Skip to main content
Log in

Managing decentralized inventory and transshipment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Any decentralized retail or wholesale system of competing entities requires a benefit sharing arrangement when competing entities collaborate after their demands are realized. For instance, consider a distribution system similar to the observed behavior of independent car dealerships. If a dealership does not have in stock the car requested by a customer, it might consider acquiring it from a competing dealer. Such behavior raises questions about procurement strategies that achieve system optimal (first-best) outcomes. In this paper, we examine the existence and uniqueness of pure strategy Nash equilibrium (PSNE) for a decentralized system that adopts a transfer payment approach proposed by Anupindi et al. (Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 4(3):349–368, 2001). In particular, we state a set of conditions on cost parameters and distributions that guarantee uniqueness of PSNE and discuss its consequences. We also examine a situation with incomplete information and expand the scope of the earlier models by relaxing the assumption of satisfying local demand first. That is, we allow the retailers to transship their inventory regardless of the local demand status if such transshipment increases retailer’s profit, and observe that this model extension does not affect our results relative to the more restrictive case. In short, our results provide important insights, clarifications, and strategic limitations regarding collaborations in decentralized distribution system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anupindi R, Bassok Y, Zemel E (2001) A general framework for the study of decentralized distribution systems. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 4(3):349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann RJ (1997) Rationality and bounded rationality. Games Econ Behav 21:2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann RJ, Maschler MB (1995) Repeated games with incomplete information. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli M, Bergstrom T (2005) Log-concave probability and its applications. Econ Theory 26(2):455–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Granot D, Sošić G (2003) A three-stage model for a decentralized distribution system of retailers. Oper Res 51(5):771–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman BC, Dror M (2005) Allocation of gains from inventory centralization in newsvendor environments. IIE Trans 37:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaesmen I, van Ryzin GJ (2004) Overbooking with substitutable inventory classes. Oper Res 52(1):83–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov AN, Fomin SV (1970) Introductory real analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. (Translated by R.A. Silverman)

    Google Scholar 

  • Prékopa A (1973) On logarithmic concave measures and functions. Acta Sci Math 34:335–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Samet D, Zemel E (1984) On the core and dual set of linear production games. Math Oper Res 9(2):309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Soriano J, López MA, García-Jurado I (2001) On the core of transportation games. Math Soc Sci 41:215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandsmark M (2009) Spatial oligopolies with cooperative distribution. Int Game Theory Rev 11(1):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley L, Shubik M (1975) Competitive outcomes in the cores of market games. Int J Game Theory 4(4):229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topkis DM (1998) Supermodularity and complementarity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong H, Van Houtum GJ, Cattrysse D, Van Oudheusden D (2006) Multi-item spare parts systems with lateral transshipments and waiting time constraints. Eur J Oper Res 171(3):1071–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nichalin Suakkaphong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suakkaphong, N., Dror, M. Managing decentralized inventory and transshipment. TOP 19, 480–506 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-010-0137-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-010-0137-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation