Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rejoinder on: Distance geometry and data science

  • Discussion
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmadi A, Majumdar A (2019) DSOS and SDSOS optimization: more tractable alternatives to sum of squares and semidefinite optimization. SIAM J Appl Algebra Geometry 3(2):193–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspnes J, Eren T, Goldenberg D, Morse S, Whiteley W, Yang R, Anderson B, Belhumeur P (2006) A theory of network localization. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 5(12):1663–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach J, Taylor C (2005) Localization in sensor networks. In: Stojmenović I (ed) Handbook of Sensor Networks. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 3627–3643

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahr A, Leonard J, Fallon M (2009) Cooperative localization for autonomous underwater vehicles. Int J Robotics Res 28(6):714–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas P, Lian T, Wang T, Ye Y (2006) Semidefinite programming based algorithms for sensor network localization. ACM Trans Sensor Netw 2:188–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrizosa E, Guerrero V, Morales DR (2017) Visualizing proportions and dissimilarities by space-filling maps: a large neighborhood search approach. Comput Oper Res 78:369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COIN-OR (2006) Introduction to IPOPT: a tutorial for downloading, installing, and using IPOPT

  • Crippen G (2015) An alternative approach to distance geometry using \(l^\infty\) distances. Discrete Appl Math 197:20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crippen G, Havel T (1988) Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrosio C, Liberti L (2017) Distance geometry in linearizable norms. In: Nielsen F, Barbaresco F (eds) Geometric Science of Information, LNCS, vol 10589. Springer, Berlin, pp 830–838

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dias G, Liberti L (2016) Diagonally dominant programming in distance geometry. In: Cerulli R, Fujishige S, Mahjoub R (eds) International Symposium in Combinatorial Optimization, LNCS, vol 9849. Springer, New York, pp 225–236

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eco U (1980) Il nome della rosa. Bompiani, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel T, Kuntz I, Crippen G (1983) The theory and practice of distance geometry. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 45(5):665–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krislock N, Wolkowicz H (2010) Explicit sensor network localization using semidefinite representations and facial reductions. SIAM J Opt 20:2679–2708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasserre J (2009) Moments and sums of squares for polynomial optimization and related problems. J Global Opt 45:39–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberti L, Lavor C (2017) Euclidean Distance Geometry: An Introduction. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liberti L, Lavor C, Maculan N, Mucherino A (2014) Euclidean distance geometry and applications. SIAM Rev 56(1):3–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar A, Ahmadi A, Tedrake R (2014) Control and verification of high-dimensional systems with dsos and sdsos programming. In: Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 53, pp. 394–401. IEEE, Piscataway

  • Plastria F (2009) Asymmetric distances, semidirected networks and majority in fermat-weber problems. Ann Oper Res 167:121–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plastria F (2019) Pasting gauges I: shortest paths across a hyperplane. Discrete Appl Math 256:105–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado E, Scozzari A, Tardella F, Liberti L (2018) Alternating current optimal power flow with generator selection. In: J. Lee, G. Rinaldi, R. Mahjoub (eds.) Combinatorial Optimization (Proceedings of ISCO 2018), LNCS, vol. 10856, pp. 364–375

  • Singer A (2011) Angular synchronization by eigenvectors and semidefinite programming. Appl Comput Harmonic Anal 30:20–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabaghi P, Dokmanić I, Vetterli M (2020) Kinetic Euclidean distance matrices. IEEE Trans Signal Process 68:452–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LIX CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France

    Leo Liberti

Authors
  1. Leo Liberti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leo Liberti.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This comment refers to the invited paper available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-020-00560-3, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-020-00561-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-020-00562-1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liberti, L. Rejoinder on: Distance geometry and data science. TOP 28, 350–357 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-020-00564-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-020-00564-z

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation