Abstract
The goal of this short note is to show the constrained nature of the set of variations and the set of admissible sections of the Euler–Poincaré reduction scheme for field theories in both the continuous formalism and in a discrete model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Castrillón López M., García P.L., Ratiu T.: Euler–Poincaré reduction on principal bundles. Lett. Math. Phys. 58(2), 167–180 (2001)
Castrillón López M., Marsden J.: Some remarks on Lagrangian and Poisson reduction for field theories. J. Geom. Phys. 48(1), 52–83 (2003)
Castrillón López M., Muñoz Masqué J.: The geometry of the bundle of connections. Math. Z. 236(4), 797–811 (2001)
Marsden J.E., Patrick G., Shkoller S.: Multisymplectic geometry, variational integrators, and nonlinear PDEs. Comm. Math. Phys. 199, 351–395 (1998)
Moser J., Veselov A.: Discrete versions of some classical integrable systems and factorization of matrix polynomials. Comm. Math. Phys. 139(2), 217–243 (1991)
Saunders D.J.: The geometry of jet manifolds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)
Vankerschaver J.: Euler–Poincaré reduction for discrete field theories. J. Math. Phys. 48(3), 032902 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castrillón López, M. Field theories: reduction, constraints and variational integrators. RACSAM 106, 67–74 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-011-0020-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-011-0020-z