Skip to main content
Log in

Preference intensity and cardinality

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Beyond its mathematization, preference intensity is a relevant concept, more general than cardinal representable preference, and an according axiomatic definition is introduced, dispensing with the Archimedean assumption. Given a preference intensity, a uniform space (generating the order topology of the induced preference) is associated to it. If the preference intensity is representable, this uniformity is semimetrizable. A “uniqueness” result for preference intensities leads naturally to the hypothesis of compactness. Through the uniformity corresponding to the preference intensity, compactness can be characterized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcantud JCR (1999) Topological properties of spaces ordered by preferences. Int J Math Math Sci 22:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcantud JCR, Gutiérrez JM (1999) Preference through indifference: a topological approach. J Math Econ 31:543–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu K (1983) Cardinal utility, utilitarianism, and a class of invariance axioms in welfare analysis. J Math Econ 12:193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff G (1940) Lattice theory, 3rd edn. AMS, Providence

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges DS, Mehta GB (1995) Representations of preference orderings. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor G (1895) Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre. Math Ann 46:481–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilenberg S (1941) Ordered topological spaces. Am J Math 63:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1970) Utility theory for decision making. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • French S (1988) Decision theory: an introduction to the mathematics of rationality. Ellis Horwood, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronau D (2000) A remark on Sincov’s functional equation. Not South Afr Math Soc 31:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz DH, Luce RD, Suppes P, Tversky A (1971) Foundations of measurement, vol I. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta G (1983) Ordered topological spaces and the theorems of Debreu and Peleg. Indian J Pure Appl Math 14:1174–1182

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts FS (1979) Measurement theory, with applications to decisionmaking, utility, and the social sciences. Reissue edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Terencio (ca 161 BC) (1991): El Eunuco, in Comedias, Volume I. Latin text and facing Spanish translation, edited and translated by L Rubio. CSIC

  • Scott D (1964) Measurement models and linear inequalities. J Math Psychol 1:233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil A (1938) Sur les espaces à structure uniforme et sur la topologie générale. Hermann, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilansky A (1970) Topology for analysis. Reissue edn. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The useful suggestions provided by the referees are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Manuel Gutiérrez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gutiérrez, J.M. Preference intensity and cardinality. TOP 22, 739–748 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-013-0290-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-013-0290-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation