Skip to main content
Log in

Combinatorial mutations and block diagonal polytopes

  • Published:
Collectanea Mathematica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Matching fields were introduced by Sturmfels and Zelevinsky to study certain Newton polytopes, and more recently have been shown to give rise to toric degenerations of various families of varieties. Whenever a matching field gives rise to a toric degeneration, the associated polytope of the toric variety coincides with the matching field polytope. We study combinatorial mutations, which are analogues of cluster mutations for polytopes, of matching field polytopes and show that the property of giving rise to a toric degeneration of the Grassmannians, is preserved by mutation. Moreover, the polytopes arising through mutations are Newton-Okounkov bodies for the Grassmannians with respect to certain full-rank valuations. We produce a large family of such polytopes, extending the family of so-called block diagonal matching fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akhtar, M., Coates, T., Galkin, S., Kasprzyk, A.M.: Minkowski polynomials and mutations. SIGMA. Symm. Integr. Geometry: Methods Appl. 8, 094 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexandersson, P.: Gelfand-Tsetlin polytopes and the integer decomposition property. Eur. J. Combinat. 54, 1–20 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. An, B.H., Cho, Y., Kim, J.S.: On the f-vectors of Gelfand-Tsetlin polytopes. Eur. J. Combinat. 67, 61–77 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, D.: Okounkov bodies and toric degenerations. Math. Annalen 356(3), 1183–1202 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bigatti, A.M., La Scala, R., Robbiano, L.: Computing toric ideals. J. Symbol. Comput. 27(4), 351–365 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bossinger, L., Fang, X., Fourier, G., Hering, M., Lanini, M.: Toric degenerations of Gr\((2, n)\) and Gr\((3,6)\) via plabic graphs. Ann. Combinat. 22(3), 491–512 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bossinger, L., Lamboglia, S., Mincheva, K., Mohammadi, F.: Computing toric degenerations of flag varieties. In: Smith, G., Sturmfels, B. (eds.) Combinatorial Algebraic Geometry, pp. 247–281. Springer (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bossinger, L., Mohammadi, F., Chávez, A.N.: Families of Gröbner degenerations, Grassmannians and universal cluster algebras. arXiv preprintarXiv:2007.14972, (2020)

  9. Chary Bonala, N., Clarke, O., Mohammadi, F.: Standard monomial theory and toric degenerations of Richardson varieties inside Grassmannians and flag varieties. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03210, (2020)

  10. Chen, T., Mehta, D.: Parallel degree computation for binomial systems. J. Symbol. Comput. 79, 535–558 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Clarke, O., Mohammadi, F.: Toric degenerations of Grassmannians and Schubert varieties from matching field tableaux. J. Algebra 559, 646–678 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke, O., Mohammadi, F.: Standard monomial theory and toric degenerations of Schubert varieties from matching field tableaux. J. Symbol. Comput. 104, 683–723 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Clarke, O., Mohammadi, F.: Toric degenerations of flag varieties from matching field tableaux. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 225(8), 106624 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Cox, D.A., Little, J.B., Schenck, H.K.: Toric Varieties. American Mathematical Society (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Escobar, L., Harada, M.: Wall-crossing for Newton-Okounkov bodies and the tropical Grassmannian. Int. Math. Res. Notices, rnaa230, (2020)

  16. Fink, A., Rincón, F.: Stiefel tropical linear spaces. J. Combinat. Theory, Ser A 135, 291–331 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujita, N., Higashitani, A.: Newton-okounkov bodies of flag varieties and combinatorial mutations. International Mathematics Research Notices, preprintarXiv:2003.10837, (2020)

  18. Galkin, S., Usnich, A.V.: Mutations of potentials. Preprint IPMU 10–0100, (2010)

  19. Gawrilow, E., Joswig, M.: polymake: a framework for analyzing convex polytopes. In: Polytopes—combinatorics and computation (Oberwolfach, 1997), vol. 29 of DMV Sem., P. 43–73. Birkhäuser, Basel, (2000)

  20. Herrmann, S., Jensen, A., Joswig, M., Sturmfels, B.: How to draw tropical planes. Electron. J. Combinat. 16(2), R6 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Higashitani, A.: Two poset polytopes are mutation-equivalent. arXiv:2002.01364, (2020)

  22. Kahle, T.: Decompositions of binomial ideals. Ann. Institu. Statist. Math. 62(4), 727–745 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaveh, K., Manon, C.: Khovanskii bases, higher rank valuations, and tropical geometry. SIAM J. Appl. Algebra Geom. 3(2), 292–336 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Kogan, M., Miller, E.: Toric degeneration of Schubert varieties and Gelfand-Tsetlin polytopes. Adv. Math. 193(1), 1–17 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Loho, G., Smith, B.: Matching fields and lattice points of simplices. Adv. Math. 370, 107232 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Mohammadi, F., Shaw, K.: Toric degenerations of Grassmannians from matching fields. Algebraic Combinat. 2(6), 1109–1124 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Rietsch, K., Williams, L.: Newton-Okounkov bodies, cluster duality, and mirror symmetry for Grassmannians. Duke Math. J. 168(18), 3437–3527 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Robbiano, L., Sweedler, M.: Subalgebra bases. In: Bruns, W., Simis, A. (eds.) Commutative Algebra, pp. 61–87. Springer (1990)

  29. Speyer, D., Sturmfels, B.: The tropical Grassmannian. Adv. Geom. 4(3), 389–411 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Sturmfels, B.: Gröbner Bases and Convex Polytopes. American Mathematical Society (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Sturmfels, B., Zelevinsky, A.: Maximal minors and their leading terms. Adv. Math. 98(1), 65–112 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

OC and FM would like to thank the organizers of the “Workshop on Commutative Algebra and Lattice Polytopes” at RIMS in Kyoto, where this work began. OC is supported by EPSRC Doctoral Training Partnership award EP/N509619/1. AH is partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI \(\sharp\)20K03513. FM was partially supported by EPSRC Fellowship EP/R023379/1, the BOF Starting Grant BOF/STA/201909/038 of Ghent University, and FWO grant G023721N.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Mohammadi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clarke, O., Higashitani, A. & Mohammadi, F. Combinatorial mutations and block diagonal polytopes. Collect. Math. 73, 305–335 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13348-021-00321-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13348-021-00321-w

Navigation