \simeq \mathcal {F}_{\lambda }(V) = \mathbb {C} v\).
In the wild case instead write \(\nu = \sum _{\alpha \in \mathcal {R}^+} m_{\alpha } \alpha \) for \(m_{\alpha } \in \mathbb {Z}_{\ge 0}\), and consider the vector
ordering again the positive roots along the Cartan–Weyl basis (17) (note this makes sense at all depths \(p \ge 2\)). Clearly \(\widehat{w}_{\nu } \not \in \mathfrak {n}^- W\), since all occrrences of root vectors have positive z-degree, hence \(\mathscr {H} \ne (0)\) always in this case. \(\triangle \)
Remark
One may also consider the tensor products of the grading of Def. 5.2, in addition to the \(\mathfrak {h}\)-weight grading—i.e. use the fact that every finite module is a graded \(\mathfrak {n}^- \llbracket z \rrbracket \)-module. Namely there is a decomposition
which is preserved by the tensor product \(\mathfrak {b}^-\)-action, so \(\mathscr {H} \simeq \bigoplus _{k \in \mathbb {Z}^{J'}} ({\varvec{\mathcal {F}}}^+_{{\varvec{k}}})_{\mathfrak {b}^-}\). This is a new feature: in the tame case the grading in positive z-degree is trivial. \(\triangle \)
11 Flat connections
Consider a particular case of the setup of Sect. 8: mark \(n+1\) (ordered) points on \(\Sigma \), vary the first \(n \ge 1\) of them, and fix singular characters at those points.
Thus we work on a closed subspace of \({{\,\textrm{Conf}\,}}_{n+1} (\Sigma )\), which is naturally identified with the local chart \(U' = {{\,\textrm{Conf}\,}}_n(U) \subseteq C_n\) of Rem. 8.1 where \(p_{n+1} = \infty \)—whence \(\left\{ { p_1,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}},p_n }\right\} \subseteq U \simeq \mathbb {C}\). The label set becomes \(J = \left\{ { 1,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}},n,\infty }\right\} \), and we write \(J' {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}J \setminus \left\{ {\infty }\right\} \).
Then we have two versions of spaces of covacua: either we put a singular module at infinity, or a \(\theta \)-dual. In any case we consider the restrictions of the vector bundles \({\varvec{\mathcal {H}}} \subseteq \widehat{{\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}}\) over \(U' \simeq C_n(\mathbb {C}) {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}{{\,\textrm{Conf}\,}}_n(\mathbb {C})\), as well as for the sheaves \((\pi _{\Sigma })_{*} \mathcal {O}_{*\mathcal {D}}\) and \(\mathfrak {g}_{*\mathcal {D}}\) on \(U'\)—and keep the same notation for them.
Then we want to define a connection \(\widehat{\nabla }\) on \(\widehat{{\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}} \rightarrow C_n(\mathbb {C})\) which is compatible with the action of the sheaf of Lie algebras \(\mathfrak {g}_{*\mathcal {D}}\). In the given trivialisation this will be of the form \(\widehat{\nabla } = d- \widehat{\varpi }\), where \(\widehat{\varpi }\) is a 1-form on \(C_n(\mathbb {C})\) with values in endomorphisms of the fibres, and with a view towards (generalisations of) KZ [38] we set
where we use the coordinates \({\varvec{t}} :C_n(\mathbb {C}) \rightarrow \mathbb {C}^n\) of Rem. 8.1 and the Sugawara operator (33). This is a translation-invariant 1-form on the parallelisable manifold \(C_n(\mathbb {C})\), so in particular \(d\widehat{\varpi } = 0\). Further the actions of \(L_{-1}\) on different slots commute, so \(\bigl [ \widehat{\varpi } \wedge \widehat{\varpi } \bigr ] = 0\), and the connection \(\widehat{\nabla }\) is (strongly) flat.
11.1 Compatibility with the action of meromorphic functions
We now consider a natural connection D on the sheaf \(\mathfrak {g}_{*\mathcal {D}}\)—a linear map \(D :\mathfrak {g}_{*\mathcal {D}} \rightarrow \Omega ^1_{C_n(\mathbb {C})} \otimes \mathfrak {g}_{*\mathcal {D}}\) satisfying Leibniz’s rule. Namely we set
where \(d:\Omega ^0_{C_n(\mathbb {C})} \rightarrow \Omega ^1_{C_n(\mathbb {C})}\) is the standard de Rham differential.
Proposition 11.1
One has
where \(X \in \mathfrak {g}\), and f and \(\widehat{{\varvec{w}}}\) are local sections of \((\pi _{\Sigma })_{*} \mathscr {O}_{*\mathcal {D}}\) and \(\widehat{{\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}}\), respectively.
To prove this we use the following well-known fact.
Lemma 11.1
([35], Lem. 12.8) One has the identity \(\bigl [ L_{-1}, Xz^m \bigr ] = -m X z^{m-1}\) inside the level-\(\kappa \) completion of \(U \bigl (\widehat{\mathfrak {g}} \bigr )\), for \(X \in \mathfrak {g}\) and \(m \in \mathbb {Z}\).
Proof of Proposition 11.1
For \(i \in J'\) and for local sections \(\widehat{{\varvec{w}}}\) and \(X \otimes f\) of \(\widehat{\mathcal {H}}\) and \(\mathfrak {g}_{*\mathcal {D}}\)—respectively—we must prove that
Now for \(j \in J'\) we have the expansions
where \(f_k\) is a regular function on an open subset of \(C_n(\mathbb {C})\), and we take the local coordinate \(z_j = z - t_j\) on \(\Sigma \)—vanishing at \(p_j\). Since \(\partial _{t_i}(z_j) + \delta _{ij} = 0\) one has
using Lem. 11.1. Hence by (40):
and we conclude with
\(\square \)
Thus a reduced connection is well defined on \(\mathscr {H} \rightarrow C_n(\mathbb {C})\), since \(\widehat{\nabla }\) preserves the sheaf of sections with values in the subspaces \(\mathfrak {g}_{*D} \widehat{\mathcal {H}}_{{\varvec{p}},{\varvec{\chi }}} \subseteq \widehat{\mathcal {H}}_{{\varvec{p}},{\varvec{\chi }}}\), by (54). We conclude the sheaf of covacua has a natural structure of flat vector bundle over the space of tame isomonodromy times, so in particular the dimension of (41) is constant along variations of the marked points—when finite. After dualising the connection, the same statements follow for the spaces of vacua.
11.2 Description on finite modules: first version
By the results of Sect. 9 it is possible to describe the reduction of \(\widehat{\nabla }\) as the \(\mathfrak {g}\)-reduction of a connection \(\nabla \) living on the vector sub-bundle \({\varvec{\mathcal {H}}} \subseteq \widehat{{\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}}\), and further as a connections acting on \({\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}' \subseteq {\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}\) when the module at infinity is tame.
The goal is to find an explicit expression for \(\nabla \). For this we will use the following elementary fact, where we further set \(z_{\infty } {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}z^{-1}\)—a local coordinate vanishing at infinity.
Lemma 11.2
(Expansions at irregular singularities) For \(i \in J'\) and for an integer \(m > 0\) one has
11.2.1 Tame case
Suppose \(r_j = 1\) for \(j \in J\). Then using (55) with \(m = 1\) yields
for \(X \in \mathfrak {g}\), \(i \ne j \in J'\), \(\widehat{v}_j \in V_j\) and \(\widehat{v}_{\infty } \in V_{\infty }\)—since \( z_j \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z_j \rrbracket V_j = (0)\) for \(j \in J\). Hence by (43) one has the following identity inside \(\mathscr {H}\)—with tacit use of \(\pi _{\mathscr {H}}\):
where \(\widehat{{\varvec{v}}} = \bigotimes _{j \in J'} \widehat{v}_j \in {\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}\). In particular the action is trivial at infinity.
Looking at (37) and writing \(L_{-1}^{(i)} (\widehat{{\varvec{v}}} \otimes \widehat{v}_{\infty }) = \widehat{{\varvec{v}}}_i \otimes \widehat{v}_{\infty }\) we find
where \(\Omega ^{(ij)} {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\iota ^{(ij)} (\Omega )\) denotes the embedding (39) of the quadratic tensor (5)—with \(m = l = 0\).
One recovers the KZ connection [38] on the sub-bundle \(\mathcal {H}'_{\left| {{\varvec{\lambda }}}\right| } \hookrightarrow \mathcal {H}\), taking \(V_{\infty }\) as auxiliary tame module.
11.2.2 Tame modules in the finite part
Now allow \(r_{\infty } \ge 1\) to be arbitrary. What changes is
for \(X \in \mathfrak {g}\), \(\widehat{w}_{\infty } \in W_{\infty }\) and \(i \in J'\), using the case \(m = 1\) of (55). So the action is nontrivial at infinity if \(r_{\infty } \ge 2\).
Then by (43) one has the following identity inside \(\mathscr {H}\)—with tacit use of \(\pi _{\mathscr {H}}\):
Thus looking at (37) one finds \(L_{-1}^{(i)} (\widehat{{\varvec{v}}} \otimes \widehat{w}_{\infty }) = \widehat{{\varvec{v}}}_i \otimes w_{\infty } + \mathcal {D}_i (\widehat{{\varvec{v}}} \otimes \widehat{w})\), where \(\widehat{{\varvec{v}}}_i\) is as in (56), and
using again the embedding \(\iota ^{(i\infty )} (\Omega _{0,l+1})\) of (5) defined by (39).
Remark
E.g. if \(r_{\infty } = 2\) then the new operator acts by
In this case the reduced connection is close to the dynamical KZ connection, i.e. [23, Eq. 3]. We will recover the very same “dynamical” Cartan term in Sect. 14. \(\triangle \)
11.2.3 Tame module at infinity
Suppose symmetrically \(r_{\infty } = 1\), but \(r_j\) is arbitrary for \(j \in J'\).
Proposition 11.2
One has \(L_{-1}^{(i)} \widehat{{\varvec{w}}} \otimes \widehat{v}_{\infty } = \widehat{{\varvec{w}}}_i \otimes \widehat{v}_{\infty }\), with
Proof
Postponed to § B.2. \(\square \)
This is an irregular generalisation of the KZ connection, corresponding to an action of the universal connection of [46].Footnote 10
Remark
The flat connection (58) is known to admit an isomonodromy system as semiclassical limit (see op. cit.): precisely the irregular isomonodromy system on \(\mathbb {C}P^1\) for variations of the positions of the poles (the tame isomonodromy times, as considered in [37]).
This generalises the same fact from the tame case: the quantisation of the Schlesinger system [48] yields the KZ connection [30, 46]. \(\triangle \)
11.2.4 General case
Finally take \(r_{\infty } \ge 1\) to be generic as well.
Proposition 11.3
One has \(L_{-1}^{(i)} \widehat{{\varvec{w}}} \otimes \widehat{w}_{\infty } = \widehat{{\varvec{w}}}_i \otimes \widehat{w}_{\infty } + \mathcal {D}_i (\widehat{{\varvec{w}}} \otimes \widehat{w}_{\infty })\), with \(\widehat{{\varvec{w}}}_i\) as in (58) and
Proof
This is a generalisation of Proposition 11.2 where moreover
for \(X \in \mathfrak {g}\), \(\widehat{w}_{\infty } \in W_{\infty }\) and \(i \in J'\), using the general case of (55). Now the action is nontrivial at infinity for \(r_{\infty } \ge m+1\), and the result still follows from (36). \(\square \)
11.3 Description on finite modules: second version
Finally one may consider the setup of Sect. 10, i.e. put a \(\theta \)-dual module \(W'_{\theta }\) at infinity. In the analogue of §§ 9.2.1 and 9.2.3—when the module at infinity is tame—the description of the reduced connection does not change, using (32). In the remaining cases one finds the action of the same quadratic tensors on the last slot, acting on the \(\theta \)-dual.
Hence in the next section we will introduce a universal versions of the reduced connection, looking at (58) and (59), to treat the two versions on the same footing.
12 Universal connections
Fix again a depth \(p \ge 1\), an integer \(n \ge 1\), and the finite ordered sets
Consider then the nonautomous (quantum) Hamiltonian systems
with Hamiltonians \(\widehat{H}_i = \widehat{H}'_i + \widehat{H}''_i\) for \(i \in J'\), where
and
as suggested by (58) and (59).
These Hamiltonians are equivalent to the universal connection (at depth p):
defined on the trivial vector bundle \(U(J,p) {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}C_n(\mathbb {C}) \times U \bigl ( \mathfrak {g}_p \bigr )^{\otimes \, \left| {J}\right| } \rightarrow C_n(\mathbb {C})\) by means of the \(U(\mathfrak {g}_p)^{\otimes \, \left| {J}\right| }\)-valued 1-forms \(\varpi '_p\) and \(\varpi ''_p\) on the base space. This generalises [46] with a nontrivial action at infinity.
Then for every choice of singular modules labeled by J there is an action of (62) on \({\varvec{\mathcal {H}}}\) for \(p \gg 0\), which reproduces the most general case of § 9.2 (with \(\theta \)-duals or not), so in particular there are induced integrable quantum Hamiltonian systems. Hence one expects (62) to be flat before taking representations, as we will show.
Remark
One directly checks that
so (strong) flatness is equivalent to the commutativity of the quantum Hamiltonians. \(\triangle \)
12.1 Flatness at finite distance
The 1-form defining the Hamiltonians (60) can be written
where \(r_p :\mathbb {C} \setminus \left\{ {0}\right\} \rightarrow \mathfrak {g}_p^{\otimes 2}\) is the following rational function:
Remark
It is easy to see that \(r_p\) is skew-symmetric, meaning
\(\triangle \)
The study of the connection \(\nabla '_p {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}d- \varpi '_p\) is closely related to the theory of the classical Yang–Baxter equation (CYBE) [4]. In particular flatness (for \(\left| {J'}\right| \ge 3\)) is equivalent to the CYBE for (63) in the Lie algebra \(\mathfrak {g}_p\), i.e. to the following identity inside \(\mathfrak {g}_p^{\otimes 3}\):
where \(t_{ij} {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}t_i - t_j\).
Theorem 12.1
(cf. [46]) The rational function (63) is a solution of the CYBE.
Proof
We will reduce the proof to the well-known case \(p = 1\), where \(\mathfrak {g}_p = \mathfrak {g}\). In this case we have the classical result that the rational function \(r_1(t) = \Omega t^{-1}\) is a skew-symmetric solution of the CYBE [4], which is an easy consequence of the Drinfeld–Kohno relations \(\bigl [ \Omega ^{(ij)},\Omega ^{(ik)}+\Omega ^{(jk)} \bigr ] = 0\), and the Arnold relations [2]:
To prove the general case consider the identification \(\mathfrak {g}_p^{\otimes 2} \simeq \mathfrak {g}^{\otimes 2} \otimes A(2,p)\), where \(A(n,p) {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\mathbb {C} \llbracket w_1,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}},w_n \rrbracket \big /\mathfrak {I}_p\) is the quotient of the power-series ring by the ideal \(\mathfrak {I}_p = \bigl ( w_1^p,{{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}},w_n^p \bigr )\) generated by \(\left\{ { w_1^p, {{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}}, w_n^p }\right\} \). In this identification \(\Omega _{ml} = \Omega \otimes w_1^mw_2^l\), and (63) can be written
and where \(\tau _{(0,0)}^{(p)}(f_t)\) is the class mod \(\mathfrak {I}_p\) of the Taylor expansion of \(f_t\) at the origin. Then, up to the identification \(\mathfrak {g}_p^{\otimes 3} \simeq \mathfrak {g}^{\otimes 3} \otimes A(3,p)\), the CYBE follows again from (65), with \(t_i\) replaced by \(t_i - w_i\), for \(i \in \left\{ {1,2,3}\right\} \). \(\square \)
Hence we have an inverse system of classical r-matrices, with respect to the canonical projections \(\mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \big /z^{\bullet + 1} \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \twoheadrightarrow \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \big /z^{\bullet } \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \), corresponding to an inverse system of flat vector bundles \(\bigl ( U(n,p),\nabla '_p \bigr )\) over the space of configurations of \(J'\)-tuples of points in the complex plane. The inverse limit of the vector bundles is naturally identified with the trivial vector bundle with fibre \(U \bigl ( \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \bigr )^{\widehat{\otimes } \, \left| {J}\right| }\), the completion of the n-th tensor power of the positive part of the loop algebra.
Remark
The inverse limit \(r_\infty (t) = \varprojlim _p r_p(t) \in \mathfrak {g}^{\otimes 2} [t^{-1}] \llbracket z_1,z_2 \rrbracket \) is a solution of the CYBE in a completion of \(\mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket ^{\otimes 3} \otimes \mathscr {O}_{C_{3} (\mathbb {C})} \bigl ( C_{3}(\mathbb {C}) \bigr )\).
Analogously on the representation-theoretic side one may consider characters of the Lie subalgebra
using (7). Then \(\mathfrak {S}^{(\infty )}_{{{\,\textrm{ab}\,}}} \simeq \mathfrak {h} \llbracket z \rrbracket \oplus \mathbb {C} K\), so the induced non-smooth modules \(\widehat{W}^{(\infty )}\) depend on infinitely many Cartan parameters (and a level \(\kappa \)), and are generated over \(U(\mathcal {L}\mathfrak {n}^-)\) by a cyclic vector annihilated by \(\mathfrak {n}^+ \llbracket z \rrbracket \). Under (15) the parameters of these modules correspond to principal parts of connections with essential singularities. \(\triangle \)
12.2 Flatness overall
The 1-form defining the Hamiltonians (61) can be written
where \(s_p :\mathbb {C} \setminus \left\{ {0}\right\} \rightarrow \mathfrak {g}_p^{\otimes 2}\) is the following rational function:
Theorem 12.2
The universal connection \(\nabla _p\) is flat for \(p \ge 1\).
Proof
Reasoning as in the proof of Theorem 12.1 consider the function
Then one directly checks that the Taylor expansion of \(g_t\) at the origin satisfies
and we can conclude by proving a version of the CYBE in the Lie algebra \(\mathfrak {g}_p\).
Namely by Theorem 12.1 the commutator of two Hamiltonians becomes
using the fact that actions on disjoint pairs of slots commute, and the skew-symmetry (64). Now we can use the standard Drinfeld–Kohno relations to reduce flatness (for all \(p \ge 1\)) to a variation of the Arnold relations (65), namely to the following identity:
where \(f_t = f_t(w_i,w_j)\) is as in the proof of Theorem 12.1. \(\square \)
Remark 12.1
One can give a more symmetric expression of (62), with no special role for the marked point at infinity.
To this end consider the generating function
which is a meromorphic function on \(\mathbb {C}^2\) with poles along \(\left\{ { w_i = w_j }\right\} \subseteq \mathbb {C}^2\)—and only there. It can be extended (by zero) to a meromorphic function on the complex surface \(\Sigma ^2 \setminus \left\{ { (\infty ,\infty ) }\right\} \), so we can take Taylor expansions \(\tau _{(p_i,p_j)} (\varphi )\) of \(\varphi \) at any pair of distinct points \(p_i,p_j \in \Sigma \)—using the local coordinates \(w_i^{-1}\) and \(w_j^{-1}\) at infinity.
Then analogously to the above one checks that
for points \(p_i, p_j \in \Sigma \) at finite distance of coordinates \(t_i,t_j \in \mathbb {C}\), respectively.
Hence
and all marked points are treated the same.
Then the flatness of (62) for \(p \ge 1\) is equivalent to generalised Arnold relations, relating the Taylor expansions of (66) at pairs extracted from a triple of distinct points on the Riemann sphere. \(\triangle \)
Hence we find again an inverse system of flat vector bundles \(\bigl ( U(J,p),\nabla _p \bigr )\), over the space of configurations of \(J'\)-tuples of points in the complex plane.
12.3 Connection on coinvariants
The universal connection (62) is well defined for sections with values in the space of \(\mathfrak {g}\)-coinvariants of \(U (\mathfrak {g}_p)^{\otimes n}\).
To prove this consider the canonical embedding \(\mathfrak {g} \hookrightarrow \mathfrak {g}_p \simeq \mathfrak {g} < imes \mathfrak {b}_p\) and the universal embedding \(\mathfrak {g}_p \hookrightarrow U (\mathfrak {g}_p)\). Composing them we let \(\mathfrak {g}\) act on \(U(\mathfrak {g}_p)\) in the regular representation, and finally the tensor product action (analogous of (40) in the case of constant functions). Then we get a \(\mathfrak {g}\)-action on differential forms with values in the flat vector bundle \(\bigl ( U(J,p), \nabla _p \bigr )\).
Proposition 12.1
The \(\mathfrak {g}\)-action is flat for all \(p \ge 1\).
Note this is a particular case of a compatibility such as (54), for constant sections of the trivial bundle \(C_n(\mathbb {C}) \times \mathfrak {g} \rightarrow C_n(\mathbb {C})\), equipped with the trivial connection.
Proof
Postponed to § B.3. \(\square \)
It follows that (62) preserves sections with values in \(\mathfrak {g} U (\mathfrak {g}_p)^{\otimes \, \left| {J}\right| } \subseteq U (\mathfrak {g}_p)^{\otimes \, \left| {J}\right| }\), so a reduced (flat) connection is well defined on the space of \(\mathfrak {g}\)-coinvariants of the tensor product. This was to be expected, as it holds for the induced connections above.
13 On conformal transformations
Consider the action of Möbius transformations on \(\Sigma = \mathbb {P}(\mathbb {C}^2)\), that is
for \((t_1,t_2) \in \mathbb {C}^2 \setminus \left\{ {{\varvec{0}}}\right\} \), with \(g = g(a,b,c,d)\) given by numbers \(a,b,c,d \in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(ad - bc = 1\). In the standard affine chart \(U = \Sigma \setminus \{ [1 :0] \} \xrightarrow {t}{} \mathbb {C}\) we then have the subgroup of affine transformation of the complex plane, with diagonal action on \(C_n(\mathbb {C}) \subseteq \mathbb {C}^n\), and with induced pull-back (right) action on sections of vector bundles over that base.
In particular translations \(t \mapsto t + b\) correspond to \(a = d = 1\) and \(c = 0\). This is the 1-parameter subgroup corresponding to the infinitesimal generator \(E \in {{\,\textrm{Lie}\,}}\bigl ( {{\,\textrm{PSL}\,}}(2,\mathbb {C})\bigr ) = \mathfrak {sl}(2,\mathbb {C})\), and the associated infinitesimal action reads
considering the path \(\gamma :\varepsilon \mapsto g(1,\varepsilon ,0,1)\).
Analogously dilations correspond to the 1-parameter subgroup generated by \(H \in \mathfrak {sl}(2,\mathbb {C})\), and the associated infinitesimal action is given by the Euler vector field
considering the path \(\gamma :\varepsilon \mapsto g \bigl ( 1+\varepsilon ,0,0,(1+\varepsilon )^{-1} \bigr )\).
Proposition 13.1
Suppose the module at infinity is tame. Then the action of affine transformations on horizontal sections of the bundle of covacua reads
where \({\varvec{t}}' = (t'_i)_{i \in J'}\) with \(t'_i = e^{2a} t_i + b\). In particular horizontal sections are invariant under translations.
Proof
Postponed to B.4. \(\square \)
Remark
As in the tame case, the \(\mathfrak {g}\)-coinvariance implies
in the space \(\mathscr {H}\). The action of \(\Omega ^{(kk)}\) is that of the quadratic Casimir (4) on the k-th slot, so this term acts diagonally and can be exponentiated to find the usual conformal weight (cf. Rem. 7.2). The point is that in general the dilation action has further nonscalar terms. \(\triangle \)
14 A different dynamical term at infinity
In this section we generalise the dynamical KZ connection [23], varying the setup of Sect. 3.
Namely note another natural family of Lie algebras \(\underline{\mathfrak {S}}^{(p)} \subseteq \mathfrak {S}^{(p)} \subseteq \widehat{\mathfrak {g}}\) is given by
The derived Lie algebra of \(\underline{\mathfrak {S}}^{(1)}\) yields the first “level subalgebra” of [21], then the two differ for \(p \ge 2\). One can then define (smooth) induced modules \(\underline{\widehat{W}}\) as in Sect. 3, where \(\underline{\widehat{W}} = \underline{\widehat{W}}^{(p)}_{\underline{\chi }}\) depends on a character \(\underline{\chi } :\underline{\mathfrak {S}}^{(p)} \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\). However one does not recover the standard affine Verma module as the starting element of the family, contrary to (10)—which is one motivation behind Def. 3.1.
Moreover one has \(\underline{\mathfrak {S}}^{(p)} \simeq \mathfrak {h}_{2p} \oplus \mathbb {C}K\), analogously to Lem. 3.1, so for \(p = 1\) a character is defined by elements \(\underline{\lambda } \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) and by the irregular Cartan term \(\mu \in ( \mathfrak {h} \otimes z )^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) (plus the choice of a level \(\kappa \)). Hence for \(p = 1\) we see (15) matches up the parameters of \(\underline{\widehat{W}}\) with principal parts of meromorphic connections at poles of order two, but in general only poles of even order can be obtained with this construction, contrary to (10)—which is another motivation behind Def. 3.1.
So we can put the module \(\underline{\widehat{W}} = \underline{\widehat{W}}^{(1)}_{\underline{\chi }}\) at infinity in the tensor product \(\widehat{\mathcal {H}}\), and consider the spaces of coinvariants \(\mathscr {H}\) as in Sect. 8. The proofs of Props. 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3 can be adjusted introducing suitable filtrations on \(\underline{\widehat{W}}\) and \(\underline{W} = U (\mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket ) \underline{w}\), where \(\underline{w} \in \underline{\widehat{W}}\) is the cyclic vector, as well as the whole of § 9.1. Hence in brief one can use \(\underline{W}\) as auxiliary module at infinity, which yields a different “dynamical” Cartan term in the reduced connection—with respect to (57).
Namely (57) simplifies to
where \((H_k)_k\) is a \((\cdot \mid \cdot )\)-orthonormal basis of \(\mathfrak {h}\), using \((\mathfrak {n}^+ \oplus \mathfrak {n}^-) \otimes z_{\infty } \cdot \underline{w} = 0\), \(H_k z_{\infty } \cdot \underline{w} = \mu _k \underline{w}\), and writing \(\mu _k = \langle \mu ,H_k z_{\infty } \rangle \).
We see the reduced connection generalises the dynamical KZ equations, i.e. [23, Eq. 3], and it coincides with it when the modules over finite points are tame.Footnote 11 So we recover the Felder–Markov–Tarasov–Varchenko connection (FMTV) over variations of marked points as a particular case of this construction.
Remark 14.1
Note the whole of the FMTV connection also allows for variations of the irregular part \(\mu \in (\mathfrak {h} \otimes z)^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\), in addition to the deformations à la Klarès considered here [37]. In particular when there is only one simple pole the resulting flat connection for variations of \(\mu \) is the DMT connection [40, 52], which is derived from a representation-theoretic setup in [21, § 3.11], and [22, § 3.7] (for the latter see also [53]). \(\triangle \)
Remark 14.2
(On quantisation of isomonodromy connections) Just as in the case of the KZ connection, a different derivation of these flat connections has been obtained by (filtered) deformation quantisation of isomonodromy systems, this time importantly for irregular meromorphic connections.
Namely [9] derived the DMT connection from the quantisation of a dual version of the Schlesinger system. This is related to the usual Schlesinger system by the Harnad duality [29], i.e. the Fourier–Laplace transform (cf. [50] on the quantum side). In the same spirit, the whole of FMTV connection can be obtained by quantising the isomonodromy system of Jimbo–Miwa–Môri–Sato [33] (see [44, § 11]; more generally see op. cit. and [45] for a further extension to connections with poles of order three including all the above cases). \(\triangle \)
15 Outlook
As explained in the introduction we also wish to consider flat quantum connections along variations of irregular types (i.e. variations of “wild” Riemann surface structures on the sphere [7]). Two viable viewpoints to introduce them are:
-
(1)
The quantisation of the full irregular isomonodromy connections, in the spirit of [9, 44], generalising the simply-laced quantum connections (which quantise the simply-laced isomonodromy systems [12]);
-
(2)
Considering quantum symmetries: the quantum/Howe duality [3] was used in [52] to relate KZ and the “Casimir” connection of De Concini and Millson–Toledano Laredo (DMT) [40], and at the level of isomonodromy systems corresponds to the Harnad duality [29]. An analogous quantisation of the Fourier–Laplace transform may be taken here in order to turn the variations of marked points into variations of irregular types, extending the viewpoint of [11, 45].
Another natural direction to pursue is the higher-genus case, noting in that case the moduli spaces of connections on holomorphically trivial bundles have positive codimension inside the full de Rham spaces.
Finally one may try to introduce integrality conditions, and lift this Lie-algebra representation setup to Lie groups, with a view towards the geometric quantisation of coadjoint \(G_p\)-orbits (along the lines of the Borel–Weyl–Bott theorem [17, 49, 51], or more generally of the orbit method [36]). Another approach we will try in this direction is that of the quantisation of the nilpotent Birkhoff orbits \(\mathcal {O}_B \subseteq \mathfrak {b}_p^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) [8].
Change history
18 March 2023
Missing Open Access funding information has been added in the Funding Note
Notes
“Singularity modules” is also a fitting name, since they are attached to the singularity of a connection—at a point on Riemann surface.
These data are the G-conjugacy class of the monodromy representation of the fundamental group of the punctured sphere, with the poles removed. Indeed the isomonodromy connection is the pullback of the (nonabelian) Gauß–Manin connection on the associated family of character varieties along the Riemann–Hilbert correspondence, viz. the map taking monodromy data (which can thought as a “global” version of the exponential \(\mathfrak {g} \rightarrow G\), cf. the abstract of [14]).
The viewpoint of op. cit. on meromorphic connections is different: at critical level \(\kappa = -h^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\) one identifies quotients of the “universal Gaudin algebra” with algebras of functions on spaces of opers with prescribed singularities for the Langlands dual group \(^{L}{G}\) of G, with a view towards the geometric Langlands correspondence for loop groups [25].
Recall a \(\mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \)-module is smooth if every vector is annihilated by \(z^{N} \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \subseteq \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z \rrbracket \) for \(N \gg 0\).
Note the connection of [46] is given in universal terms: \(\mathfrak {g}_p\)-modules and (co)invariants are not discussed, nor are the irregular types of irregular meromorphic connections.
Beware a “regular” Verma modules is a Verma module defined by a dominant weight \(\lambda \in \mathfrak {h}\), so “tame” is better terminology here.
Beware to distinguish the positive/negative deeper Borel subalgebra \(\mathfrak {b}^{\pm }_p\) from the Birkhoff subalgebra \(\mathfrak {b}_p\).
A composition of \(m_{\alpha }\) is a sequence of positive integers summing to \(m_{\alpha }\); it is a p-composition if the sequence has finite length \(p \ge 1\); and it is weak if zero is allowed.
Replace \(\kappa + h^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \in \mathbb {C}\) with “\(\kappa \)” and \(\sum _k \mu _k H_k \in \mathfrak {h}\) with “\(\mu \)” to retrieve the exact [23, Eq. 3].
References
Alday, L.F., Gaiotto, D., Tachikawa, Y.: Liouville correlation functions from four-dimensional gauge theories. Lett. Math. Phys. 91(2), 167–197 (2010)
Arnol’d, V.I.: The cohomology ring of the group of dyed braids. Mat. Zametki 5, 227–231 (1969)
Baumann, P.: The q-Weyl group of a q-Schur algebra, hal-00143359
Belavin, A.A., Drinfel’d, V.G.: Solutions of the classical Yang-Baxter equation for simple Lie algebras. Funktsional. Anal. I Prilozhen. 16(3), 1–29 (1982)
Biquard, O., Boalch, P.P.: Wild nonabelian Hodge theory on curves. Compos. Math. 140(1), 179–204 (2004)
Biswas, I., Mukhopadhyay, S., Wentworth, R.A.: Geometrization of the TUY/WZW/KZ connection, arXiv:2110.00430 (2021)
Boalch, P.P.: Hyperkähler manifolds and nonabelian Hodge theory of (irregular) curves, arXiv:1203.6607
Boalch, P.P.: Symplectic manifolds and isomonodromic deformations. Adv. Math. 163(2), 137–205 (2001)
Boalch, P.P.: \(G\)-bundles, isomonodromy, and quantum Weyl groups. Int. Math. Res. Not. 22, 1129–1166 (2002)
Boalch, P.P.: Quasi-Hamiltonian geometry of meromorphic connections. Duke Math. J. 139(2), 369–405 (2007)
Boalch, P.P.: Regge and Okamoto symmetries. Comm. Math. Phys. 276(1), 117–130 (2007)
Boalch, P.P.: Simply-laced isomonodromy systems. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 116, 1–68 (2012)
Boalch, P.P.: Geometry and braiding of Stokes data; fission and wild character varieties. Ann. Math. 179(1), 301–365 (2014)
Boalch, P.P.: Wild character varieties, meromorphic Hitchin systems and Dynkin diagrams, In: Proceedings, Nigel Hitchin’s 70th birthday conference, Oxford University Press (2017)
Boalch, P.P., Douçot, J., Rembado, G.: Twisted local wild mapping class groups: configuration spaces, fission trees and complex braids, arXiv:2209.12695, submitted
Boalch, P.P., Yamakawa, D.: Twisted wild character varieties, arXiv:1512.08091
Bott, R.: Homogeneous vector bundles. Ann. Math. 66(2), 203–248 (1957)
Douçot, J., Rembado, G.: Topology of irregular isomonodromy times on a fixed pointed curve, arXiv:2208.02575; submitted
Douçot, J., Rembado, G., Tamiozzo, M.: Local wild mapping class groups and cabled braids, arXiv:2204.08188; submitted
Etingof, P.I., Frenkel, I.B., Kirillov, A.A., Jr.: Lectures on Representation Theory and Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov Equations, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 58. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1998)
Fedorov, R.M.: Irregular Wakimoto modules and the Casimir connection. Selecta Math. (N.S.) 16(2), 241–266 (2010)
Feigin, B., Frenkel, E., Toledano Laredo, V.: Gaudin models with irregular singularities. Adv. Math. 223(3), 873–948 (2010)
Felder, G., Markov, Y., Tarasov, V., Varchenko, A.: Differential equations compatible with KZ equations. Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 3(2), 139–177 (2000)
Felińska, E., Jaskólski, Z., Kosztołowicz, M.: Whittaker pairs for the Virasoro algebra and the Gaiotto–Bonelli–Maruyoshi–Tanzini states. J. Math. Phys. 53(3), 033504 (2012)
Frenkel, E.: Langlands Correspondence for Loop Groups, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 103. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)
Gaiotto, D.: Asymptotically free \(n\) = 2 theories and irregular conformal blocks. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 462(1), 012014 (2013)
Gaiotto, D., Lamy-Poirier, J.: Irregular singularities in the H3+ WZW model, arXiv:1301.5342
Gaiotto, D., Teschner, J.: Irregular singularities in Liouville theory and Argyres–Douglas type gauge theories. J. High Energy Phys. 2, 1–79 (2012)
Harnad, J.: Dual isomonodromic deformations and moment maps to loop algebras. Comm. Math. Phys. 166(2), 337–365 (1994)
Harnad, J.: Quantum isomonodromic deformations and the Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov equations. Symmetries Integrability Differ. Equ. (Estérel, PQ 1996) 9, 155–161 (1994)
Hitchin, N.J.: Frobenius manifolds, Gauge theory and symplectic geometry (Montreal, PQ, 1995). NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C Math. Phys. Sci. 488, 69–112 (1997)
Humphreys, J.E.: Representations of Semisimple Lie Algebras in the BGG Category \(\cal{O} \), Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 94. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2008)
Jimbo, M., Miwa, T., Môri, Y., Sato, M.: Density matrix of an impenetrable Bose gas and the fifth Painlevé transcendent. Phys. D 1(1), 80–158 (1980)
Jimbo, M., Nagoya, H., Sun, J.: Remarks on the confluent KZ equation for \(sl_2\) and quantum Painlevé equations. J. Phys. A 41(17), 175205 (2008)
Kac, V.G.: Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Kirillov, A.A.: Lectures on the Orbit Method, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 64. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2004)
Klarès, B.: Sur une classe de connexions relatives, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B 288(3), A205–A208 (1979)
Knizhnik, V.G., Zamolodchikov, A.B.: Current algebra and Wess-Zumino model in two dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B 247(1), 83–103 (1984)
Kohno, T.: Conformal Field Theory and Topology, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 210. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2002)
Millson, J.J., Toledano Laredo, V.: Casimir operators and monodromy representations of generalised braid groups. Transform. Groups 10(2), 217–254 (2005)
Nagoya, H.: Irregular conformal blocks, with an application to the fifth and fourth Painlevé equations. J. Math. Phys. 56(12), 123505 (2015)
Nagoya, H., Sun, J.: Confluent KZ equations for \(\mathfrak{s} l _N\) with Poincaré rank 2 at infinity. J. Phys. A 44(28), 285205 (2011)
Novikov, S.P.: The Hamiltonian formalism and a multivalued analogue of Morse theory. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 37(5 (227)), 3–49 (1982)
Rembado, G.: Simply-laced quantum connections generalising KZ. Comm. Math. Phys. 368(1), 1–54 (2019)
Rembado, G.: Symmetries of the simply-laced quantum connections and quantisation of quiver varieties. SIGMA Symmetry Integr. Geom. Methods Appl. 16, 103 (2020)
Reshetikhin, N.Y.: The Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov system as a deformation of the isomonodromy problem. Lett. Math. Phys. 26(3), 167–177 (1992)
Ribault, S., Teschner, J.: \(H^+_3\)-WZNW correlators from Liouville theory. J. High Energy Phys. 6, 014 (2005)
Schlesinger, L.: Über die Lösungen gewisser linearer Differentialgleichungen als Funktionen der singulären Punkte. J. Reine Angew. Math. 129, 287–294 (1905)
Serre, J.-P.: Représentations linéaires et espaces homogènes kählériens des groupes de Lie compacts (d’après Armand Borel et André Weil). Séminaire Bourbaki 2, 447–454 (1995)
Tarasov, V., Varchenko, A.: Duality for Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov and dynamical equations. Acta Appl. Math. 73, 141–154 (2002)
Tits, J.: Sur certaines classes d’espaces homogènes de groupes de Lie. Acad. Roy. Belg. Cl. Sci. Mém. Coll. in \(8^\circ \)29(3), 268 (1955)
Toledano Laredo, V.: A Kohno-Drinfeld theorem for quantum Weyl groups. Duke Math. J 112(3), 421–451 (2002)
Vinberg, È.B.: Some commutative subalgebras of a universal enveloping algebra. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 54(1), 3–25 (1990)
Wess, J., Zumino, B.: Consequences of anomalous Ward identities. Phys. Lett. 37B, 95–97 (1971)
Witten, E.: Nonabelian bosonization in two dimensions. Comm. Math. Phys. 92(4), 455–472 (1984)
Yamada, Y.: A quantum isomonodromy equation and its application to \(\cal{N} \) = 2 SU (N) gauge theories. J. Phys. A 44(5), 055403 (2011)
Acknowledgements
G.F. is supported in part by the National Centre of Competence in Research SwissMAP—The Mathematics of Physics—of the Swiss National Science Foundation. G.R. is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy - GZ 2047/1, Projekt-ID 390685813. We thank Philip Boalch and Leonid Rybnikov for helpful discussions.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A. Standard notions/notations
Duals The (algebraic) dual of a vector space W is written \(W^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} = {{\,\textrm{Hom}\,}}(W,\mathbb {C})\), and the natural pairing \(W^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \otimes W \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) is denoted \(\alpha \otimes w \mapsto \langle \alpha ,w \rangle \). If I is a set and \(W = \bigoplus _i \mathcal {F}_i(W)\) an I-graded vector space then the restricted/graded dual of \((W,\mathcal {F}_{\bullet })\) is the I-graded vector space \(W^* {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\bigoplus _{i \in I} \mathcal {F}_i(W)^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \subseteq \prod _{i \in I} \mathcal {F}_i(W)^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \simeq W^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}}\).
Gradings and filtrations If \((I,\le )\) is a totally ordered set and \(W = \bigoplus _{i \in I} \mathcal {F}_i(W)\) an I-graded vector space, the associated I-filtration on W is defined by the subspaces \(\mathcal {F}_{\le i} {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\bigoplus _{j \le i} \mathcal {F}_j(W)\).
If I and J are sets and \(W_j = \bigoplus _{i \in I} \mathcal {F}^{(j)}_i (W_j)\) a J-family of I-graded vector spaces, the tensor product \(I^{J}\)-grading on \(W = \bigotimes _{j \in J} W_j\) is defined by the subspaces
If further \((I,\le )\) is a totally ordered \(\mathbb {Z}\)-module then the tensor product I-filtration on W is defined by the subspaces
Lie-algebraic constructions Let L be a Lie algebra. The abelianisation of L is the abelian Lie algebra \(L_{{{\,\textrm{ab}\,}}} {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}L \big /\bigl [ L,L \bigr ]\), and the opposite of L is the Lie algebra \(L^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}\) on the same vector space, with bracket \(\bigl [ X,Y \bigr ]_{L^{{{\,\textrm{op}\,}}}} {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\bigl [ Y,X \bigr ]_L\) for \(X,Y \in L\).
If \(p \ge 1\) is an integer and “z” a variable then the associate Lie algebra of depth p is
coming with a projection \(L_p \twoheadrightarrow L_1 = L\). There is then a canonical vector space isomorphism \(L_p \simeq \bigoplus _{i = 0}^{p-1} L \otimes z^i\), which can be upgraded to an isomorphism of Lie algebras if one defines a Lie bracket on the direct sum by truncating terms of degree greater than \(p-1\).
If W is a left L-module then the space of L-coinvariants is \(W_L {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}W \big /L W\), where \(L W {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\sum _{X \in L} X W \subseteq W\)—in particular \(L_{{{\,\textrm{ab}\,}}}\) is the space of \({{\,\textrm{ad}\,}}_L\)-coinvariants.
Appendix B. Computations
B.1. Proof of Prop. 7.1
Proof
Set \(a_k^{(j)} {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\langle a_j, H_k z^j \rangle \) for \(k \in \left\{ { 0, {{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}}, r }\right\} \) and \(j \in \left\{ { 0, {{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}}, p-1 }\right\} \), and further \(a_{\alpha }^{(j)} {{\,\mathrm{{:}{=}}\,}}\langle a_j, H_{\alpha } z^j \rangle \) for \(\alpha \in \mathcal {R}\).
By (11) we see that \(:X_kz^{-j} X^k z^{n+j} :w \ne 0\) implies \(1 - p \le j \le p - 1 - n\), so \(n \le 2(p - 1)\) is necessary for nonvanishing terms.
Now importantly for \(n \in \left\{ { p-1, {{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}}, 2(p-1) }\right\} \) and \(j \in \left\{ { 1-p, {{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}}, p-1-n}\right\} \) one has
so the normal ordered products are void in (33). Then for \(\alpha \in \mathcal {R}^+\) and \(i \in \left\{ { 1, {{\,\mathrm{\dotsc }\,}}, r }\right\} \) one computes
and
Hence
which implies (34) and (35) using \(\frac{ (\alpha \mid \alpha )}{2} \langle \mu , H_{\alpha } z^i \rangle = ( \alpha \mid \mu )\), for \(\mu \in \mathfrak {h}^{{{\,\mathrm{\small {\vee }}\,}}} \otimes z^i\). \(\square \)
B.2. Proof of Prop. 11.2
Proof
Using the general case of (55) yields
for \(X \in \mathfrak {g}\), \(i \ne j \in J'\), \(\widehat{w}_j \in W_j\) and \(\widehat{v}_{\infty } \in V_{\infty }\)—since \(z_{\infty } \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z_{\infty } \rrbracket V_{\infty } = 0 = z_j^{r_j} \mathfrak {g} \llbracket z_j \rrbracket V_j\).
Hence by (43) one has the identity \(\bigl ( X \otimes z_i^{-m} \bigr )^{(i)} \widehat{{\varvec{w}}} \otimes \widehat{v}_{\infty } = \widehat{{\varvec{w}}}_{i,m,X} \otimes \widehat{v}_{\infty }\) inside \(\mathscr {H}\), where
The result then follows from (36). \(\square \)
B.3. Proof of Prop. 12.1
Proof
We prove the \(\mathfrak {g}\)-action commutes with \(\nabla _p :\Omega ^0 \bigl ( U(n,p) \bigr ) \rightarrow \Omega ^1 \bigl ( U(n,p) \bigr )\). Since the \(\mathfrak {g}\)-action is independent of the point on the base space, this is equivalent to \(\varpi '_p \otimes X \psi - X \bigl ( \varpi '_p \otimes \psi \bigr ) = 0 = \varpi ''_p \otimes X \psi - X \bigl ( \varpi ''_p \otimes \psi \bigr )\), for \(X \in \mathfrak {g}\).
Now by (60) one has
and analogously by (61)
Hence it is enough to show that
for all \(i \ne j \in J\) and for all \(m,l \in \mathbb {Z}\). Finally by (5) we have
where we let \((X_r)_r\) be a \((\cdot \mid \cdot )\)-orthonormal basis of \(\mathfrak {g}\), which vanishes by (6). \(\square \)
B.4. Proof of Prop. 13.1
Proof
Indeed if \(\widehat{{\varvec{w}}}\) is a \(\nabla '_p\)-horizontal section of \(U(J,p) \rightarrow C_n(\mathbb {C})\) then
which vanishes by the skew-symmetry (64), and which implies the statement about translations after taking \(\mathfrak {g}_p\)-modules.
As for dilations, in the universal case of a \(\nabla '_p\)-horizontal section one finds
and we must consider the induced action on finite singular modules. Now one computes
analogously to (36), using a \(( \cdot \mid \cdot )\)-orthonormal basis \((X_k)_k\) of \(\mathfrak {g}\). Then reasoning as in § 9.2.3 the induced slot-wise action on coinvariants is
with tacit use of the projection \(\pi _{\mathscr {H}} :\mathcal {H}'_{\left| {{\varvec{\lambda }}}\right| } \rightarrow \mathscr {H}\), and on the whole
by (63). This is the action of an endomorphism on the finite-dimensional vector space \(\mathscr {H}\), and the statement follows by integrating the resulting (linear, first-order) differential equation. \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Felder, G., Rembado, G. Singular modules for affine Lie algebras, and applications to irregular WZNW conformal blocks. Sel. Math. New Ser. 29, 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-022-00821-y
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-022-00821-y
Keywords
- Affine Lie algebras
- Conformal field theory
- Irregular meromorphic connections
- Integrable quantum systems
- Isomonodromic deformations