Skip to main content
Log in

On the convergence of the Weiszfeld algorithm for continuous single facility location–allocation problems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general family of single facility continuous location–allocation problems is introduced, which includes the decreasingly weighted ordered median problem, the single facility Weber problem with supply surplus, and Weber problems with alternative fast transportation network. We show in this paper that the extension of the well known Weiszfeld iterative decrease method for solving the corresponding location problems with fixed allocation yields an always convergent scheme for the location allocation problems. In a generic way, from each starting point, the limit point will be a locally minimal solution, whereas for each possible exceptional situation, a possible solution is indicated. Some computational results are presented, comparing this method with an alternating location–allocation approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brimberg J (2003) Further notes on convergence of the Weiszfeld algorithm. Yugosl J Oper Res 13(2):199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cánovas L, Cañavate R, Marín A (2002) On the convergence of the Weiszfeld algorithm. Math Program 93(2):327–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrizosa E, Rodríguez-Chía AM (1997) Weber problems with alternative transportation systems. Eur J Oper Res 97:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran R, Tamir A (1989) Open questions concerning Weiszfeld’s algorithm for the Fermat–Weber location problem. Math Program 44(3):293–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper L (1963) Location–allocation problems. Oper Res 11:331–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper L (1964) Heuristic methods for location–allocation problems. SIAM Rev 6:37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig GB (1957) Discrete variable extremum problems. Oper Res 5:266–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z, Suzuki A (2004) The big triangle small triangle method for the solution of non-convex facility location problems. Oper Res 52(1):128–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z, Klamroth K, Schöbel A, Wesolowsky GO (2003) The Weber problem. In: Drezner Z, Hamacher H (eds) Facility location: applications and theory. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilon S, Watson-Gandy CDT, Christofides N (1971) Distribution management. Hafner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, McGinnis LF, White JA (1992) Facility layout and location: an analytical approach, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Gugat M, Pfeiffer B (2007) Weber problems with mixed distances and regional demand. Math Methods Oper Res 66:419–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen P, Peeters D, Thisse J-F (1983) Public facility location models: a selective survey. In: Thisse J-F, Zoller HG (eds) Locational analysis of public facilities. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 223–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen P, Peeters D, Richard D, Thisse J-F (1985) The minisum and minimax location problems revisited. Oper Res 33:1251–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman L, Plastria F (1988) The Weber problem with supply surplus. Belgian J Oper Res Stat Comput Sci 28:15–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn HW, Kuenne RE (1962) An efficient algorithm for the numerical solution of the generalized Weber problem in spatial economics. J Reg Sci 4:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupitz YS, Martini H (1997) Geometric aspects of the generalized Fermat-Torricelli problem. In: Intuitive geometry, Bolyai society, Mathematical studies, vol 6, pp 55–127

  • Martello S, Toth P (1990) Knapsack problems—algorithms and computer implementations. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickel S, Puerto J (2005) Location theory—a unified approach. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Okabe A, Boots B, Sugihara K (1992) Spatial tessellations. Concept and applications of Voronoi diagram. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer B, Klamroth K (2008) A unified model for Weber problems with continuous and network distances. Comput Oper Res 35(2):312–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plastria F (1992) GBSSS: the generalized big square small square method for planar single facility location. Eur J Oper Res 62(2):163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardi Y, Zhang C-H (2001) A modified Weiszfeld algorithm for the Fermat–Weber location problem. Math Program 90:559–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiszfeld E (2008) On the point for which the sum of the distances to n given points is minimum (translated and annotated by F. Plastria). Ann Oper Res. doi:10.1007/s10479-008-0352-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiszfeld E (1936–1937) Sur le point pour lequel la somme des distances de n points donnés est minimum. Tohoku Math J 355–386

  • Wesolowsky G (1993) The Weber problem: History and perspective. Location Sci 1:5–23

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Plastria.

Additional information

The research of the second author was partially supported by the grant of the Algerian Ministry of High Education 001BIS/PNE/ENSEIGNANTS/BELGIQUE.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plastria, F., Elosmani, M. On the convergence of the Weiszfeld algorithm for continuous single facility location–allocation problems. TOP 16, 388–406 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-008-0056-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-008-0056-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation