Skip to main content
Log in

Rejoinder on: A comparative study of time aggregation techniques in relation to power capacity-expansion modeling

  • Discussion
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanie Buchholz.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This rejoinder refers to the comments available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-019-00520-6, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-019-00521-5, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-019-00522-4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-019-00526-0.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buchholz, S., Gamst, M. & Pisinger, D. Rejoinder on: A comparative study of time aggregation techniques in relation to power capacity-expansion modeling. TOP 27, 421–425 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-019-00525-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-019-00525-1

Navigation