Abstract
In this paper we study a class of physical systems that combine a finite number of mechanical and thermodynamic observables. We call them elementary thermo-mechanical systems (ETMS). We introduce these systems by means of simple examples, and we obtain their (time) evolution equations by using, essentially, the Newton’s laws and the First Law of Thermodynamics only. We show that such equations are similar to those defining certain constrained mechanical systems. From that, and addressing the main aim of the paper, we give a general definition of ETMS, in a variational formalism, as a particular subclass of the Lagrangian higher order constrained systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Physical systems whose states depend on mechanical and thermodynamic variables are more common in the domain of continuous media or fluid dynamics, but not in contexts where only a finite number of degrees of freedom are involved.
By external force we mean any non-conservative force, or a conservative force whose corresponding potential energy is not included in what we consider the mechanical energy of the system.
The thermal conductivity of the material, of which the wagon is made, is supposed to be big enough to ensure that the temperature is well defined and is uniformly distributed for all time.
Note that \(E_{mec}\) is constituted, besides the kinetic energy, just by the potential energy related to \(F_{g}=-mg\). We are not including the potential energy related to \(F_{e}=kA^{-\gamma +1}x^{-\gamma }\) [see Eq. (22)] because, as previously mentioned, we are taking it as an external force.
Using NDSolve in Wolfram Mathematica.
The Newton’s equation has been derived by our generalization of D’Alembert Principle without using the second order kinematic constraint [see Eq. (41)]. Using Newton’s equation, we can replace such a constraint by a first order constraint: \(-\frac{\mu ({\dot{x}})^{2}}{2}+U=0\). Thus, we can describe our ETMS also as a HOCS of order (1, 1).
Recall that, given a Lagrangian function \(L:TQ\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\), its energy \(E:TQ\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) is given by
$$\begin{aligned} E\left( v\right) =\left\langle {\mathbb {F}}L\left( v\right) ,v\right\rangle -L\left( v\right) ,\quad \forall v\in TQ, \end{aligned}$$being \({\mathbb {F}}L:TQ\rightarrow T^{*}Q\) the fiber derivative of L, i.e. the Legendre transformation related to L.
The local representative of \(j^{\left( 2\right) }\) (in the above mentioned local charts) is
$$\begin{aligned} j^{\left( 2\right) }\left( q,{\dot{q}},\ddot{q}\right) =\left( q,{\dot{q}},{\dot{q}},\ddot{q}\right) . \end{aligned}$$
References
Abraham, R., Marsden, J.E.: Foundations of Mechanics. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, San Francisco (1978)
Abraham, R., Marsden, J.E., Ratiu, T.: Manifolds, Tensor Analysis and Aplications. Addison-Wesley, London (1983)
Amaya, M.P.: Introducción a los sistemas termo-mecánicos desde una perspectiva simpléctica. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina (2014)
Arnold, V.I.: Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. Springer, New York (1989)
Bloch, A.M., Marsden, J.E., Zenkov, D.V.: Nonholonomic dynamics. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 52, 324–333 (2005)
Boothby, W.M.: An Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds and Riemannian Geometry. Academic Press, New York (1985)
Callen, H.B.: Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1985)
Cendra, H., Ferraro, S., Grillo, S.: Lagrangian reduction of generalized nonholonomic systems. J. Geom. Phys. 58, 1271–1290 (2008)
Cendra, H.: Generalized nonholonomic mechanics, servomechanisms and related brackets. J. Math. Phys. 47, 022902 (2006)
Cendra, H., Grillo, S.: Lagrangian systems with higher order constraints. J. Math. Phys. 48, 052904 (2007)
Cendra, H., Ibort, A., de León, M., Martín de Diego, D.: A generalization of Chetaev’s principle for a class of higher order nonholonomic constraints. J. Math. Phys. 45(7), 2785 (2004)
Crampin, M., Sarlet, W., Cantrijn, F.: Higher-order differential equations and higher-order Lagrangian mechanics. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 99, 565–587 (1986)
de León, M., Rodrigues, P.R.: Generalized Classical Mechanics and Field Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1985)
Dobronravov, V.V.: The fundamentals of the mechanics of nonholonomic systems. Vysshaya Shkola 271 (1970)
Eberard, D., Maschke, B.M., van der Schaft, A.J.: An extension of hamiltonian systems to the thermodynamic phase space: towards a geometry of nonreversible processes. Rep. Math. Phys. 60(2), 175–198 (2007)
Fermi, E.: Thermodynamics. Dover Publications, Mineola (1956)
Gay-Balmaz, F., Yoshimura, H.: A lagrangian variational formulation for nonequilibrium thermodynamics. Part I: discrete systems. J. Geom. Phys. 111, 169–193 (2017)
Gay-Balmaz, F., Yoshimura, H.: Dirac structures in nonequilibrium thermodynamics. J. Math. Phys. 58, 012701 (2018)
Goldstein, H., Poole, C., Safko, P.: Classical Mechanics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (2000)
Grillo, S.: Higher order constrained Hamiltonian systems. J. Math. Phys. 50, 082901 (2009)
Grillo, S., Zuccalli, M.: Variational reduction of Lagrangian systems with general constraints. J. Geom. Mech. 4(1), 49–88 (2012)
Kobayashi, S., Nomizu, K.: Foundations of Differential Geometry. Wiley, New York (1963)
Marsden, J.E., Ratiu, T.: Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry. Springer, New York (1994)
Moran, M.J., Shapiro, H.N., Boettner, D.D., Bailey, M.B.: Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, 7th edn. Wiley, New York (2011)
Mrugala, R.: On contact and metric structures on thermodynamic spaces. Departmental Bulletin Paper, pp. 167–181 (2000)
Mrugala, R., Nulton, J.D., Schön, J.C., Salamon, P.: Contact structure in thermodynamic theory. Rep. Math. Phys. 29, 109–121 (1991)
Neimark, J.I., Fufaev, N.A.: Dynamics of Non-holonomic Systems. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 33. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1972)
Planck, M.: Treatise on Thermodynamics. Dover Publications, Mineola (1917)
Śniatycki, J., Tulczyjew, W.M.: Generating forms of Lagrangian submanifolds. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 22(3), 267 (1972)
Stueckelberg, E.C.G., Scheurer, P.B.: Thermocinétique phénoménologique galiléenne. Birkhäuser, Basel (1974)
Tulczyjew, W.M.: The Legendre transformation. Ann. l’Inst. Henri Poincaré Sect. A XXVII, 101 (1977)
Tulczyjew, W.M., Urbański, P.: A slow and careful Legendre transformation for singular Lagrangians. Acta Phys. Pol. Ser. B 30(10), 2909–2978 (1999)
Zemansky, M.: Heat and Thermodynamics: An Intermediate Textbook, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)
Acknowledgements
The authors thank CONICET for its financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A: Background on Thermodynamics
Appendix A: Background on Thermodynamics
Below, we introduce the basic notation and terminology on thermodynamics that we shall use along all of the paper, and recall some fundamental concepts on the subject (see [7, 16, 24, 28]).
\(*\) A thermodynamic system is typically defined by \(2d+1\) observables, which we shall denote \(x_{1},\ldots ,x_{d-1},T,y_{1},\ldots ,y_{d-1},S\) and U. The \(x_{i}\)’s and T (resp. \(y_{i}\)’s, S and U) are called intensive (resp. extensive) variables. The extensive variables depend on the “size” of the system, while the intensive ones do not. U is the internal energy, T is the temperature and S the entropy. For example, consider a mixture of \(r\in {\mathbb {N}}\) different chemical components. In this case, we have that:
\(d=r+2\);
for \(i=1,\ldots ,r\), each variable \(y_{i}:=N_{i}\) (resp. \(-x_{i}:=\mu _{i}\)) represents the number of moles (resp. the chemical potential) of a given type;
\(x_{r+1}=:P\) is the pressure and \(y_{r+1}=:V\) the volume.
Remark I
Sometimes, systems can be seen as composed by “simpler” ones, i.e. those defined by a smaller number of variables. We say in this case that such a system is a composite system. In the last example, each chemical compound can be seen as a part of a composite system.
\(*\) The possible values of the variables \(x_{1},\ldots ,x_{d-1},T,y_{1},\ldots ,y_{d-1},S\) and U give rise to a manifold \({\mathcal {T}}\subset {\mathbb {R}}^{2d+1}\) (that we shall assume to be open), usually called the thermodynamical phase space (TPS): the set of states of the system. We can see these variables as coordinates for \({\mathcal {T}}\).
\(*\) The manifold \({\mathcal {T}}\) is a contact manifold with contact form
Thus, \(\left( x_{1},\ldots ,x_{d-1},-T,y_{1},\ldots ,y_{d-1},S,U\right) \) defines a global Darboux system for \(\left( {\mathcal {T}},\theta \right) \), see [4, 26].
Remark II
For a composite system (see Remark I) formed out by two simpler ones, the TPS is a product manifold \({\mathcal {T}}={\mathcal {T}}_{1}\times {\mathcal {T}}_{2}\) with contact form
Here \(\left( x_{k,1},\ldots ,x_{k,d_{1}-1},-T_{k},y_{k,1},\ldots ,y_{k,d_{1}-1},S_{k},U_{k}\right) \), with \(k=1,2\), are the global Darboux coordinates of \({\mathcal {T}}_{1}\) and \({\mathcal {T}}_{2}\).
\(*\) By process we shall mean every curve \(\Gamma :\left[ a,b\right] \rightarrow {\mathcal {T}}\). It represents a “continuum” of actions on the system that produce a “continuum” of changes on its states.
\(*\) Among the states, a special role is played by a subset \({\mathcal {N}}\subset {\mathcal {T}}\), known as the space of equilibrium states, which is defined by the following two conditions on U. The first one says that, on the equilibrium states, U and the rest of the extensive variables \(y_{i}\)’s and S must be related by the formula
for some function \(\Phi \) (typically homogeneous of degree one). Equation above is known as the Fundamental Equation of the system. The second condition says that, for any differentiable curve \(\Gamma :\left[ a,b\right] \rightarrow {\mathcal {N}}\subset {\mathcal {T}}\), the variation \(\Delta U:=U\left( \Gamma \left( b\right) \right) -U\left( \Gamma \left( a\right) \right) \) must satisfies
where \({\mathbb {Q}}={\mathbb {Q}}\left( \Gamma \right) \) and \(W=W\left( \Gamma \right) \) are the heat and the mechanical work, respectively, interchanged by the system and the environment along the process \(\Gamma \). This is the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Remark
When \({\mathbb {Q}}=0\) along a process, one says that such a process is adiabatic.
At a differential level, Eq. (A.4) translates to
Here, and are 1-forms (non-necessarily closed) on \({\mathcal {T}}\) such that, given a process \(\Gamma \),
Idem for . For instance, for a mixture of chemical components (see above), and are given by
at least for some processes. Accordingly,
In general, we must have
Combining Eqs. (A.3) and (A.6), it follows that the subset \({\mathcal {N}}\) is defined by the equations
known as state equations. This means that \({\mathcal {N}}\) is a Legendre submanifold of \(\left( {\mathcal {T}},\theta \right) \) (see [4, 26]).
Remark III
As explained in [16], the function \(\Phi \) or, equivalently, the internal energy U, is defined by the allowed mechanical work on the system. In other words, U is completely determined if we know the work done \(W\left( \Gamma \right) \) along any process \(\Gamma \). (This information, in fact, not only determines U, but also \({\mathbb {Q}}\)).
\(*\) For instance, the fundamental equation of the so-called ideal gas, with only one chemical component, is given by
where \(\alpha \) is a dimensionless constant, R is the universal constant of ideal gases, and \(s_{0}\), \(v_{0}\) and \(u_{0}\) are constants with units of entropy, volume and energy per mole, respectively (see [7] for more details). Thus, the related state equations read
with
Let us mention that the last two equations in (A.9) and the Eq. (A.10) are usually written as
where \(t_{0}:=u_{0}/R\alpha \).
\(*\) The differentiable curves along the equilibrium states \(\Gamma :\left[ a,b\right] \rightarrow {\mathcal {N}}\) are usually called quasi-static processes (and we shall take this convention). Note that, along such curves, the state equations (A.7) are satisfied for every \(t\in \left[ a,b\right] \) (by definition of \({\mathcal {N}}\)).
Remark IV
In practice, in order to have a quasi-static process \(\Gamma \), the velocity of \(\Gamma \) must be small (w.r.t. certain characteristic lengths and times related to the microscopic properties of the system). That is to say, the action that defines the process must produce changes in the states at a very slow rate. This justifies the name “quasi-static.” However, in this paper, when we say that a process is quasi-static we will not be assuming that the rate of change of states is necessarily slow. We will only assume that the state equations are satisfied for all time along such a process.
\(*\) Not every process \(\Gamma :\left[ a,b\right] \rightarrow {\mathcal {N}}\) is allowed. According to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, a process \(\Gamma \) must satisfy
where
In infinitesimal terms
For adiabatic processes, since , we must have \(\Delta S\ge 0\).
\(*\) A process \(\Gamma :\left[ a,b\right] \rightarrow {\mathcal {N}}\) is say to be reversible if there exists another process \(\Gamma ^{-}:\left[ a,b\right] \rightarrow {\mathcal {N}}\) such that \(\Gamma ^{-}\left( t\right) =\Gamma \left( a+b-t\right) \). Otherwise, \(\Gamma \) is say to be irreversible. Then, a process is reversible if and only if the equation
holds.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cendra, H., Grillo, S. & Palacios Amaya, M. Elementary Thermo-mechanical Systems and Higher Order Constraints. Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 19, 39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-020-00371-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-020-00371-8