Skip to main content
Log in

Maximizing performance with an eye on the finances: a chance-constrained model for football transfer market decisions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Composing a team of professional players is among the most crucial decisions in association football. Nevertheless, transfer market decisions are often based on myopic objectives and are questionable from a financial point of view. This paper introduces a chance-constrained model to provide analytic support to club managers during transfer windows. The model seeks a top-performing team while adapting to different budgets and financial-risk profiles. In addition, it provides a new rating system that is able to numerically reflect the on-field performance of football players and thus contribute to an objective assessment of football players. The model and rating system are tested on a case study based on real market data. The data from the case study are available online for the benefit of future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW (1959) Chance-constrained programming. Manag Sci 6(1):73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dendir S (2016) When do soccer players peak? A note. J Sports Anal 2:89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson S, Goddard J (2001) The economics of football. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hvattum L (2019) A comprehensive review of plus-minus ratings for evaluating individual players in team sports. Int J Comput Sci Sport 18(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcss-2019-0001

  • Il Sole 24 Ore (2018) Juventus e Amplifon verso l’ingresso nel Ftse Mib, 2018. https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/finanza-e-mercati/2018-12-06/juventus-e-amplifon-l-ingresso-ftse-mib-075333.shtml?uuid=AEiV30tG. Accessed 6 Dec 2018

  • Kaut M, Wallace SW (2007) Evaluation of scenario-generation methods for stochastic programming. Pac J Optimi 3(2):257–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Késenne S (1996) League management in professional team sports with win maximizing clubs. Eur J Sports Manag 2:14–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Késenne S (2006) The objective function of a team. In: Andreff W, Szymanski S (eds) Handbook on the economics of sport. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 601–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleywegt A J, Shapiro A, Homem-de Mello T (2002) The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization. SIAM J Optim 12(2):479–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2017) Football clubs and the stock exchange in 2016 . https://www.footballbenchmark.com/stock_exchange_football_clubs. Accessed 6 Dec 2018

  • Kuper S, Szymanski S (2018) Soccernomics. Nation Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis M (2004) Moneyball: the art of winning an unfair game. W.W.Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald B (2012a) Adjusted plus-minus for NHL players using ridge regression with goals, shots, Fenwick, and Corsi. J Quant Anal Sports. https://doi.org/10.1515/1559-0410.1447

  • Pagnoncelli BK, Ahmed S, Shapiro A (2009) Sample average approximation method for chance constrained programming: theory and applications. J Optim Theory Appl 142(2):399–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantuso G (2017) The football team composition problem: a stochastic programming approach. J Quant Anal Sports 13(3):113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payyappalli V, Zhuang J (2019) A data-driven integer programming model for soccer clubs’ decision making on player transfers. Environ Syst Decis 39:466–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rascher D (1997) A model of a professional sports league. In: Hendricks W (ed) Advances in the economics of sport, vol 2. JAI Press, London, pp 27–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæbø O, Hvattum L (2015) Evaluating the efficiency of the association football transfer market using regression based player ratings. In: NIK: Norsk Informatikkonferanse. Bibsys Open Journal Systems

  • Sæbø O, Hvattum L (2019) Modelling the financial contribution of soccer players to their clubs. J Sports Anal 5:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro A (2003) Monte Carlo sampling methods, Chap 5. In: Handbooks in operations research and management science, vol 10. Elsevier, pp 353–425

  • Sill J (2010) Improved NBA adjusted +/– using regularization and out-of-sample testing. In: Proceedings of the 2010 MIT sloan sports analytics conference

  • Sloane P (1971) The economics of professional football: the football club as a utility maximizer. Scottish J Polit Econ 17:121–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szczepański Ł (2015) Assessing the skill of football players using statistical methods. Ph.D. thesis, Salford Business School, University of Salford, Salford

  • UEFA (2018) Club licensing benchmarking report: financial year 2016. https://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/OfficialDocument/uefaorg/Clublicensing/02/53/00/22/2530022_DOWNLOAD.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2018

  • Vanguard (2018) Juventus shares to be added to Italy’s FTSE-Mib index. https://www.vanguardngr.com/2018/12/juventus-shares-to-be-added-to-italys-ftse-mib-index/. Accessed 10 Nov 2018

  • Winston W (2009) Mathletics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank two anonymous reviewers, whose comments helped to improve the contents and presentation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Pantuso.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Sensitivity to the formation

Sensitivity to the formation

Figure 11 illustrates that solutions to model (1) are not sensitive to the formation, and thus, the discussion in Sect. 5 holds independently of the formation chosen.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Total team rating for different values of \(\alpha\) and for different formations with \(R=1.0\)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pantuso, G., Hvattum, L.M. Maximizing performance with an eye on the finances: a chance-constrained model for football transfer market decisions. TOP 29, 583–611 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-020-00584-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-020-00584-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation