Skip to main content
Log in

Domain structuring for knowledge-based multiattribute classification (a verbal decision analysis approach)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classification problems in decision making are, at least, ill-structured or even unstructured ones, since, among other things, human judgments (i.e., Decision Maker preferences and/or expert knowledge) are the primary sources of information for their solving. Thus, not only the classification rules eliciting, but the application domain structuring as well, is a complex problem itself. The paper focuses on knowledge-based classification problem structuring in the context of complete (up to the expert knowledge) and consistent knowledge base construction for a Diagnostic Decision Support System. Two structuring techniques are proposed as expert aids, as well as an approach to large-size problem decomposition. It is asserted that application domain structuring and classification rules eliciting have to be arranged as interconnected procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashikhmin I, Furems E, Petrovsky A, Sternin M (2008) Intelligent DSS under verbal decision analysis. In: Adam F, Humphreys P (eds) Encyclopedia of decision making and decision support technologies, vols 1, 2. Information Science Reference, Hershey, pp 514–527

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y (2006) Multiple criteria decision analysis: classification problems and solutions. A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of PhD in Systems Design Engineering, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Available via http://etd.uwaterloo.ca/etd/y3chen2006.pdf

  • Doyle J (2004) Prospects for preferences. Comput Intell 20(2):112–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira J, Mousseau V, Roy B (2005) Electre methods. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Berlin, pp 133–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Furems E (2008) Knowledge-based multi-attribute classification problems structuring. In: Ruan D, Montero J et al. (eds) Computational intelligence in decision and control. Proceedings of the 8th international FLINS conference. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 465–470

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Furems E, Gnedenko L (1996) Stepclass—a system for eliciting expert knowledge and conducting expert analyses for solving diagnostic problems. Autom Doc Math Linguist 30(5):23–28. Translations of selected articles from Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco S (2008) Dominance-based rough set approach for decision analysis—a tutorial. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5009/2008. Springer, Berlin, pp 23–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (1998) A new rough set approach to evaluation of bankruptcy risk. In: Zopounidis C (ed) Operational tools in the management of financial risks. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 121–136

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (2002) Rough sets methodology for sorting problems in presence of multiple attributes and criteria. Eur J Oper Res 138:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (2005) Decision rule approach. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Berlin, pp 507–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang S (2003) Dimensionality reduction in automatic knowledge acquisition: a simple greedy search approach. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 15(6):1364–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagreze E, Siskos Y (1982) Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: the UTA method. Eur J Oper Res 10:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney R, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Larichev O, Bolotov A (1996) The DIFKLASS system: construction of complete and noncontradictory expert knowledge bases in problems of differential classification. Autom Doc Math Linguist 30(5):12–17. Translations of selected articles from Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya

    Google Scholar 

  • Larichev O, Moshkovich H (2001) Verbal decision analysis for unstructured problems. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Larichev O, Naryzhny Y (1999) Computer-based tutoring of medical procedural knowledge. In: Lajoie S, Vivet M (eds) Artificial intelligence in education. JOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 517–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Larichev O, Moshkovich H, Furems E et al. (1991) Knowledge acquisition for the construction of the full and contradiction free knowledge bases. Iec ProGAMMA, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Larichev O, Asanov A, Naryzhny Y, Strahov S (2001) ESTHER—expert system for the diagnostics of acute drug poisonings. In: Macintosh A, Moulton M, Preece A (eds) Applications and innovations in intelligent systems IX, Proceedings of ES2001, the 21 SGES international conference on knowledge based systems and applied artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Larichev O, Asanov A, Naryzhny Y (2002) Effectiveness evaluation of expert classification methods. Eur J Oper Res 138(2):260–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin M (2006) Composite systems decisions. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero J, Gómez D, Bustince H (2007) On the relevance of some families of fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 158:2429–2442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puppe F (1998) Knowledge reuse among diagnostic problem-solving methods in the shell-kit D3. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 49:627–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (1981) A multicriteria analysis for trichotomic segmentation problems in multiple criteria analysis. In: Nijkamp P, Spronk J (eds) Operational methods. Gower Press, Farnborough, pp 245–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T, Shihb H-S (2009) Structures in decision making: on the subjective geometry of hierarchies and networks. Eur J Oper Res 199(3):867–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheubrein R, Zionts S (2006) A problem structuring front end for a multiple criteria decision support system. Comput Oper Res 33(1):18–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1960) The new science of management decision. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • von Winterfeldt D (1980) Structuring decision problems for decision analysis. Acta Psychol 45:71–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallenius J, Dyer J, Fishburn P, Steuer R, Zionts S, Deb K (2008) Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility analysis: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Manag Sci 54(7):1336–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis C (2002) MCDA methodologies for classification and sorting. Eur J Oper Res 138(2):227–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (2002) Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 138(2):229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (2004) Multicriteria decision aid in classification problems. EWG-MCDA Newsletter, Ser 3(10)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugenia M. Furems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furems, E.M. Domain structuring for knowledge-based multiattribute classification (a verbal decision analysis approach). TOP 19, 402–420 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-009-0133-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-009-0133-0

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation