Skip to main content
Log in

Detecting nilpotence and projectivity over finite unipotent supergroup schemes

  • Published:
Selecta Mathematica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work concerns the representation theory and cohomology of a finite unipotent supergroup scheme G over a perfect field k of positive characteristic \(p\ge 3\). It is proved that an element x in the cohomology of G is nilpotent if and only if for every extension field K of k and every elementary sub-supergroup scheme \(E\subseteq G_K\), the restriction of \(x_K\) to E is nilpotent. It is also shown that a kG-module M is projective if and only if for every extension field K of k and every elementary sub-supergroup scheme \(E\subseteq G_K\), the restriction of \(M_K\) to E is projective. The statements are motivated by, and are analogues of, similar results for finite groups and finite group schemes, but the structure of elementary supergroups schemes necessary for detection is more complicated than in either of these cases. One application is a detection theorem for the nilpotence of cohomology, and projectivity of modules, over finite dimensional Hopf subalgebras of the Steenrod algebra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alperin, J.L., Evens, L.: Varieties and elementary abelian subgroups. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 26, 221–227 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Avrunin, G.S., Scott, L.L.: Quillen stratification for modules. Invent. Math. 66, 277–286 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bendel, C.: Cohomology and projectivity of modules for finite group schemes. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 131, 405–425 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bendel, C.: Projectivity of modules for infinitesimal unipotent group schemes. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 131(3), 405–425 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Benson, D.J.: Representations and cohomology I: Basic representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 30, Cambridge University Press, (1991), reprinted in paperback, 1998

  6. Benson, D.J., Carlson, J.F.: Nilpotence and generation in the stable module category. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 222(11), 3566–3584 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Benson, D.J., Carlson, J.F., Rickard, J.: Complexity and varieties for infinitely generated modules. II. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 120, 597–615 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Benson, D.J., Iyengar, S.B., Krause, H., Pevtsova, J.: Colocalising subcategories of modules over finite group schemes. Ann. K Theory 2(3), 387–408 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Benson, D.J., Iyengar, S.B., Krause, H., Pevtsova, J.: Stratification for module categories of finite group schemes. J. Am. Math. Soc. 31(1), 265–302 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Benson, D.J., Iyengar, S.B., Krause, H., Pevtsova, J.: Local duality for representations of finite group schemes. Compos. Math. 155, 424–453 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Benson, D.J., Iyengar, S.B., Krause, H., Pevtsova, J.: Rank varieties and \(\pi \)-points for elementary supergroup schemes. Preprint (2020) arXiv:2008.02727

  12. Benson, D.J., Iyengar, S.B., Krause, H., Pevtsova, J.: Stratification and duality for finite unipotent supergroup schemes, Preprint (2020) arXiv:2010.10430

  13. Benson, D.J., Pevtsova, J.: Representations and cohomology of a family of finite supergroup schemes. J. Algebra 561, 84–110 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Burke, J.: Finite injective dimension over rings with Noetherian cohomology. Math. Res. Lett. 19(4), 741–752 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Carlson, J.F.: The varieties and the cohomology ring of a module. J. Algebra 85, 104–143 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Cartan, H., Eilenberg, S.: Homological Algebra. Princeton Mathematical Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1956)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Chouinard, L.: Projectivity and relative projectivity over group rings. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 7, 278–302 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Dade, E.C.: Endo-permutation modules over \(p\)-groups. II. Ann. Math. 108, 317–346 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Demazure, M., Gabriel, P.: Groupes algébriques, vol. I. North Holland, Amsterdam (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Drupieski, C.: Cohomological finite generation for restricted Lie superalgebras and finite supergroup schemes. Represent. Theory 17, 469–507 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Drupieski, C.: Cohomological finite-generation for finite supergroup schemes. Adv. Math. 288, 1360–1432 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Drupieski, C., Kujawa, J.: Graded analogues of one-parameter subgroups and applications to the cohomology of \(GL_{m|n(r)}\). Adv. Math. 348, 277–352 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Drupieski, C., Kujawa, J.: On support varieties for Lie superalgebras and finite supergroup schemes. J. Algebra 525, 64–110 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Drupieski, C., Kujawa, J.: On the cohomological spectrum and support varieties for infinitesimal unipotent supergroup schemes, Advances in algebra (J. Feldvoss, L. Grimley, D. Lewis, A. Pavalescu, and C. Pillen, eds.), Springer Proc. Math. Stat., vol. 277, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York, 2019, pp. 121–167

  25. Fontaine, J.-M.: Groupes \(p\)-divisibles sur les corps locaux, Astérisque, vol. 47–48, Société Math. de France (1977)

  26. Friedlander, E.M., Pevtsova, J.: Representation theoretic support spaces for finite group schemes. Am. J. Math. 127, 379–420 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Friedlander, E.M., Pevtsova, J.: \(\Pi \)-supports for modules for finite groups schemes. Duke Math. J. 139, 317–368 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Friedlander, E.M., Suslin, A.: Cohomology of finite group schemes over a field. Invent. Math. 127, 209–270 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Hovey, M., Palmieri, J.H., Strickland, N.P.: Axiomatic Stable Homotopy Theory, Memoirs of the AMS, vol. 128. American Mathematical Society, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Jantzen, J.C.: Representations of Algebraic Groups, 2nd edn. American Mathematical Society, New York (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Koch, A.: Witt subgroups and cyclic Dieudonné modules killed by \(p\). Rocky Mt. J. Math. 31(3), 1023–1038 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kroll, O.: Complexity and elementary abelian \(p\)-groups. J. Algebra 88, 155–172 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Masuoka, A.: The fundamental correspondences in super affine groups and super formal groups. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 202, 284–312 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Masuoka, A.: Hopf algebra techniques applied to super algebraic groups. Preprint (2017) arXiv:1311.1261

  35. May, J.P.: A general algebraic approach to Steenrod operations, The Steenrod algebra and its applications (F. P. Peterson, ed.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 168, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York, pp. 153–231 (1970)

  36. Milnor, J.: The Steenrod algebra and its dual. Ann. Math. 67(1), 150–171 (1958)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Nakano, D.K., Palmieri, J.: Support varieties for the Steenrod algebra. Math. Zeit. 227, 663–684 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Quillen, D.G.: The spectrum of an equivariant cohomology ring, I, II. Ann. Math. 94(549–572), 573–602 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Quillen, D.G., Venkov, B.B.: Cohomology of finite groups and elementary abelian subgroups. Topology 11, 317–318 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Serre, J.-P.: Sur la dimension cohomologique des groupes profinis. Topology 3, 413–420 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Steenrod, N.E., Epstein, D.: Cohomology Operations, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 50. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Suslin, A.A.: Detection theorem for finite group schemes. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 206, 189–221 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Suslin, A., Friedlander, E., Bendel, C.: Infinitesimal \(1\)-parameter subgroups and cohomology. J. Am. Math. Soc. 10, 693–728 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Suslin, A., Friedlander, E., Bendel, C.: Support varieties for infinitesimal group schemes. J. Am. Math. Soc. 10, 729–759 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Waterhouse, W.C.: Introduction to Affine Group Schemes, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 66. Springer, Berlin (1979)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Wilkerson, C.W.: The cohomology algebras of finite dimensional Hopf algebras. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 264(1), 137–150 (1981)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support and hospitality of the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute in Berkeley, California where we were in residence during the semester on “Group Representation Theory and Applications” in the Spring of 2018. The American Institute of Mathematics in San Jose, California gave us a fantastic opportunity to carry out part of this project during intensive research periods supported by their “Research in Squares” program; our thanks to them for that. Dave Benson thanks Pacific Institute for Mathematical Science for its support during his research visit to the University of Washington in the Summer of 2016 as a distinguished visitor of the Collaborative Research Group in Geometric and Cohomological Methods in Algebra. Dave Benson and Julia Pevtsova have enjoyed the hospitality of City University while working on this project in the summers of 2017 and 2018. We are grateful to Chris Drupieski and Jon Kujawa for useful and informative conversations and their interest in our work. We thank the anonymous referee for the careful reading of our work and very helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Pevtsova.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The work was supported by the NSF Grant DMS-1440140 while DB, SBI and JP were in residence at the MSRI. SBI was partly supported by NSF Grant DMS-1700985 and JP was partly supported by NSF Grants DMS-0953011 and DMS-1501146 and Brian and Tiffinie Pang faculty fellowship.

Appendix A. Witt vectors and Dieudonné modules

Appendix A. Witt vectors and Dieudonné modules

Recall that finite commutative connected unipotent group schemes form an abelian category \(\mathfrak {A}\) which is equivalent to an appropriate category of Dieudonné modules. This is described for example in Fontaine [25], but we give an outline here. What will interest us is the Dieudonné modules killed by p, which were classified by Koch [31].

We begin with a brief recollection concerning the Witt vectors. Define a polynomial \(w_n\) in variables \(Z_0,\dots ,Z_n\) with integer coefficients by

$$\begin{aligned} w_n(Z_0,\dots ,Z_n) = p^nZ_n + p^{n-1}Z_{n-1}^p + \dots + Z_0^{p^n}. \end{aligned}$$

Then the polynomials \(S_i\) and \(P_i\) in variables \(X_0,\dots ,X_n,Y_0,\dots ,Y_n\), again with integer coefficients, are defined by

$$\begin{aligned} w_n(S_0,\dots ,S_n)&= w_n(X_0,\dots ,X_n)+w_n(Y_0,\dots ,Y_n), \\ w_n(P_0,\dots ,P_n)&= w_n(X_0,\dots ,X_n)w_n(Y_0,\dots ,Y_n). \end{aligned}$$

So for example \(S_0=X_0+Y_0\), \(P_0=X_0Y_0\),

$$\begin{aligned} S_1 = X_1 + Y_1 + \frac{(X_0+Y_0)^p - X_0^p-Y_0^p}{p}, \qquad P_1 = pX_1Y_1 + X_0^pY_1 + X_1Y_0^p, \end{aligned}$$

and so on.

Witt vectors W(k) over k are vectors \((a_0,a_1,\dots )\) with \(a_i\in k\), where \(S_i\) and \(P_i\) give the coordinates of the sum and product:

$$\begin{aligned} (a_0,a_1,\dots )+(b_0,b_1,\dots )&= (S_0(a_0,b_0),S_1(a_0,a_1,b_0,b_1), \dots ) \\ (a_0,a_1,\dots )(b_0,b_1,\dots )&= (P_0(a_0,b_0),P_1(a_0,a_1,b_0,b_1), \dots ). \end{aligned}$$

Thus for example if \(k=\mathbb {F}_p\) then W(k) is the ring of p-adic integers \(\mathbb {Z}_p\). More generally, W(k) is a local ring of mixed characteristic p. The Frobenius endomorphism of k lifts to a ring endomorphism of W(k) denoted \({\varvec{\sigma }}\). It is defined by \((a_0,a_1\dots )^{\varvec{\sigma }}=(a_0^p,a_1^p,\dots )\).

More generally, if A is a commutative k-algebra then W(A) is the ring of Witt vectors over A, defined using the same formulae. This defines a functor from commutative k-algebras to rings. The additive part of this functor defines an affine group scheme over k denoted W, the additive Witt vectors. If we stop at length m vectors, we obtain \(W_m\), and we write \(W_{m,n}\) for the nth Frobenius kernel of \(W_m\).

There are two endomorphisms V and F of W of interest to us. These are the Verschiebung V defined by

$$\begin{aligned} V(a_0,a_1,\dots )=(0,a_0,a_1,\dots ), \end{aligned}$$

and the Frobenius F given by

$$\begin{aligned} F(a_0,a_1,\dots )=(a_0^p,a_1^p,\dots ). \end{aligned}$$

These commute, and their product corresponds to multiplication by p on Witt vectors. Multiplication by a Witt vector \(x\in W(k)\) also gives an endomorphism of W which we shall denote x by abuse of notation. These are related to V and F by the relations \(Vx^{\varvec{\sigma }}=xV\) and \(Fx=x^{\varvec{\sigma }}F\).

We write \(W_{m}\) for the group scheme of Witt vectors of length m, corresponding to the quotient \(W(k)/(p^m)\) of W(k). This is a group scheme with a filtration whose quotients are m copies of the additive group \(\mathbb {G}_a\). We write \(W_{m,n}\) for the nth Frobenius kernel of \(W_m\). This is a finite group scheme with a filtration of length mn whose quotients are copies of \(\mathbb {G}_{a(1)}\).

The Dieudonné ring \(D_k\) is generated over W(k) by two commuting variables V and F satisfying the following relations:

$$\begin{aligned} FV=VF=p,\qquad Vx^{\varvec{\sigma }}= xV, \qquad Fx=x^{\varvec{\sigma }}F \end{aligned}$$

for \(x\in W(k)\). Then W is a module over \(D_k\), as are its quotients \(W_m\) and their finite subgroup schemes \(W_{m,n}\).

Recall that there is a duality on \(\mathfrak {A}\) called Cartier duality, which corresponds to taking the k-linear dual of the corresponding Hopf algebras. We denote the Cartier dual of G by \(G^\sharp \).

Now consider the subcategory \(\mathfrak {A}_{m,n}\) of \(\mathfrak {A}\) consisting of the those group schemes G in \(\mathfrak {A}\) such that G has height at most n and the Cartier dual \(G^\sharp \) has height at most m. Then there is a covariant equivalence of categories between \(\mathfrak {A}_{m,n}\) and the category \({\mathsf {mod}}(D_k/(V^m,F^n))\) of finite length modules over the quotient ring \(D_k/(V^m,F^n)\). This equivalence is given by the functor

$$\begin{aligned} {\text {Hom}}_\mathfrak {A}(W_{m,n},-):\mathfrak {A}_{m,n}\rightarrow {\mathsf {mod}}(D_k/(V^m,F^n)). \end{aligned}$$

Write \(\hat{D}_k\) for the corresponding completion \(\displaystyle \lim _\leftarrow D_k/(V^m,F^n)\) Then every \(\hat{D}_k\)-module of finite length is a module for some quotient of the form \(D_k/(V^m,F^n)\), and these equivalences combine to give an equivalence between \(\mathfrak {A}\) and the category \({\mathsf {fl}}(\hat{D}_k)\) of \(\hat{D}_k\)-modules of finite length. Let us write

$$\begin{aligned} \psi :{\mathsf {fl}}(\hat{D}_k)\rightarrow \mathfrak {A}\end{aligned}$$

for this equivalence. Thus for example

$$\begin{aligned}&\psi (D_k/(V^m,F^n))\cong W_{m,n}, \\&\psi (D_k/(V^m,F^n,p)) \cong W_{m,n}/W_{m-1,n-1} \cong E_{m,n} \end{aligned}$$

where the last notation is introduced in Definition 8.6.

Let \(G = \psi (M)\) be a finite unipotent abelian group scheme, so that M is a finite length \(D_k/(V^m,F^n)\)-module for some \(m,n\ge 1\). If we are only interested in the algebras structure of G, this means that we can ignore the action of F on M and just look at finite length modules for \(D_k/(V^m,F)=W(k)[V]\) with \(xV=Vx^{\varvec{\sigma }}\) (\(x\in W(k)\)). Such modules are always direct sums of cyclic submodules, and the cyclic modules are just truncations at smaller powers of V. Translating through the equivalence \(\psi \), we have the following.

Lemma A.1

Let G be a finite unipotent abelian group scheme. Then kG is a isomorphic to a tensor product of algebras of the form \(kW_{m,1} \simeq k[s]/s^{p^m}\).

Lemma A.2

Let G be a finite unipotent abelian group scheme. Assume that \({\text {dim}}_k{\text {Hom}}_{\mathsf {Gr}/k}(G,\mathbb {G}_{a(1)})=1\). If G does not have \(W_{2,2}\) as a quotient, then G is isomorphic to a quotient of the group scheme \(E_{m,n}\).

Proof

The condition \({\text {dim}}_k{\text {Hom}}_{\mathsf {Gr}/k}(G,\mathbb {G}_{a(1)})=1\) implies that the corresponding Dieudonné module is cyclic, \(G_{\mathrm {ev}}\cong \psi (D_k/I)\) for some ideal I containing \(V^m\) and \(F^n\) for some m, n. Not having \(W_{2,2}\) as a quotient implies that \(p =FV\) kills \(D_k/I\), and, hence, G is isomorphic to a quotient \(D_k/(V^m, F^n, p)\). But the latter is precisely \(E_{m,n}\).

The last thing we need is the classification of the quotients of the group scheme \(E_{m,n}\). In terms of Dieudonné modules, we have

$$\begin{aligned} E_{m,n} = \psi (D_k/(V^m,F^n,p)). \end{aligned}$$

The isomorphism classes of quotients of \(D_k/(V^m,F^n,p)\) were classified by Koch [31]. The main results of that paper may be stated as follows.

Theorem A.3

Every nonzero finite quotient of \(\hat{D}_k/(p)\) as a left \(\hat{D}_k\)-module is isomorphic to either \(M_{m,n}=D_k/(V^m,F^n,p)\) (of length \(m+n-1\)) or \(M_{m,n,\mu }=D_k/(F^n-\mu V^m,p)\) (of length \(m+n\)) for some \(m,n \ge 1\) and \(0\ne \mu \in k\). The only isomorphisms among these modules are given by \(M_{m,n,\mu }\cong M_{m,n,\mu '}\) if and only if \(\mu /\mu '=a^{p^{m+n}-1}\) for some \(a\in k\).

Outline of proof

Let M be a nonzero finite quotient of \(\hat{D}_k/(p)\), let m be the height of \(M^\sharp \) and n be the height of M. Then M is a finite quotient of \(D_k/(V^m,F^n,p)\). So either M is isomorphic to \(D_k/(V^m,F^n,p)\) or the kernel is at least one dimensional. If the kernel has length one, then it is in the socle, which has length two, and is the image of \(V^{m-1}\) and \(F^{n-1}\). By minimality of m and n, the kernel is then \((F^{n-1}-\mu V^{m-1})\) for some \(0\ne \mu \in k\). If M is equal to this, we have \(M \cong M_{m-1,n-1,\mu }\). Otherwise M is a proper quotient of \(M_{m-1,n-1,\mu }\). But the socle of \(M_{m-1,n-1,\mu }\) is one dimensional, spanned by the image of \(V^{m-1}\), so in this case M is a quotient of \(M_{m-1,n-1}\), which implies that m and n are not minimal. This contradiction proves that these are the only isomorphism types.

The dimensions of \(M/F^iM\) and \(M/V^iM\) distinguish all isomorphism classes, with the possible exception of isomorphisms between \(M_{m,n,\mu }\) and \(M_{m,n,\mu '}\). Such an isomorphism is determined modulo radical endomorphisms by a scalar \(a\in k^\times \subseteq W(k)^\times \). The equation \((F^n-\mu V^m)a=b(F^n-\mu ' V^m)\) implies that \(b=a^{{\varvec{\sigma }}^n}\) and \(\mu a=b^{{\varvec{\sigma }}^m}\mu '\). Thus

$$\begin{aligned} \mu /\mu '=a^{{\varvec{\sigma }}^{m+n}}a^{-1}=a^{p^{m+n}-1}. \end{aligned}$$

\(\square \)

Remark A.4

Note that if \(k=\mathbb {F}_p\) then this condition on \(\mu \) and \(\mu '\) is only satisfied if \(\mu =\mu '\), so there are \(p-1\) isomorphism classes of \(M_{m,n,\mu }\). But if k is algebraically closed then the isomorphism type of \(M_{m,n,\mu }\) is independent of \(\mu \).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benson, D., Iyengar, S.B., Krause, H. et al. Detecting nilpotence and projectivity over finite unipotent supergroup schemes. Sel. Math. New Ser. 27, 25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-021-00632-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-021-00632-7

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation