Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic interactions in service supply chain with horizontal competition

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze strategic interaction issues that arise in service supply chain, such as consulting, service outsourcing, and travel service. To capture strategic interactions in service supply chain, we study a case where there are two service vendors providing competing service products and selling them through a common Service Integrator. In particular, we derive and compare equilibrium solutions (e.g. service prices, wholesale prices, service volumes) for the service supply chain under three different scenarios. We then study the effect of key parameters in the model upon the equilibrium solution using sensitivity analysis, and discuss our results along with a numerical experiment. Finally, future research direction is pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allon G, Federgruen A (2009) Competition in service industries with segmented markets. Manag Sci 55(4):619–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apte UM, Nath HK (2007) Size, structure and growth of the US information economy. Manag Inf Econ 1(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Apte U, Ferrer G, Lewis I, Rendon R (2008). Service supply chain in the department of defense: opportunities and challenges: 235–242: Springer US

  • Chao X, Liu L, Zheng S (2003) Resource allocation in multisite service systems with interstice customer flows. Manag Sci 49(12):1739–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase RB, Kumar KR, Youngdahl WE (1992) Service-based manufacturing: the service factory. Prod Oper Manag 1(2):175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chayakrit C (2004) Competition in supply chain with service contributions. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Charoensiriwath, Chayakrit

  • Chen IJ, Paulraj A (2004) Understanding supply chain management: critical research and a theoretical framework. Int J Prod Res 42(1):131–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang WK, Chhajed D, Hess JD (2003) Direct marketing, indirect profits: a strategic analysis of dual-channel supply chain design. Manag Sci 49(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho RK, Gerchak Y (2005) Supply chain coordination with downstream operating costs: coordination and investment to improve downstream operating efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 162(3):762–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi SC (1996) Price competition in a duopoly common retailer channel. J Retail 72(2):117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dernirkan H, Cheng HK (2008) The risk and information sharing of application services supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 187(3):765–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du TC, Lee H, Chen A (2003) Constructing federated databases in coordinated supply chains. Decis Support Syst 36(1):49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellram LM, Tate WL, Billington C (2004) Understanding and managing the service supply chain. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 17–32

  • Hua G, Wang S, Cheng TCE (2010) Price and lead time decisions in dual-channel supply chains. Eur J Oper Res 205:113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Swaminathan JM (2009) Introduction of a second channel: implications for pricing and profits. Eur J Oper Res 194(1):258–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khouja M, Rajagopalan HK, Sharer E (2010) Coordination and incentives in a supplier-retailer rental information goods supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 123(2):279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurata H, Yao DQ, Liu JJ (2007) Price policies under direct vs indirect channel competition and national vs store brand competition. Eur J Oper Res 180:262–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch RF, Vargo SL, O’Brien MS (2007) Competing through service: insights from service-dominant logic. J Retail 83(1):5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire TM, Staelin R (1983) An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Mark Sci 2(2):161–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu W, Brown S (2000) Manufactures marketing services: factors underlying the changing business domain. In: American marketing association conference proceedings, Chicago, USA, pp 189–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng L, Tong Z, Li Q (2009) An analysis of the third party payment system based on service supply chain. In: IEEE IRI 2009, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu RG (2009) Computational thinking of service systems: dynamics and adaptiveness modeling. Serv Sci 1(1):42–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju J, Abhik R (2000) Market information and firm performance. Manag Sci 46(8):1075–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey RG, Dalela MTV Jr (2010) Examining collaborative supply chain service technologies: a study of intensity, relationships, and resources. J Acad Mark Sci 38:71–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth AV, Menor LJ (2003) Insights into service operations management: a research agenda. Prod Oper Manag 12(2):145–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer J, Maglio PP (2008) The emergence of service science: toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Prod Oper Manag 17(3):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole J (2000) The theory of industrial organization. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay AA, Agrawal N (2000) Channel dynamics under price and service competition. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 2(4):372–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J Mark 68:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss C (1992) Applying service concepts in manufacturing. Int J Oper Prod Manag 12(4):93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao DQ, Yue XH, Liu J (2008) Vertical cost information sharing in a supply chain with value-adding retailers. OMEGA 36(5):838–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngdahl WE (1996) An investigation of service-based manufacturing performance relationships. Int J Oper Prod Manag 16(8):29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue X, Liu JJ (2006) Demand forecast sharing in a dual-channel supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 174:646–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Cheng.

Appendix

Appendix

Proof of Theorem 1

Given service prices p 1,p 2 by the Service Integrator and earlier decision variables w 1,w 2,S 1,S 2 by the service vendors, the first-order condition can be shown as

From \(\frac{\partial \phi_{\mathrm{SIP}}}{\partial p_{i}}=0\), we get

To check the optimality, we have the Hessian matrix:

Since \(\frac{\partial^{2}\phi_{\mathrm{SIP}}}{\partial p_{i}^{2}}=-2\beta_{p}-2\gamma_{p}<0\), \(\frac{\partial^{2}\phi_{\mathrm{SIP}}}{\partial p_{i}\partial p_{3-i}}=\frac{\partial^{2}\phi_{\mathrm{SIP}}}{\partial p_{3-i}\partial p_{i}}=2\gamma_{p}>0\) and

$$\left|\begin{array}{c@{\quad }c} -2\beta_{p}-2\gamma_{p} & 2\gamma_{p}\\ 2\gamma_{p} & -2\beta_{p}-2\gamma_{p}\end{array}\right| =4(\beta_{p}+\gamma_{p})^{2}-4\gamma_{p}^{2}>0, $$

where β p >0,γ p >0, we have a negative definite Hessian. Therefore, the p i calculated above are the optimal response functions for the Service Integrator. Solving for \(p_{i}^{*}\) by plugging p i into p 3−i , we have

Substituting (6) into (1) and simplifying, we get (7). □

Proof of Theorem 2

The service vendors in this game simultaneously announce their prices w i and service volume S i , respectively. Owing to Service Integrator’s response function, they can calculate the optimal w i and S i . From the Service Integrator’s response function, we can obtain that

(16)

Substituting (16) and (6) into (1) and simplifying, we get

(17)

From (17) and (4),

Given earlier decision variables w 1,w 2,S 1,S 2 by the service vendors, \(\varphi_{\mathrm{SV}_{i}}\) is the profit of service vendor i at this stage. To obtain the optimal wholesale price w i , above all, we check in the first-order condition.

Moreover,

Therefore, we have a negative definite Hessian. \(\varphi_{\mathrm{SV}_{i}}\) is strictly jointly concave in w i and S i .

From \(\frac{\partial \varphi_{\mathrm{SV}_{i}}}{\partial w_{i}}=0\), \(\frac{\partial \varphi_{\mathrm{SV}_{i}}}{\partial S_{i}}=0\), we get

(18)
(19)

Substituting (19) into (18), we obtain (8). □

Proof of Theorem 3

Using a similar method as in proof of Theorem 2, one can obtain very easily the validity of Theorem 3. Here the proof is omitted. □

Proof to Theorem 4

From (3) and simplifying, we can show the first-order condition as

where

To check for optimality, we check the Hessian matrix:

Since \(\frac{\partial^{2}\phi_{\mathrm{SIP}}}{\partial p_{i}^{2}}=-2\beta_{p}-2\gamma_{p}<0\), \(\frac{\partial^{2}\phi_{\mathrm{SIP}}}{\partial p_{i}\partial p_{3-i}}=\frac{\partial^{2}\phi_{\mathrm{SIP}}}{\partial p_{3-i}\partial p_{i}}=2\gamma_{p}>0\) and

$$\left|\begin{array}{c@{\quad }c} -2\beta_{p}-2\gamma_{p} & 2\gamma_{p}\\ 2\gamma_{p} & -2\beta_{p}-2\gamma_{p}\end{array} \right|=4(\beta_{p}+\gamma_{p})^{2}-4\gamma_{p}^{2}>0, $$

where β p >0, γ p >0, we have a negative definite Hessian.

Thus, using the above conditions, we can calculate the optimal response functions for the Service Integrator.

The notation adopted in this proof is as below.

 □

Proof of Theorem 5

Using a similar method as in proof of Theorem 4, one can obtain very easily the validity of Theorem 5. Here the proof is omitted. The notation adopted in this proof is as below.

 □

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, X.T., Fang, S.J. & Cheng, F. Strategic interactions in service supply chain with horizontal competition. TOP 22, 469–488 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-012-0265-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-012-0265-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation