Abstract
We provide a potential conceptual reason for the positivity of the Weil functional using the Hilbert space framework of the semi-local trace formula of Connes (Sel Math (NS) 5(1):29–106, 1999). We explore in great details the simplest case of the single archimedean place. The root of this result is the positivity of the trace of the scaling action compressed onto the orthogonal complement of the range of the cutoff projections associated to the cutoff in phase space, for \(\Lambda =1\). We express the difference between the Weil distribution and the trace associated to the above compression of the scaling action, in terms of prolate spheroidal wave functions, and use, as a key device, the theory of hermitian Toeplitz matrices to control that difference. All the concepts and tools used in this paper make sense in the general semi-local case, where Weil positivity implies RH.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For any interval \(I\subset {{\mathbb {R}}}_+^*\) we let \(C_c^\infty (I)\) be the space of smooth functions with compact support on \({{\mathbb {R}}}_+^*\) whose support is contained in I.
Theorem 1 of op.cit. is formulated in terms of periodic test functions, one can show [17] that this nuance does not affect the lower bound of the quadratic form.
See “Appendix C” for some comments on the irrelevance of the additional vanishing at 0.
The role of the operator Q is to multiply the Fourier transforms of the test functions by \(z^2+\frac{1}{4}\) so that they then vanish at \(z=\pm \frac{i}{2}\), thus imposing the boundary conditions while keeping positivity and support restrictions.
In the sense of representation theory.
The upper index g stands for “geometric”.
i.e. here the dual of \(C_c^\infty ({{\mathbb {R}}}_+^*)\) which is strictly larger than the space \({{\mathcal {S}}}'({{\mathbb {R}}}_+^*)\) of tempered distributions, and \(\rho ^{\pm \frac{1}{2}}\notin {{\mathcal {S}}}'({{\mathbb {R}}}_+^*)\).
We use the convention that the inner product \(\langle \xi \mid \eta \rangle \) is antilinear in \(\xi \) (and linear in \(\eta \)).
We are only using the even prolate functions, the sum of squares of eigenvalues including the odd ones is 4.
Note that for \(-1< \lambda <1\) one has \(\lambda \sqrt{1-\lambda ^2}+\lambda ^2\frac{\lambda }{\sqrt{1-\lambda ^2}}=\frac{\lambda }{\sqrt{1-\lambda ^2}}\).
\([-N,N]^c\) denotes the complement of \([-N,N]\).
Normalized to be of norm 1.
References
Bakonyi, M., Woerdeman, H.: Matrix Completions, Moments, and Sums of Hermitian Squares. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011)
Berry, M., Keating, J.: \(H=qp\) and the Riemann zeros. In: Keating, J.P., Khmelnitskii, D.E., Lerner, I.V. (eds.) Supersymmetry and Trace Formulae: Chaos and Disorder. Plenum Press, New York (2012)
Boas, R.P., Kac, M.: Inequalities for Fourier transforms of positive functions. Duke Math. J. 12, 189–206 (1945)
Bombieri, E.: Remarks on Weil’s quadratic functional in the theory of prime numbers. I. (English, Italian summaries). Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur. Rend. Lincei (9)Mat. Appl. 11(3), 183–233 (2000)
Bombieri, E.: The Riemann hypothesis. In: The Millennium Prize Problems, pp. 107–124. Clay Math. Inst., Cambridge (2006)
Burnol, J.F.: Sur les formules explicites. I. Analyse invariante [On explicit formulae. I. Invariant analysis]. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 331(6), 423–428 (2000)
Connes, A.: Noncommutative Geometry. Academic Press, New York (1994)
Connes, A.: Trace formula in noncommutative geometry and the zeros of the Riemann zeta function. Sel. Math. (N.S.) 5(1), 29–106 (1999)
Connes, A., Marcolli, M.: Noncommutative Geometry, Quantum Fields, and Motives, Colloquium Publications, vol. 55. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2008)
Connes, A.: An essay on the Riemann Hypothesis. In: Rassias, M., Nash, J. (eds.) Open Problems in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (2016)
Connes, A., Consani, C.: Schemes over \({\mathbb{F}}_1\) and Zeta Functions. Compos. Math. 146(6), 1383–1415 (2010)
Connes, A., Consani, C.: From Monoids to Hyperstructures: In Search of an Absolute Arithmetic, Casimir Force, Casimir Operators and the Riemann Hypothesis, pp. 147–198. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2010)
Connes, A., Consani, C.: Geometry of the scaling site. Sel. Math. (N.S.) 23(3), 1803–1850 (2017)
Connes, A., Consani, C.: The Riemann-Roch strategy, complex lift of the scaling site. In: Chamseddine, A., Consani, C., Higson, N., Khalkhali, M., Moscovici, H., Yu, G. (Eds.) Advances in Noncommutative Geometry, On the Occasion of Alain Connes’ 70th Birthday”. Springer (2020). http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.10501. ISBN 978-3-030-29596-7
Connes, A., Consani, C.: The scaling Hamiltonian. J. Oper. Theory 85(1), 257–276 (2019)
Connes, A., Consani, C.: Quasi-inner functions and local factors. J. Number Theory 226, 139–167 (2021)
Connes, A., Consani, C.: Spectral triples and \(\zeta \)-cycles. arXiv:2106.01715
Connes, A., van Suijlekom, W.: Spectral truncations in noncommutative geometry and operator systems. arXiv:2004.14115
Ehm, W., Gneiting, T., Richards, D.: Convolution roots of radial positive definite functions with compact support. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 356(11), 4655–4685 (2004)
Hallouin, E., Perret, M.: A unified viewpoint for upper bounds for the number of points of curves over finite fields via Euclidean geometry and semi-definite symmetric Toeplitz matrices. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 372(8), 5409–5451 (2019)
Rokhlin, V., Xiao, H.: Approximate formulae for certain prolate spheroidal wave functions valid for large values of both order and band-limit. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 22(1), 105–123 (2007)
Simon, B.: Trace Ideals and Their Applications. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 120, 2nd edn. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2005)
Slepian, D., Pollack, H.: Prolate spheroidal wave functions. Fourier analysis and uncertainty. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 40, 43–63 (1961)
Slepian, D.: Some asymptotic expansions for prolate spheroidal wave functions. J. Math. Phys. 44, 99–140 (1965)
Slepian, D.: Some comments on Fourier analysis, uncertainty and modeling. SIAM Rev. 23, 379–393 (1983)
Sonin, N.: Recherches sur les fonctions cylindriques et le développement des fonctions continues en séries (French). Math. Ann. 16(1), 1–80 (1880)
Tate, J.: Fourier analysis in number fields and Hecke’s zeta-function. Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton, 1950. Reprinted in J.W.S. Cassels and A. Frölich (Eds.) “Algebraic Number Theory”, Academic Press (1967)
Wang, L.L.: Analysis of spectral approximations using prolate spheroidal wave functions. Math. Comput. 79(270), 807–827 (2010)
Wang, L.L.: A review of prolate spheroidal wave functions from the perspective of spectral methods. J. Math. Study 50(2), 101–143 (2017)
Weil, A.: Sur les “formules explicites” de la théorie des nombres premiers, Meddelanden Fran Lunds Univ. Mat. (dédié à M. Riesz), (1952), 252–265; Oeuvres Scientifiques—Collected Papers, corrected 2nd printing, vol II, 48–61. Springer, New York (1980)
Yoshida, H.: On Hermitian forms attached to zeta functions. In: Zeta Functions in Geometry (Tokyo, 1990), Adv. Stud. Pure Math., vol. 21, pp. 281–325. Kinokuniya, Tokyo (1992)
Acknowledgements
The second author is partially supported by the Simons Foundation collaboration Grant No. 353677.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Fourier versus Mellin transforms
We use the convolution algebra \(C_c^\infty ({{\mathbb {R}}}_+^*)\) of smooth complex valued functions with compact support on the multiplicative group \({{\mathbb {R}}}_+^*\). Its convolution product and involution are given by
The (multiplicative) Fourier transform of f (see (22))
transforms convolution into pointwise product and the involution into the pointwise complex conjugation, \(s\in {{\mathbb {R}}}\). For complex values of s, the evaluation \(f\mapsto {{\hat{f}}}(s)\) is still multiplicative but no longer compatible with the involution.
The translation to formulas using the Mellin transform is done in (41) and uses the isomorphism
which respects the convolution product, and transforms \(x^{-1}k(x^{-1})\) into \(f(x^{-1})\). Hence, after taking complex conjugates, the natural involution \(k\mapsto {{\bar{k}}}^\sharp \) becomes \(f\mapsto f^*\) . The Mellin transform \({{\tilde{k}}}(z):=\int _0^\infty k(u)u^zd^*u \) is related to the (multiplicative) Fourier transform of f by (41) i.e.
where the sign in \(-s\) is due to the convention for the multiplicative Fourier transform (22).
Appendix B: Explicit formula
In this appendix, we gather different sources on the normalization of the archimedean contribution to the explicit formula. Following [5], one defines the Mellin transform of a function \(f\in C^\infty _c({{\mathbb {R}}}_+^*)\) as
Then, with \(f^\sharp (x):=x^{-1}f(x^{-1})\) the explicit formula takes the form
where v runs over all places \(\{{{\mathbb {R}}},2,3,5,\ldots \}\) of \({{\mathbb {Q}}}\), the sum on the left hand side is over all complex zeros \(\rho \) of the Riemann zeta function, and for \(v=p\)
The archimedean distribution is defined as
One then has
In [4, 6] a positivity result for the distribution \({{\mathcal {W}}}_\infty =-{{\mathcal {W}}}_{{\mathbb {R}}}\) is proven, (for test functions with support in a small enough interval around 1), by writing the distribution \({{\mathcal {W}}}_\infty \) in terms of the Mellin transform of the test function as follows
The function \(h_+(\tau )\) is
It is the derivative of \(2\,\theta (\tau )\), where \(\theta \) is the Riemann-Siegel angular function defined as
with \(\log \Gamma (s)\), for \(\mathfrak {R}(s)>0\), the branch of the \(\log \) which is real for s real.
In order to reflect the unitarity of the scaling action it is convenient to use the automorphism of \(C_c^\infty ({{\mathbb {R}}}_+^*)\), \(f\mapsto \Delta ^{1/2}f\), \(\Delta ^{1/2}f(x):=x^{1/2}f(x)\) which replaces the involution \(f\mapsto {{\bar{f}}}^\sharp \) by the involution \(f\mapsto f^*\) of the convolution \(C^*\)-algebra and the restriction of the Mellin transform to the critical line by the Fourier transform. One has, for any place v, \(W_v(f):={{\mathcal {W}}}_v(\Delta ^{-1/2}f)\), \(\forall f\in C_c^\infty ({{\mathbb {R}}}_+^*)\).
Appendix C: Positivity criterion
This appendix shows that one may impose finitely many vanishing conditions to test functions without altering the validity of Weil’s positivity criterion. We follow [31] and state the following equivalence, using the Mellin transform
Proposition 6.12
Let \(Z\subset {{\mathbb {C}}}\) be the set of non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function and \(F \subset {{\mathbb {C}}}\) a finite set disjoint from Z and containing \(\{0,1\}\), then
Proof
The implication “\(\Rightarrow \)” follows from the explicit formula (149) and the hypothesis \(\{0,1\}\subset F\). Conversely, the proof of Proposition 1 of [31] applies verbatim, provided one first refines the proof of Lemma 1 of op.cit. by showing that, given \(\epsilon >0\) and \(\rho _0\in Z\), there exists \(g_0 \in C_c^\infty ({{\mathbb {R}}}_+^*)\) such that
In order to fulfill the additional vanishing condition: \({{\tilde{g}}}_0(z)=0, \forall z\in F\), one adjoins F to the finite set of zeros fulfilling \(\vert \rho -\rho _0\vert <R\) (same notation as in Proposition 1 of [31]), and one then proceeds exactly as in op.cit. \(\square \)
Appendix D: Quantized calculus redux
Let C be a locally compact abelian group endowed with the proper homomorphism
We let \({\widehat{C}}\) be the Pontrjagin dual of C endowed with its Haar measure. The elements \(f\in L^\infty ({\widehat{C}})\) act as multiplication operators on the Hilbert space \({{\mathcal {H}}}:= L^2({\widehat{C}})\). We define the “quantized” differential of f to be the operator
where the operator H on \({{\mathcal {H}}}\) is
where \({{\mathbb {F}}}_C: L^2(C) \rightarrow {{\mathcal {H}}}\) is the Fourier transform, and \(\mathbf{1}_P\) is the multiplication by the characteristic function of the set \(P=\{u \in C\,| \, \vert u\vert \ge 1\}\).
We take the case \(C={{\mathbb {R}}}\) with module \(\exp : {{\mathbb {R}}}\rightarrow {{\mathbb {R}}}_+^*\) considered in this paper and identify the dual \({{\widehat{C}}} \sim {{\mathbb {R}}}\) using the bi-character \(\nu (s,t):=\exp (-ist)\) which corresponds to (21) under the isomorphism given by the module. We give a “geometric” proof of the following Lemma (see [7] Chapter IV for the general theory, a compact operator has infinite order when its characteristic values form a sequence of rapid decay; this implies that it is of trace class).
Lemma 6.13
For \(f\in {{\mathcal {S}}}({{\widehat{C}}})\) the quantized differential [H, f] is an infinitesimal of infinite order and in particular a trace class operator.
Proof
Let us work in the Hilbert space \(L^2(C)\) so that the action of \(K={{\mathbb {F}}}_C^{-1} f{{\mathbb {F}}}_C\) is a convolution operator with Schwartz kernel \(k(x,y)={{\widehat{f}}}(x-y)\). The projection \(\mathbf{1}_P\) is the multiplication by the characteristic function of the halfline \([0,\infty ]\). It is enough to show that the operator \(PK(1-P)\) is of infinite order. After precomposition with the symmetry \(\sigma (\xi )(x):=\xi (-x)\) the Schwartz kernel of \(PK(1-P)\sigma \) is \(h(x,y)=P(x){{\widehat{f}}}(x+y)P(y)\). Let \(\phi \in C^\infty ({{\mathbb {R}}})\) be a smooth function which is identically 0 for \(x\le -1\) and identically 1 for \(x\ge 0\). Let \(g={{\widehat{f}}}\) and T be the operator in \(L^2({{\mathbb {R}}})\) given by
One has \(PTP=PK(1-P)\sigma \) and thus it is enough to show that T is of infinite order. Let \(A:=-\partial _x^2 +x^2\) be the harmonic oscillator, it is enough to show that the operator \(A^nT\) is bounded for any \(n>0\). Indeed the eigenvalues of A are the positive integers with multiplicity 1 and the above boundedness ensures that the characteristic values of T are of rapid decay. Now the Schwartz kernel of \(A^nT\) is a finite linear combination of products of the form
Since \(g={{\widehat{f}}}\in {{\mathcal {S}}}({{\mathbb {R}}})\) the derivatives \(g^{(\ell )}\) are of rapid decay and for any given \(m>0\) one has an inequality of the form \(\vert g^{(\ell )}(a)\vert \le C_m (3+a)^{-m} \) for all \(a\ge -2\). it follows that one controls the Hilbert Schmidt norm by the square root of the integral
which is finite for m large enough. This shows as required that \(A^nT\) is bounded for any \(n>0\). \(\square \)
Remark 6.14
One can give two alternate proofs of Lemma 6.13. The first uses the conformal invariance of the quantized calculus to get a unitary operator \(U:L^2(S^1)\rightarrow L^2({{\mathbb {R}}})\) of the form \( (U\xi )(t):=\frac{\pi ^{-1/2}}{t+i}\ \xi (\frac{t-i}{t+i})\) which conjugates, up to sign, the Hilbert transform H (which acts in \(L^2({{\widehat{C}}})\)) by the operator \(2P_{H^2}-1\) where \(P_{H^2}\) is the orthogonal projection on boundary values of holomorphic functions. Moreover the conjugate of the multiplication operator by \(f\in {{\mathcal {S}}}({{\mathbb {R}}})\) is the multiplication by the smooth function \(g(z)=f(i(1+z)/(1-z))\). Then the result follows since the quantized differential of a smooth function \(g\in C^\infty (S^1)\) is of the form \(2\sum {{\widehat{g}}}(n)[P_{H^2},z^n]\) which is of infinite order because the \({{\widehat{g}}}(n)\) are of rapid decay. The fact that \(g\in C^\infty (S^1)\) comes from the smoothness os the extension of a Schwartz function to \(P^1({{\mathbb {R}}})\) by the value 0 at \(\infty \).
Another instructive alternate proof is to estimate directly, for \(f\in {{\mathcal {S}}}({{\mathbb {R}}})\), the Schwartz kernel given by
Appendix E: Signs and normalizations
We follow [27] and use the classical formula expressing the Fourier transform as a composition of the inversion
and a multiplicative convolution operator. In our framework the unitary u is given by the ratio of archimedean local factors on the critical line
In terms of the Riemann-Siegel angular function (155), one has
so that the function \(Z(t):=e^{i\theta (t)}\zeta (\frac{1}{2}+it)\) is real valued. Indeed, this follows from the functional equation since the complete zeta function \(\zeta _{{\mathbb {Q}}}(z):=\pi ^{-z/2}\Gamma (z/2)\zeta (z)\) is real valued on the critical line. The quantized differential \(\ ^-\!\!\!\!\!df\) of f is given by the kernel
Thus when one takes the logarithmic derivative of u one obtains on the diagonal
One can then write
This corresponds to (153) since \({{\mathcal {W}}}_{{\mathbb {R}}}=-{{\mathcal {W}}}_\infty \) and to the semi-local trace formula
for the single archimedean place.
Appendix F: Issues of convergence
We gather several inequalities which ensure the convergence of the series (99) of Proposition 5.3. We first consider the terms
We estimate the integral using Schwarz’s inequality
One has, using \(D_u(f)(x)=x\partial _xf(x)\)
With \(\zeta _n(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\lambda (n)^2}}\,\eta _n(x)\) and \(\eta _n={{\mathbb {F}}}_{e_{{\mathbb {R}}}}\xi _n\) one thus obtains
since \(\partial _y\eta _n\) is the Fourier transform of \(2 \pi i x \xi _n(x)\) whose \(L^2\)-norm is bounded by \(2\pi \). We thus get
To estimate \(\int _{\rho ^{-1}}^1(D_u\xi _n)(x)^2 dx\), we rewrite the equality (67) as follows
so that since \(\xi _n\) is an eigenvector of \(\mathbf{W}\) (i.e. \(\mathbf{W}\xi _n=\chi _{2n}^{2\pi }\xi _n\)), using the notations of [28], we get
Assuming \(n\ge 3\) to ensure \(\chi _{2n}^{2\pi }\ge 2 \pi ^2 \) one then derives
By [28] (Theorem 3.6) one has (note the different normalization of inner product due to (16))
while the eigenvalues \(\chi _{2n}^{2\pi }\) fulfill (see op.cit. ): \(\chi _{2n}^{2\pi }\le 2n(2n+1)+(2\pi )^2\). Thus, one obtains the inequality
and the following uniform bound (take \(\rho \le 2\))
We then consider the terms
By (101), one has \(\vert \xi _n(1)\vert \le \sqrt{2n+\frac{1}{2}}\). One also has \(\zeta _n=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\lambda (n)^2}}\,\eta _n\) and \(\eta _n={{\mathbb {F}}}_{e_{{\mathbb {R}}}}\xi _n\) thus
using the equality \(\eta _n'(\rho )=-4\pi \int _0^1 \sin (2\pi \rho x) \xi _n(x)xdx\) and Schwarz’s inequality. Hence
By (75) one gets: \(\eta _n(x)=\lambda (n)\xi _n(x)\), for \(x\in [0,1]\) thus one obtains by proportionality
and the above bound for \(\eta _n'(y)=-4\pi \int _0^1 \sin (2\pi y x) \xi _n(x)xdx\), applied for \(y=\rho ^{-1}\) thus gives
so that
The above inequalities then give
We thus obtain
Lemma 6.15
(i) The series (99) of Proposition 5.3 is convergent and the remainder (after replacing the infinite sum by the sum of the first N terms) is majored as follows
where \(p(n)=16 n^2+8 (1+3 \pi ) n+(4+\sqrt{2}) \sqrt{4 n+1}+32 \pi ^2+24 \pi +2\).
(ii) For \(N=10\), the remainder is less than \(2.366 \times 10^{-12}\) for any \(\rho \in [1,2]\):
Proof
(i) follows from (168) and (169) which, together with (72), combine to yield for \(n\ge 3\),
which gives (170).
(ii)To compute the upper bound of the right hand side of (170) for \(N=10\), one splits the sum in two, using the simple estimate \(p(n)\le 120 n^2\) for \(n\ge 35\):
With \(\nu _n\) the right hand side of this inequality, one obtains the relation
and \(n^2\nu _{n+1}/\nu _n<1\) for all \(n\ge 35\). One has \(\nu _{35}\le 5 \times 10^{-81}\), and thus using the trivial bound by the geometric series one gets
One then simply computes the missing terms and they give
Thus combining the above inequalities we obtain (171).\(\square \)
Remark 6.16
For completeness, we give a short proof of an improved form of (167). As in [28] (Equation (3.26)) one has, using integration by parts, the identity, for \(f\in C^\infty ([-1,1],{{\mathbb {R}}})\), and \(c=2 \pi \), using (67)
Applying this to \(f=\xi _n\) and using \(\mathbf{W}\xi _n=\chi _{2n}^{2\pi }\xi _n\) one gets
providing the following improvement of (167)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Connes, A., Consani, C. Weil positivity and trace formula the archimedean place. Sel. Math. New Ser. 27, 77 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-021-00689-4
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-021-00689-4