Abstract
We define the Hopf algebra structure on the Grothendieck group of finite-dimensional polynomial representations of\(U_q \widehat{\mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}}_N \) in the limitN→∞. The resulting Hopf algebra Rep\(U_q \widehat{\mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}}_\infty \) is a tensor product of its Hopf subalgebras Repa \(U_q \widehat{\mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}}_\infty \),a ∈ ℂ×/q2ℤ. Whenq is generic (resp.,q 2 is a primitive root of unity of orderl), we construct an isomorphism between the Hopf algebra Rep a \(U_q \widehat{\mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}}_\infty \) and the algebra of regular functions on the prounipotent proalgebraic group\(\widetilde{SL}\overline {_\infty } \) (resp.,\(\widetilde{GL}\overline {_l } \)). Whenq is a root of unity, this isomorphism identifies the Hopf subalgebra of Rep a \(U_q \widehat{\mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}}_\infty \) spanned by the modules obtained by pullback with respect to the Frobenius homomorphism with the algebra generated by the coefficients of the determinant of an element of\(\widetilde{GL}\overline {_l } \) considered as anl×l matrix over the Taylor series. This gives us an explicit formula for the Frobenius pullbacks of the fundamental representations. In addition, we construct a natural action of the Hall algebra associated to the infinite linear quiver (resp., the cyclic quiver withl vertices) on Rep a \(U_q \widehat{\mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}}_\infty \) and describe the span of tensor products of evaluation representations taken at fixed points as a module over this Hall algebra.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
[A] S. Ariki. On the decomposition numbers of the Hecke algebra ofG(m, 1, n).J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 36 (1996), 789–808.
[AKOS] H. Awata, H. Kubo, S. Odake and J. Shiraishi. QuantumW N algebras and Macdonald polynomials.Comm. Math. Phys. 179 (1996), 401–416.
[B] J. Beck. Braid group action and quantum affine algebras.Comm. Math. Phys. 165 (1994), no. 3, 555–568.
[BCP] J. Beck, V. Chari and A. Pressley. An algebraic characterization of the affine canonical basis.Duke Math. J. 99 (1999), 455–487.
[BK] J. Beck and V. Kac. Finite-dimensional representations of quantum affine algebras at roots of unity.Journal of AMS 9 (1996), 391–423.
[BR] V. Bazhanov and N. Reshetikhin. Restricted solid-on-solid models connected with simply laced algebras and conformal field theory.J. Phys. A 23 (1990), 1477–1492.
[BZ] J. Bernstein and A. Zelevinsky. Induced representations of reductivep-adic groups, I.Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 10 (1977), 441–472.
[Ch] I. Cherednik. A new interpretation of Gelfand-Zetlin bases.Duke Math. J. 54 (1987), 563–577.
[CP1] V. Chari and A. Pressley. Quantum affine algebras.Comm. Math. Phys. 142 (1991), no. 2, 261–283.
[CP2] V. Chari and A. Pressley.A Guide to Quantum Groups. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
[CP3] V. Chari and A. Pressley. Quantum affine algebras and their representations. Representations of groups (Banff, AB, 1994) 59–78, CMS Conf. Proc.16, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1995.
[CP4] V. Chari and A. Pressley. Quantum affine algebras and affine Hecke algebras.Pacific J. Math. 174 (1996), 295–326.
[CP5] V. Chari and A. Pressley. Quantum affine algebras at roots of unity.Representation Theory 1, (1997), 280–328.
[CP6] V. Chari and A. Pressley. Weyl modules for classical and quantum affine algebras. Preprint QA/0004174.
[Da] I. Damiani. LaR-matrice pour les algebres quantiques de type affine non tordu.Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (4)31 (1998), no. 4, 493–523.
[Dr1] V.G. Drinfeld. Hopf algebras and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation.Sov. Math. Dokl. 32 (1985), 254–258.
[Dr2] V.G. Drinfeld. A new realization of Yangians and of quantum affine algebras.Sov. Math. Dokl. 36 (1987), 212–216.
[Dr3] V.G. Drinfeld. On almost cocommutative Hopf algebras.Leningrad Math. J. 1 (1990), 1419–1457.
[DF] J. Ding and I. Frenkel. Isomorphism of two realizations of quantum affine algebraU q(ĝl(n)).Comm. Math. Phys. 156 (1993), 277–300.
[EFK] P.I. Etingof, I.B. Frenkel and A.A. Kirillov, Jr.Lectures on Representation Theory and Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov Equations. AMS, 1998.
[FF] B. Feigin and E. Frenkel. QuantumW-algebras and elliptic algebras.Comm. Math. Phys. 178 (1996), 653–678.
[FKRW] E. Frenkel, V. Kac, A. Radul and W. Wang.W 1+∞ andW(gl N) with central chargeN.Comm. Math. Phys. 170 (1995), 337–357.
[FM1] E. Frenkel and E. Mukhin. Combinatorics of q-characters of finite-dimensional representations of quantum affine algebras.Comm. Math. Phys. 216 (2001), 23–57.
[FM2] E. Frenkel and E. Mukhin. Theq-characters at roots of unity. Preprint math. QA/0101018.
[FR1] E. Frenkel and N. Reshetikhin. Deformations ofW-algebras associated to simple Lie algebras.Comm. Math. Phys. 197 (1998), no. 1, 1–32.
[FR2] E. Frenkel and N. Reshetikhin. Theq-characters of representations of quantum affine algebras and deformations ofW-algebras.Contemporary Math, AMS 248 (1998), 163–205.
[GZ] I.M. Gelfand and M.L. Zetlin. Finite-dimensional representations of the unimodular group.Dokl. Acad. Nauk USSR 71 (1950), 825–828.
[GRV] V. Ginzburg, N. Reshetikhin and E. Vasserot. Quantum groups and flag varieties. in Mathematical aspects of conformal and topological field theories and quantum groups, pp. 101–130, Contemp. Math.175, AMS 1994.
[GV] V. Ginzburg and E. Vasserot Langlands reciprocity for affine quantum groups of typeA n.Int. Math. Res. Not. (1993), no. 3, 67–85.
[G] J.A. Green. Hall algebras, hereditary algebras and quantum groups.Invent. Math. 120 (1995), 361–377.
[Gr] I. Grojnowski. Affinesl p controls the representation theory of the symmetric group and related Hecke algebras. Preprint math. RT/9907129.
[H] T. Hayashi.q-analogues of Clifford and Weyl algebras spinor and oscillator representations of quantum enveloping algebras.Comm. Math. Phys. 127 (1990), 129–144.
[J] M. Jimbo. Aq-difference analogue ofU(g) and the Yang-Baxter equation.Lett. Math. Phys. 10 (1985), no. 1, 63–69.
[K] V.G. Kac.Infinite-dimensional Lie Algebras. 3rd Edition. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[KT] S. Khoroshkin and V. Tolstoy. Twisting of quantum (super)algebras. Connection of Drinfeld's and Cartan-Weyl realizations for quantum affine algebras. Generalized symmetries in physics (Clausthal, 1993) 42–54, World Sci. Publishing, River Edge, NJ, 1994.
[Ko] Y. Koyama. Staggered polarization of vertex models withU q(ŝl(n))-symmetry. Preprint hep-th/9307197.
[LNT] B. Leclerc, M. Nazarov and J.-Y. Thibon. Induced representations of affine Hecke algebras and canonical bases of quantum groups. Preprint math. QA/0011074.
[Lor] S. Levendorsky, Ya. Soibelman and V. Stukopin. The quantum Weyl group and the universal quantumR-matrix for affine Lie algebraA 1 (1).Lett. Math. Phys. 27 (1993), no. 4, 253–264.
[L] G. Lusztig.Introduction to Quantum Groups. Birkhäuser, 1993.
[L2] G. Lusztig. Canonical bases arising from quantized enveloping algebras, I.Journal of AMS 3 (1990), 447–498.
[M] P. MacMahan.Combinatory Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1916.
[Mac] I. MacDonald.Symmetric Functions and Hall Polymomials. Oxford University Press, 1995.
[NT] M. Nazarov and V. Tarasov. Representations of Yangians with Gelfand-Zetlin bases.J. Reine Angew. Math. 496 (1998), 181–212.
[Ri] C. Ringel. Hall algebras and quantum groups.Invent. Math. 101 (1990), 583–591.
[Sh] O. Schiffmann. The Hall algebra of a cyclic quiver and canonical bases of Fock spaces.Internat. Math. Res. Notices (2000), no. 8, 413–440.
[VV] M. Varagnolo and E. Vasserot. On the decomposition matrices of the quantized Schur algebra.Duke Math. J. 100 (1999), 267–297.
[V] E. Vasserot. Affine quantum groups and equivariantK-theory.Transform. Groups 3 (1998), no. 3, 269–299.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frenkel, E., Mukhin, E. The hopf algebra rep\(U_q \widehat{\mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}}_\infty \) . Selecta Mathematica, New Series 8, 537–635 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02637313
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02637313