Skip to main content
Log in

Common best proximity points: global minimal solutions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let us suppose that A and B are nonempty subsets of a metric space. Let S:AB and T:AB be nonself-mappings. Considering the fact S and T are nonself-mappings, it is feasible that the equations Sx=x and Tx=x have no common solution, designated as a common fixed point of the mappings S and T. Eventually, when the equations have no common solution, one contemplates to figure out an element x that is in close proximity to Sx and Tx in the sense that d(x,Sx) and d(x,Tx) are minimum. In fact, common best proximity point theorems scrutinize the existence of such optimal approximate solutions, known as common best proximity points, to the equations Sx=x and Tx=x in the event that the equations have no common solution. Further, one can perceive that the real-valued functions xd(x,Sx) and xd(x,Tx) estimate the magnitude of the error involved for any common approximate solution of the equations Sx=x and Tx=x. In light of the fact that the distance between x and Sx, and the distance between x and Tx are at least the distance between A and B for all x in A, a common best proximity point theorem ascertains global minimum of both functions xd(x,Sx) and xd(x,Tx) by limiting a common approximate solution of the equations Sx=x and Tx=x to fulfil the requirement that d(x,Sx)=d(A,B) and d(x,Tx)=d(A,B). This article discusses a common best proximity point theorem for a pair of nonself-mappings, one of which dominates the other proximally, thereby yielding common optimal approximate solutions of some fixed point equations when there is no common solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Thagafi MA, Shahzad N (2008) Best proximity sets and equilibrium pairs for a finite family of multimaps. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2008:457069, 10 pp

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Thagafi MA, Shahzad N (2009a) Convergence and existence results for best proximity points. Nonlinear Anal 70(10):3665–3671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Thagafi MA, Shahzad N (2009b) Best proximity pairs and equilibrium pairs for Kakutani multimaps. Nonlinear Anal 70(3):1209–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anuradha J, Veeramani P (2009) Proximal pointwise contraction. Topology Appl 156(18):2942–2948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Bari C, Suzuki T, Vetro C (2008) Best proximity points for cyclic Meir–Keeler contractions. Nonlinear Anal 69(11):3790–3794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldred AA, Veeramani P (2006) Existence and convergence of best proximity points. J Math Anal Appl 323:1001–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldred AA, Kirk WA, Veeramani P (2005) Proximinal normal structure and relatively nonexpansive mappings. Studia Math 171(3):283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan K (1969) Extensions of two fixed point theorems of FE Browder. Math Z 112:234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungck G (1976) Commuting mappings and fixed points. Amer Math Monthly 83:261–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpagam S, Agrawal S (2009) Best proximity point theorems for p-cyclic Meir–Keeler contractions. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2009:197308, 9 pp

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim WK, Kum S, Lee KH (2008) On general best proximity pairs and equilibrium pairs in free abstract economies. Nonlinear Anal 68(8):2216–2227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk WA, Reich S, Veeramani P (2003) Proximinal retracts and best proximity pair theorems. Numer Funct Anal Optim 24:851–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prolla JB (1982–1983) Fixed point theorems for set valued mappings and existence of best approximations. Numer Funct Anal Optim 5:449–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich S (1978) Approximate selections, best approximations, fixed points and invariant sets. J Math Anal Appl 62:104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq Basha S (2010a) Best proximity points: global optimal approximate solution. J Global Optim. doi:10.1007/s10898-009-9521-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq Basha S (2010b) Extensions of Banach’s contraction principle. Numer Funct Anal Optim 31:569–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq Basha S, Veeramani P (1997) Best approximations and best proximity pairs. Acta Sci Math (Szeged) 63:289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq Basha S, Veeramani P (2000) Best proximity pair theorems for multifunctions with open fibres. J Approx Theory 103:119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq Basha S, Veeramani P, Pai DV (2001) Best proximity pair theorems. Indian J Pure Appl Math 32:1237–1246

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankar Raj V, Veeramani P (2009) Best proximity pair theorems for relatively nonexpansive mappings. Appl Gen Topol 10(1):21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal VM, Singh SP (1988) A generalization to multifunctions of Fan’s best approximation theorem. Proc Am Math Soc 102:534–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal VM, Singh SP (1989) A theorem on best approximations. Numer Funct Anal Optim 10:181–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan PS (2001) Best proximity pair theorems. Acta Sci Math (Szeged) 67:421–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetrivel V, Veeramani P, Bhattacharyya P (1992) Some extensions of Fan’s best approximation theorem. Numer Funct Anal Optim 13:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wlodarczyk K, Plebaniak R, Banach A (2009) Best proximity points for cyclic and noncyclic set-valued relatively quasi-asymptotic contractions in uniform spaces. Nonlinear Anal 70(9):3332–3341

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Sadiq Basha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sadiq Basha, S. Common best proximity points: global minimal solutions. TOP 21, 182–188 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-011-0171-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-011-0171-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation